Only some seriously deranged cunts would call federal spending at a 60 year low with 650,000 lost government jobs a “soci***st.”

Only a deranged cunt like Soused would keep using the work “cunt” over and over again to distract from the fact that he’s a cunt.

Only some seriously deranged cunts would call federal spending at a 60 year low with 650,000 lost government jobs a “soci***st.”

Usnews.com:

President Obama has shelled out more in federal spending than the five presidents that came before him.

A new chart by the Comeback America Initiative (CAI), a non-partisan group dedicated to promoting fiscal responsibility by policymakers, shows federal spending by president as a percentage of GDP, and it doesn’t reflect well on Obama.

“There has been a dramatic increase in spending under the Obama administration,” David Walker, Founder and CEO of CAI, told Whispers. “Most of it is attributable to year one of his presidency and the stimulus… but President Obama has continued to take spending to a new level.”

Federal spending was close to 20 percent under the Carter administration, dropped to 18 percent under Clinton, and is currently at an incredible 24 percent of GDP. According to the Congressional Budget Office, federal spending may hover around 22 percent for the next decade.

Federal spending is also higher this year than any year since 1949. The last time spending was higher—in 1946, it was 24.8—the country was just coming down from the exorbitant rates of spending during World War II.

The article also answers a question you failed (probably willingly since it doesn’t fit your narrative) to answer, and that was the effect of the elimination of government jobs on those numbers.

650,000.

From USA Today:
Between January 2009 and the most recently reported figures, there has been a net increase of just 332,000 private-sector jobs.
Moreover, if you include all jobs — including the hard-hit government job sector — there remains a net decrease of 316,000 jobs since the start of Obama’s presidency.

42 straight months and counting of an 8.0+ unemployment rate. A 22 straight month run of a 9.0+ unemployment rate.

“Incomplete.”

Exactly. He has a grasp of the fact that the work of a community organizer cleaning up the economic mess caused by an MBA is not done.

42 straight months and counting of an 8.0+ unemployment rate. A 22 straight month run of a 9.0+ unemployment rate.
“Incomplete.”

Unemployment up .5% since Jan 09 while economy up 6.8% since Jan 09.

But overall, there are still fewer people working now

part 1 of the last sentence in the CNN article.

than when Obama took office at the height of the recession.

part 2 provides the context you didn’t want to. So, since the economy hit rock bottom in 10, it has slowly improved. Seems to place his actions in a positive light. The article also answers a question you failed (probably willingly since it doesn’t fit your narrative) to answer, and that was the effect of the elimination of government jobs on those numbers.

“Incomplete.”

Yeah it’s a rough life when citizens don’t have to declare bankruptcy in order to afford health care.

Yes, the fundamental principle of “Soc-ism”. As long as people aren’t bankrupt, it’s ok to keep increasing what you take from them.

Funny how every time you mention “soc-ism” in a comment it gets moderated.

Ah, a carryover from the 2008 election when some folks here got a little nutty

Didn’t you already cite a positive number of job growth since 2010 which would tie into policy change taking effect (it’s not like the federal government acts quickly)? You keep using the net figure since it tells you what you want to hear

Per CNN (liberal media source): The figure of 4.5 million jobs is accurate if you look at the most favorable period and category for the administration. But overall, there are still fewer people working now than when Obama took office at the height of the recession.

the term to 6 years

He had from April 2009 to January 2010.

Under your premise, I guess I have no choice but to vote for Romney. If BO wins, then the Republicans will not allow him to do anything to help the economy.

Cool so you will reward obstructionism which is damaging to the American people. Good to know.

Obamacare is going to raise my taxes and that I better start

Yeah it’s a rough life when citizens don’t have to declare bankruptcy in order to afford health care.

I’m sorry that the 4 year presidential term has not allowed your guy enough time to add any new jobs or get the unemployment rate to at least a breakeven to when he took office

Didn’t you already cite a positive number of job growth since 2010 which would tie into policy change taking effect (it’s not like the federal government acts quickly)? You keep using the net figure since it tells you what you want to hear

Now I’m going to read the 6 page letter that I just got from my accountant explaining how Obamacare is going to raise my taxes and that I better start preparing for it now. I guess I need to start paying even more of my “fair share”.

Full disclosure: I don’t even make a fucking third of 250,000.00/year.

Complain of non-action to fix the economy and turn around and vote for the party that actively prevented any economic action? Also link.

Again 375 dem bills prevented from passing 200 threatened with filibuster.

Also Obama has spent the least since Eisenhower (partly attributed to GOP preventing anything being done).

Under your premise, I guess I have no choice but to vote for Romney. If BO wins, then the Republicans will not allow him to do anything to help the economy.

Now I’m going to read the 6 page letter that I just got from my accountant explaining how Obamacare is going to raise my taxes and that I better start preparing for it now. I guess I need to start paying even more of my “fair share”.

doesn’t have ONE NET JOB ADDED to show for it

Again you’re expecting policies that would have had to been put in place before inaugaration to have somehow already been working…blame the man for policies put in place leading to growth being too slow but this net jobs thing doesn’t pass a logic test

I’m sorry that the 4 year presidential term has not allowed your guy enough time to add any new jobs or get the unemployment rate to at least a breakeven to when he took office. Maybe you should petition your local representatives for an ammendment that changes the term to 6 years. By then, I’m sure Obama would have things running on all cylinders.