Bracketology: First Projection for 2013 Has Duke, Indiana, Kansas and Michigan as Top Seeds
College basketball is already underway, but the schedule gets really interesting this weekend. Minnesota and Indiana face off in a heavy weight clash in the Big Ten and North Carolina State looks to add a huge win and knock off #1 Duke. Several other games, such as Marquette-Pittsburgh, Colorado State-San Diego State, Illinois-Wisconsin, Missouri-Mississippi, and North Carolina-Florida State, will have a big impact on team’s fortunes at various levels in their chase for seeding or getting into the tournament.
With the start of conference season (for the most part) this week, we will begin our foray into projecting the NCAA Tournament field (the top 12 seeds, including all at-larges, to start). However, when I project the tournament field, I do not just look at wins to date, the current RPI and rankings, and then slot teams. For most of the teams who will eventually reach the NCAA Tournament from the ten best conferences, 75% or more of their key games are yet to come. What I like to do is also look forward and project the field, based on the future schedule and number of games that could influence the committee, and projecting an average outcome based on team strength and how those will likely be perceived.
Let’s take Pittsburgh for example, a team that is currently unranked in the national polls. I am projecting Pittsburgh as a #3 seed, likely higher than most current projections based on RPI (50th). Pittsburgh just destroyed Georgetown on the road for their first real quality win this year, and also has close losses to Michigan, Cincinnati, and Rutgers. Based on their current resumé, they would not be a high seed. They are also 6th in Ken Pomeroy’s rankings, and 16th in Sagarin’s predictive ratings. They will have plenty of opportunities to add key wins, and a decent chance of adding them, against the other tournament level teams in the Big East. If Pittsburgh gets to 24 or 25 wins entering the Big East tournament, a winning record against NCAA and NIT tournament type teams, and some key wins, they will be a reasonably high seed in March.
So I looked at the future schedule and current wins for all teams with a reasonable chance at an at-large bid, and here are the first projections:
#1 seeds: Duke*, Indiana*, Kansas*, Michigan
Pretty clear cut at the top, and although many current bracket projections do not have Indiana as a #1 right now, I think they get there by winning the best conference in basketball. The interesting question will be the final one, whether it is second place in the Big Ten, or Kansas, Louisville, or Arizona. It could come down to who wins the conference tournaments on that one, and right now, I’m projecting Louisville to just miss.
#2 seeds: Louisville*, Arizona*, Syracuse, Minnesota
Arizona’s loss last night takes them from the unbeatens, and should knock them off the #1 line for many current projections. The Big East should have two top seeds, while the Big Ten will add another high seed in Minnesota.
#3 seeds: Florida*, Gonzaga*, Pittsburgh, Creighton*
Florida has some tough losses on the road. I’m not sure they can get higher than this in the committee’s eyes merely because the bottom half of the SEC is so weak, and they do not have as many key win opportunities as teams in the Big Ten or Big East. I already talked about Pittsburgh. Creighton and Gonzaga should be able to secure high seeds here if they win their conferences as expected with very few losses to come.
#4 seeds: Notre Dame, Michigan State, Oregon, Butler*
Michigan State will get plenty of opportunities for wins against top teams, and the win over Iowa last night was a solid one. Butler already has key wins that should play well for the committee, while Oregon beat Arizona last night, and should be the second best team in the Pac-12. Getting to 24-25 wins in that conference should be good for a 4 seed, with an outside chance at a 3.
#5 seeds: Ohio State, Missouri, Miami, Cincinnati
Ohio State is ranked highly in polls, but not in the RPI. They do not have many key wins to date, but should add them in conference play. Missouri won’t have as many opportunities, while I am projecting Miami, and not NC State, to be the second highest seed from the ACC.
#6 seeds: Virginia Commonwealth, Wichita State, Illinois, Oklahoma State
Virginia Commonwealth is another team that is ranked higher in predictive rankings, and we know how dangerous they can be come March. The Rams only get Butler, Temple, and St. Louis once each in conference (all late), so they likely need to sweep those games, or win the conference regular season and tournament, to jump higher. Illinois is probably projected higher in most, but while I think they will still look good to the committee, they are a team where the record against tourney teams will likely regress in
Big Ten play.
#7 seeds: Baylor, Kentucky, UCLA, NC State
Kentucky is young, and has been inconsistent. They would be a dangerous 7 seed if they mature throughout conference season. The problem for Kentucky is the conference strength, and that they are only 1-4 against tournament type teams with only four likely matchups remaining before the SEC tournament. They would likely have to win at least 3 of those games and the SEC tournament to shoot higher. NC State is ranked, and a darling of the RPI, but don’t really have any great wins yet, and are not rated highly in predictive systems. A win over Duke on Saturday would change this.
#8 seeds: Kansas State, San Diego State*, Virginia, UNLV
San Diego State and UNLV are the first of six Mountain West teams, all projected between an 8 and 11 seed, in the field. Will there really be six teams from the conference? Well, there are going to be a lot of tossup type games in the Mountain West. Whoever can win more of those will finish higher than this, but it’s wide open right now. Maybe one team loses well more than half of the key games and drops out, but I think five is very realistic, and the sixth will be a true bubble team.
#9 seeds: Wisconsin, Temple, New Mexico, Colorado
Temple has the key win over Syracuse but 4 losses. They’ll need to move past Butler and VCU to move up. Wisconsin has four losses to likely tournament teams, with their best wins over teams likely on the outside (California and Arkansas). That said, they will get plenty of opportunities. Their next eleven games are against either likely tournament or bubble teams, and will decide their fate. Colorado has a high enough RPI that they should make the field if they finish reasonably well in the Pac-12, and maybe the committee will remember that crazy road loss at Arizona.
#10 seeds: Wyoming, Ole Miss, St. Louis, Colorado State
Ole Miss is the fourth SEC team projected in. Wyoming and Colorado State are part of the Mountain West logjam right now.
#11 seeds: Boise State, Marquette, Maryland, Bucknell*
Bucknell looks like a NCAA tournament at-large caliber team if the committee employs the “eye test”. They didnt really win any key tournament type games (narrowly losing at Missouri, while Purdue is not going to be in the mix). They cannot afford too many losses in the Patriot league to stay there if they don’t win the tournament. Boise State is a young team that just had a big win over Wyoming and lost a close game at Michigan State on the road this year.
#12 seeds: Memphis*, Belmont*, North Carolina vs. St. Mary’s, Georgetown vs. Arizona State
The play-in games. Here I have Georgetown, who is currently ranked by the polls, but just got destroyed by Pitt, has three losses, and has started 0-2 in the Big East. They are outside the top fifty in both Sagarin and Ken Pom, as well as the RPI, and they are likely to be closer to .500 in conference play than solidly in the field by the time March rolls around. North Carolina is also barely in, but they have to add some notable wins, soon, or that will change. I guess I’m expecting them to show slightly better than they have so far, but I understand those that would have them just out.
First Eight Out: Florida State, Iowa, Iowa State, St. Joseph’s, Southern Miss, Tulane, BYU, Oklahoma
[photo via USA Today Sports Images]

- Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago’s Sarah Spain
- Premier League: What Each Club Should Prioritize in the Summer
- Footage of Kelly Tripucka Unveiling the Original Teal Charlotte Hornets’ Uniforms in 1988 is Breathtaking [Video]
- NFL Coaches Using Microsoft Tablets on the Sidelines in the Future Should Lead to Advances in Clock Management and Strategy
- European Tour Chief George O’Grady: “Most of Sergio’s friends are colored athletes”

- HuskerDawg on Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago's Sarah Spain
- ms621 on Premier League: What Each Club Should Prioritize in the Summer
- somewhereoverthedwaynebowe on Footage of Kelly Tripucka Unveiling the Original Teal Charlotte Hornets' Uniforms in 1988 is Breathtaking [Video]
- arkbadger on European Tour Chief George O'Grady: "Most of Sergio's friends are colored athletes"
- Nada on NFL Coaches Using Microsoft Tablets on the Sidelines in the Future Should Lead to Advances in Clock Management and Strategy
77 Responses to “Bracketology: First Projection for 2013 Has Duke, Indiana, Kansas and Michigan as Top Seeds”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







January 11th, 2013 at 3:28 PM
I’d bitch about OSU being a 5 seed. But they’re not good right now. Not good at all.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:29 PM
Where’s Uconn?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:30 PM
Ineligible.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:30 PM
Is it August 31st yet?
/sobs
January 11th, 2013 at 3:30 PM
Nice. This is the way projections should work. None of this as of today crap.
Most overrated team -Arizona (needed complete meltdowns/ref help to beat Florida and Colorado at home. Struggled against a mediocre Utah team at home, and needed a superhuman block to beat SDSU neutral. No thanks)
Most underrated team – Maryland. They can score in bunches and a have a ton of guys. The problem is their schedule has been really soft and the ACC won’t really provide them much in the way of marquee wins.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:31 PM
The interesting question will be the final one, whether it is second place in the Big Ten, or Kansas, Louisville, or Arizona.
KU’s RPI is #2 now. How far do you think it will drop playing in the Big 12?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:31 PM
What are the asterisks for?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:32 PM
Struggling with NEB doesn’t inspire confidence going into conference play. Would not be shocked to see them on the bubble especially if they can’t get a win against minnesota or illinois.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:33 PM
Wichita St. at #6 is too low. They doing all this while three guys are occasionally out. Seth Davis has Jay V’s cousin as coach of the year.
Damn it. I hate when people say too high or too low. Couldn’t help myself.
/punches self in the nuts.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:33 PM
If I ask politely for this to be the year where we don’t have to be updated on the number of days until opening weekend will the request be granted?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:34 PM
Automatic qualifiers?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:34 PM
On the other hand, Pitt has to go 11-4 in conference to get to 24 wins, and I’ve seen them play in person.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:34 PM
I believe conference champs, Mullet.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:34 PM
Wait, Duke was No. 25 in the TBL preseason top 25, how can they rate a No. 1 seed?!
January 11th, 2013 at 3:35 PM
Was kidding. The ineligibility is absurd
January 11th, 2013 at 3:35 PM
I was shocked to see them make the field, really think conference play knocks them out…the guard play is mediocre at best and Ryan Evans thinks he’s good, a bad mix there
January 11th, 2013 at 3:35 PM
Maybe if he was just “kinda in”.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:36 PM
ahahahahahahah AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
January 11th, 2013 at 3:37 PM
Maybe a couple of players’ grandmas could “climb the scissor lift,” just to be sure?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:37 PM
26 actually.
Though again, if Kelly is out for a long time, they’re not winning the conference. Though it will be funny when Plumlee wins the Wooden.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:38 PM
Top 5 bands/artists I hate the most:
1. Lenny Kravitz
2. The Eagles
3. Indigo Girls
4. KISS
5. Country music
January 11th, 2013 at 3:39 PM
/Searches through “Athletic 7ft white guy” file for obligatory NBA racial comp
January 11th, 2013 at 3:40 PM
Frauds would be my guess.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:40 PM
Memphis is rated properly; they’re a bubble team from now on. That win at UT was big, but the Tigers are middling & Conference USA ain’t very strong.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:41 PM
Most underrated team – Maryland. They can score in bunches and a have a ton of guys. The problem is their guards are garbage and their schedule has been really soft and the ACC won’t really provide them much in the way of marquee wins.
Love the size and depth up front but they turn the ball over way too much. Pe’shon might be the slowest PG in the country, Allen is immature/spastic and there is no one else that can handle the ball. Think Sweet 16 is ceiling this year. (With Roddy Peters coming in next year, 2014-15 season is the big year.)
January 11th, 2013 at 3:42 PM
Top 5 bands/artists I hate the most:
I really don’t have this problem now that I don’t listen to radio. I kind of like not flipping stations when shitty songs are on. I play what I want.
Although, I will strangle a child if I am somewhere that is playing that Lenny Kravitz song from 20 years ago.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:44 PM
Incomplete without Rod Stewart
January 11th, 2013 at 3:47 PM
That’s the understatement of the year. How’d you like to be a #2 seed, seeing a hot Kentucky team in the second round?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:47 PM
Yeah. I miss Jordan Taylor and will never not be pissed off when reminded of just how close they came to winning against Syracuse.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:53 PM
Wichita St. at #6 is too low. They doing all this while three guys are occasionally out. Seth Davis has Jay V’s cousin as coach of the year.
The top two lines are pretty clear, then there are about 15 teams bunched together. Wichita State can certainly go up, and arguably could get as high as a 4 by tying Creighton for conference title. They have fewer opportunities to get impact wins from here on out.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:54 PM
/are we still doing that thing where we make fun of twitter-ers’ grammar?
January 11th, 2013 at 3:55 PM
/taps foot
//gives up
January 11th, 2013 at 3:55 PM
I asked Lisk, but he said it’s a secret.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:56 PM
Asterisks denote the team I assigned as an auto bid for accounting purposes (so I could add up autos and at larges).
January 11th, 2013 at 3:56 PM
Are you allowed to write this without following it with an obligatory “high enough seed to get upset in the first round and screw everyone’s brackets up” comment?
/10 straight years of March Sadness
January 11th, 2013 at 3:57 PM
maybe richt should coach the basketball team
January 11th, 2013 at 3:58 PM
Are you allowed to write this without following it with an obligatory “high enough seed to get upset in the first round and screw everyone’s brackets up” comment?
Yeah, I’m not projecting they will do well if they get there, only that they could again be a top 4 seed once conference ends.
January 11th, 2013 at 3:58 PM
Pitt will be no higher than a 7 or 8 seed. can’t believe they lost to a shitty Rutgers team
January 11th, 2013 at 3:59 PM
Seven years as a top 3 seed, plus a 4,5,9 seed in the last 10 years… no elite eight.
/pours one out for Brandon Knight
January 11th, 2013 at 4:00 PM
I feel the same way about people doing 2 month countdowns for two people playing catch in February
January 11th, 2013 at 4:01 PM
The twitter theme today is that Rubby De la Rosa, one of the two SPs we got for Adrian, learned his change-up from some dude his grandmother was a nanny for, named Pedro Martinez. I hope he can get some AAA run as a SP and not just in the pen.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:01 PM
DON’T YOU CARE ABOUT AJ BURNETT????
January 11th, 2013 at 4:02 PM
/reminisces about a Big East in which Pitt thought it was good at basketball
January 11th, 2013 at 4:02 PM
FYI, the Mike Napoli deal isn’t even finalized. Fuck it, Red Sox should go get Michael Morse.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:02 PM
No school from the MAC? They’re always up for a good first round upset. Would think Akron with their 7 footer or Ohio since they return everybody from a team that took UNC to OT in the Sweet 16 last year.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:03 PM
Man, it’s only a month before Ps/Cs, huh? I love baseball opening day, but can’t get very excited for that, especially when it hardly signifies Spring around the corner, when it is currently 70 degrees in mid-January
January 11th, 2013 at 4:03 PM
the Big East is so fucking weird this year. Syracuse absolutely destroyed Rutgers, then Rutgers goes out and beats Pitt. Pitt then goes and annihilates an overrated Georgetown team (suck it, starkweather)
January 11th, 2013 at 4:04 PM
Reminisces about that time UConn started a player who hadn’t committed an NCAA violation or broke the law.
/think it was Tom Penders
January 11th, 2013 at 4:04 PM
I vote for Conference USA getting no teams in this year. That conference is horrid. Even memphis is average this year.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:05 PM
And Uconn has the worst frontcourt they’ve had in 25 years. Smart moves by Roscoe Smith and Oriakhi………
January 11th, 2013 at 4:05 PM
yeah, Oriakhi is helping Mizzou a bit.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:06 PM
The go to anti-Calhoun move!
/3 titles
January 11th, 2013 at 4:06 PM
Still puzzled by SU losing to Temple. Free throws will be the achilles heel come tournament time.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:07 PM
Would’ve been Uconn’s only interior player of any quality, thus a focal point. He was brainwashed by his father, who actually thought Calhoun was intentionally sabotaging AO last yr to prevent him from entering the draft
January 11th, 2013 at 4:09 PM
Don’t be. Temple are a strange and difficult team to play. They played Kansas close and their other losses are Duke and Xavier (okay and Canisius). I hate playing them.
Better to fall from free throws this year than Matta paying officials.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:10 PM
My dad was at UConn for the Tom Penders years, and my mom was there just after that. I grew up a big fan of Ray Allen and Donny Marshall… but when I got to Pitt, that went away pretty quickly. I think Khalid El Amin was the last UConn player I liked.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:12 PM
The best fat pg in Big East history
January 11th, 2013 at 4:12 PM
sctrojans, Oriakhi was just bad anyways last year. Not sure why he would think Calhoun was sabotaging him. Syracuse made him look like a freshman.
and Mole, that OSU game still pisses me off. Oh well. Syracuse may be a bit better this year because the Triche-MCW backcourt is better than the Jardine-Waiters-triche backcourt. Carter-Williams has such great court vision and isn’t shoot first which was the case of Dion and Scoop.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:13 PM
AP – this Spring will be filled with prospect puff pieces. Given how the Boston team is, and how many really ‘good character/work ethic’ prospects the Sox have, it’s much more palatable to read about Xander and JBJ than Shane Victorino hitting .260
January 11th, 2013 at 4:15 PM
Fills up the stat sheet. The other night he had like 14-6-6 with 5 steals. 6 if you count Lord and Taylor.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:16 PM
January 11th, 2013 at 4:16 PM
I am surprised they haven’t traded Ellsbury yet. Maybe teams are waiting to see him not get injured in April before calling Ben about a trade
January 11th, 2013 at 4:16 PM
botched that quoting
January 11th, 2013 at 4:16 PM
sctrojans – that’s awesome.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:17 PM
Sounds about right. Good for my attendance purposes however. Went to more games this year than I have in a long time. Probably seven
January 11th, 2013 at 4:19 PM
if shane Victorino bats any higher than 7th, I will break things.
Come on Cherington, bring us Michael Morse!
January 11th, 2013 at 4:21 PM
He has little value now. They’ll take the picks they can’t work out a deal. The whole point of getting Victorino was to give them flexibility to trade Ellsbury, but also to give JBJ some time. Can’t wait to see him in that tricky CF. Also, they don’t really have enough starting OF if they trade Ells right now. Gotta see how Kalish (who hasn’t really played in three years) does. Gomes-Victorino-Kalish + Nava OF is not going to get it done.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:22 PM
scrotes – you gonna be able to get to Pawtucket end of the year? Might see all the top guys there by August, except Barnes.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:22 PM
Gomes should not be starting whatsoever unless it’s a regular day off for someone in left field. He’s only effective against lefties anyways
January 11th, 2013 at 4:23 PM
know what’s hilarious? Arizona is planning on having Cody Ross play CF unless something changes in spring training. HAHA!
January 11th, 2013 at 4:26 PM
Nava can only hit righties, so that’s not the worst platoon, in the world. I hate that Nava can’t be a legit 25-man guy, because he’s a great story, but he really is a 4th OF at best.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:27 PM
Until the Red Sox depth chart ceases to have Mauro Gomez as the only option at 1B, I will not be making fun of any teams’ players. http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/depth/_/name/bos/boston-red-sox
January 11th, 2013 at 4:31 PM
WHY IS ALFREDO ACEVES STILL ON THIS FUCKING ROSTER? and I really dislike the rotation.
/prepares for 5th place
//weeps
January 11th, 2013 at 4:32 PM
Roscoe Smith story: goes into Calhoun to say he’s considering transfer. Asks Calhoun why he doesn’t get to play the three. Calhoun informs him because he can’t dribble or shoot, then tells him to get out without any effort to convince him to stay
Yea Calhoun knew he wasn’t a big part of the team. Same thing with Combs-McDaniel who managed to get caught stealing as soon as he stepped on campus at Hofstra. Shows how Kemba was basically a one man team. Lamb was there to help, but he showed last year he’s best in a supporting role.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:34 PM
Fenway Sports Group, killing it as always.
January 11th, 2013 at 4:49 PM
LSU’s got a 7-foot white guy, but he’s not athletic and is best known for playing tuba in the marching band.
January 11th, 2013 at 5:11 PM
ugh, that was an ugly win. don’t let them fool you, MSU is not a very good team. i will not be shocked to see them finish outside the top 25.