Big Ten Basketball: Investigating “First to Fifty” and the Truth about Offense
The Big Ten has been at the forefront of college basketball all year – we’ve been treated to fantastic matchups and finishes – and conference play has led to a “Game of the Year” seemingly every week. Despite the outstanding basketball (#1 on ranking on KenPom.com and #2 on my own site sevenovertimes.com), the conference is consistently knocked for their lack of offense, low-scoring, boring games. We can attribute much of this to one team (mostly Wisconsin, but Nebraska, Penn St, and Northwestern don’t help), but the stigma is attached to all the teams.
The cliche most commonly tossed around to disparage the Big Ten is that each game is simply “First to Fifty” – implying that the games are so low-scoring, whichever team gets to 50 points first is going to win the game. Using play-by-play data for nearly 12,000 games back to 2008, I found every conference game where at least one team reached 50 points.
I was surprised to find the Big Ten right in the middle. The West Coast Conference leads the way with the “First to Fifty” winning over 90% of the time, and the SEC and Big Sky were at the bottom with the “First to Fifty” winning only 81% of the time. The data for the Great West and SWAC is probably too small of a sample to really draw a conclusion – but they won’t change where the Big Ten fits.
While Big Ten fans might be excited to see this – there is a stat where their low-scoring ways are a bit more apparent. Instead of looking at the average number of points per game, I wanted to see the average number of points needed to win. In this category, The Big Ten had the smallest total (59), which was six points fewer than the biggest major conference (ACC).
There are several factors that my be skewing these results – including the relative competitiveness of each conference. Top-heavy conferences like the West Coast and Mountain West may have fewer comebacks than more balanced conferences. Also, for the “First to Fifty” stats, I am ignoring games where both teams failed to reach 50. In that regard, Western Illinois is #1 with five such games, Savannah St is #2 with four, and Georgetown, Wisconsin, and Eastern Michigan are tied at #3 with three Sub-50 point games.
I think the real finding from this is that while the “First to 50″ mantra for the Big Ten may not be as true as some would like, we should feel free to start using “First to 60.”

- Roundup: Horrific London Attack, Fast & Furious 6 and Hangover III Arrive, Roy Hibbert Speaks Up
- LeBron James Hits Game-Winning Layup at the Buzzer in Overtime as Roy Hibbert Watched From the Bench [Video]
- Paul George Hit a Ridiculous 3 to Send it Into Overtime After Throwing the Ball Away Moments Earlier [Video]
- Paul George Wore Aqua Pants and a Green, Amoeba-Pattered Dress Shirt to Game 1 in Miami
- Shane Battier Kneed Roy Hibbert in the Balls [Video]

- Chelsea Chris on Roundup: Horrific London Attack, Fast & Furious 6 and Hangover III Arrive, Roy Hibbert Speaks Up
- kazzythekid on Roundup: Horrific London Attack, Fast & Furious 6 and Hangover III Arrive, Roy Hibbert Speaks Up
- spencer096 on Roundup: Horrific London Attack, Fast & Furious 6 and Hangover III Arrive, Roy Hibbert Speaks Up
- sjurat on David Beckham: Ignore Revisionist History, He Was One of the Greats
- Clayton Cargill on Roundup: Horrific London Attack, Fast & Furious 6 and Hangover III Arrive, Roy Hibbert Speaks Up
9 Responses to “Big Ten Basketball: Investigating “First to Fifty” and the Truth about Offense”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







February 21st, 2013 at 6:51 PM
Well… First! D
February 21st, 2013 at 7:10 PM
Good post, Bashuk
February 21st, 2013 at 7:11 PM
interesting, but @ 84% I’ll keep using first to fifty
February 21st, 2013 at 7:17 PM
is TBL bringing in Bashuk because he thinks Lisk’s cap hit is going to be too big next year?
I certainly hope not…
February 21st, 2013 at 7:21 PM
They just bring him in for posts with big charts with lots of information.
February 21st, 2013 at 10:31 PM
Offense in the big ten is much better this year with Indiana and Michigan. They are two of the top 7 or 8 offenses in the country, pts/possession wise. Osu and msu don’t fill it up but I’m guessing they both score about 70 per game. I’d say 2008-2011 were bad years for offense in the big ten but their recruiting has improved the last couple seasons.
February 22nd, 2013 at 12:16 AM
I agree that offense is better this year – especially at the top. I went back all 5 years to give myself a bigger sample – I thought just one year of data was not enough.
May be worth revisiting this in a year or two see how it has changed.
February 22nd, 2013 at 8:01 AM
Why has MSU been ranked so ridiculously low on sevenovertimes. In the 40′s until last week now “up” to 25. Projecting them as a 7 seed when everyone else has them between 1 and 3.
February 22nd, 2013 at 2:15 PM
I think underrating Michigan State is one of the biggest flaws in my system right now. In general I stand by the rankings, but this one surprises me too. Their problem is lots of close-medium wins, and not enough blowouts. The Iowa, Kansas, Wisconsin, Ohio State, Illinois, La-Lafayette, and Boise St games were all very close wins. I believe they’ll continue moving up the rankings and be in their rightful place when the tourney starts.