We've Been Using the BCS This Whole Time and It's Been Fine
By Kyle Koster

The much-maligned BCS was replaced by a selection committee tasked with anointing the four best teams in college football. Much time and energy is spent every week. There’s a big television show on Tuesday night with a dramatic reveal. Times change and the march for progress continues. This is what it means to be a human.
But what if it didn’t have to? What if there was an obvious and minor fix to the BCS system that could have been implemented to determine a four- or eight-team playoff?
Check out the simulated formula for this year next to the playoff committee’s rankings. The two are very much like each other.
A side-by-side comparison between our simulated BCS and tonight's @CFBPlayoff rankings. And yes, that's not a mistake, the entire top-10 is identical across the two ranking systems: pic.twitter.com/D2BoFLqZON
— BCSKnowHow.com (@BCSKnowHow) November 21, 2018
What if we’d kept the BCS, but expanded the field to four teams? That would have been fine.
Here’s the simulated standings from last year.
Here it is, the final simulated BCS rankings of the season. Alabama edges Ohio State by the smallest of margins for No. 4 pic.twitter.com/QMHzsyCFPm
— BCSKnowHow.com (@BCSKnowHow) December 3, 2017
Again, that looks pretty familiar, doesn’t it, folks?
Side-by-side comparison of the final @CFBPlayoff ranking and our final simulated #BCS pic.twitter.com/xCQeBoWys0
— BCSKnowHow.com (@BCSKnowHow) December 4, 2016
Noticing a trend?
Look, I’m not expecting everyone to go full Will Forte and literally sing the praises of the BCS, but with time, it’s aged quite well. Sure there were some problems. Spoiler alert here: there will always be problems. What I’m positing is that we could have been operating with a four-team playoff based on the formula this whole time and found relative satisfaction.