Penn State Punishment: 4-Year Bowl Ban, Vacated Wins From 1998-2011, Fined $60 Million, Loss of Scholarships
All, Penn State Scandal July 23rd. 2012, 9:14am
Mark Emmert and the NCAA just slapped Penn State with severe penalties:
* Penn State has been fined $60 million
* 4 year bowl ban
* Vacated wins from 1998-2011
* 20 total/10 annual scholarship reduction for 4 yrs
* Any entering or returning players can transfer without penalty
Will that cripple the program?
Previously: Paterno Family Statement: “Tearing Down the Statue of Joe Paterno Does Not Serve the Victims”
Previously: Joe Paterno Statue Taken Down

- Muhammed “King Mo” Lawal’s KO of the Year Candidate Against Seth Petruzelli at Bellator 96
- Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
- Fight Master: Bellator MMA: Freshening Up a Tired Format
- John Wall Tattoos Are of the Raleigh Skyline and ‘The Great Wall’
- Neymar’s Silky Dribbling Schools the Mexican Defense, Sets Up Another Brazilian Goal [Video]

- KC Resident on Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
- A.P. on Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
- The Wayne Fontes Safari on Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
- A.P. on Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
- VladimirCrouton on Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
aroundtheweb
126 Responses to “Penn State Punishment: 4-Year Bowl Ban, Vacated Wins From 1998-2011, Fined $60 Million, Loss of Scholarships”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






July 23rd, 2012 at 9:15 AM
Bobby Bowden – winningest coach in Division I-A history…
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:16 AM
Probably not
/wanking motion
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:16 AM
Is this rhetorical?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:17 AM
If the Badgers can’t beat out Illinois, Indiana and Purdue to take that division this year I want Bielema gone before the bowl game
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:17 AM
Temporarily, yes.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:17 AM
Indiana no longer has the worst record in the Big Ten the last dozen years.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:18 AM
it will hurt but it won’t cripple them.
it’s nice to see actual punishments for the time period in question, rather than just throwing the death penalty on them and punishing those who never had any involvement in the scandal.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:18 AM
Will that cripple the program?
I’ve never been a fan, but I hope not.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:18 AM
thats pretty stiff. but it needed to happen, so we can now focus on meaningful shit like the pga and the start of football.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:19 AM
Not even questionable whether Badgers beat out those three.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:19 AM
it’s nice to see actual punishments for the time period in question,
+1
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:20 AM
Silas Redd’s phone is blowing up right now.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:21 AM
Finally, the stink of losing to a team quarterbacked by Anthony Morelli in 2002 is gone…the healing can begin in Madison
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:21 AM
That’s why I don’t get the 4 year bowl ban. If anything, just stipulate that all bowl revenue goes into the “fund” they have to create.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:22 AM
How we’ve gotten to a place where the NCAA can fine a public institution of higher learning sixty effing million dollars… yikes. Terrible.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:22 AM
Mark Emmert can deliver more justice in a weekend than in ten years of your courts and tribunal, just stay out of his way.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:23 AM
So Jason – does this satisfy your bloodlust? Or should the NCAA have done more?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:24 AM
Seeing this elsewhere and doesnt know what it means. I heard reduction of 10 for 4 years, whats the 20 total thing?
Could have been worse, about in line with what I was expecting. Everyone has had their chance to wag fingers and get their pound of flesh. Time to move on, BOB will get it done.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:24 AM
Well I’m sure this will stop schools from ever covering anything up in the future.
/rolls eyes
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:25 AM
What was the actual charge, they able to find a way to pigeon-hole this into an existing NCAA violation?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:26 AM
* Penn State has been fined $60 million
Who gets the money?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:26 AM
so far, so good.
I hope the Big Ten gives them a TV ban, if possible
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:27 AM
Now Bobby Bowden with his fake victories at Salem College is the best coach ever!!!
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:27 AM
Somehow, Jim Delaney
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:28 AM
The BCS
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:28 AM
I thought there was already a ban? BTN would only ban other sports – or are you saying a ban in excess of NCAA one?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:28 AM
I don’t get the math here, either.
A reduction of 10 schollys for 4 years would be 40 total, no?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:28 AM
They shoehorn’d it into the morality/institutional control measures. But, all penalties are to the football program/athletics and not the Schulz/Spanier led areas of the school where the biggest failures occurred.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:29 AM
So, what NCAA rule did they break?
/Serious question
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:29 AM
I dunno. I imagine their first televised game will be very high demand. I know I’ll want to tune in to at least the beginning.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:29 AM
Yes, because giving him more power would have prevented all of this.
/air wanking
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:30 AM
So football is going to be making a lot less money, and the school is going to pay the NCAA’s $60 million fine, on top of what were already massive budget cuts from the state.
I’m sure PSU will just have to lay off some more folks and find more revenue in tuition and fee hikes.
“Justice”.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:30 AM
//Tires on Urban’s H2 squealing
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:30 AM
In other words – Mark Emmert thinks he’s Roger Goodell.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:31 AM
If you don’t have bloodlust after following this case, you either don’t have kids or don’t have a conscience.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:31 AM
/coop
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:33 AM
aint no party like a blogger justice party cause a blogger justice party don’t stop for reasoned thinking.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:34 AM
the 4 year ban still allows players to play, even though they don’t get the chance to go to a bowl and get all sorts of free SWAG.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:34 AM
They shoehorn’d it into the morality/institutional control measures. But, all penalties are to the football program/athletics and not the Schulz/Spanier led areas of the school where the biggest failures occurred.
Exactly. Everyone thinks that football is the cash cow of the school, but the current fundraising drive (led previously by Spanier) brings in 3x more per year. The operating budget that Spanier oversaw was over $4B per academic year, and the guy had no BoT oversight. This cover-up was lead by Spanier to protect Spanier. The fact that it was athletic staff was ancillary (IMO).
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:34 AM
Still feel it’s wrong to punish the athletic program.
Punishment in a situation like this is so delicate because you affect so many people who are doing great things with the best intent.
So, the old man is dead and instead of lynching him in the streets, we punish 100,000 people that were affected by his lies.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:34 AM
Wait so THIS is their solution that doesn’t punish the innocent?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:35 AM
Stupid.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:35 AM
So, what NCAA rule did they break?
/Serious question
I would assume Lack of Institutional Control. But I didn’t click on the link.
/There was no link.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:35 AM
The courts will take care of them.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:35 AM
the 4 year ban still allows players to play, even though they don’t get the chance to go to a bowl and get all sorts of free SWAG.
No toast of the town for those guys.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:36 AM
ELO – Out of the Blue (20yr anniversary) is rocking my office this morning. Couldn’t have kicked the work-week off any better. Jeff Lynne is a genius.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:36 AM
WE GOT BLOOD…of the revenue that was put into the general fund used by the entire university.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:36 AM
There are some that any punishment of the program is unfair and undue. There are others that wanted a nuclear winter on football at PSU.
I am not sure how anybody could come to the “fair” penalty but somebody had to take a stab at it. I’m glad this is turning the corner. PSU elects to have football and be a NCAA member institution. It is a flawed governing body but the concept of a billion dollar sports enterprise intertwined in our schools of higher learning is flawed as well. But they exercised their lot and now the lawyers and press agents can have at it.
These are terrible things that have happened. Fairness went out the window a long time ago. Hopefully moving on will let the individuals move on in some peace.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:37 AM
They don’t have to pay it.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:37 AM
also, as I posted in the roundup, the fact that penalties stretch to a 1998 incident that was investigated by police and no charges were filed lets you know that this is simply a matter of appeasing the TBLs of the world and nothing more.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:38 AM
Very well thought out argument.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:38 AM
About as well thought out as your statement.
Tit for tat.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:38 AM
I expect litigation in this matter, and I think that Penn State can win.
This might eventually be known as the matter that pops the air out of the NCAA’s ever-increasing enforcement balloon.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:39 AM
Come on down Dorian Johnson.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:40 AM
/that is not the expression
//Well it should be!
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:41 AM
I hope not. Why should I be punished by not being able to watch my team play PSU?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:41 AM
Penn St should now go after Lane Kiffin.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:42 AM
This makes RichRod an almost .500 coach during his Michigan tenure.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:42 AM
1st decommittment just occurred. CB just left.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:42 AM
/awaits Bear’s more appropriate solution/punishment
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:43 AM
I’m wondering if schools will start to seriously reconsider membership in the NCAA. It’s a “special case” that won’t be repeated, until the next “special case” comes along.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:43 AM
We already agreed to it. Dragging it out only makes it worse. I think the “process” was ridiculous, but I actually like the outcome, quick punishment. We got the report, we took down the statue, punishment done. Camp starts in a few weeks and everyone can move on.
And I realize this is asking a lot, but I would implore my fellow PSUers to not whine and complain and bitch. Whats done is done, bitching wont change it, take our punishment, be contrite, and know that we’ll be back.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:44 AM
That meeting, where PSU officials do the cost/benefit analysis of taking this to court… would love to listen to that.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:45 AM
no moreso than having the alzheisman as coach for a decade.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:46 AM
Not just Penn St. filing lawsuits, rich PSU alums are going to file suit against the NCAA, Freeh and Big Ten. This is going to explode.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:47 AM
Who would present it to the courts? Certainly not the BOT or the President.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:47 AM
I’m not going to act like TBL and pretend that I’m right about everything. I will say, however, that I agree with a lot of what people have said in this thread:
Roeth:
That’s why I don’t get the 4 year bowl ban. If anything, just stipulate that all bowl revenue goes into the “fund” they have to create.Timmy:
So football is going to be making a lot less money, and the school is going to pay the NCAA’s $60 million fine, on top of what were already massive budget cuts from the state.I’m sure PSU will just have to lay off some more folks and find more revenue in tuition and fee hikes.
“Justice”.
Urinal:
So, the old man is dead and instead of lynching him in the streets, we punish 100,000 people that were affected by his lies.And I’d be interested in Jay V’s reasoning:
I expect litigation in this matter, and I think that Penn State can win.This might eventually be known as the matter that pops the air out of the NCAA’s ever-increasing enforcement balloon.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:47 AM
HTML OVERLOAD!!!
/sorry everyone
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:47 AM
I thought Marky Mark said PSU signed something which stated that they would accept the penalties and not appeal.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:48 AM
Show me where that’s the case because I certainly have seen no report that states that. In fact, the BOT has retained Gene Marsh.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:48 AM
By who? Penn State consented to this.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:48 AM
a paddlin’.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:49 AM
I expect litigation in this matter, and I think that Penn State can win.
you really think so? i dont think PSU has enough to successfully win, and it will further drag this on. i think they threaten, but after the DD period, will pass.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:49 AM
They did waive right to appeal…via the NCAA appeals process. Not via civil action.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:50 AM
Other schools can’t be happy if this is the case.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:50 AM
Hopefully Matt Millen is on ESPN today
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:50 AM
Adam Breneman’s phone must be blowing up right now.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:52 AM
How exactly is this worse than the death penalty? Stupid Jesse Palmer
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:52 AM
PSU signed a consent decree so penalties are basically self-imposed
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:53 AM
Really? They have a textbook due process argument. They could get injunctive relief in their sleep in this matter.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:53 AM
Kaiser – not sure if you got ban-hammer’d or not, but did you see my last suggestion the other night of Dr. Dog – Be the Void?
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:53 AM
And going back to your original comment, you must not be able to turn on the news or open a newspaper without having a coronary.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:53 AM
This isn’t going to court. What’s done is done. PSU needs to pick up the pieces and rebuild with their new leadership in place. And whoever said this was “worse than the death penalty” obviously hasnt followed the SMU program for the past 25 years. The only way it would be worse than the death penalty is if PSU got kicked out of the Big 10, which I dont see happening. Maybe it’s naivete but I dont see PSU turning into Indiana/Minnesota on the field. They’ll suck for a few years and have the community rally around their depleted roster and then will go back to being a solid 4th or 5th place Big 10 team with the occasional top 10 season, which is pretty much what they’ve been for 15 years.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:53 AM
Kinda like his knee did.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:54 AM
In any event…I am backing away from the statement that they will litigate.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:54 AM
You know what would have been an enlightened approach?
To be as severe as they’ve been to the football program. Maybe more. Certainly the scholarship penalties and bowl ban are fair.
But then the NCAA could have coordinated with other member institutions to show that they intended no further collateral damage in this matter, and helped PSU make up budget shortfalls from the loss of football revenue.
PSU is one of only a few Div 1 schools whose athletic department actually operated in self-sufficiency. The NCAA could have helped sustain that.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:55 AM
We need a fight to the death between him and Mark May.
And by fight to the death I mean they both end up dead.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:55 AM
Penn State was on board with this punishment.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:56 AM
• A $60 million fine, with the proceeds going to an endowment fund for victims of sexual abuse
I found the answer to my question. Which only brings up more questions.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:56 AM
Really? They have a textbook due process argument. They could get injunctive relief in their sleep in this matter.
if this consent to accept and not appeal is true, i dont see what PSU can do. The NCAA could easily point out that PSU hired a 3rd party investigation that led to this punishment, and this would easily hold up as due process.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:58 AM
Endowment fund? Go on.
/coop
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:58 AM
good.
i don’t see how they could say they opposed it w/o being destroyed. and if they opposed it, i’m sure the NCAA could have been much worse.
July 23rd, 2012 at 9:59 AM
It’s moot now, anyway…but I absolutely disagree that a 3rd party investigation would “easily hold up as due process” — if Penn State hadn’t signed the consent agreement.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:00 AM
Maybe the kid diddling drove the profitability.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:03 AM
When it concerns kids getting raped in a public institution’s shower facilities that he was given the keys to by PSU’s Fab Four, yes. Better the punishment err on the side of overkill here.
And don’t worry about PSU’s funding. If their alumni have shown anything in the last year, it’s that the money will keep rolling in regardless of how egregious the crime. The school will be fine. The victims will not.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:04 AM
So what’s the purpose of a bowl ban and scholarship reduction if the Fab Four is either dead, in jail, or a combinatin of both?
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:04 AM
If by on board, you mean signed off on them to try to escape more publicity, then sure.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:05 AM
Ed Gennero’s phone is blowing up right now.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:06 AM
Straight Arrow Gennero. Legend.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:08 AM
Like all NCAA punishments, it’s too late to punish those who committed the crimes. The courts will do that. But the NCAA is trying to set a precedent here. If PSU or any other school covers up something like this in order to protect the university and continue to bring in revenue, the NCAA will destroy the program.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:09 AM
what about holly
mclanegennero?/picks up photo frame laid down
//sees picture of american who’s seen too many movies
///now i have a machine gun ho ho ho
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:12 AM
he wasn’t given the keys by them.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:12 AM
So jail time and 9 figure civil suits aren’t sufficient deterrants?
“Well, I was ok with going to jail and crippling the University with lawsuits, but now we won’t be able to go to the Holiday Bowl! Fuck that. Joyce, get me a sports blog on the line, stat! I’m going to make their day.”
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:14 AM
finds it funny that “given the keys” and “fab four” nickname was mentioned…you know, considering the fab five’s cheating and all that.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:16 AM
I’m wondering if schools will start to seriously reconsider membership in the NCAA. It’s a “special case” that won’t be repeated, until the next “special case” comes along.
or….they could play within the rules
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:19 AM
No, that’s not sufficient. Getting a school that makes 10 or 11 figures off the football program per year to write checks isn’t sufficient. The punishment is, IMO, an attempt to “change the culture”. You can argue all day whether or not it will actually work, but calling it to harsh is a joke when you consider what went on.
Based on his retirement package given to him by PSU (which was the 4 of them), he certainly was. He sat in Spanier’s fucking box for JoePa’s game to pass Eddie Robinson for christ sakes.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:19 AM
The most laughable part of the punishment is the Athletics Integrity Monitor. What’s he going to do – read the AD/President’s emails? It’s not like there are recruiting violations going on.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:23 AM
he had keys based on his emeritus status not based on those guys having a key made and giving it to him.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:26 AM
You are correct. JoePa did not go to Home Depot and have the keys copied for him. They just didn’t take the keys away after they knew he was fucking kids in the showers.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:26 AM
He has a rape whistle and he lurks in the change-rooms.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:29 AM
The most laughable part of the punishment is the Athletics Integrity Monitor. What’s he going to do – read the AD/President’s emails? It’s not like there are recruiting violations going on.
the most laughable part of the Titanic was the paint on the smokestacks…
you and other PSU folks, why are you complaining? please share what should have been done IYO. I apologize if you’ve already made suggestions. I just don’t want to read complaints without alternate suggestions
I do respect the bold move of complaining about punishments in the face of horrific crimes and coverups
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:32 AM
They don’t have any suggestions, I’ve already asked.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:32 AM
You are correct. JoePa did not go to Home Depot and have the keys copied for him. They just didn’t take the keys away after they knew he was fucking kids in the showers.
if you read the report, there was no legal mechanism for taking his keys away. weird.
you and other PSU folks, why are you complaining? please share what should have been done IYO. I apologize if you’ve already made suggestions. I just don’t want to read complaints without alternate suggestions
as Roeth mentioned, this was an administrative scandal that punishes the athletic department.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:40 AM
That would be sound logic if we weren’t talking about a school that was run by the athletic department. And after all, it was one of the coaches that was fucking the kids, not a trustee or an administrator. This was a football scandal as well, which people tend to forget. If it was a biology professor fucking kids in the lab, he would have been in jail in 1998.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:41 AM
46yearslump wants MORE BLOOD. You should probably work on that anger issue.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:41 AM
sir, i think it sucks that athletes and coaches whose programs benefited from football revenue will suffer, but the point was a stern warning to universities on what can happen in the future if a revenue-generating program runs off the rails.
the most injustice will be if innocent folks lose jobs.
that typed, any comments on ‘injustice’ will be compared to the past experiences and future plight of the Sandusky victims. if these punishments can prevent this from happening again, and of course we’d never know if they do, sacrifice of some innocents is a small price
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:42 AM
That would have happened had they contacted the police. That was their “legal mechanism”.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:43 AM
Nope, I think the NCAA did what it could. I’m good, thanks. Just don’t understand the people that want LESS blood.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:45 AM
I’ve said it already, but NCAA had to do something, I was prepared for worse, would have liked a little less, but I’m alright with things. I feel better today, think this allows everyone to move on.
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:47 AM
who’s legal mechanism?
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:49 AM
liquor, what punishment from NCAA do you think is appropriate, if any?
Any from the conference?
Not trying to bait you, really want to know. I do appreciate your comment asking PSU folks to zip it, take it and move on (that was you, right?)
July 23rd, 2012 at 10:52 AM
Presser at 11:00 am. Possible TV ban or a ban on B1G postseason revenue sharing are some of the rumors….who knows.
July 23rd, 2012 at 11:07 AM
Removing the wins is ridiculous. The reason being is because it was done to strictly “harm” Paterno since the fines and bans won’t since he is in a box. When the head of an organization lays punishment simply to harm a reputation or legacy it makes it nothing more than a witch hunt. Paterno’s rep and legacy is stained all accolades being removed etc. have taken care of that and will continue to on its own.
July 23rd, 2012 at 11:10 AM
Seems doubly ridiculous that it goes back to 1998, when seemingly nothing was covered up, and the allegation was full investigated by the DA.
July 23rd, 2012 at 11:13 AM
It was the only way to punish Penn State for its actions during that specific time period.
July 23rd, 2012 at 11:30 AM
No. He is trying to punish Paterno not Penn St. If you cannot see that then you must have a backwards mullet.