But I’m sure I’ll grab the triple-crown and lose all three title games, thanks to favorable match-ups for each of my opponents, the Gronkowski conundrum (I have him and if I bench him, he’ll go off, and if I start him, he’ll play one series), and it seems like every opponent has Calvin Johnson or Andre Johnson (or both). Yikes.

I saw a report that Gronkowski will be inactive, we’ll see if that happens.

Robot Santa

But I’m sure I’ll grab the triple-crown and lose all three title games, thanks to favorable match-ups for each of my opponents, the Gronkowski conundrum (I have him and if I bench him, he’ll go off, and if I start him, he’ll play one series), and it seems like every opponent has Calvin Johnson or Andre Johnson (or both). Yikes.

My top pick: Lesean McCoy

My WRs: Percy harvin and Julio jones

/started 2-6
//removed yahoo fantasy app

The difference between having Peterson and Jackson on a roster was a little over 2 wins, which seems right. If we are talking about a total of 5 wins separating bad teams from the top teams, and you have 8-9 starters, that’s less than half a win per starter.

If you were counting on a TE to win you games, you’re doing it all wrong.

They get 1.5ppr in our league. Makes for an interesting draft.

Yo, at work I can’t use adblockers so can someone please buy the ad space that keeps showing me kids with cleft lips? Because I don’t like that shit.

I know there’s no way in hell I want to travel to Quebec right now.

//got cut off

keeps showing me kids with cleft lips? Because I don’t like that shit.

Think of it as a guidance groove.

TE 1-4 = 125 points average
TE 7-10 = 94 (75% of the peak)

RB 1-4: 225
RB 7-10: 170 (75% of the peak)

All done in my head, so I apologize if there’s any slight errors, but in general, the top vs middle isn’t more dramatic for TE. In addition, since RBs generate more points, the top RB is more valuable, meaning that I’d expect the top RBs to be prominently featured on the least of most winning players.

/top 3 spots
//take that, WWoS!

MJD was doing pretty well until he got hurt. I think the Jags sucktitude needs to be considered when putting him on the least valuable list. if they had been playing worth a shit I bet he would have been back a month ago.

He had one good game at Indy in week 3. Got hurt the next week and hasn’t done shit since. Jags should have just put him on IR and saved his fantasy owners the grief.

Or the ZERO he put up not once but twice

That didn’t affect me too much since that was during my bye and/or I had already clinched the bye in my league. Oh well.

I’m surprised the ‘least’ still won 45% of his team’s games. I guess if you let one player ruin your season, it’s a you problem, not a him problem. Though you should probably still send him that tweet that it’s all his fault.

I would guess most teams are a combination of players from the good and bad lists, making things average out around 50%. Teams with multiple players from the bad list probably have a much worse winning percentage. For example I had Fred Jackson the whole season (still do even though he’s on IR) but am in the final, in part because I almost never played him.

The point production difference from having Adrian Peterson vs. settling for Fred Jackson is quite a bit bigger than anything you would get at the TE position.

That’s not the comparison. If you are looking at #1-3 vs #7-10, is RB or TE going to be more important to get early?

Or the ZERO he put up not once but twice