Phil Mushnick Wants to Know Why Olympic Gymnasts Are So Short and Have “Virtually No Breasts”
Phil Mushnick, who a decade ago had a relevant sports media column, increasingly seems to be making embarrassing reaches in an effort to regain past glory. I’m not sure how he wasn’t suspended or fired earlier this year after suggesting the Brooklyn Nets call themselves the “New York N—–” because of Jay-Z’s connection to the team. Does the copy desk let some of this garbage through because they dislike Mushnick? Or is he just desperate for clicks?
This weekend, Mushnick asked the following questions about female gymnasts at the Olympics – mind you, girls that range from 16-21 years old:
1) Why, in their mid-teens to early 20s, are they almost all tiny?
2) Why are they so under-developed? Virtually no breasts, no hips, no natural physiological — or just plain logical — progression.
3) Why do so many have squeaky voices, the voices of 10- to 12-year-olds?
4) Why do so many have chalky, pallid complexions, as if just pulled from a freezer?
Why is Phil Mushnick still such an angry old man? Why is Phil Mushnick a shell of what he used to be? [NY Post]

- Lionel Messi Holding His Son Thiago Is Your Sports Photo of the Week
- UCLA AD Dan Guerrero Would Like People Stop Focusing on Steve Alford’s Past and Instead Look at What He Has Accomplished at UCLA
- Chris Parmelee of the Twins Got Hit in a Sensitive Area While Running to First [GIF]
- Steelers Fans Who Have Difficulty Spelling Should Avoid Homemade Tattoos
- Twins are Screening ‘The Sandlot’ at Target Field Today; Squints and Ham Showed Up, Too

- orly57 on Steelers Fans Who Have Difficulty Spelling Should Avoid Homemade Tattoos
- orly57 on Fans Are Buying All of Robert Griffin III's Wedding Registry Gifts, and He Has a Picture to Prove It
- resolutedefense on Premier League: Arsenal Books Champions League Spot; Spurs Snake Bitten Again
- Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah! on Twins are Screening 'The Sandlot' at Target Field Today; Squints and Ham Showed Up, Too
- A.P. on Twins are Screening 'The Sandlot' at Target Field Today; Squints and Ham Showed Up, Too
36 Responses to “Phil Mushnick Wants to Know Why Olympic Gymnasts Are So Short and Have “Virtually No Breasts””
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






August 6th, 2012 at 10:52 AM
I bet he understands the tiebreak scenarios, though.
/they’re underdeveloped because gymnastics destroys your body and shortens your life
August 6th, 2012 at 10:58 AM
Can’t believe I am doing this, but the guy does have a point. He asked those questions because as explained earlier and later in the column that their training prevents their bodies from developing naturally. This is selective editing and ironically you are doing what you accuse him of doing.
August 6th, 2012 at 10:58 AM
any chance he’s being passive aggressive, railing against what this sport does to them developmentally?
not a mushnick defender, just a devil’s advocate
August 6th, 2012 at 10:59 AM
If this guy was no longer relevant, then why would you post about him, if only to grab some clicks for yourself?
August 6th, 2012 at 11:02 AM
/stifles laughter
August 6th, 2012 at 11:02 AM
I saw Nastia Liukin on the Today Show last week (I was in the doctor’s office, don’t judge me), and damn does she look great. That sex would make your face melt.
August 6th, 2012 at 11:04 AM
Ha!
August 6th, 2012 at 11:06 AM
Part of it is what gymnastics does to your body and what you have to do to your body to be Olympic caliber at gymnastics. The flip side is that girls who develop like Kate Upton have bodies that don’t allow for world class gymnastics. Somewhere up the chain, they don’t advance to the next level. They aren’t all no hip/no breasts as well. But I agree those girls are the exception (Sacramone).
Why are all Male swimmers hairless with long torsos!
August 6th, 2012 at 11:08 AM
So to recap the TBL Olympic coverage: criticizing someone for trolling for attention by selectively editing, and complaining about technical issues.
Nobody may read the comments, but by osmosis they seem to have taken over the posts.
August 6th, 2012 at 11:08 AM
Why are all basketball players tall?
August 6th, 2012 at 11:09 AM
Why are all Male swimmers hairless with long torsos!
Because they shave their bodies like gay strippers.
//coop just perked up
August 6th, 2012 at 11:10 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqcLcXPL3S0
August 6th, 2012 at 11:12 AM
Why are all sprinters bla….
/nevermind
August 6th, 2012 at 11:14 AM
ಠ_à²
August 6th, 2012 at 11:16 AM
/pours one out for njensen79
//banhammer’d
August 6th, 2012 at 11:17 AM
I was thinking the Maroney girl last night was looking pretty good…Just found out she’s 16….
/Just got Rob Lowe’d
August 6th, 2012 at 11:19 AM
Why are all weightlifters strong?
August 6th, 2012 at 11:21 AM
why are their weights so heavy?
August 6th, 2012 at 11:22 AM
This article is a textual dong.
August 6th, 2012 at 11:23 AM
Why are all sprinters so fasr?
August 6th, 2012 at 11:23 AM
Or fast. Let’s go with fast.
August 6th, 2012 at 11:23 AM
Obligatory. No byline photo is as appropriate as this one: http://thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/mushnick-better-than-you.jpg
August 6th, 2012 at 11:26 AM
Why are water polo players wet all of the time?
August 6th, 2012 at 11:27 AM
Or is he just desperate for clicks?
this is like the awesomest thing ever.
/SHUT MUSHNICK DOWN!
August 6th, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Mushnick was never relevant.
August 6th, 2012 at 11:50 AM
interesting darrel. what writers do you consider relevant?
/not a trap
//to me relevant means they affect change or are must-reads even for folks of whatever industry the writer covers
August 6th, 2012 at 11:56 AM
I’m pretty sure it is because their families were ravaged by gay Boy Scout leaders. Or their was fluoride in the water.
August 6th, 2012 at 11:56 AM
Why do the equestrian events have horses in them?
August 6th, 2012 at 11:57 AM
Because the riders looked silly prancing around banging coconuts together.
August 6th, 2012 at 12:01 PM
brave sir robin!
/pours one out
August 6th, 2012 at 12:26 PM
Reading the Post in the 80′s, the relevant writers from there, to me, were Dick Young, Izenberg, Maury Allen, Peter Vecsey, Kevin Kernan with the Mets. Those are off the top of my head. Lupica with the Daily News, George Vecsey with the Times. Mushnick always came off to me as a dude who had a job because he had naked pics of Murdoch hidden somewhere.
August 6th, 2012 at 12:30 PM
…..Fred Kerber with the Knicks. Wallace Matthews when he did boxing
August 6th, 2012 at 12:31 PM
ok so relevant to you mean no-nonsense, good info, well written, informative
August 6th, 2012 at 12:39 PM
that and/or the definition you gave earlier. Even in the media critic industry, I don’t think he carried the cache’ of someone like a Rudy Martzke on a national scale, and he wasn’t as good as Raissman from the News on a local one. He just had much more bombast than either of them.
/Newspaper nerd. Used to read 3 of them a day.
August 6th, 2012 at 12:54 PM
how do marathon runners run for so long?
August 6th, 2012 at 4:21 PM
why can’t Phil get a boner? Because he’s a fat old man.