<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: NCAA Tournament Analysis: Comparing At-Large Candidates By How a Typical Tournament Team Would Do Against Their Schedule</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/</link> <description>Sports, Media, Entertainment</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: HtownHacker</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-2/#comment-1901591</link> <dc:creator>HtownHacker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:08:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901591</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Dunn and Council were only missing at the beginning of the year and the games they missed Providence went 10-2. &lt;/blockquote&gt;While that is true, the two losses were by 2 to UMass and in overtime to Penn St. It&#039;s fair to say they probably would have won those two with Council, considering they had to play a walkon the full 45 minutes against PSU &#039;cuz they only had 6 bodies.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dunn and Council were only missing at the beginning of the year and the games they missed Providence went 10-2.</p></blockquote><p>While that is true, the two losses were by 2 to UMass and in overtime to Penn St. It&#8217;s fair to say they probably would have won those two with Council, considering they had to play a walkon the full 45 minutes against PSU &#8216;cuz they only had 6 bodies.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: H.E. Pennypacker</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-2/#comment-1901485</link> <dc:creator>H.E. Pennypacker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:30:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901485</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Gonzaga, Louisville&lt;/blockquote&gt;solid troll x2]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gonzaga, Louisville</p></blockquote><p>solid troll x2</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trey</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-2/#comment-1901480</link> <dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:13:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901480</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;um, i prefer to use all the numbers and not be selective.&lt;/blockquote&gt;How is that selective? My argument is that the Big Ten is a product of what we&#039;ll call the Missouri Valley Plan. Play one or two tough games. 10-12 teams that are okay but should be easy wins and move on to tournament gold.Most the Big Ten skirted through out of conference schedules that featured the Illinois States of the world giving 7 teams solid records and allowing games against each other to elevate their actual SOS.The Mountain West is doing the same thing right now.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>um, i prefer to use all the numbers and not be selective.</p></blockquote><p>How is that selective? My argument is that the Big Ten is a product of what we&#8217;ll call the Missouri Valley Plan. Play one or two tough games. 10-12 teams that are okay but should be easy wins and move on to tournament gold.</p><p> Most the Big Ten skirted through out of conference schedules that featured the Illinois States of the world giving 7 teams solid records and allowing games against each other to elevate their actual SOS.</p><p>The Mountain West is doing the same thing right now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: QueeferSutherland</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-2/#comment-1901479</link> <dc:creator>QueeferSutherland</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:10:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901479</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The SEC is a highly undervalued conference. 1-14 they’re probably every bit as good as the Big Ten.&lt;/blockquote&gt;holy SHIT]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The SEC is a highly undervalued conference. 1-14 they’re probably every bit as good as the Big Ten.</p></blockquote><p>holy SHIT</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oskie</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901478</link> <dc:creator>oskie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:09:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901478</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Considering you all are blowing the Big Ten back to the stone age I thought I’d drop a little reality on you. Solid conference. Probably will get their lunch handed to them in the tourney. &lt;/blockquote&gt;lol. if you said. &quot;the B1G will be done at the end of the first weekend,&quot; then I would say you have a pair of balls.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Considering you all are blowing the Big Ten back to the stone age I thought I’d drop a little reality on you. Solid conference. Probably will get their lunch handed to them in the tourney.</p></blockquote><p>lol. if you said. &#8220;the B1G will be done at the end of the first weekend,&#8221; then I would say you have a pair of balls.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oskie</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901477</link> <dc:creator>oskie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:07:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901477</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The ol’ weighted Out Of Conference trick! Out of conference strength of schedule…Michigan – 121 Michigan State – 63 Indiana – 81 Wisconsin – 112 Ohio State – 122Illinois at 39 had a respectable out of conference SOS. Minnesota the best at 12.&lt;/blockquote&gt;um, i prefer to use all the numbers and not be selective.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The ol’ weighted Out Of Conference trick! Out of conference strength of schedule…</p><p>Michigan – 121<br /> Michigan State – 63<br /> Indiana – 81<br /> Wisconsin – 112<br /> Ohio State – 122</p><p>Illinois at 39 had a respectable out of conference SOS. Minnesota the best at 12.</p></blockquote><p>um, i prefer to use all the numbers and not be selective.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trey</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901476</link> <dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:07:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901476</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Wow. Way to go out on a limb here. In a tournament that is based heavily on randomness and matchups 7 teams won’t be in the final four. Prediction. One team will win the National championship.SHUT IT DOWN.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Considering you all are blowing the Big Ten back to the stone age I thought I&#039;d drop a little reality on you. Solid conference. Probably will get their lunch handed to them in the tourney.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Wow. Way to go out on a limb here. In a tournament that is based heavily on randomness and matchups 7 teams won’t be in the final four. Prediction. One team will win the National championship.</p><p>SHUT IT DOWN.</p></blockquote><p>Considering you all are blowing the Big Ten back to the stone age I thought I&#8217;d drop a little reality on you. Solid conference. Probably will get their lunch handed to them in the tourney.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Watsonian</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901474</link> <dc:creator>Watsonian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:05:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901474</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The ol’ weighted Out Of Conference trick! Out of conference strength of schedule…&lt;/blockquote&gt;Maybe Husker was right. They are the SEC of college basketball.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The ol’ weighted Out Of Conference trick! Out of conference strength of schedule…</p></blockquote><p>Maybe Husker was right. They are the SEC of college basketball.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trey</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901472</link> <dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:02:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901472</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;uh, Minnesota and Wisconsin have the #1 and #3 SOS. Michigan’s is #16. Illinois has #2. you should have kept going with your = thingy. it was more convincing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;The ol&#039; weighted Out Of Conference trick! Out of conference strength of schedule...Michigan - 121 Michigan State - 63 Indiana - 81 Wisconsin - 112 Ohio State - 122Illinois at 39 had a respectable out of conference SOS. Minnesota the best at 12.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>uh, Minnesota and Wisconsin have the #1 and #3 SOS. Michigan’s is #16. Illinois has #2. you should have kept going with your = thingy. it was more convincing.</p></blockquote><p>The ol&#8217; weighted Out Of Conference trick! Out of conference strength of schedule&#8230;</p><p>Michigan &#8211; 121<br /> Michigan State &#8211; 63<br /> Indiana &#8211; 81<br /> Wisconsin &#8211; 112<br /> Ohio State &#8211; 122</p><p>Illinois at 39 had a respectable out of conference SOS. Minnesota the best at 12.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nada</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901471</link> <dc:creator>Nada</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:01:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901471</guid> <description><![CDATA[LSU, the hottest team in the SEC, is playing its way into NCAA contention!/ No, no they&#039;re not // Also not the hottest team in the NCAA /// But they did beat Mizzou two weeks ago]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LSU, the hottest team in the SEC, is playing its way into NCAA contention!</p><p>/ No, no they&#8217;re not<br /> // Also not the hottest team in the NCAA<br /> /// But they did beat Mizzou two weeks ago</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WheresWallace</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901469</link> <dc:creator>WheresWallace</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:00:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901469</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Prediction. The 7 or so Big Ten teams that make the tourney all bounce before the Final Four.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Wow. Way to go out on a limb here. In a tournament that is based heavily on randomness and matchups 7 teams  won&#039;t be in the final four. Prediction. One team will win the National championship.SHUT IT DOWN.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Prediction. The 7 or so Big Ten teams that make the tourney all bounce before the Final Four.</p></blockquote><p>Wow. Way to go out on a limb here. In a tournament that is based heavily on randomness and matchups 7 teams  won&#8217;t be in the final four. Prediction. One team will win the National championship.</p><p>SHUT IT DOWN.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: angry</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901467</link> <dc:creator>angry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:56:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901467</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Prediction. The 7 or so Big Ten teams that make the tourney all bounce before the Final Four.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Would be shocked if this happened. Wouldn&#039;t be shocked if Indiana and MUS make it.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Prediction. The 7 or so Big Ten teams that make the tourney all bounce before the Final Four.</p></blockquote><p>Would be shocked if this happened. Wouldn&#8217;t be shocked if Indiana and MUS make it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: oskie</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901466</link> <dc:creator>oskie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:56:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901466</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Look at their out of conference schedules.&lt;/blockquote&gt;uh, Minnesota and Wisconsin have the #1 and #3 SOS. Michigan&#039;s is #16. Illinois has #2. you should have kept going with your = thingy. it was more convincing.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Look at their out of conference schedules.</p></blockquote><p>uh, Minnesota and Wisconsin have the #1 and #3 SOS. Michigan&#8217;s is #16. Illinois has #2. you should have kept going with your = thingy. it was more convincing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HuskerDawg</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901462</link> <dc:creator>HuskerDawg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:50:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901462</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;so no side bets on the Arkansas-Georgia game this Thursday? &lt;/blockquote&gt;I&#039;ll be the sport ends as we know it by halftime. Babies will be crying, players will quit and fans will sit there in a stunned silence at just how bad what they&#039;re watching truly is.&lt;blockquote&gt;it baffles me how a team like Georgia isn’t at least competitive in basketball most years.&lt;/blockquote&gt;One big issue is Adams and Co refuse to let Mark Fox play the AAU game. That&#039;s not the main reason why they&#039;re bad, but it&#039;s a big one.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>so no side bets on the Arkansas-Georgia game this Thursday?</p></blockquote><p>I&#8217;ll be the sport ends as we know it by halftime. Babies will be crying, players will quit and fans will sit there in a stunned silence at just how bad what they&#8217;re watching truly is.</p><blockquote><p>it baffles me how a team like Georgia isn’t at least competitive in basketball most years.</p></blockquote><p>One big issue is Adams and Co refuse to let Mark Fox play the AAU game. That&#8217;s not the main reason why they&#8217;re bad, but it&#8217;s a big one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Trey</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901461</link> <dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:49:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901461</guid> <description><![CDATA[Well the Big Ten has adopted the Missouri Valley approach to basketball this year. Look at their out of conference schedules. Outside of Michigan State everyone loaded up on teams that weren&#039;t so awful they&#039;d kill them in the RPI.Prediction. The 7 or so Big Ten teams that make the tourney all bounce before the Final Four.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the Big Ten has adopted the Missouri Valley approach to basketball this year. Look at their out of conference schedules. Outside of Michigan State everyone loaded up on teams that weren&#8217;t so awful they&#8217;d kill them in the RPI.</p><p>Prediction. The 7 or so Big Ten teams that make the tourney all bounce before the Final Four.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arkbadger</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901459</link> <dc:creator>arkbadger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901459</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I watched 5 min of UGA and wanted to cry. Just a terrible, terrible product.&lt;/blockquote&gt;so no side bets on the Arkansas-Georgia game this Thursday?it baffles me how a team like Georgia isn&#039;t at least competitive in basketball most years.  I know that no one really gives a shit about UGA basketball, but it would seem like they could get at least a player or two from in state that is pretty good and would want to go there every year. but more often than not they are straight dog shit.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I watched 5 min of UGA and wanted to cry. Just a terrible, terrible product.</p></blockquote><p>so no side bets on the Arkansas-Georgia game this Thursday?</p><p>it baffles me how a team like Georgia isn&#8217;t at least competitive in basketball most years.  I know that no one really gives a shit about UGA basketball, but it would seem like they could get at least a player or two from in state that is pretty good and would want to go there every year. but more often than not they are straight dog shit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Watsonian</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901458</link> <dc:creator>Watsonian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:48:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901458</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Really great trolling here. Top notch stuff.&lt;/blockquote&gt;It&#039;s what Trey excels at.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Really great trolling here. Top notch stuff.</p></blockquote><p>It&#8217;s what Trey excels at.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WheresWallace</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901456</link> <dc:creator>WheresWallace</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:47:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901456</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Head to headFlorida = Indiana Kentucky w/ Noel = Michigan State Alabama = Michigan Ole Miss = Ohio State Missouri = Wisconsin Tennessee = MinnesotaI can keep going.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Really great trolling here. Top notch stuff.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Head to head</p><p>Florida = Indiana<br /> Kentucky w/ Noel = Michigan State<br /> Alabama = Michigan<br /> Ole Miss = Ohio State<br /> Missouri = Wisconsin<br /> Tennessee = Minnesota</p><p>I can keep going.</p></blockquote><p>Really great trolling here. Top notch stuff.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Watsonian</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901454</link> <dc:creator>Watsonian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:45:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901454</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I thought you were just trolling. But keep it up if not. Watson’s head’ll explode if you keep it up.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I thought he was as well. But yes, Trey, please continue.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I thought you were just trolling. But keep it up if not. Watson’s head’ll explode if you keep it up.</p></blockquote><p>I thought he was as well. But yes, Trey, please continue.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: arkbadger</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2013/02/18/ncaa-tournament-analysis-comparing-at-large-candidates-by-how-a-typical-tournament-team-would-do-against-their-schedule/comment-page-1/#comment-1901453</link> <dc:creator>arkbadger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:45:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiglead.com/?p=248758#comment-1901453</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Florida = Indiana Kentucky w/ Noel = Michigan State Alabama = Michigan Ole Miss = Ohio State Missouri = Wisconsin Tennessee = Minnesota&lt;/blockquote&gt;you forgot Arkansas.  Tennessee sucks ass, then again so does Minnesota, and there is no way Bama is as good as Michigan]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Florida = Indiana<br /> Kentucky w/ Noel = Michigan State<br /> Alabama = Michigan<br /> Ole Miss = Ohio State<br /> Missouri = Wisconsin<br /> Tennessee = Minnesota</p></blockquote><p>you forgot Arkansas.  Tennessee sucks ass, then again so does Minnesota, and there is no way Bama is as good as Michigan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/24 queries in 0.021 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 478/480 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com

 Served from: www.thebiglead.com @ 2013-05-23 13:23:31 by W3 Total Cache -->