Rick Neuheisel Thinks the SEC is a Big Deal Thanks to ESPN
Rick Neuheisel, who was jettisoned as UCLA’s football coach after four straight putrid seasons (21-29), is now an analyst at the Pac-12 network. Last week, he was rambling a bit – as he is wont to do – about the state of college football when he tossed this out there:
“You wonder how the SEC became so powerful? It’s a direct correlation to how ESPN has been talking them up over the years, because they have a financial interest in them. So all the sudden, it’s a monster conference.”
For the record, ESPN is invested in the Pac-12, having signed a rights deal in partnership with Fox Sports that covers 12 years and $3 billion for the conference. Neuheisel still isn’t convinced that’s enough to make a network like ESPN change its focus.
“I think they just want to be competitive in all the time zones, but we’re still not given the same amount of attention as the SEC or the Big Ten. Watch `(College) Game Day,’ and the Pac-12 will get one block, and it’s usually just about USC or Oregon.”
Yeah, Rick, the SEC became powerful simply because ESPN has been hyping the conference for years. SEC strength has absolutely nothing to do with six straight BCS titles, or the fact that the SEC – by far – produced the most NFL players from 1992-2011. According to NFL.com, in that time span, the SEC had 576 players drafted, which is more than the Pac 12 (250) and Big 12 (224) combined. [Ed. That NFL.com piece only looked at the 25 winningest programs, and not all draft picks from each league. The SEC does not have as many draft picks as both combined considering all programs.] Obviously ESPN has a financial interest in the SEC, but only a doofus would overlook the fact that the conference has been, by far, the best in the country. [LA Daily News]

- LeBron James and Paul George Slapped Hands After Exchanging Spectacular Baskets to End the 3rd Quarter [Video]
- Paul George’s Vicious Dunk on Birdman Was Not Rated PG [Video]
- Matt Harvey, the New York Mets’ Star Pitcher, is Dating SI Swimsuit Model Anne V
- The Kansas City Royals Are Becoming the Royals Again, and Fans Have Been Far Too Patient
- Champions League: Bayern Munich a Legacy of Losing at Stake

- The Alarm on Premier League: What Each Club Should Prioritize in the Summer
- kaiserwilhelmreems is commenting too quickly on LeBron James and Paul George Slapped Hands After Exchanging Spectacular Baskets to End the 3rd Quarter [Video]
- Billy Buckner on LeBron James and Paul George Slapped Hands After Exchanging Spectacular Baskets to End the 3rd Quarter [Video]
- Chief on LeBron James and Paul George Slapped Hands After Exchanging Spectacular Baskets to End the 3rd Quarter [Video]
- A.P. on Matt Harvey, the New York Mets' Star Pitcher, is Dating SI Swimsuit Model Anne V
41 Responses to “Rick Neuheisel Thinks the SEC is a Big Deal Thanks to ESPN”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






August 22nd, 2012 at 10:30 AM
As a coach for a team not named USC or Oregon, he should better than anyone why nobody cares. It’s the equivalent of Miss. State raising a stink because they’re not getting the airtime of LSU or Bama.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:33 AM
* know…he should know
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:34 AM
Where is everybody? Oh…there’s a post with an “erection” in it…
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:34 AM
I kind of read this as the the SEC dominance being a result of the media exposure, no different than Notre Dame recruiting kids based on playing to a nationally televised audience every Saturday of their career.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:34 AM
probably could have stopped right there and then said that Neuheisel is an idiot and been done with it. I understand people get worn out by hearing about how great the SEC has been, but shit, if you argue against it you just look like a buffoon.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:37 AM
UCLA is the most underachieving program in the country. Have not been relevant since the mid-80′s.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:37 AM
He probably thinks March Madness is a big deal because…oh, yea.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:37 AM
http://www.thepostgame.com/commentary/201208/better-without-em-northern-manifesto-southern-secession-chuck-thompson-sec-bcs
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:38 AM
there’s a PAC 10 network?
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:39 AM
I guess, but every team is on TV nowadays.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:40 AM
Ohio State #1 overall. Rest of the B1G needs to get their shit together.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:42 AM
Btw can somebody explain to me why ESPN would talk up the SEC when most weeks the best SEC game is on CBS?
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:44 AM
Yeah. Launched last week. Unfortunately I don’t think I’ll be getting it. Eat shit Comcast.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:46 AM
SEC strength has absolutely nothing to do with six straight BCS titles, or the fact that the SEC – by far – produced the most NFL players from 1992-2011.
Couldn’t the argument be construed that because the SEC has so much ESPN exposure, it is easier for them to recruit high-class talent, and that is why they have been so powerful/had so many players drafted? I’m not agreeing or disagreeing, but that is how I would view his argument.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:46 AM
Btw can somebody explain to me why ESPN would talk up the SEC when most weeks the best SEC game is on CBS?
That is the first thing I thought. It has been that way for years. That SEC game is competing against at least three ESPN games (ABC/ESPN/ESPN 2.)
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:46 AM
“Hey, kid. We’re showcased on ESPN every Saturday.”
vs
“Hey, kid. We’re showcased on FoxSportsNet Peoria every Tuesday”
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:47 AM
Georgia and Notre Dame beg to differ.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:48 AM
This is what I’m saying. I’m curious if that’s the argument he was trying to make. I don’t really give a shit either way.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:48 AM
That’s possible. But the general point remains that everyone has exposure now because everyone is always on TV. Also, the “perception” carries over to the coaches, polls, “experts” etc., so make the point that ESPN affects perception to recruits, you’d also have to make it that ESPN affects the perception of, literally, everyone else.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:51 AM
Craig James thinks Rick Neuheisel is a genius
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:51 AM
And the other way of spinning this is…what nationally elite team in any given year has not been given an adequate amount of hype no matter what conference they are in? Oregon got it. USC got it. Ohio State got it…got way too much of it. OU gets it. Same with Texas.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:55 AM
This. The constant SEC ballwashing by ESPN results in more coverage and higher preseason polls rankings, which in turn inflates the programs and enables them to get more recruits. Its a vicious cycle.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:56 AM
OU gets it. Same with Texas.
The South.
/bangs head into keyboard.
August 22nd, 2012 at 10:58 AM
OU isn’t the South. Austin isn’t in the South either, according to my very, very specific standards. Neither are in the SEC.
Okay then, which SEC teams have been given too much hype and which non-SEC teams aren’t given enough?
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:01 AM
So does Bernie Madoff.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:01 AM
Last year?
Too much: Auburn, Ole Miss (preseason top 10), Arkansas (feasted on a crap schedule), South Carolina (same)
Not enough: Oklahoma State, Wisconsin, Boise
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:02 AM
It has much more to do with the fact the South owns high school football in the 21st century. SEC schools do not need to recruit ‘nationally’ like many schools do. One of the thing that’s hurt Tennessee is that they were the rare SEC school that relied on out-of-state talent, and they’re not getting it like they used to since Georgia, S. Carolina, etc. are keeping guys in-state.
The other factor is that SEC schools, even mid-tier ones like Arkansas and S. Carolina, are willing to pay top dollar for coaches. Imagine Steve Spurrier or Bobby Petrino going to Purdue or Kansas State.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:04 AM
See: Neuheisel, Rick
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:05 AM
OU isn’t the South. Austin isn’t in the South either, according to my very, very specific standards. Neither are in the SEC.
Agreed, Ritty. Consult the round-up. I was being sarcastic.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:05 AM
Are we talking baseball or football?
Wisconsin? The back-to-back losses didn’t help and they were always destined for the Rose Bowl, which in and of itself, is nothing by B10/Pac10 “hype.” Oklahoma State may have an argument. But I don’t really remember.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:06 AM
Ahh, I see. I wasn’t around the Roundup.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Boise gets a TON of hype given the # of meaningful games they play each year. Wisconsin – wake me when they win a big game. They’re like the VaTech of the Midwest. Okie State had a great season but they could be a one-hit wonder for all we know.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:09 AM
Baseball? No one gives a shit about college baseball except The Regional South.
Wisconsin was the best two-loss team in the country, let they finished behind Arkansas and South Carolina in the final polls. Joke. Oklahoma State should have been in the title game but I don’t care to rehash that argument.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Agreed, Ritty. Consult the round-up. I was being sarcastic.
Ahh, I see. I wasn’t around the Roundup.
NE folks refuse to accept the fact that Texas is not considered part of The South. Silly rationalization such as it is south of the Mason/Dixon line made my head spin.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Then why were you talking Ole Miss?
And Auburn only got “hype” because we were the defending national champs. We were ranked like 23rd to begin the season, barely beat Utah St., barely beat Miss. State, lost to Clemson and were not heard from again until we beat UVA in the Chic Fil A Bowl. The only way we were overhyped is because we were considered the worst defending champion in the history of the sport.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:20 AM
Maybe not a big deal, but the real deal.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:20 AM
Idiots.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:21 AM
I’ll rehash it for you: they lost to Iowa State.
August 22nd, 2012 at 11:28 AM
Agree with everyone that the SEC and Wisconsin are both horrible frauds. I’d also like to nominate the Big12 and OSU.
August 22nd, 2012 at 12:22 PM
The south also has spring football which allows for specialization. North doesn’t. I’ve read recruiting analysts say that senior’s in southern high schoold are nearly equivalent to northern university’s freshman (and not just because they’ve been held back a time or two). That does even out over 4-5 years as the northerner has more room for growth (assuming the ceiling is the same), but is an advantage.
August 22nd, 2012 at 1:08 PM
The constant SEC ballwashing by ESPN results in more coverage and higher preseason polls rankings, which in turn inflates the programs and enables them to get more recruits. Its a vicious cycle.
I don’t subscribe to this.
For the most part, I think it has more to do with the combination of three things:
1. progression/improvement of HS football regionally and with that, better training of athletic talent in certain regions. Kids want to play near home.
2. coaching
3. 1-sport focused kids.
I think there are more 1-sport focused athletes in the southeast than anywhere else in the country. My kid’s in middle school and coaches are already pushing kids to focus on one sport. We basically tell them to mind their damn business.