Bracketology: Miami on the Rise, Notre Dame and Temple in Free Fall
The Bracketology projections return and will be a weekly staple from here on it. Two weeks ago, I took a first stab at projecting the field, not only based on year to date results at the time, but also by looking at future schedules, probability of adding big wins or bad losses, and based on a projection of what the profile would look like after the conference tournaments.
After two more weeks of games, the board generally looks the same. There has been some shuffling among the top ten teams, as Syracuse went on the road and won at Louisville, flipping the Big East race. Indiana lost at home to Wisconsin. Most notably, Duke was beaten twice on the road, first by NC State, and then destroyed by Miami. As of right now, I still have Duke projected as a #1 seed on the basis of all of their tournament caliber wins earlier this season. Unless they start playing better, though, they will drop, and the beneficiary will be the 2nd team in the Big Ten (Indiana) or Florida, who has looked like one of the best teams in the country recently.
I had Miami ahead of NC State, and as a #5 seed, in the last projection, and now the win over Duke, coupled with an earlier victory over Michigan State, has them looking like they could be a top 3 seed in the tournament. Minnesota has faltered, but I also have them just ahead of Michigan State and Ohio State on the seed line.
The Mountain West is an interesting conference this year. In the first projection, I had five teams between 8 and 10 seed. Two have emerged now. New Mexico has gotten to 17-2 with home wins over UNLV and Colorado State, and an OT win on the road at Boise State. I actually have UNLV projected higher, despite close road losses at New Mexico and Colorado State, because they got a key road win at San Diego State, and will get New Mexico at home later in the year.
Here are the projections (asterisks are teams assigned as auto bids):
#1 Seeds: Kansas*, Michigan*, Syracuse*, Duke*
#2 Seeds: Florida*, Indiana, Louisville, Arizona*
#3 seeds: Miami, Gonzaga*, Minnesota, Oregon
#4 seeds: Michigan State, Butler*, Creighton*, Ohio State
#5 seeds: Wichita State, UNLV*, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh
#6 seeds: VCU, New Mexico, UCLA, Mississippi
#7 seeds: Marquette, NC State, Kansas State, Missouri
#8 seeds: Colorado, San Diego State, Baylor, Wisconsin
#9 seeds: Colorado State, Oklahoma State, North Carolina, St. Mary’s
#10 seeds: Wyoming, Oklahoma, Notre Dame, Georgetown
#11 seeds: Virginia, Kentucky, Illinois, Memphis*
#12 seeds: Southern Miss vs. Iowa State, Iowa vs. Temple, Middle Tennessee State*, Belmont*
#13 seeds: Bucknell*, North Dakota State*, Akron*, Stephen F. Austin*
BIGGEST RISERS: Marquette (#11 to #7), Ole Miss (#10 to #6), New Mexico (#9 to #6), UNLV (#8 to #5),
BIGGEST FALLERS: Notre Dame (#4 to #10), Illinois (#6 to #11), Kentucky (#7 to #11) Temple (#8 to #12),
OUT last projection, IN this one: Oklahoma, Southern Miss, Iowa, Iowa State
IN last projection, OUT this one: Arizona State, St. Louis, Maryland, Boise State
FIRST FOUR OUT: Maryland, Boise State, BYU, Alabama


- Shining Base Path on Jalen Rose Leaving Numbers Never Lie, Jemele Hill in as New Co-Host
- A.P. on Peyton Manning Loves Football So Much He'll Even Play Pass Rusher
- Flaccid Indigestion on Jalen Rose Leaving Numbers Never Lie, Jemele Hill in as New Co-Host
- Shining Base Path on Peyton Manning Loves Football So Much He'll Even Play Pass Rusher
- orly57 on Game of Thrones: "Second Sons" Recap
27 Responses to “Bracketology: Miami on the Rise, Notre Dame and Temple in Free Fall”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







January 25th, 2013 at 4:34 PM
I don’t think Creighton is getting better than a #6 after this last week. They’ve got some solid wins (Wisconsin, AZ St., Cal) but nothing special. If they don’t win the MVC tourney, which I think goes to WSU, they’ll drop further.
January 25th, 2013 at 4:36 PM
I don’t want to go too off-topic so I won’t post all the data, but I did some legwork on the backcourt/frontcourt FGA in crunch time for a couple teams and put it on twitter. The more I see, the more I believe my thinking that FGA will shift from front to backcourts in crunchtime, regardless of the best players, but more because the ability to create their own shots without a post feed.
January 25th, 2013 at 4:39 PM
Simmer down WWoS. We all knew this to be true, the one guy who questioned you excepted
January 25th, 2013 at 4:40 PM
Can I get a percentage the Hawkeyes make the dance, Lisk? Over 50%? I like what they’re doing, obviously don’t think they’d make much noise, but I want them to make it. If they would have hit their free throws in Columbus they may have beat the Bucks on Tuesday.
I really think that home loss to Sparty is going to come back and bite them in the ass. Very winnable game they let slip away.
January 25th, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Dirk is a rare exception, but that’s because he plays high post/elbow extended
January 25th, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Or even better, what round of the B1G tournament would they need to get to?
January 25th, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Wyoming
The Legend of Fennis Dembo!!!
January 25th, 2013 at 4:42 PM
I don’t think Duke makes it out of the Sweet 16…
January 25th, 2013 at 4:42 PM
No who’s getting no seed? Lennay Kekua.
January 25th, 2013 at 4:44 PM
i can see all of those teams out on the first weekend.
January 25th, 2013 at 4:45 PM
Can we get a post on how cool it is that the regular coverage of Torrey is being simulcast online? I’m streaming it from work, and able to follow all the action. It’s a nice example of the PGA Tour making efforts to get its product to more people, especially young hip ones.
January 25th, 2013 at 4:46 PM
WTH?
January 25th, 2013 at 4:46 PM
If they are healthy there is absolutely no reason they shouldn’t.
/first weekend loss
January 25th, 2013 at 4:50 PM
I feel the same way about the #1 and #2 seeds. Other than Kansas, there isn’t a single team in the country whom would surprise me by missing the Sweet 16.
January 25th, 2013 at 4:56 PM
I think VCU will make a run
January 25th, 2013 at 4:57 PM
I hate this Ohio State team, but I still wouldn’t want to play them.
January 25th, 2013 at 5:07 PM
I’ve liked what i’ve seen from miami, though recency bias with respect to them destroying my boys i’m sure is a factor. Its very strange to see a Bo Ryan style system being run with the athletes they have.
January 25th, 2013 at 5:15 PM
What amount of importance do you put on getting a high seed in the tournament? For a team like Indiana I don’t think seeding is so important just need to be playing their best at tournament time. Thoughts?
January 25th, 2013 at 5:18 PM
As long as no one’s Tweeting.
January 25th, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Uconn with Kemba Walker. Still only got a 3seed despite winning the Big East tournament, but played well at the right time
January 25th, 2013 at 6:20 PM
To me there are 3 groupings of seeds (1,2,3) (4,5,6,7) (everyone else)
If you’re a 3 seed or better it really doesn’t matter which one you are. Same for a 7 or better. It’s all about location. You want to be in a region that benefits you and your fans. Syracuse is desparate to be in the East. UCLA is the same out West. Butler/Indiana are begging for the Midwest. Seeds for those schools aren’t going to matter as much as where they are.
January 25th, 2013 at 6:27 PM
Other than Kansas, there isn’t a single team in the country whom would surprise me by missing the Sweet 16. Jay
I don’t know. If it wasn’t for Jeff Withey, KU would have four or five losses. I think teams are starting to figure him out. They haven’t been winning, but Jeff has gotten into early foul trouble and is now out of position a lot. And not because he forgot how to play hoops. Teams have enough tape this year without Thomas Robinson to attack him.
And, I hate to say it, but college hoops is in a world of parity (some say down) this year if KU is considered the best team in the country. They have two players and one of them forgets to shoot the ball. McLemore only has 49 shots in five Big 12 games. This is something that can be fixed going forward. I am just talking about right now.
January 25th, 2013 at 6:28 PM
Just looking at the upset percent, 3 and 4 are nearly equal.
http://www.listafterlist.com/tabid/57/listid/5930/Sports++Recreation/NCAA+Tournament+Winning+Percentage+for+Seeds+in+First+Round.aspx
January 25th, 2013 at 6:31 PM
another source says 85.7 (3 seed) vs 75.6 (4 seed).
To me… you can usually start the bracket by putting all #1/#2 seeds in the sweet 16. I rarely have all four #3 seeds advance.
/never won a pool
January 25th, 2013 at 6:31 PM
For a team like Indiana I don’t think seeding is so important just need to be playing their best at tournament time. Angry
That’s true with any of the top 2 and 3 seeds this year. Probably true with the 4 seeds. Any of Lisk’s 1 seeds would be nervous about playing MSU or Butler.
If you’re a 3 seed or better it really doesn’t matter which one you are. Wallace
Agreed. And like I just posted, you can probably throw the 4 seeds in as well. Going chalk in your tourney bracket this year ain’t going to cut it.
January 25th, 2013 at 6:33 PM
To me… you can usually start the bracket by putting all #1/#2 seeds in the sweet 16. WWoS
I almost always do that. I just have a feeling this year, past numbers can be thrown out.
/will probably still have the 1s and 2s in the Sweet Sixteen unless I see an obvious mismatch.
March is going to be fun.
January 25th, 2013 at 6:52 PM
They were unbeatable the first 10 minutes of the Michigan game. They can do some damage.
Going to be a very wide open tournament.
//Still think Indiana rolls to the championship.