NFL Power Rankings, Big Brother Style: Who Gets Voted Off First?
People love power rankings, they love to trash them, rip them, complain about them, print them out and use as toilet paper. It’s a little rough for my taste, but I get it. So in an effort to do something different with the power rankings this year, we are going to be having a season long Big Brother style power rankings where each week, we vote off 1-2 teams out of the NFL Big Brother House, who have to go sit with the little kids. I don’t watch much reality TV, but I do have to admit that I’ve gotten hooked this year and am on Team Frank, which has caused plenty of arguments in the house.
It will work just like Big Brother with nominations. I will serve as the HOH (Head of Household) each week and the bottom five teams in the Big Brother rankings are on the block. I’ll then post a poll and you, the reader, will have an opportunity to vote for the team you want evicted. Just like Big Brother, though, there is Power of Veto. In this case, teams win the Veto if they actually win the following week, and they come off the block. The team with the highest vote total (or sometimes the top two teams) who then loses the following week is evicted. Teams can also gain immunity from the bottom five by beating a team ranked higher than them who is still alive in the Big Brother rankings the week before.
Other than that little twist, I’ll do the power rankings like normal. Once a team is evicted, though, they will be separately ranked in the Little Brother rankings. I will hope to avoid knee jerk reactions with teams, but also want the nominations to generally involve teams not playing well. By midseason, though, this could get interesting. Let’s hope you don’t vote out anyone that goes on to win the Super Bowl. We will try to have 12 survivors after week 17, and hopefully they will match the playoff teams.
We will start week one with just one removal at the end of next week’s games. Feel free to complain about anything in addition to my HOH nominations for the bottom five teams. My rankings are designed to be both predictive yet acknowledging past results. Think of it like where I think teams will end up by season’s end.
- New England Patriots
- Houston Texans
- San Francisco 49ers
- Baltimore Ravens
- Green Bay Packers
- Atlanta Falcons
- Chicago Bears
- Philadelphia Eagles
- New Orleans Saints
- Denver Broncos
- Dallas Cowboys
- New York Jets
- Detroit Lions
- New York Giants
- Pittsburgh Steelers
- San Diego Chargers
- Washington Redskins
- Tampa Bay Buccaneers
- Carolina Panthers
- Cincinnati Bengals
- Seattle Seahawks
- Minnesota Vikings
- Buffalo Bills
- Kansas City Chiefs
- Tennessee Titans
- Arizona Cardinals
- Jacksonville Jaguars
- Indianapolis Colts
- St. Louis Rams
- Cleveland Browns
- Oakland Raiders
- Miami Dolphins
If I were to put these teams in tiers, I would right now have about seven teams at the top, then a large group extending from #8 to #17 that are interchangeable. I know Pittsburgh is probably low at #15, and the same with the Giants at #14, and that both will get healthier. I played with a bunch of permutations, though, and none of them are satisfactory in this group, so we’ll just go with this. Don’t be surprised if there is a bunch of movement in this tier next week.
After that, I still believe in Carolina and that the offense will play better, and that Tampa will at least be competitive. I know that there will be an outcry for the Bills after the egg they laid last week. I don’t want to vote them out yet. I think they should be better than a lot of teams once the defense meshes. That Bills vs. Chiefs game Sunday could be to stay off the block in a week, though.
As for the nominations, Jacksonville survives as they almost won at Minnesota. Arizona stays off with their close win at home over Seattle. So the nominees are:
Indianapolis Colts – Yes, they lost by 20 at Chicago. I think they will improve as the season progresses, but they were 2-14 last year, and I think the upside is along the lines of what Carolina accomplished in the second half of last year.
St. Louis Rams – They have the worst record over the last five years, and have been historically bad, so including them here isn’t a stretch. Has Jeff Fisher turned things around? Well, they just lost in a close game at Detroit, but it took a pick six and two other interceptions in the red zone to keep it close.
Oakland Raiders – New coach, new GM, and an owner with the best hair this side of Tim Ryan. They couldn’t snap the ball last night, which kind of sums up their chances.
Cleveland Browns – This was an auto pick. The website software automatically inserted the Browns. Sorry, Cleveland fans.
Miami Dolphins – From Hard Knocks to out of the Big Brother house? Well, they aren’t exactly playing for now, the team lacks weapons at receiver for Ryan Tannehill, and it could be a long season for the triumvirate of Joe Philbin, Jeff Ireland, and Stephen Ross.
And now, it’s up to you (voting closes Thursday at first game time):
Who Should Be Evicted After Week 1?
- Miami Dolphins (51%, 402 Votes)
- Cleveland Browns (35%, 277 Votes)
- Oakland Raiders (8%, 59 Votes)
- St. Louis Rams (4%, 31 Votes)
- Indianapolis Colts (2%, 15 Votes)
Total Voters: 784
[photos via bigbrothernetwork.com, US Presswire]

- Paul George Wore Aqua Pants and a Green, Amoeba-Pattered Dress Shirt to Game 1 in Miami
- Shane Battier Kneed Roy Hibbert in the Balls [Video]
- Chuck Norris Wants a NFL Team to Sign Tim Tebow Because He is a Winner Like Chuck Norris
- Young Rockies Fans Also Sport Giant Purple Mohawks
- Legends Football League Issues Statement About Coach Yelling, “I’m gonna punch you in the face” at Female Player

- Liquor on Paul George Wore Aqua Pants and a Green, Amoeba-Pattered Dress Shirt to Game 1 in Miami
- Shining Base Path on Paul George Wore Aqua Pants and a Green, Amoeba-Pattered Dress Shirt to Game 1 in Miami
- Shining Base Path on Former UFC Fighter Waylon Lowe Suing Philly Sex Shop After a Gel Left His Genitals Burned and Scarred
- A.P. on Paul George Wore Aqua Pants and a Green, Amoeba-Pattered Dress Shirt to Game 1 in Miami
- Some Random Old Dude on Paul George Wore Aqua Pants and a Green, Amoeba-Pattered Dress Shirt to Game 1 in Miami
107 Responses to “NFL Power Rankings, Big Brother Style: Who Gets Voted Off First?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.







September 11th, 2012 at 2:12 PM
Jets
September 11th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
The Phins are phucking awful.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
Dolphins and it aint even close.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:14 PM
You can’t throw that Browns Defense off the island.
/goes back to photoshopping Matt Barkley ruining his career as he holds up a Browns #1 jersey.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:14 PM
Interesting in that the Mia/Oak game may decide who gets sent to the little brother rankings.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:18 PM
luck hosting vikings. punt coverage is improved. wayne saved luck’s ass a few times last week. fleener could be a star. colts win
September 11th, 2012 at 2:18 PM
Miami is probably going to win this week. You have to vote off Cleveland first.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:18 PM
Voted Rams out of spite for them not finishing off the Lions on Sunday…plus there can’t be a less interesting team to watch, at least the Dolphins can theoretically be an entertaining shit show
September 11th, 2012 at 2:18 PM
that’s carrot top? what a freak he looks like in movies or tv, with popcorn muscles and makeup. looks normal there
September 11th, 2012 at 2:19 PM
This looks like it could go off the rails by midseason.
People love power rankings, they love to trash them, rip them, complain about them, print them out and use as toilet paper.
I have no problem with rankings. They are meaningless, but generate conversation. I just don’t understand why “power” always precedes “rankings.”
September 11th, 2012 at 2:19 PM
I think 3 of this 5 teams win this week.
/Not the Browns
September 11th, 2012 at 2:20 PM
I think Buffalo was at least deserving of a nomination
/picked the Bills to win 10 games
//wants to vote them out after week 1
September 11th, 2012 at 2:21 PM
I have no problem with rankings. They are meaningless, but generate conversation. I just don’t understand why “power” always precedes “rankings.”
Because with great power rankings comes great responsibility
September 11th, 2012 at 2:22 PM
My guess is Jeff Ireland gets voted out of the Miami household at season’s end.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:22 PM
Detroit
September 11th, 2012 at 2:23 PM
I know we’re not supposed to pay attention to the rankings part of this post, but why are the Eagles so high?
September 11th, 2012 at 2:23 PM
i’m not quite sure how anyone could look themself in the mirror after ranking 16(!) teams ahead of Robert III.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:24 PM
Flip flop #26 and #21. You are buying a lot of hype with Seattle that high.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:24 PM
I want a sticker saying “I Voted!”
September 11th, 2012 at 2:25 PM
i’m not quite sure how anyone could look themself in the mirror after ranking 16(!) teams ahead of Robert III.
I’m a vampire.
They will move quickly if they follow it up.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:26 PM
Eagles way too high as long as Vick is still the QB
September 11th, 2012 at 2:26 PM
Tim Ryan’s hair sure is great. Is it real squirrel or faux?
September 11th, 2012 at 2:26 PM
Oakland should be better once they get their top 2 wide outs back, and their long snapper. Interesting that once Lane Kiffin knew the details of USC’s punishment, one of the first things they did was a get a scholarship to a 4 year commit long snapper. Talk about a high paying part time job.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Lisk,
Chiefs will be voted out by Week 4?
September 11th, 2012 at 2:27 PM
Is this the Football Rotisserie Chicken Bucket Bowl thing we signed up for?
/LOL at your Arghhhhkansas pick
September 11th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Thanks for explaining the rules.
For a minute there, I was concerned you thought we were all idiots, watched that crap of a show and knew the rules. whew.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Here are my picks for the 12 playoff teams after week 1:
Chicago, SF, ATL, NYG, RGIII, GB
NE, Baltimore, Denver, HOU, KC, Pittsburgh
These picks are subject to change, enjoy the random abbreviations
September 11th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
/Looks at Miami roster
//Looks at 2013 draft class
///Miami is going to suck for seemingly the rest of time
September 11th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
I’m not the biggest Vick fan, but I think the Browns Defense is vastly underrated and caused him to play like shit.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Is this the Football Rotisserie Chicken Bucket Bowl thing we signed up for?
/LOL at your Arghhhhkansas pick
The last laugh will be on everyone else when Arkansas wins the SEC, and is up against a team from another conference, and everyone talking about OSU’s OT loss to Iowa State a day after school plane crash will be forgiving that loss. At least if I were writing the season, that’s how it would go.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:29 PM
Is it real squirrel or faux?
cmon man. it’s f-o-x
September 11th, 2012 at 2:30 PM
I have no idea who that picture is of but if he ever finds out that Mark Wahlberg is his half brother he will be on easy street in no time.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:30 PM
220 votes and NO comments? Mindbottling…
September 11th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
if Tannehill sees this he’s going to think the dolphins wont be allowed to play the rest of the year
September 11th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
So the Lions will be number 1 next week after they beat the faggot niners?
/no chance they win
//unless hillbilly plays great
September 11th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
That and being a left-handed reliever are two things that you can do for a really long time, good work if you can get it…I think the Packers have had two long-snappers going back to the mid-90s unless I’m forgetting someone between Rob Davis and Brett Goode
September 11th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
we encourage you to throw at joe haden on an island, however.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:32 PM
It helps if you hit ‘refresh’ every now and then.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:32 PM
i’m not quite sure how anyone could look themself in the mirror after ranking 16(!) teams ahead of Robert III.
I can’t wait for the reaction after his 2nd concussion of the season in week 9.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:33 PM
Oakland should be better once they get their top 2 wide outs back, and their long snapper.
i spent all night waiting for dhb to score 9 ff pts last night. dropped his ass this morning for lance moore. mcfadden is their best reciever
September 11th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
Are people really serious with this idea of benching Vick?
September 11th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
It might take three years to finally see an RGIII Vs Vick game.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:35 PM
Because with great power rankings comes great responsibility Lisk
Well, you seam to be responsible. Now, if that CRM kid was doing this, then there would be some concern.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:35 PM
I can’t wait for the reaction after his 2nd concussion of the season in week 9.
yep, people need to tap the brakes on old rgIII. he is my god now, but a flawed god.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:35 PM
people are crazy if they think that it will happen. However, I do expect to see a defensive player bench him at some point this season.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:36 PM
Are people really serious with this idea of benching Vick? Stark
A tiny amount of Philly fans are clamoring for this.
/Yesterday post’d
September 11th, 2012 at 2:37 PM
How many Dolphin players would start for another team? Jake Long? Pretty sure Jake Long is the only player.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:38 PM
Are people really serious with this idea of benching Vick?
well, you can’t bench reid
September 11th, 2012 at 2:38 PM
Eagles are too high. Baltimore is going to fistfuck them next week.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:38 PM
After last night’s shmushmortion of a MNF game, I have to vote Raiders. Oh wait, excuse me: RAIDAAAHHSS!!
/fuck you ESPN
September 11th, 2012 at 2:38 PM
Dansby.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:39 PM
we encourage you to throw at joe haden on an island, however.
Which island is he going to visit on his 4 week vacation?
September 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
they should bench the OL.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Chicage Cubs
/glares at SouvenirCity
September 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
if Tannehill sees this he’s going to think the dolphins wont be allowed to play the rest of the year
I almost loled
September 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Have to imagine they got a good 5-6 guys who would be better than their Green Bay counterparts…that side of the ball isn’t bad, they were just done in by having short fields after turnovers on Sunday
September 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Vontae… Nevermind.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
the one he was ferried off of for week 1?
September 11th, 2012 at 2:40 PM
Cuba, for cheap pharmaceuticals.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:41 PM
They will move quickly if they follow it up.
the rams OWN the redskins. expect bad, bad things to happen.
It might take three years to finally see an RGIII Vs Vick game.
is vick going back to prison?
September 11th, 2012 at 2:41 PM
How many Dolphin players would start for another team? Jake Long? Pretty sure Jake Long is the only player.
Cameron Wake, Dansby. Paul Solaiaeiuaeia would definitely start for Chiefs line. Reggie Bush is a better option than a few contenders currently have at RB.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:41 PM
i see what you did there
September 11th, 2012 at 2:41 PM
The Browns are abortastic.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:41 PM
I’m not sure I understand most of this but this
could really screw things up (in a good way). Awesome idea, but I’ll appreciate it a lot more in a few weeks when things start to shake out and the format becomes clear.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:42 PM
Baltimore is going to fistfuck them next week.
in philly? maybe a gentle diddling (means close game)
September 11th, 2012 at 2:43 PM
How many Dolphin players would start for another team? Jake Long? Pretty sure Jake Long is the only player.
Lauren Tannehill could start for my team.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:45 PM
and yet, baltimmore would still want to steal that lifeless husk of stem cells and ruined potential and dress it up in purple camo.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:45 PM
Nevermind, I get it.
/fist pump
September 11th, 2012 at 2:47 PM
LEGEND
September 11th, 2012 at 2:49 PM
The commanding officer must relieve themselves of command if they are emotionally compromised.
/trekk’d
September 11th, 2012 at 2:49 PM
People are going overboard on their Ravens reactions. The Bengals aren’t very good
September 11th, 2012 at 2:50 PM
Lauren Tannehill could start for my team.
she is a day one starter on my all horse team.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:52 PM
But JOE FLACCO!!!! I MEAN DID YOU NOT SEE THAT PERFECTLY THROWN INCOMPLETE TOUCHDOWN PASS????!?!?!?! HE HAS ARRIVED!
September 11th, 2012 at 2:52 PM
+1
September 11th, 2012 at 2:54 PM
for being from Missourah, you’re an all right guy Lisk.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:57 PM
The Bengals aren’t bad, either. They’re not the Bills or Chiefs. Cincy made the playoffs last year and has a lot of talent. No, the two teams aren’t 31 points apart, just like the Ravens and Steelers weren’t 28 points apart after last year’s week one blowout. But the Ravens are a damn good football team, and Flacco has been a damn good QB for two years now. Time to recognize.
September 11th, 2012 at 2:57 PM
Starting a basement hostage team I presume?
September 11th, 2012 at 3:01 PM
interesting…since when is ‘damn good’ a description for a QB who completes less than 60% of his passes for less than 7 ypa, like flacco LAST YEAR? i guess he was good in 2010, give him that much…well definitely against the browns, that’s for sure.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:01 PM
The Bengals are awful.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:02 PM
The Bengals will win less than 6 games.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:02 PM
Cincy made the playoffs last year and has a lot of talent.
Well, they made the playoffs last year
September 11th, 2012 at 3:04 PM
Last year was a bit of an aberration due to CamCam’s dumbass playcalling and the decision to throw 50-60 times a game early to work in Torrey Smith. He did well in 2010, the second half of last year and should be even better this season with Cameron’s influence somewhat blunted by the no-huddle.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:05 PM
they were a quick snap against the browns away from 0-3, beat the gauntlet of the bills, jags and colts and had one win by more than double digits…that thin margin is not sustainable for long term success, and if long term success is a barometer for being “good” the bengals don’t qualify.
i mean, shit dude…their QB is rich man’s colt mccoy with a red haircut. yeesh.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:05 PM
He had the smarts and poise to get drafted by a great defensive team.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:05 PM
What are you basing that on? The fact that they made the playoffs last season and had a killer draft?
September 11th, 2012 at 3:09 PM
What are you basing that on? The fact that they made the playoffs last season and had a killer draft?
So you’re saying they made the playoffs last season?
September 11th, 2012 at 3:09 PM
You are what your record says you are. The New York Giants are the luckiest team in NFL history yet Eli Manning’s hand says he’s a two-time Super Bowl winning QB. The Bengals won nine games and made the playoffs out of a tough division. I’m OK with that win.
Houston beat Miami and New England beat Tennessee. Yet Baltimore is being criticized for a weak win? Don’t really get that.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:10 PM
By what measure did they have a killer draft? None of the players have made an impact yet, at all. The WRs don’ even play.
I’m basing my assessment on the fact that they a) have a limited QB, b) played a creampuff schedule last year. and c) Marvin Lewis is very mediocre.
And it’s not like they were world beaters last year. They finished 9-7 against one of the NFL’s easiest schedules. They’ve done this plenty of times before.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:11 PM
If the eye test isn’t enough using Pro-Football Reference’s SRS metric they were the 8th best team in the AFC last season…they were basically Dolphins with a little better luck
September 11th, 2012 at 3:11 PM
odd, considering my bengals fan buddy was PISSED at their draft this year.
youre really not though…CONTEXT.
yea, me neither. that was a helluva statement by the ratbirds, gotta say. in my eyes, even without suggs, they’re the AFC north favs.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:12 PM
Yes they are. They were a complete fraud last year that didnt beat a single team with a winning record. And the Bungles always, I mean always, collapse with any kind of expectations.
6 wins max. But keep putting your name on the Lombardi trophy Ravens fans.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:12 PM
Yet Baltimore is being criticized for a weak win? Don’t really get that.
Easy there. Baltimore isn’t being criticized for an easy win. I just think their week 1 win over a team that seems likely to be not very good this year is probably not all we need to see to make them presumptive Super Bowl favorites
September 11th, 2012 at 3:12 PM
Is anyone criticizing Baltimore’s win? I must of missed something here. The Bengals sucking ass does note equate to Baltimore being criticized.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:13 PM
The Giants were basically the Dolphins with better luck.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:17 PM
No argument here…although the Giants did play without some pretty important defensive players for long stretches during the regular season
Don’t see why you have to go to bat for the Bengals…there was nothing overly impressive with them last season and with their weaknesses don’t see how they pull 9 wins out again
September 11th, 2012 at 3:19 PM
Maybe, but I’m not sure what that means beyond the division. Their scheduled is absolutely hellacious, meaning even if they manage to win the division it’s probably a 9-7 record, which means no bye.
They just can’t get enough pressure without someone constantly having to account for Suggs. Dalton had 6-8 seconds back there to throw for a while. A better QB will pick the Ravens – or any defense – apart. They can’t just rely on turnovers.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:22 PM
I’m really sad this is a dead link
September 11th, 2012 at 3:22 PM
Not really going to bat. I just don’t think it’s fair to lump the Bengals in with the Dolphins, Bills, and Browns just because they got smoked by a very good Ravens team playing at home less than a week after their owner died.
I’d probably slot the Bengals between 15 and 20.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:27 PM
dude they beat the browns with a fucking QUICK SNAP in week 1 and won by 3 in week 12. they’re closer to the browns than they are to the ravens.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:28 PM
And it can’t be mentioned enough, their QB has red hair
September 11th, 2012 at 3:29 PM
A hell of a lot of NFL games are decided by a touchdown or less.
I agree that they’re closer to the Browns than Ravens. I just don’t think they suck, and I hate that Baltimore closes their regular season in Cincy. That’s a terrible game with what will likely be a division title on the line.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:35 PM
right…just not by the best teams. if you’re in that middling cesspool of first round exits and mid-teen draft slots, you’re average, not good.
that said…id take aj and geno atkins and jermaine gresham and whitworth on my team anytime.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:36 PM
Falcons are too high at #6. Without Grimey, teams are gonna toast that D. Fun offense to watch though.
September 11th, 2012 at 3:36 PM
A COSBY SWEATERRED HAIR!!!September 11th, 2012 at 3:38 PM
Cincinnati will be within one win of the Bills and Chiefs this year. Easily.
September 11th, 2012 at 4:30 PM
Between this and the guy in the U. of Memphis t-shirt, I am really guffawing here.
For the rest of the post, SD can claim the middle ground the rest of the year. Yippee!
September 11th, 2012 at 4:35 PM
I’d put the 49ers first, based on the quality of their win compared to NE or HOU.