Comments on: The Morning After: Alabama Outlasted Georgia, Wisconsin Smoked Nebraska, Stanford Just Getting Started

By: Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce

Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:20:02 +0000

All of Oregon’s shady financial and cannibolical advantages aside, agreed that when USC is off the scholarship reduction there is zero reason why they shouldn’t be a level above Oregon still.

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:17:14 +0000

Eugene isn’t surrounded by ghetto, though. Also has better drugs.

First part is true, second most certainly is not.

By: Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce

Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:14:56 +0000

As soon as the Nike flow ends the NCAA takes Oregon out back and shoots it.

By: Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce

Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:13:45 +0000

Eugene isn’t surrounded by ghetto, though. Also has better drugs.

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:13:14 +0000

Sweet jebus you’re right, USC has over 80 CA players.
And still fucking sucks though.

Lane Kiffin. That is all.

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:12:41 +0000

Oregon still won’t be able to compete with SC when SC is right. They don’t have the fan base, recruiting ground, history, location, quality of school, or quality of girl to do so.

By: Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce

Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:12:28 +0000

Sweet jebus you’re right, USC has over 80 CA players.

And still fucking sucks though.

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:11:00 +0000

Oregon is operating in a different manner than they have historically. Phil Knight is the ultimate super-booster. They aren’t dependent on a weak anything anymore. Ever since Rich Brooks rode Dino Philyaw to a flukey Rose Bowl, Phil Knight has had it in his head that his alma mater, Nike U, has got to be a super-power. He spends on the facilities there like he’s a pro owner. There is no reason to think that will end any time soon.

I understand this. That isn’t a durable model though. The program will die with Knight.

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:09:19 +0000

Stanford currently has 42 players on their roster from California.

That’s a low number. Compare it to SC, UCLA, and Cal.

By: JayhawkerJ

JayhawkerJ — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:08:44 +0000

Look where Florida and Norte Dame are now, Weis goes through you’re program and you’re an instant powerhouse. We’ve had our time with him, I think Colorado might buy him out for next season before sending him somewhere else…I’ll see you all at the title game next year.

/noticed a pattern

By: Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce

Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:07:32 +0000

Stanford doesn’t get that many of their players from California.

Stanford currently has 42 players on their roster from California.

By: Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce

Cowboy Mike's Old Original Red Hot Ricochet Barbeque Sauce — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:03:52 +0000

So does NIU all depend on the computer polls and whatnot now?

By: starkweather

starkweather — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 18:03:06 +0000

Oregon is operating in a different manner than they have historically. Phil Knight is the ultimate super-booster. They aren’t dependent on a weak anything anymore. Ever since Rich Brooks rode Dino Philyaw to a flukey Rose Bowl, Phil Knight has had it in his head that his alma mater, Nike U, has got to be a super-power. He spends on the facilities there like he’s a pro owner. There is no reason to think that will end any time soon.

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:55:19 +0000

I should also say SC gets all the top players from Washington, Oregon, Arizona, Colorado, and of course California when they are up.

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:52:36 +0000

This! … is not true. There is enough talent in the state for UCLA, USC, and Stanford to all be PAC contenders every year. Oregon and UW can also be strong, at the same time. Theoretically, so could Colorado.

No. Stanford doesn’t get that many of their players from California. It is one of the few national recruiting programs, but they only have serious appeal when they can compete to win the PAC12, which can NEVER happen when SC has a legitimate coach in place. UCLA can compete at a respectable level, and I don’t dispute that. UW is one of the few naturally strong programs in conference as well. Oregon and Colorado however, are both dependent on having excellent coaches and weak programs in the out of state areas they recruit. Oregon now is a cheating anomaly.

By: stronger15

stronger15 — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:49:44 +0000

9 of Stanford’s 13 games were against teams that were ranked this year… 4 of Georgia’s were (that includes Tennessee).

fuck the SEC

By: starkweather

starkweather — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:38:52 +0000

Stanford can only function as a strong program when SC is very, very down.

This! … is not true. There is enough talent in the state for UCLA, USC, and Stanford to all be PAC contenders every year. Oregon and UW can also be strong, at the same time. Theoretically, so could Colorado.

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:25:42 +0000

Stanford can only function as a strong program when SC is very, very down. Though I suppose that could be said of nearly any PAC12 program that doesn’t have Phil Knight buying them recruits on a national scale. UCLA, ASU, and UW have a tad more self-determination than the rest, but not much.

By: roastbeast

roastbeast — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:25:13 +0000

Anyone seen Killing Me Softly yet? Going tonight

By: sctrojans

sctrojans — Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:21:37 +0000

Shaw has inherited what Harbaugh built and is expanding it. The program may have a trifling number of fans, but, in the television revenue era, who cares?

Nobody cares. That’s the point.