Deferring the Coin Flip: Maybe It Is Not a Toss Up Decision
A flip of the coin may be deciding games, but not in the way that you imagine. Jim Trotter at Sports Illustrated did a story on the choice of taking the ball first or deferring to the second half. The evidence suggests that coaches may want to consider deferring more often, so that they get more second half possessions.
Coaches seem to be divided on the topic of whether they want to get the ball first to start the game, or to defer to the second half, and then choose to start with the ball after halftime. Through last weekend’s games, coaches are opting to defer to the second half when winning the toss 51.3% of the time in 2012, and that is up from 41.8% of the time last year.
Is there justification for that increase? Trotter presents the numbers:
The difference of opinions could be traced to no direct correlation between the outcome of games and the decision on whether to receive the opening kickoff or defer. Since the start of the 2010 season, flip-winning clubs that have opted to receive first are 185-209 (.470), versus 140-115 (.549) for those deferring.
Often, we take small sample sizes in sports and draw big conclusions. Here, Trotter is being too conservative, though. Add those games up, and we have 649 events. The team starting the game with the ball after winning the toss has won 47% of the time. The team starting the game with the ball after the opponent won the toss but deferred has won 45.1% of the time (this assumes that no one chose to kick after an opponent deferred, and I don’t recall anyone doing that). Combined, teams starting with the ball at the beginning of the game have won 46.2% of games.
Now, if you had an actual coin that you were testing, and after 649 tests, heads was coming up only 46.2% of the time, you might have a problem with the coin. The p-value is 3%, meaning it is statistically significant at the 5% level, the most commonly accepted value for statistical significance.
There’s an actual reason to think that having the ball to start the second half is an advantage. It’s the same philosophy as to why a college team would prefer to have the ball last in overtime, on a much more diluted scale. You have a better idea of what you need in the second half, and will always have at least as many possessions as your opponent.
The team that starts each half with the ball will have either the same number, or one additional possession. In the first half, teams are more likely to waste this possession than in the second half. You get the ball with a minute left in the first half, in a close game, deep in your own territory? How aggressive are you? Maybe, but maybe not, and you just take a knee or run some plays to end the half before having to punt back.
In the second half, you know what you need more clearly, and act accordingly.
Of course, just because the results are statistically significant doesn’t mean that starting the second half is that big an advantage. Maybe the better teams, for reasons other than the coin flip and when they have the ball, happen to be starting in the second half more.
Bill Belichick, for example, has deferred every single time (33 of 33) he has had the option since opening day of 2008, when the rule change allowing deferrals was implemented to match the college rule. Perhaps he is superstitious after starting that game with the ball where Brady got injured. Perhaps he believes it is a strategic advantage, and Belichick will take any small advantage he can find.
Here are the teams who have always chosen to receive when winning the toss this year: Chargers, Chiefs, Jaguars, Lions, Saints and Texans. Those teams are a combined 22-33 this year, and for teams like the Jaguars and Chiefs, had they chosen the opposite, well, they weren’t going to change their fortunes.
Here are the teams who have always deferred in 2012: Bears, Bengals, Buccaneers, Cardinals, Patriots, Redskins and Seahawks. Those teams are a combined 35-29.
[photo via US Presswire]

- Angels Fans Demonstrates Why You Shouldn’t Try to Catch a Baseball With a Full Beer – Beer Explosion!
- Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn’t Try and Play
- Justin Verlander Not Sharp Again, But Detroit Fans Don’t Need to Panic
- A Russell Wilson Song Set to an Old Dolly Parton Hit? Yes, It’s “Russie” [Video]
- J.J. Watt Visits Kid With Leukemia Who Uses a Robot Named “Watt” to Go To School

- orly57 on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
- orly57 on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
- resolutedefense on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
- BlackDynamite on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
- orly57 on Bradley Beal Seems to Have Lost a Little Respect for Derrick Rose Because He Didn't Try and Play
41 Responses to “Deferring the Coin Flip: Maybe It Is Not a Toss Up Decision”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






November 15th, 2012 at 2:07 PM
Hue Jackson last year…but I am pretty sure it was a preseason game, and I am not entirely convinced he knew the rule.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:11 PM
I believe he’s mentioned before, one advantage he sees is the opportunity to score twice without having to give the ball back to the other offense, being a huge momentum turner. Scoring at the end of the 1st half then scoring to open the 2nd half.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:12 PM
Just the mental aspect of it espeically if you score before the end of the half and get to start with the ball in the 3rd quarter. It’s a huge momentum builder.
McCarthy usually liked to “set the tone” last year and chose to receive if GB won the toss. This year he’s deferred quite a bit more.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:12 PM
Take the ball first, surprise onside to start the 2nd half.
/Butters
November 15th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
/tips hat to CJ
November 15th, 2012 at 2:16 PM
If you have a horrific defense like New Orleans, Buffalo or Oakland, it always makes more sense to take the ball to start the game lest you risk being down before your offense sees the field, right?
November 15th, 2012 at 2:17 PM
Kubiak always takes the ball if he wins the toss. Given that the clear strength of this team is defense, I think it’s the wrong call. Though I have no idea what the stats look like this year for the Texans’ initial drives. Seems like they’ve gotten off to a few slow starts though.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:19 PM
Jerome Bettis thinks this is bullshit.
/didn’t read post
November 15th, 2012 at 2:20 PM
Soon-to-be Eagles head coach Marty Mornhinweg will change that.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:21 PM
If you have a horrific defense like New Orleans, Buffalo or Oakland, it always makes more sense to take the ball to start the game lest you risk being down before your offense sees the field, right?
If you are going balls to the wall and will treat your last possession of the first half like a must score as well, then maybe.
We don’t know how many possessions there will be, but it’s usually somewhere between 8 and 12. Unless you buy that a team gets down psychologically, there is no advantage to going first if you always get a chance to respond.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Oakland has scored in the final 2 minutes of the first half in every game this year.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Jim Schwartz loves to just give up with a couple minutes left in the half when he’s losing and gets possession of the ball.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Aside from issues of “momentum” and what not, isn’t it advantageous to know what adjustments need to be made and then have an extra possession? I would think that’s more the key
November 15th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
I dunno…but my perception is that Kubiak’s first 15 (scripted) plays are pretty successful. It would take too much effort for me to compare their points per drive, and compare that to other drives from similar field position, but my guess is the scripted plays have more success.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
I remember some Denny Green Vikings teams (post-Dungy) that would defer “to send a message.” That message apparently was “We want to be down 7-0 to start this game.”
November 15th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
/takes knee to end the half
November 15th, 2012 at 2:32 PM
I’ve never understood scripted plays…I know Bill Walsh did it, and he was a mastermind of sorts. However, down and distance always seems to be more important than the script.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:32 PM
Someone fucking gets it…although in the Flynn game at NE they deferred and went surprise onside to start the game, brilliance
Surprised the Packers haven’t deferred each time it’s been their call, seems like they do
November 15th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
Admittedly, I don’t know how closely Kubiak sticks to that “script”, nor how much it’s affected by down/distance. He does seem to make a point to go deep more during the scripted portion, and my sense is that he throws more often in general before settling into “pound with Arian” mode.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:36 PM
golf first, dvr later.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:38 PM
Couple years ago in flag football league, this dude on our team went to do the coin flip because our captain was a little late showing up. Our team wins the flip and he says “we want to kick”, thinking we would automatically receive in the second half. We ended up kicking off in the first and second half.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
take the ball in NFL. Defer in college.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Did you follow him home that night and flog him in his sleep with socks full of bars of soap a la Full Metal Jacket?
November 15th, 2012 at 2:41 PM
I’ve never understood scripted plays…I know Bill Walsh did it, and he was a mastermind of sorts. However, down and distance always seems to be more important than the script.
Because I am now an expert based on being offensive coordinator for flag football, who semi-scripted his early plays, I would say:
1) plays may also be scripted for scenarios and a coach may not always follow a straight “this is play 7″ plan– I often went in knowing that I wanted to run certain plays early, but also had a game plan for which plays I would run in 3rd or 4th down situations.
2) things move fast in a game, and sometimes you miss a strategy point. I planned out my start, by calling certain plays in sequence, to see how the defense reacted. Off tackle run to the up back, followed by fake off tackle run, play action pass behind it, followed by fake off tackle run, counter run other direction to deep back. I would then see how they were defending those to use in my play calling going forward.
3) scripting allows you to game plan areas of emphasis early in a game.
3)
November 15th, 2012 at 2:43 PM
No, we just mocked him mercilessly.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:43 PM
scripting plays also improves execution since there’s less time thinking about adjustments…perfect execution will beat the perfectly designed defense just about every time.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:44 PM
Oh, and I would say also that in the heat of the moment, you may actually fall back on tendencies, always throw left on third down, always go to your favorite play, whatever.
Scripting allows you to self-scout ahead of time and consciously plan to counteract some of your own tendencies under pressure, and do so in a way that shows the opponent something different that you then can go to your favorite call later, and it doesn’t seem patterned.
Anyway, those are my thoughts.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:44 PM
liked em braj.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:44 PM
I really think Kubiak uses it not just as Lisk described (to see what they do), but equally to affect what they do (back the safeties off, etc.) in addition to just trying to exploit some hole he’s seen.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:45 PM
I always thought scripting plays was more about seeing what looks the defense would give you against various formations/motions. I also don’t think they’re set in stone (except may 1st and 2nd down) – no Bama X-Cross 34 Lead Dive on 3rd and 8 – the coach had a few plays for distance.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:45 PM
That second 3) better be good, Lisk. You’re killing me with the cliffhanger
November 15th, 2012 at 2:46 PM
Our team wins the flip and he says “we want to kick”, thinking we would automatically receive in the second half.
That happened to Miami once a long time ago. I want to say it was in the Butch Davis years and it cost them the game (maybe one of the Washington games?) but I am prepared to be wrong about that.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:47 PM
i think it’s also fair to say that it was easier to script plays in walsh’s era when defenses weren’t throwing exotic pre-snap looks and zone-blitzes in there all the time.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:48 PM
I really miss the Jeff Garcia/Jon Gruden days in Tampa when Garcia would fuck up all of Gruden’s meticulous planning every game. “Would you shut the fuck up and quit audibling all the time, Mr. Hero?”
November 15th, 2012 at 2:48 PM
They need to make another ‘NFL Head Coach’ game.
November 15th, 2012 at 2:51 PM
That also happened, I think in overtime, in a windy AFL championship game where someone won the coin toss and said something like “We want to kick to that end.” and the ref had to take that as a desire to kick off.
November 15th, 2012 at 3:35 PM
Nice job.
What about just that 2nd half possessions are more valuable because you can make adjustments? Is that a thing?
November 15th, 2012 at 3:39 PM
I just had a really interesting talk at lunch about p-values (false positive on null data), false-discovery and likelihood ratios… I’ll spare the details, but apparently p-values aren’t so great any more, and you need even greater statistical computation to really determine probability of significance.
November 15th, 2012 at 3:40 PM
p-values? you don’t…ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
/uncalled for
November 15th, 2012 at 3:47 PM
Hey Lisk, how did you come up with that value? Did you use a Chi square?
November 15th, 2012 at 4:59 PM
In addition to the advantages listed above, there might be another factor. Better teams are more confident and may be more willing to give up the chance to score first. On the other hand, teams that suck have less confidence and: a) may be worried about falling behind early; and/or b) are more likely to feel like they need to make “an early statement.”