Replacement Referees and Home Field Advantage: It’s Been Almost Eight Points a Game Through Two Weeks
I’ve spent a fair amount of time over the years thinking about home field advantage in football. It’s a complex, and real, phenomenon. It is not uniform, and it may change from week to week depending on things like the opponent and their familiarity with your venue, the particular strengths and weaknesses of both teams, weather changes (when applicable), and yes, even the officials.
The impact of the officials, though, has been relatively small in the NFL, at least compared to some other sports like basketball. I’m not saying it doesn’t exist or occasionally there aren’t calls in favor of the home team–just that they make up a fairly small portion of the broad concept we call home field advantage in the NFL, probably no more than 15%.
My interest was piqued, though, by a couple of observations by Chase Stuart of Football Perspective this week. First, he notes that 14 of the 16 home teams won this week, the first time since the league expanded in 2002 that many home teams have won. Second is the discrepancy in penalties called on the road and home teams through two weeks of these replacement officials.
So far this season, there have been 231 penalties against visiting teams and only 188 penalties against the hosts. That ratio — road teams having to deal with 23% more penalties — is far out of line with historical data, which informs us that road teams had 7% more penalties enforced against them than home teams from 2000 to 2011.
One of the areas where we might surmise that inexperienced officials might be affected is by crowd influence. This could be particularly true for those coming from situations with much smaller home fields, and we know that these officials by and large are not coming from the FBS level of collegiate officiating.
So, I dug a little further, to look at home field advantage through the first two weeks.
So far this year, the home teams are 23-9 (72%). Here is a comparison to the home records in the first two weeks for the last decade.
Two years have seen 21 home wins in the first two weeks. The average is 18.4 wins. Not all home games are created equal, though, so perhaps this variation is based on specific home teams. One way to account for this is to look at the Vegas spreads. Using data from goldsheet.com, I compared the previous three seasons against the spread to this year. This was done by comparing the actual result to the spread to see how much better or worse than expectation each home team did. There are extreme results, so we will use the median data.
Here is the against the spread records and median points above or below the spread for the home team:
- 2012: 19-13 against the spread, +5.3 points over spread for home team
- 2011: 16-15-1 against the spread, +1.5 points over spread for home team
- 2010: 19-11-2 against the spread, +3.8 points over spread for home team
- 2009: 12-20 against the spread, -4.8 points under spread for home team
Combining all three previous years, we get a home team ATS record of 47-46-3, with a median result of a push. So basically, Vegas has been dead on with variation from year over year. Maybe this year is just another case of random variation, though I think there are legitimate reasons to think that it is more than that.
So far, in order to get an even betting result of point spread wins by home teams and road teams, Vegas would have had to add a whopping 5.3 points to each spread to the home team’s line. They already build in somewhere around 2.5 to 3 points for home field in matchups, meaning Vegas would have had to add about 8 points to home field to even out the replacement referee results. How will the market react to the referees this week?
The NFL has had a love/hate relationship with sports wagering, pretending to be against it at certain times while benefitting from its impact on the product’s popularity. Vegas insiders have to be concerned about these results through two weeks, and how it affects the market view on home teams. Much discussion has been about the integrity of the game, a lot of it focusing on injuries. A potentially undervalued angle is the impact on home field advantage. A team with a front loaded home schedule may be enjoying an advantage if the league settles with the normal officials before season’s end. We may also see this effect diminish, even if it is real, as the officials become more experienced in handling crowd input. Thus, getting to start at home, particularly in an important game, may not be such a bad thing.
[photo via US Presswire]

- John Tortorella And a Ref Dropped F-Bombs On Live TV During the Rangers-Bruins Game [Video]
- LeBron James and Paul George’s Epic Game 1 Battle Looks Even Cooler in Slow Motion [Video]
- Manchester City Players Were Super Excited To Catch Passes From Eli Manning [Video]
- Miami Heat Remix of Pitbull’s “Feel This Moment?” Dále!
- Buffalo Bills Fan Has O.J. Simpson Mug Shot Tattoo on His Thigh

- KC Resident on Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago's Sarah Spain
- Monster is Meth on Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago's Sarah Spain
- Smallie Bigs on Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago's Sarah Spain
- Some Random Old Dude on Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago's Sarah Spain
- Monster is Meth on Fox Sports 1 Heavily in Pursuit of Former NFL Player Trevor Pryce and ESPN Chicago's Sarah Spain
62 Responses to “Replacement Referees and Home Field Advantage: It’s Been Almost Eight Points a Game Through Two Weeks”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







September 19th, 2012 at 4:12 PM
SHUT ‘EM DOWN!
September 19th, 2012 at 4:13 PM
That really is a great picture.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:14 PM
Refs were sooooooooo bad in the Niners/Lions game. I think they called it equally shitty on both sides, though.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:16 PM
/doubles down on Carolina +1.5
September 19th, 2012 at 4:16 PM
nfl has been tough to bet on this year. only constants are teams with stellar defenses.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:19 PM
Anybody seen this yet? Gold.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:21 PM
So how much does Vegas adjust this week? Will the refs start adjusting to the NFL and perhaps be less intimidated by the surroundings?
September 19th, 2012 at 4:21 PM
I saw some Pick Em’s earlier today. Very tempted to jump on Carolina as well.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:21 PM
And home teams, apparently.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:23 PM
Of all the games I watched that day, I didn’t think this one stood out to me. I’m thinking the terrible PI call, a couple of instances where they could (should) have whistled the play to not start, Matt Stafford knee down and the missed Alex Smith sliding personal foul (which I can see how they missed, it was a subtle forearm to the head)?
September 19th, 2012 at 4:23 PM
Surely some savvy bettors have already researched which officiating crews have shown the most “penalty bias” in favor of the home teams? If Lisk has access to THAT information it would be worth a shekel or two this week for sure.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:25 PM
home team is already down 1 game this coming week. Browns not coming close to beating Buffalo
September 19th, 2012 at 4:26 PM
They need to find a similar shot with Ray Lewis, in which he’s telling the official, “I will kill you. Done it before.”
September 19th, 2012 at 4:26 PM
I can’t figure out whether the real refs are gaining leverage week by week or not at all. On one hand, the replacement refs are making the games “unwatchable” and everyone is complaining. On the other hand, we’re all still watching / attending games so the league isn’t really losing anything (besides credibility, which they don’t care about). Perplexing.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:27 PM
Point taken, but I don’t think categorical variables can really have a median, can they?
September 19th, 2012 at 4:29 PM
Which post will the Tebow-inspired pissing match between WWoS and jthussler spill over into?
September 19th, 2012 at 4:29 PM
The worst call I have seen so far this year.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:30 PM
That’s some must-see football right there.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:31 PM
Inelastic demand, yo.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:32 PM
I don’t like to spill over threads. When it ends, so do the comments.
/plus I have work to do in 30 minutes
September 19th, 2012 at 4:32 PM
I like Cleveland in that game, any team that loses by 20 to the Jets is not to be trusted
September 19th, 2012 at 4:33 PM
Ike Taylor would have to get within three yards of a receiver to actually interfere with them, so yeah that is a pretty bad call.
/QB targets wide open receiver Ike let get away
//ball is overthrown
///Ike does hand swag dance
September 19th, 2012 at 4:33 PM
I like Cleveland too. Id like them a lot more if Spiller wasn’t going off the past couple weeks.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:36 PM
Huh. Not quite that’s what you mean. Using your own data, I could then write: “meaning Vegas would have had to add about 6.5 points to home field to even out the regular referee results from 2010.”
September 19th, 2012 at 4:36 PM
Damn it, how does this passbook thing work?
September 19th, 2012 at 4:36 PM
Funny the other day folks here were defending the replacement refs. It was laughable then and is even more so now.The Denver-ATL game has to take the cake for ineptness.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:37 PM
People will support The Shield to the bitter end…can only assume that if the internet existed back in ’87 they would have convinced themselves that the scabs were doing just as fine a job as the greedy striking players
September 19th, 2012 at 4:38 PM
I don’t think people were really defending them, just arguing that the regular refs are so bad normally that there’s zero “integrity” at stake here.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:39 PM
I don’t think they’ve done all that bad of a job. But then again, I never had a conniption if a ref missed a call like some people do.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:40 PM
I always feel comfortable betting against Ryan Fitzpatrick on the road.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:41 PM
When the regular refs drop their ridiculous demand for a “pension”, maybe then we can have them back.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:41 PM
A whole lot of this too. Remember the Calvin Johnson TD catch that wasn’t a catch? Or the Lions playoff INT? So at worst the quality of referring went from a C to a D+? Not a bit difference.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:43 PM
I can’t get past how they can’t control a game, bad calls happening is to be expected since no sport is harder to officiate other than maybe playoff basketball but the other stuff is dragging down the product…Monday’s game was an embarrassment and I don’t think that’s hyperbole
September 19th, 2012 at 4:44 PM
I feel good rooting for my team to win in spite of Fitzpatrick.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:44 PM
Not supporting the shield, just pointing out that they’re fucking refs, not brain surgeons. They could easily be replaced, you would just have to spend more than a few days calling DII refs like the NFL did.
With time these scabs will be better. With actual time and effort in the hiring process, they could be just as good.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:45 PM
You’re taking a handful of bad calls and saying they’re mediocre at their jobs as a result, don’t think that’s fair
September 19th, 2012 at 4:45 PM
The Shield tv show >>>> the NFL shield
September 19th, 2012 at 4:46 PM
That’s simplifying it a bit. I just said the regular officials miss / make bad calls all the time too.
The procedural errors, misplacing the spot of the ball, losing control of the game, etc. is what’s worse. Just shows they’re egregiously not prepared.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:48 PM
I’m taking a few high profile calls that I was able to think of off the top of my head. My point is that it’s not like the regular refs were this bastion of quality that everybody loved. Bad/questionable calls happen every game, but it doesn’t bother me as much as it appears to bother some other people.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:49 PM
COME AT ME, BRO!!1!!
September 19th, 2012 at 4:50 PM
I can’t fathom how many missed false starts I’ve seen. That’s the easiest penalty to call.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:50 PM
Fuck you.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:52 PM
Pass Interference calls are a straight up coin flip, you have no idea which way the call is going, especially since they are letting them push/grab all the way down the field.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:52 PM
Why is that ridiculous?
September 19th, 2012 at 4:52 PM
And thats the NFL’s fault. But still, fuck the normal refs.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:53 PM
When the regular refs drop their ridiculous demand for a “pension”, maybe then we can have them back.
I was wondering what you were doing in a sports discussion
September 19th, 2012 at 4:54 PM
They are part time employees that work maybe 20 days a year. I’ll be generous and put in travel/training/etc, and they work 60 days a year. And they are already well compensated for that level of effort.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:54 PM
Because it takes money out of the owners’ hands, and that bothers our friend here
September 19th, 2012 at 4:54 PM
And thats the NFL’s fault. But still, fuck the normal refs.
you don’t like gift Superbowls???
September 19th, 2012 at 4:55 PM
I actually prefer they let more stuff go than call more PI. I think that’s what they’ve been doing. Unless, of course, it happens to my team.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:55 PM
While I never ever ever agree with Mike on labor/politics …. isn’t it the case that none of the officials have it as their primary job? Seems weird to be demanding a pension for a part time gig.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:58 PM
Here’s the thing – they can’t be easily replaced. Unless BCS conference officials decide to take the job – and they won’t unless the union is broken – you’re left with bottom-of-the-barrel jabronis from the LFL, DII and III, and high school.
September 19th, 2012 at 4:59 PM
The only people who expect pensions in 2012 are clueless labor union members. In the private sector — you know, the real world — they have been phased out long ago for things like a 401(k). Pensions do not even exist anymore. Except in cities all across California that are going bankrupt because of them.
That doesn’t even address the fact that the refs are part-time employees. But sure, go ahead and demand a fixed sum payment of regular occurrence after you’ve retired just because the owners have a lot of money.
September 19th, 2012 at 5:02 PM
They’re asking to keep what they already have and grandfather current officials. New ones would go to 401k.
Even Peter king has slightly changed his tune here. For a couple of MMQBs he said that the NFL did away with definied benefit pensions for employees – now he writes for “most” employees. Wonder who still gets those?
September 19th, 2012 at 5:04 PM
In real dollars, the switch to a 401k is a loss of $30,000 per current official, per year.
September 19th, 2012 at 5:04 PM
Pensions do not even exist anymore.
Why is that? Since i have been in the workforce, they have not been around so i couldnt guess why they have gone away. Too expensive?
September 19th, 2012 at 5:05 PM
Could you phrase that in terms of options and Porsches please?
September 19th, 2012 at 5:08 PM
Could you phrase that in terms of options and Porsches please?
1 3/16 Options and 24/32 Porsches
September 19th, 2012 at 5:08 PM
I’ve never had a pension, but have a pretty decent understanding of labor relations.
Many of these pensions were negotiated benefits. Nobody made business owners give employees these benefits. They were negotiated in a business setting, just like any other business agreement.
If the refs can negotiate a pension (I doubt it, since the NFL has dug their heels in at this point), then why would you care?
September 19th, 2012 at 5:12 PM
Corporations generally have to fund a defined benefit plan as they went, so each pay period, the employer had to set aside the full corporate contribution amount for each employee.
When 401k cae around, the employer only need match what the emploee contributed, up to a certain amount.
September 19th, 2012 at 6:41 PM
I work in labor law, so I feel like some educatin’ about pensions is in order here.
The reason why employees and unions like defined benefit pension plans– and why employers don’t like them– is simple. In a defined benefit plan, the risk of poor investment choices is on the employer, because the employee is entitled to a certain benefit, and if the plan’s investments are awful, the employer has to make up the difference.
In a defined contribution plan, on the other hand, the employee bears all the risk. If the stock market tanks, guess what– your 401(k) just became worthless. Same if you invest it in the wrong kind of stock.
From a pure economic-theory standpoint, defined contribution plans make no sense. An employer is a larger organization which is better able to absorb market risk than an individual employee. (Aggregate people into a multiemployer fund and you’re even better off.) Higher risk investments generate higher returns on average, but being higher risk, they are also more likely to fail completely. That means that a defined-benefit plan should outperform a defined-contribution plan when both are properly invested– it can absorb more market risk. Even when you subtract out what you have to pay the plan trustees to do the investing (which isn’t really that much if you have a large enough plan), it’s still way ahead of defined-contribution.
And that’s not even taking into account the fact that most employees are, well, employees, not stockbrokers, and invest 401(k) money in asset balances which are wildly out of whack with the risk profile that they should be adopting given their financial situation (which varies a lot depending on age of employee and how much you’ve already got socked away). The end result is a ton of people who either don’t save enough because they put too much money in low-risk investments like bonds, or lose everything because they put too much money in super-high-risk investments like stock of a single company (usually their own, which is doubly idiotic since if the company goes bust they’re out of a job AND a pension).
So why are defined-benefit plans out of fashion? Well, there are some red herrings like “they’re not mobile” (rubbish, it’s easy to transfer the value of a defined-benefit plan if it operates on a cash balance basis) and “they’re bankrupting state governments” (public-sector pension plans, unlike private-sector pension plans like the referees’ plan, are basically unregulated and thus state legislators are free to write insane, obviously false assumptions like “we’re going to make 8 percent return on investment every year” into the plans, figuring that THEY won’t be around when taxes have to be raised later on to pay for the damn things) but the basic reason is “because American workers have absurdly little bargaining power and employers can force defined-contribution plans on them.” Unionized employees actually have some degree of bargaining power and thus resist 401(k)-type retirement plans, but nowadays unions are basically in retreat in most sectors… including the NFL, where the referees are now under pressure to give up their pension plan.
September 25th, 2012 at 7:46 AM
there is a really easy way to end this. bring up the very real possibility of corruption. what is to stop these “officals” from fixing games? we”ve already seen an offical of the saints game wearing a saints sweatshirt. Let”s hear the leagues response to that. Stats don”t lie… you must be crazy if you think that vegas doesn’t see the trend!!!!!!!