special forces and delta force rode horses in alongside the northern alliance in afghanistan

Horses and bayonettes sure worked well for the Polish Army against the German Army.

I don’t just hold the party line no matter what like most of the liberals do

That’s great that you don’t only vote R but let’s not act like liberals are the only ones who vote strictly down party lines

special forces and delta force rode horses in alongside the northern alliance in afghanistan

Future Al Jazeera Headline:
“Drone horses armed with bayonets decimate orphanage at India-Pakistan border”

It’s not what you spend but what you spend it on…hippie.

Horses and bayonets?

I think it was Dennis Miller who said that they could have used some horses and bayonets at the Embassy a few weeks ago.

Like 2 wars, rich tax cuts and taking a surplus into a deficit like a real cowboy all of which I’m sure you ardently opposed.

Yep, Bush sucked. I agree. That’s why I voted for Kerry. I don’t just hold the party line no matter what like most of the liberals do, especially the ones who won’t acknowlege Clinton’s hand in destroying the American economy.

It’s not what you spend but what you spend it on…hippie.

Horses and bayonets?

It’s not what you spend but what you spend it on…hippie.

Like 2 wars, rich tax cuts and taking a surplus into a deficit like a real cowboy all of which I’m sure you ardently opposed.

Yeah I’ll keep taking acid, banging chicks with sub-par hygiene and dreaming that Obama spending rate at 1.4% is the lowest since fucking Eisenhower.

It’s not what you spend but what you spend it on…hippie.

Soused and Queefer fall into one of these categories. I’ll call them hippies to be nice.

Yeah I’ll keep taking acid, banging chicks with sub-par hygiene and dreaming that Obama spending rate at 1.4% is the lowest since fucking Eisenhower.

So, if these supposed conspiring businesses didn’t need to hire in 4 years under Obama

Not a conspiracy, just a fact. Businesses and business leaders hate giving money to the government. They risk going to jail to avoid it. Stupid, I know. But a fact nonetheless.

Once Obama wins re-election, this obstruction in the House loses power. Obama not having to worry about another election while many of these same Congressmen have to worry about the mid term elections will create more willingness to work.

Maybe, maybe not. If the economy continues to falter, it just makes BO look worse and the opposing party look better. I hope they do look to work together but Washington is so broken that I have my doubts.

sure, for a fuckface

/dick move

The trouble with him more than anything else, is that business leaders hate him. And they will win in the end. They can wait out another 4 years while The Chosen One pisses away more money running up the debt and tries to get everyone to pay their fair share. They’ll continue to sit on their reserves, they won’t hire and try to grow their businesses, and the country loses

The problem with this scenario is twofold. Business isn’t in the work of hiring people for the public good. They hire for need. So, if these supposed conspiring businesses didn’t need to hire in 4 years under Obama, they aren’t going to suddenly start hiring because they supposedly have a friend in the White House. 2. Once Obama wins re-election, this obstruction in the House loses power. Obama not having to worry about another election while many of these same Congressmen have to worry about the mid term elections will create more willingness to work.

just asking, no need to be a dickbag. You presented a scenario where “business leaders” are conspiring to do harm to the nation as a whole because they do not like the president. And this is a scenario you are ok with?

Sorry, didn’t mean to be an ass. No, in a perfect world things would be alot better. But dreaming of a perfect world is for hippies and idiots. Soused and Queefer fall into one of these categories. I’ll call them hippies to be nice.

Both. But that’s the capitalist system. If you don’t like it, feel free to leave. Europe is lovely. Of course, you may find things even worse over there.

just asking, no need to be a dickbag. You presented a scenario where “business leaders” are conspiring to do harm to the nation as a whole because they do not like the president. And this is a scenario you are ok with?

You see, Soc***ism just doesn’t work.

We all so it going there, ladies and gentlemen your informed GOP voter.

What is wrong with you? First off, you sound like an infected gash. Second, I live in PA and its certainly not generous with UC. In fact, having been on both sides of the table, I can tell you that its difficult for employees to simply get a check for no reason.

Don’t know what to tell you other than you’re wrong.

I just used the Google machine and read the pertinent Pennsylvania regulation. It’s there, you just need to do a better job documenting your reasons.

so who really is the bad guy in that hypothetical? The president or the business leaders who “hate him”?

Both. But that’s the capitalist system. If you don’t like it, feel free to leave. Europe is lovely. Of course, you may find things even worse over there.

The trouble with him more than anything else, is that business leaders hate him. And they will win in the end. They can wait out another 4 years while The Chosen One pisses away more money running up the debt and tries to get everyone to pay their fair share. They’ll continue to sit on their reserves, they won’t hire and try to grow their businesses, and the country loses

so who really is the bad guy in that hypothetical? The president or the business leaders who “hate him”?