NFC Playoff Picture: Seahawks on a Good Perch, Bears Need To Win
The NFC Playoff Picture is not as clear as the AFC, as three of the divisions are still undetermined, and far more teams are in play with a legitimate shot. Earlier this week, I also broke down the chances of each team in the NFC East. Now, we’ll focus on what each team needs to reach the playoffs or gain a bye.
Atlanta Falcons (11-2): Atlanta still has a 1.5 lead on San Francisco. Win two, and they clinch the #1 seed. Finish 12-4, and San Francisco can pass them, and Green Bay would finish ahead on a tiebreaker (conference record). Atlanta clinches at least a bye with one more win, and a loss by either Green Bay or San Francisco.
San Francisco 49ers (9-3-1): That tie to the Rams is haunting San Francisco. If they had won that game, all they would need is a win over Arizona in week 17 to win the West. It also was no better than a loss going against Green Bay, since they have the head to head tiebreaker, and would have been two games clear of the Packers with a win in that game.
As it stands, San Francisco has to go to both New England and Seattle. They can lose the NFC West by losing both those games, if Seattle wins out. They win it if they can get two more wins. San Francisco clinches a playoff spot with a win, or losses by Washington, Dallas, and Minnesota.
Green Bay Packers (9-4): Green Bay clinches the NFC North with a win at Chicago this week. Green Bay can still get the #1 seed by winning out, Atlanta losing twice, and San Francisco losing once. Even if they lose to Chicago, Green Bay wins the NFC North by winning the last two games (division record). They would clinch a playoff spot next week with a win, if Minnesota loses before their week 17 game.
New York Giants (8-5): I went down the division winning scenarios earlier in the week for the NFC East. New York can get a wildcard at 10-6 going against most competitors based on conference record, because they would be 8-4 in the NFC. They would win against Chicago or Minnesota on a tiebreaker, and could win over Seattle depending on who the remaining loss came against.
They could also win some tiebreakers at 9-7, but would need multiple losses by both Chicago and Seattle, and could not be stuck behind Washington and Dallas in a three team tie in the East.
Seattle Seahawks (8-5): Seattle needs a San Francisco loss at New England and they “control their own destiny” for the NFC West by winning out. Seattle is in pretty good shape by holding head to head wins over Chicago, Dallas, and Minnesota. Seattle would win a common opponents tiebreaker at 10-6 over Washington IF their only remaining loss was to Buffalo, but not if it was in conference. Seattle would likely lose a tiebreaker to New York on conference record at 10-6, though that could change.
Chicago Bears (8-5): The Bears would need to win out, and have Green Bay lose twice to win the division. The Bears would likely lose any tiebreaker with the Packers on either division record or common opponents. Chicago clinches a playoff spot by winning out. They can get in at 10-6, though their conference record in that case (7-5) would leave them vulnerable on a tiebreaker–they would lose to Washington, New York, or Seattle, and probably Minnesota (on division record or common opponents). They have the head to head win over Dallas. Chicago thus should be rooting for Dallas, and for Minnesota to lose a game.
Washington Redskins (7-6): If they win out, and the Giants lose a game, they win the division. Washington is in good shape if they get to 10-6, as they would need either a Bears loss or a Seahawks loss to either San Francisco or St. Louis.
Washington can also win the division or wildcard at 9-7, though the scenarios are too complex to lay out here.
Dallas Cowboys (7-6): Dallas wins the division by getting to 10-6 combined with a Giants loss. Unlike the Redskins, though, their wildcard outlook at 10-6 is not as favorable. They would lose tiebreakers to Seattle and Chicago and would need one of them to get two losses. They would win a common games tiebreaker over Minnesota at 10-6.
Similarly, Dallas can still win the division or wildcard at 9-7, but would be hurting in most tiebreaker scenarios, because it would be less likely that both Seattle and Chicago lose all remaining games.
Minnesota Vikings (7-6): Minnesota can still win the NFC North. It would require winning out, Green Bay losing to the Bears also, and Chicago losing one more game. The Vikings would win on a common games tiebreaker in that case.
Minnesota could get in at 10-6 as a wildcard, by holding the edge over Chicago, but would lose out to Seattle, Washington, or Dallas at 10-6. Minnesota probably needs to win out, as they would be in trouble in many tiebreakers at 9-7.
St. Louis Rams (6-6-1): They need to win out, then get help by others finishing at 9-7 amongst Seattle, Chicago, Dallas, New York, Washington and Minnesota.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers (6-7): Tampa Bay has to win out and needs lots of help. Their conference record will only be 6-6 if they win out, so they will be in trouble in many tiebreakers. The scenarios are complex, but let’s just put it this way: root for teams in front to lose, especially conference games.
New Orleans Saints (5-8): The Saints are technically not eliminated. By my calculations, even if they get to 8-8, they would lose a tiebreaker to the Seahawks (common games), and either Washington (conference record) or Dallas (common games). Basically, the Saints need Chicago to lose every game, and for Dallas and Washington to tie, after already losing two games each, and for no one else to finish better than 8-8 besides Seattle and the Giants.
[photo via USA Today Sports Images]

- John Tortorella And a Ref Dropped F-Bombs On Live TV During the Rangers-Bruins Game [Video]
- LeBron James and Paul George’s Epic Game 1 Battle Looks Even Cooler in Slow Motion [Video]
- Manchester City Players Were Super Excited To Catch Passes From Eli Manning [Video]
- Miami Heat Remix of Pitbull’s “Feel This Moment?” Dále!
- Buffalo Bills Fan Has O.J. Simpson Mug Shot Tattoo on His Thigh

- orly57 on John Tortorella And a Ref Dropped F-Bombs On Live TV During the Rangers-Bruins Game [Video]
- yorwifesahor on Buffalo Bills Fan Has O.J. Simpson Mug Shot Tattoo on His Thigh
- Nada on Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago's Sarah Spain
- Nada on Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago's Sarah Spain
- A.P. on Buffalo Bills Fan Has O.J. Simpson Mug Shot Tattoo on His Thigh
74 Responses to “NFC Playoff Picture: Seahawks on a Good Perch, Bears Need To Win”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







December 13th, 2012 at 1:46 PM
Hmmm, a playoff sceanrio where the regular season matters? GTFO.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:49 PM
I feel like the Saints were added to this list just to prevent a non-sensical comment from Breesus.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:49 PM
Enjoy that extra hyphen.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:49 PM
last call, Milk Steak.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:50 PM
A home playoff game for the Redskins would be just awesome. Go Skins
/Vikings are dunzo
December 13th, 2012 at 1:50 PM
I will, Herman Zweibel.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:51 PM
God damn you Lions. Such garbage. At least the locals are starting to turn on Stafford a bit. I was just ahead of the curve.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:54 PM
According to my research, the Cardinals are eliminated from playoff contention.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:54 PM
Vlad, how angry will you be when the Cardinals out suck the Lions on Sunday?
December 13th, 2012 at 1:55 PM
I hope it doesn’t get to Sanchez levels, in which the masses so love bashing the qb that they understate the other, more meaningful issues with the team
December 13th, 2012 at 1:55 PM
Hmmm, a playoff sceanrio where the regular season matters? GTFO.
How many AFC games at the end of the year are going to have the scrubs in all game because the Divisions and seeds are all locked up?
/I see your point though, just curious
December 13th, 2012 at 1:55 PM
My sportsbook:
Y, GIANTS MAKE PLAYOFFS -320
N, GIANTS MAKE PLAYOFFS +240
Y, BEARS MAKE PLAYOFFS -160
N, BEARS MAKE PLAYOFFS +130
Y, SEAHAWKS MAKE PLAYOFFS -320
N, SEAHAWKS MAKE PLAYOFFS +220
Y, STEELERS MAKE PLAYOFFS -300
N, STEELERS MAKE PLAYOFFS +220
Y, BENGALS MAKE PLAYOFFS +190
N, BENGALS MAKE PLAYOFFS -250
December 13th, 2012 at 1:56 PM
I just dislike those last 2 weeks in the NFL that seem to have a ton of crappy games because teams that have clinched don’t want to show anything.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:56 PM
I could see the Lions easily winning like 42-14.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:58 PM
It won’t. I still believe Stafford has a ton of talent and ability. He’s just regressed this year. A lot of other major and more important issues on the team.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:58 PM
I so wish that I could have somebody link to my awesome comment that the Redskins weren’t dead because their schedule wasn’t, in fact, particularly tough. I was so smart and right that day, almost by accident.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:58 PM
How are the Cardinals going to score 14?
December 13th, 2012 at 1:58 PM
last call, Milk Steak.
this is an obvious attempt to procure a last call
December 13th, 2012 at 1:59 PM
Punt return and pick 6.
December 13th, 2012 at 1:59 PM
Wrong.
David Akers is haunting San Francisco.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:01 PM
OK. That actually makes sense. O/U on Cardinals total offense (no return yards) Sunday has to be around 125, and I’ll take the under.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:01 PM
It’s not too pervasive. Teams are still vying for seeding. It effects only a couple of games at most.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:02 PM
Best bet on the board
December 13th, 2012 at 2:02 PM
As horrendous as the cardinals are, it wouldn’t surprise me if the Lions some how lost this game.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:02 PM
Well done by the NFL flexing in the Seahawk-49er game, wasn’t sure if they were going to make it so that somehow the Eagles were on national TV again
December 13th, 2012 at 2:03 PM
It’s not too pervasive. Teams are still vying for seeding. It effects only a couple of games at most.
Probably. The ones that do happen just leave a bad taste in my mouth. They also make Matt Flynn piles of money.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:05 PM
I couldn’t trust the Lions defense to even grab them for the fantasy playoffs this week. I had the chance to grab the under on the Lions wins in Vegas back in August and I passed. Ugh.
I think it was at 9 or 9 1/2.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Cardinals have no chance of winning this game. They lost to Atlanta when they were plus 5 in turnovers. They lost to the JETS when they let up 7 points and had 4 takeaways. They lost 58-0 last week.
/Lions win and cover easily
December 13th, 2012 at 2:07 PM
I’m sorry for this. I really didn’t think they would suck this badly.
Just hoping AJ Green goes off on the overrated shitty secondary tonight. 100+ yds and 2 TDs would be sweet.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Didn’t the Cardinals start 4-0? How did that happen?
December 13th, 2012 at 2:07 PM
I was gonna try and upgrade from the Packers D, since I’ve just been streaming Ds all year, but then remembered that they were playing the Bears. Ought to be good for about 19 sacks.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:08 PM
Last three games are going to be tougher than they look midseason. Browns are playing well, Dallas will probably still be in the hunt mathematically, and the Eagles showed some life last week. Plus there’s the RG3 knee situation
December 13th, 2012 at 2:10 PM
I feel like the Saints were added to this list just to prevent a non-sensical comment from Breesus.
nah, lisk can see nada turning the lamp on and off, on and off
December 13th, 2012 at 2:10 PM
Clay Matthews really seems to enjoy sacking Jay Cutler, will be good to have him back
December 13th, 2012 at 2:10 PM
Last three games are going to be tougher than they look midseason.
Perhaps so, but I think the schedule portion in question has already passed.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:11 PM
N, BEARS MAKE PLAYOFFS +130
throw the paycheck at this. there is a rotten aura to this team
December 13th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
Seattle dropped a pass in the end zone for the winning TD in the last minute, NE missed a chip shot with time running out, they got lucky against Miami, and took advantage of Michael Vick’s turnover machine.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
As you say at the outset, they need to win. I think they are absolutely still in play to lose out. Split the difference, they lose both division games while beating AZ and are still left outside looking in.
Basically what I’m saying is that I think Chicago’s, and by combination Lovie Smith’s, goose is cooked. Weird how fast the season started to swirl the drain after that loss in the monsoon to Houston.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:16 PM
When the success of your football team is centered around the defense scoring, you’re gonna have a bad time
December 13th, 2012 at 2:17 PM
i was so excited as a lukewarm bears fan about this offense. bush, marshall, forte…knowing that the team was 7-3 and high scoring last season before cutler got hurt even with that bad o-line
the preponderance of marshall targets and drop off of other wideouts, lack of a dependable TE, and that line, married to tice’s playcalling was not foreseen, at least not by my limited stategic/scouting mind
December 13th, 2012 at 2:18 PM
When the success of your football team is centered around the defense scoring, you’re gonna have a bad time
I was led to believe by Herm Edwards that that was a strength.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:20 PM
I do think they need to say goodbye to Lovie and start fresh, feels like the Bears will always be stuck where they currently are in the NFC pecking order…that’s a franchise that needs an offensive minded head coach in the worst way, preferably Mike Tice
December 13th, 2012 at 2:22 PM
preferably Mike Tice
i for one see what you did there
December 13th, 2012 at 2:23 PM
I’m hoping they can somehow pry Marty Mornhinweg away from the Eagles.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:23 PM
There’s your problem. Switch on this thing was set to Tice.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:24 PM
Offense posted 2.5 TDs per game through 8 weeks though. Now? It’s 1.2. Offense has swooned just as much as defense isn’t forcing turnovers. They should have posted more than 14 points against both Seattle and the Vikings in the dome. Missed a handful of chances to score more.
I’m not disagreeing that the defense was being relied upon too much, just noting that the offense has hit the skids in the last 4-5 weeks.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:24 PM
preferably Mike Tice
Jay Cutler gives this a ringing endorsement.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:24 PM
cam cam is available
December 13th, 2012 at 2:26 PM
There’s your problem. Switch on this thing was set to Tice.
just figured the talent would overcome that. i thought cutler being able to change calls would be a factor too
December 13th, 2012 at 2:26 PM
Can we get a post on Hamilton going to LAA, please? That is some serious news. Would like to discuss with the baseball minds.
Please and thank you.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Yea, Packers is automatic loss. Jump on this while its hot
December 13th, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Can we get a post on Hamilton going to LAA, please? That is some serious news. Would like to discuss with the baseball minds.
Link please.
So the Rangers lost out on Greinke and couldn’t hold onto Hamilton? Looks like Jon Daniels was getting a little too cute with his free agent work.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:27 PM
I presume Carolina is omitted because they’ve already locked up the top seed, yes?
/I kid, I kid
December 13th, 2012 at 2:28 PM
Get a Twitter. Trying to be helpful, not a dick. Jon Morosi is reporting it though.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
True, also didn’t help that their schedule got a lot tougher…it’s like their’s and the Packer schedules were inverses of each other
December 13th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
It’s also worth mentioning that Cutler was surrounded by offensive talent in Denver and still did a lot of the same shit to the same result.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Nevermind, found a link: http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/mlb/story/_/id/8744414/josh-hamilton-agreed-deal-angels-source-says
5 years $25 million per year? Well it’s not quite Gary Matthews Jr. stupid….but I’d have done everything I could as a club to make that fifth year an option.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Has the Rob Parker thing not been mentioned in a post here yet? Afternoon Duffy joint on it coming? Seems like it’s right in your guys’ wheelhouse.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
And the Astros are super fucked, not that they already weren’t. Also, please trade Peter Bourjos to the Cubs.
Signed,
Thedson McHoystein
December 13th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Get a Twitter.
No thanks.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:30 PM
The diabetic Jeff George
December 13th, 2012 at 2:30 PM
Herm Edwards
espn needs to stick him and chris carter in a small, small room and let them yell nonsense at each other until they both expire.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:30 PM
And the Astros are super fucked, not that they already weren’t.
Not really. We were already going to finish last in the division next year anyway. This, if anything, spreads the talent around the division more rather than concentrating it on one team like the Rangers.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
Didn’t the Cardinals start 4-0? How did that happen?
They beat the freakin’ Patriots.
/Changes mind. NE will win it all this year.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
December 13th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
Yes please.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
I’m about to head to my office’s holiday party and so won’t be around to defend this, but I’m going on record as this being a bad contract. Go ahead, laugh away.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:33 PM
Not in 2013, 2014 or 2015. After that? Probably. But the Angels just made a dynamic move to take away a key piece of a division rival all while throwing up a big fuck you to the Dodgers for stealing that Orange County limelight all winter.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:33 PM
I particularly enjoyed 2008, or 9, where they lost like the last 4 games of the year to lose a 3 game lead.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
angels with some shiny new tv money no?
December 13th, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Moreno don’t mind spending money.
Upgrade over Hunter. Between him and Trout, they will make up a lot of the offense you don’t get from Wells, either. I like Hamilton’s game. Stay healthy, stay sober. He’ll be fine.
The Angels making up ground in the division. Between them, the Swingin’ A’s and the Rangers, I’m looking forward to following the AL West all season.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:36 PM
Wait, when did I become a Saints fan again?
December 13th, 2012 at 2:37 PM
Oops, on both counts.
December 13th, 2012 at 2:39 PM
In retrospect one of the better things to happen to the franchise. Sure, we had to put up with bumbling cheater Josh McDaniels calling 39 bubble screens a game, but it got us to Elway-Fox-Manning.
Shanahan would have been pounding his dick into that blender for infinity.