Fantasy Football: Julio Jones, Randall Cobb, Doug Martin, Alfred Morris, and Tom Brady Are the Most Common Players in the Fantasy Finals
Fantasy Football Finals week for most teams, unless you play in a league that goes into week 17 and risks even more starters being rested. I was curious which players were most commonly associated with a finals appearance, so I did a Twitter poll. I got well over 100 responses (146 to be exact) and went through and calculated it.
Now, every league is different, and I got a variety of responses. Reaching the finals is a combination of luck, skill, and matchups. Some leagues have larger playoffs than others. Still, this should give us a sense of which players are most involved as we head toward the final games.
The overall lesson is this. There is no one single way to skin the horse. No player appeared on more than 20% of the finals starting lineups that I reviewed. Julio Jones was the most frequent, at just under 20%. I have three teams in the finals. In one, I rode Drew Brees, Brandon Marshall, and a running back trio of Lynch, Bradshaw and Spiller. In another, I scraped things together at my second running back spot based on matchups, and had great receivers. In another, I played quarterback by committee and overcame drafting both LeSean McCoy and Larry Fitzgerald early, by hitting on most picks after that.
Here are the Top 25 (plus ties) Players appearing as starters from my finals appearance poll:
- Julio Jones, WR (19.2%)
- Randall Cobb, WR (17.8%)
- Doug Martin, RB (17.1%)
- Alfred Morris, RB (16.4%)
- Tom Brady, QB (16.4%)
- Calvin Johnson, WR (15.8%)
- Knowshon Moreno, RB (15.8%)
- Jimmy Graham, TE (15.1%)
- Jamaal Charles, RB (15.1%)
- SEATTLE DEF (14.7%)
- Aaron Hernandez, TE (14.4%)
- Brandon Marshall, WR (14.4%)
- Adrian Peterson, RB (14.4%)
- A.J. Green, WR (13.7%)
- Dez Bryant, WR (13.7%)
- Eric Decker, WR (13.7%)
- C.J. Spiller, RB (13.7%)
- Marshawn Lynch, RB (13.0%)
- Benjarvus Green-Ellis, RB (13.0%)
- Cam Newton, QB (12.3%)
- Ray Rice, RB (12.3%)
- Chris Johnson, RB (11.6%)
- Aaron Rodgers, QB (11.0%)
- Robert Griffin III, QB (11.0%)
- Vincent Jackson, WR (11.0%)
- Arian Foster, RB (11.0%)
Lots of interesting stuff, so let’s break it down.
FIRST ROUNDERS: The non-running backs fare pretty well here. According to the ADP’s here, there were four QB’s (Rodgers, Brady, Brees and Newton), one WR (Calvin Johnson) and one TE (Graham) going in the top 12. Those players appear 117 times on the 146 starting lineups. The six running backs (hurt by LeSean McCoy’s injury) appear 78 times.
You may also notice that adds up to 195 appearances by those players, which means that the average team in the finals has 1.33 first round caliber players from the preseason. We don’t know if teams drafting first round quarterbacks were more successful (almost half of them have Brady, Newton, Rodgers or Brees starting), because they could have been acquired by trade. What does seem evident is that successful teams either had more first rounders because of keepers, or because they were able to trade quantity for quality after the season began.
KICKERS, MAN: Repeat after me, don’t draft a kicker any time until you have to. The kickers are pretty evenly distributed and not even really related to the points list, with Shayne Graham appearing the most (12) but 24 different kickers showing up on rosters.
WIDE RECEIVER VOLATILITY MORE DECISIVE IN THE SEMIFINALS? Running backs like Doug Martin and Jamaal Charles who had bad weeks seemed to survive much better than top receivers with off weeks. Receivers ranked in the top 20 in the points list who had big weeks (Marshall, Decker, Calvin Johnson and Julio) survived at rates almost double those of other receivers ranked highly on the year but who did not have big games (Thomas, Andre Johnson, Wayne)
ANOMALIES? I’m going to go into more detail on some data that CBS Sports has provided on win percentages by player, but there are several curious results in our limited results of the polling. Peyton Manning had almost as many points as many of the quarterbacks drafted several rounds earlier. He appears less (9) than all of them, and also less than Colin Kaepernick (who was often a RGIII replacement). Matt Stafford is also in about the same range in total points, but appears only three times. Adrian Peterson is near the top, but maybe it’s just because of our little sample, but I would have expected him at #1. He had a big game again last week and is the top scorer at running back.
Here are shots of each position and the number appearing in each, feel free to click on them to enlarge and see how often your players appeared. A couple of notes: at quarterback, there were a few that were noted as 2 QB league teams, and some that listed platoons or injuries. For example, teams that had RGIII often noted who else they would start instead. Thus, the number of quarterbacks is greater than the teams submitted. At kicker and defense, some entries did not list. Others noted that they played matchups there and did not identify a specific starter. Rather than kick them out, I included the entries as long as they had QB, RB, WR listed. Some leagues also do not require a separate TE which is why the tight end totals do not equal 146.
[photo via USA Today Sports Images]

- Young Rockies Fans Also Sport Giant Purple Mohawks
- Legends Football League Issues Statement About Coach Yelling, “I’m gonna punch you in the face” at Female Player
- Former UFC Fighter Waylon Lowe Suing Philly Sex Shop After a Gel Left His Genitals Burned and Scarred
- Brian Urlacher: Combining Old School and New School in Chicago, and Probably a Spot in Canton
- The Time Has Come for Replay in Baseball, But Bud & Co. Have to Get it Right

- Caribou on Brian Urlacher: Combining Old School and New School in Chicago, and Probably a Spot in Canton
- pRohphet8 on Brian Urlacher: Combining Old School and New School in Chicago, and Probably a Spot in Canton
- Shining Base Path on Brian Urlacher: Combining Old School and New School in Chicago, and Probably a Spot in Canton
- A.P. on Young Rockies Fans Also Sport Giant Purple Mohawks
- A.P. on Brian Urlacher: Combining Old School and New School in Chicago, and Probably a Spot in Canton
57 Responses to “Fantasy Football: Julio Jones, Randall Cobb, Doug Martin, Alfred Morris, and Tom Brady Are the Most Common Players in the Fantasy Finals”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.














December 20th, 2012 at 3:13 PM
Does anyone not do playoffs in FF? We just roll all 17 games and the one with the best record wins. Tiebreaker by points scored. Playoffs seem hacky.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:15 PM
they are also 5 athletes that have a bigger rack than Alex Morgan
/banned
December 20th, 2012 at 3:15 PM
I wouldnt know anything about the playoffs
/
cries
//
curses McFadden
December 20th, 2012 at 3:15 PM
I wouldnt know anything about the playoffs
/
cries
//
curses McFadden
December 20th, 2012 at 3:16 PM
we do playoffs, but I would be equally excited about doing it this way
December 20th, 2012 at 3:16 PM
This is what the league I was in did. Playoffs in Fantasy Football are retarded. There isn’t a reason to do them at all. Someone shouldn’t go 14-0 and not be the best team in fantasy football because the best players were rested.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:18 PM
I’m in the finals in one league and only have two of those players (Spiller and Cam). Not sure what this says about my team…
December 20th, 2012 at 3:19 PM
Prefer playoffs so people aren’t “eliminated” so early in the season and stop paying attention, but we also typically award some prize $ to the regular season winner so they don’t get completely shafted.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:20 PM
Someone shouldn’t go 14-0 and not be the best team in fantasy football because the best players were rested.
Exactlly. I’ve been in the same league for 10 years and not doing it this way has never come up.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:22 PM
Both of my money leagues I lost in…one b/c I faced Marshall/Dez/Foster and the other of Brees/Hernandez and the IDPs in that league. I curse you Doug Martin for screwing me.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:23 PM
I have Nos. 7 and 22 in the TBL finals this week and I probably won’t start Johnson. Mantis has 1, 3, 5, 16, 19.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:23 PM
This is what the league I was in did. Playoffs in Fantasy Football are retarded. There isn’t a reason to do them at all. Someone shouldn’t go 14-0 and not be the best team in fantasy football because the best players were rested.
Most leagues end this week for this reason. Also, if you are in a league where a team is 14-0, you are in a bad league. (or they were really, really lucky based on who they played from week to week).
Top 4 in my primary league were 10-4, 10-4, 9-5, and 9-5 entering semis.
Reasons to do playoffs– fun, talk smack, create excitement at the end of the year. I played in a league where it was all season no playoffs. Not as big a fan.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:24 PM
Prefer playoffs so people aren’t “eliminated” so early in the season and stop paying attention,
We’ve never had that problem. Well, one year we did and we told the guy to shape up or he wasn’t playing the next year. Over 10 years in a ten team league, there have only been 13 guys. Pretty good.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:26 PM
No one goes 14-0.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:26 PM
Top 4 in my primary league were 10-4, 10-4, 9-5, and 9-5 entering semis.
Top 5 in our league, 10 – 5, 10 – 5, 9 – 4, 9 – 4, and 8-7. Five teams playing for #1 with two games to go. Exciting for them. Not for me and my 6-9 record.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:26 PM
I’d rather the team that is best win. We can’t have that in real sports all of the time, but we can in fantasy. I’ve gone 12-2 and lost in the first round before and gone 9-5 and beat a 12-2 and that’s some bullshit. The league I used to be in was a salary capped auction league with stipulations that you had to keep players for 2 years if you bid a certain amount on them. I can’t imagine doing a regular league after that. It’s so much better.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:27 PM
I made the playoffs in my league (6 teams) and won the first round game but lost last week. I have ZERO of the players on that list. I got dicked by injuries (McCoy, MJD, Mike Wallace & Big Rape) but played matchups on D and made some decent pickups throughout the year. pretty crazy I don’t have a single guy on the list though.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:27 PM
I’ve done it, and then lost in the first round of the playoffs
December 20th, 2012 at 3:29 PM
Fantasy football is a lot of luck though. That 12-2 team is not necessarily the better team.
To wit…I had the 2nd most points in a 12-team league. I finished dead last.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:29 PM
So you go by total points scored rather than head to head, right?
December 20th, 2012 at 3:29 PM
Back in the 80′s when I started playing, our league was just a total points league for the entire season. I much prefer it to head-to-head with or without playoffs.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:30 PM
True. The year I was 12-2 I had the most points, but the year I beat the 12-2 team I think they were 3rd or so in points.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:30 PM
a good way to combat that is award the weekly high point winner, along with penalizing the low point scorer every week. keeps it interesting all season.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:31 PM
First year I did it we did total points. The best team certainly won, but because this cat’s team was so good he smoked the shit out of us. By week 10 it was over. That’s why we went to a system where more than likely the best team won, but there were times where the best record didn’t have the most total points.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:31 PM
Roughly 50% luck and avoiding major injuries, 35% draft and 15% picking up one or two players that become huge assets.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:32 PM
/cracks knuckles
Brady is gonna put up 500 yards and 4 TDs this week to atone for the Pats losing last week.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:33 PM
Yeah…not really. We should, but the only way to do that was just go by total points and we found that to be not as fun as using a head-to-head system. You sacrificed the true winner concept in doing so, though.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:33 PM
I’d rather the team that is best win. We can’t have that in real sports all of the time, but we can in fantasy. I’ve gone 12-2 and lost in the first round before and gone 9-5 and beat a 12-2 and that’s some bullshit. The league I used to be in was a salary capped auction league with stipulations that you had to keep players for 2 years if you bid a certain amount on them. I can’t imagine doing a regular league after that. It’s so much better.
Define best. If you go by “all play” record or total points, then yes. If you are doing head to head, then you may be just rewarding a different type of lucky. The #1 seed in our tournament *should* have been 7-7 but got lucky on matchups from week to week and was the #1 seed coming in. The two teams that are in the finals are the two best based on season totals, but not wins coming into the playoffs.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:33 PM
I had the second most points in my 10 team league this year and finished 5th with a 7-7 record. This season was one big kick in the junk for me.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:33 PM
I always thought that a better way to do it would be to have a weekly matchup of all teams.
In a ten-team league…team with the most points in a week gets 10 points. 2nd most 9 points, and so on. Do it each week…and get total points. YOu can even still do playoffs this way by eliminating the lowest 2 teams each week. That way you eliminate the randomness of going against the tough/easy schedule.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:34 PM
We do that too in my work league. It’s all coworkers, 11 guys and 1 girl, modest buy-in ($25). League winner for the regular season gets their money back, everyone else can earn $5/week for high score. One guy earned his buy-in back with weekly point wins but was only the 3 seed. Rest of the money is divvied up in the playoffs to the Top 3.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:34 PM
First year I did it we did total points. The best team certainly won, but because this cat’s team was so good he smoked the shit out of us. By week 10 it was over. That’s why we went to a system where more than likely the best team won, but there were times where the best record didn’t have the most total points.
sounds like the exact same rationale for a playoff.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:34 PM
This is why “Fantasy Football dude who brags” is so annoying. If your studs go down for extended time you’re pretty much screwed. Or you got lucky in the draft because you picked someone you weren’t thrilled with but who blew up anyway. For me that was Steve Smith maybe 8 years ago when he just blew up for like 1,500 yards and 15 TDs or some shit like that.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:34 PM
Our payment amounts were based on point differential, so the incentive was always there. Plus, it wasn’t winner take all, so there was still some jockeying for a percentage of the pot.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:36 PM
Maybe so, but too often we were seeing the team with the most points and wins losing in the first round due to someone being rested.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:36 PM
I’m not going to lie though, I finished 1st, 1st, 3rd and 1st in my leagues this year. I lost in three of the four last week. It was the most depressed I’ve ever been about fantasy.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:37 PM
and the next year he had his knee destroyed in the first game. I remember because I blew my load and drafted him real high.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:38 PM
Yeah…we were so new to it and were tweaking things here or there. Took us a while to figure out the best way of doing it. I don’t really miss FF though. It made watching games less enjoyable for me.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:39 PM
Maybe so, but too often we were seeing the team with the most points and wins losing in the first round due to someone being rested.
Do you not do seeding in your playoffs? If the team with the best record and most points isn’t playing the lowest qualifier then you’re not doing the playoff right. If the best team loses to the lowest seed it’s difficult to feel sorry for them. Shit happens.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:40 PM
sadly, this post is useless to me.
/pours one out for xmas stole my boner, dick fingerbang, and Miss Turpenis
December 20th, 2012 at 3:41 PM
I think if you’re going to do playoffs, the season should end in week 15, not week 16. So the playoffs start in week 13 (or 12 if you have a lot of teams). So few teams (if any) rest players in week 15.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:41 PM
I thought it was because he wore his Hines Ward jersey and steelers hat on backwards to buffalo wild wings every week and took up an entire table by himself with his laptop and asked for hi-fives from everyone in the restaurant whenever Ray Rice scored a TD.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:41 PM
And I just realized Lisk said the same thing.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:43 PM
Oh man…I laughed out loud because I’ve definitely seen this dude. The best is the guy who’s a fan of Team A, but Team B has one of his players on it, so he’s all, “it’s cool, bro, because I get points when he scores anyway. I just hope my team balls out and wins 50-48.”
December 20th, 2012 at 3:44 PM
Absolutely not. Takes away the clutch factor.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:44 PM
Absolutely not. Takes away the clutch factor.
Something something outlier something something.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:45 PM
Sad, funny, and painfully common.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:47 PM
Clutchtastic
December 20th, 2012 at 3:48 PM
ah, the pre-BCS college football method.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:49 PM
Miz; You happy with Butch Jones as the coach? I think Tenn may have actually made a good hire. It kind of sucks.
December 20th, 2012 at 3:55 PM
I think you make of fantasy football what you want. I honestly don’t get caught up in rooting for things because I can’t control. I’m so busy during games that I don’t check the scores, and I don’t obsess about whether my guy gets stopped at the one or not.
That wasn’t always the case, but I’ve learned to strategize before hand, but not obsess over the minute by minute results.
December 20th, 2012 at 4:02 PM
ah, the pre-BCS college football method.
Beat me to it.
Just goes to prove you can’t please everyone when proving “who’s best”. This is devolving into a bcs thread.
December 20th, 2012 at 4:03 PM
Clutchtastic
Completely awesome, yet underutilized word.
Good job. Good effort.
December 20th, 2012 at 4:40 PM
I guess so. we’ll see after signing day.
December 20th, 2012 at 4:47 PM
I got 3 out of 5 in the top 26. Hooray! Unless you deduct for turnovers, not sure how Brees isn’t there. Now I’ll go back and read the post.
December 20th, 2012 at 5:18 PM
My team:
1. Julio Jones (traded for Brandon Marshall)
3. Doug Martin (drafted)
7. Knowshown Moreno
10. Seattle DEF (drafted)
11. Aaron Hernandez (drafted)
12. Brandon Marshall (Julio Jones trade)
14. AJ Green (drafted)
Others:
Demaryius Thomas (drafted)
Reggie Wayne (drafted)
Marques Colston (drafted)
Andrew Luck (drafted)
Drew Brees (trade Tony Romo)
Matt Forte (trade Mikel Leshoure)
I feel pretty solid about my chances this weekend.
December 20th, 2012 at 5:19 PM
FYI, that team is an auction keeper in a 12-team league. I’d never pull that haul in a redraft crapshoot.