Canada: Punt Returner Punts Ball, Team Recovers for a Touchdown
Is this legal? According to the YouTube comments, yes.
Yes it is legal. There were five players behind the punter (on the returning team) when we punted it back, and therefore they were “onside.”
According to Prep Rally once the football travels 10 yards on a punt, it is a free ball, the same as a kickoff.
However, in a nod to rugby, Canadian football holds that on scrimmage kicks (i.e., punts and missed field goals), the returning team can respond by immediately punting the ball back to the other team, creating a free-for-all where whichever team gets to the ball first will retain possession.
Canada! Am I right?

- Alex Sanabia of the Marlins Caught Throwing a Spitball Against the Phillies [GIF]
- Jim Boeheim: Carmelo Will Never Win a Title with These Knicks Because His Teammates Suck
- Andre Ethier Acted Like a Tough Guy, Gave Death Stare to an Umpire After Getting Ejected [GIF]
- Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
- Jalen Rose Leaving Numbers Never Lie, Jemele Hill in as New Co-Host

- rittyrich on Alex Sanabia of the Marlins Caught Throwing a Spitball Against the Phillies [GIF]
- cracker jack on Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
- scripty on Alex Sanabia of the Marlins Caught Throwing a Spitball Against the Phillies [GIF]
- Tha_Boogey_Man on Jim Boeheim: Carmelo Will Never Win a Title with These Knicks Because His Teammates Suck
- cracker jack on Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
22 Responses to “Canada: Punt Returner Punts Ball, Team Recovers for a Touchdown”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






November 16th, 2012 at 2:26 PM
#freejimmer
November 16th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Canadian football holds that on scrimmage kicks (i.e., punts and missed field goals), the returning team can respond by immediately punting the ball back to the other team, creating a free-for-all where whichever team gets to the ball first will retain possession.
That’s awesome
November 16th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
Yes it is legal. There were five players behind the punter (on the returning team) when we punted it back, and therefore they were “onside.”
That makes no sense to me, but hey, chaos!
November 16th, 2012 at 2:32 PM
Deadspin had this this morning and a reader said you can even do it on completed passes and such. Of course there’s almost zero chance you would get the ball after punting a completion, but at the end of games instead of the lateral play they may kick it and try to get it first.
Wild.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:32 PM
So is this Soccer Baseball?
November 16th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
We did this a couple of times when I played in high school. There’s also some kind of weird rule about being able to drop-kick field goals mid-play. I have to look it up.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:38 PM
Didn’t the Hoodie have Doug Flutie do that?
November 16th, 2012 at 2:39 PM
Yup. Converted an extra point.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
From the ESPN article
So it’s no benefit at all really.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:42 PM
I believe that was an extra point. I’m talking about running a regular offensive play, advancing the ball and then drop kicking a field goal before being tackled.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:53 PM
I believe that was an extra point. I’m talking about running a regular offensive play, advancing the ball and then drop kicking a field goal before being tackled.
Like rugby
November 16th, 2012 at 2:54 PM
Of course there’s almost zero chance you would get the ball after punting a completion,
why would there be zero chance of beating defenders to a kicked ball in the secondary? They’re chasing you, and you kick the ball ( a la rugby) and you know where it’s going.
Or, you could kick it, and have a trailing teammate chase it down or something.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:54 PM
So it’s no benefit at all really.
Going to need to see some p-factor figures before I believe your argument.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:54 PM
Like rugby
exactly. That’s exactly like rugby. And rugby is awesome.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:57 PM
I think it’d be worth 3 if you do it during a timed down, right?
Didn’t you hear, it’s all about Bayes facotrs and likelihood ratios… p-values are old news, because they refer only to false-positive rates on null data.
November 16th, 2012 at 2:58 PM
Good friend from home played for a college that played the team where I went. They get made fun of a lot, but those dudes are warriors. The hits I saw from that one match alone. Guy separated his shoulder and just got up like nothing
November 16th, 2012 at 2:58 PM
Would anyone make any drastic changes to (NFL) football if they could? Drop kicks, recovering punts, rounder balls etc?
November 16th, 2012 at 3:01 PM
Would anyone make any drastic changes to (NFL) football if they could?
1. Fewer tv timeouts
2. Shorter reviews
3. No Gus Johnson
November 16th, 2012 at 3:02 PM
Didn’t you hear, it’s all about Bayes facotrs and likelihood ratios… p-values are old news, because they refer only to false-positive rates on null data.
My cat’s breath smells like cat food.
November 16th, 2012 at 3:02 PM
Is Chase Thomas a prospect for Stanford? Just saw a post about the game tomorrow, and all I remember from the UO/SU game last year was him cheating inside as an end on every fucking play, and the Oregon back running clear to the outside. He gave them the edge all 2nd half. I don’t think this game will be very close.
November 16th, 2012 at 3:02 PM
3. No Gus Johnson
Racist.
November 16th, 2012 at 3:05 PM
True. Didn’t think about that. I was thinking more the safety would have a huge head start on the ball. But not always the case obviously.