Charlotte Beat Richmond in One of the Craziest Endings Ever, From Down 3 to Up 5 Thanks to Technicals in Final Five Seconds
Charlotte and Richmond just provided an ending that will be difficult to top. Richmond had a three point lead as Charlotte inbounded the ball with just over five seconds remaining. Richmond employed the foul strategy.
I broke down the foul up three scenarios, and then Ken Pomeroy noted some actual results, which included some bad beats for teams fouling. None, though, topped this. I can tell you I didn’t account for the “opponent will make first free throw, while you get called for a technical” scenario. My bad.
After Charlotte made the first free throw, Derrick Williams of Richmond got called for shoving his man to the ground while the free throw went through the net. The ref signaled a technical. It could have been called a personal foul instead – in fact, I would say probably should have. It was action during the course of a rebound. Chris Mooney, the head coach of Richmond, probably thought so, too.
Had it been a foul, Charlotte would have still gotten the free throws, but Richmond would have gotten the ball back. Plus, it would have been a different (worse) shooter at the line. Charlotte made all three remaining shots (the 2nd free throw and two technicals) to go up by 1. Richmond then had to foul, and after the foul, the frustrated Chris Mooney also got a technical. Four more free throws later, and Charlotte was up 5, with eight straight free throws from two intentional fouls and two technicals.
By the way, Charlotte ranked first in Ken Pomeroy’s luck statistic, even before this game. Going to guess they aren’t going down in that category now.

- Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn’t Try and Play
- Justin Verlander Not Sharp Again, But Detroit Fans Don’t Need to Panic
- A Russell Wilson Song Set to an Old Dolly Parton Hit? Yes, It’s “Russie” [Video]
- J.J. Watt Visits Kid With Leukemia Who Uses a Robot Named “Watt” to Go To School
- Dez Bryant is Prepared For Your Insults On Twitter, Will Probably Make Fun of You

- orly57 on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
- orly57 on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
- resolutedefense on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
- BlackDynamite on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
- orly57 on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
24 Responses to “Charlotte Beat Richmond in One of the Craziest Endings Ever, From Down 3 to Up 5 Thanks to Technicals in Final Five Seconds”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






March 14th, 2013 at 3:00 PM
They used to rank first in the Lutz statistic, too.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:01 PM
Dumb.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:01 PM
They used to rank first in the Lutz statistic, too.
They now rank highly in the “coaches that look like a Klingon” category as well.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:02 PM
/ OT
Marcus Spears cut by Cowboys.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:04 PM
The implication being that he looks like Dorn or an actual Klingon?
March 14th, 2013 at 3:06 PM
That’s how you call a basketball game.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:07 PM
Go check out his hairline, it’s perfect
March 14th, 2013 at 3:11 PM
McLemore on fire. I think. The damn ESPN 3 feed is really blurry at work.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:11 PM
It bugs me that UNC Charlotte markets itself as “Charlotte” for sports purposes. UNC Asheville doesn’t call itself “Asheville” and UNC Wilmington doesn’t call itself “Wilmington,” you pinheads.
/ Not sure about UNC Pembroke
March 14th, 2013 at 3:14 PM
Also, this ending reminds me of a West Virginia Conference game I covered years ago. University of Charleston down by 12 with 20 seconds left, hits four 3s to tie it and ends up winning in OT.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:14 PM
Flagrant 1 (intentional foul) would be the correct call, in my opinion. You can tell the ref working the game was either a) in shock that this occurred or b) unsure as to what to call. After he raises his hand with the whistle, there is an awkward pause before he gives the signal.
Ball is dead at this point once clearly through the basket. Any foul called after that point must be either technical/intentional/flagrant.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:16 PM
Yes, Roeth, I think that is right. Flagrant 1 would have meant the player fouled would have had to shoot (50% free throw shooter) which is why the Richmond coach then lost his top.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:18 PM
At least Richmond had that one awesome game where they beat Syracuse as a 15 seed. I would just coast on that if I were them.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:21 PM
Marcus Spears cut by Cowboys.
we landed on the moon.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:22 PM
I thought he lost it when they, after Richmond was forced to foul, they deemed the Charlotte player in the act of shooting and gave him 3 shots? Maybe the article I read was wrong.
March 14th, 2013 at 3:23 PM
How do you justify calling the 1st technical?
March 14th, 2013 at 3:23 PM
Another question – aren’t technical/possibly flagrant fouls reviewable at the NCAA level? Couldn’t they have corrected this? Did they even go to the monitor?
March 14th, 2013 at 3:57 PM
The longest 15 minutes in sports is the last 90 seconds of a basketball game.
March 14th, 2013 at 4:12 PM
Actuallt the 1st T was the right call. Once a free throw is made limke in this situation the ball is dead. You cannot have a personal foul during a dead ball situation. Therefore the only avaliable call is a dead ball T and since there was contact it became a dead ball Contact T which meant two free throws for the offended team and the abll
March 14th, 2013 at 5:44 PM
March 14th, 2013 at 7:37 PM
One of the rare circumstances where every decision was right, and everything continued to result in FUBAR.
Up three with five seconds to go while defending? Gotta foul.
Referee’s call about the dead ball flagrant? By the book.
Foul immediately when down one with 5 seconds to go. (Oops)
Throw the ball towards the hoop when you KNOW the defenders have to foul.
Express outrage when the referee makes the appropriate but rarely called ‘fouled while in the shooting motion from 52 feet away-call’. Double techinal
I’ll drink to that.
March 14th, 2013 at 9:34 PM
The first foul just should not have been called at all. Wasn’t it the first FT of 2? Not a 1and 1 so there was no rebound to fight for. Gotta just giggle at the players and swallow it
March 14th, 2013 at 9:56 PM
No coop’d
March 15th, 2013 at 11:08 AM
Dead ball foul is automatic technical.