Oscar Pistorius – the Double Amputee “Blade Runner” – Will Compete in the 400 Meters at the Olympics
Oscar Pistorius of South Africa will be competing in the Olympics in the 400 meter and 4×400 meter relay events for his country. This is notable because of Pistorius’ physical condition, as he was a double amputee of his lower legs at 11 months old. He is known as “The Blade Runner” as he runs on a set of carbon fiber prosthetic blades in pace of feet.
Four years ago, Pistorius was involved in some controversy as he tried to make the Olympics. At first, the rules were amended and he was ruled ineligible by track’s governing body. That was later changed as it was determined he did not have an advantage over other athletes. However, he missed out on qualifying for the last Olympic Games.
Bill Plaschke of the Los Angeles Times spoke with some doctors at UCLA about Pistorius and whether the blades gave him an advantage over other runners.
After spending time studying Pistorius’ motion, [Dr. Vijay] Gupta conceded he had a “very subtle advantage” in that the curvature of the blades allowed him to remain in longer contact with the track and thus propel himself slightly faster than someone with feet.
“Whoever designed those blades is very smart,” Gupta said. “He can use them to generate more power from the ground.”
Gupta added, however, that there are disadvantages in having an upper body that is attached to a mechanical lower leg.
Professor Reggie Edgerton added “There might be a slight advantage, but it is outweighed by the obvious disadvantage, and I would let him run.”
It’s a fascinating story, and an interesting debate as to whether Pistorius has an advantage running with the blades. As Plaschke notes, he is not a favorite in the event and was added as the final track athlete by South Africa, so his chances of medalling are a longshot. Would he be viewed differently if, as this article from the Sydney Morning Herald suggests, he was a favorite in the event or improved to surpass other competitors. Right now, Pistorius, who is 25, is near prime age for a 400 meter runner. The average age of all medalists in the event since the 1984 Olympics is 24.1 years old. What will happen in four years if he is still improving, as technology improves, and is better at an age when only Michael Johnson and Roger Black medalled since 1984?
For now, though, we can enjoy a story of someone that overcame a disability, and now isn’t a disabled athlete, but an Olympian who represents the drive and determination of the competitive ideal.
[photo via US Presswire]

- TV Ratings For the NBA Playoff Series Between Memphis & San Antonio Are Predictably Putrid
- Amazing GIF of Tony Allen’s Acting Job vs Spurs Includes Appearances By Steven Spielberg, Brendan Fraser
- Mario Gjurovski Celebrates Goal By Removing Shorts, Wearing them on His Head, Gets Red Card [Video]
- ESPN is Covering Every Angle Of the RGIII Workout
- The Jason McIntyre Show: NBA Draft Talk with ESPN’s Jay Williams

- JaiAlai on Amazing GIF of Tony Allen's Acting Job vs Spurs Includes Appearances By Steven Spielberg, Brendan Fraser
- Babar 2.0 on TV Ratings For the NBA Playoff Series Between Memphis & San Antonio Are Predictably Putrid
- Eric T0upal aka BrawnyTom on TV Ratings For the NBA Playoff Series Between Memphis & San Antonio Are Predictably Putrid
- spencer096 on Amazing GIF of Tony Allen's Acting Job vs Spurs Includes Appearances By Steven Spielberg, Brendan Fraser
- Nada on Amazing GIF of Tony Allen's Acting Job vs Spurs Includes Appearances By Steven Spielberg, Brendan Fraser
17 Responses to “Oscar Pistorius – the Double Amputee “Blade Runner” – Will Compete in the 400 Meters at the Olympics”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






July 7th, 2012 at 3:23 PM
You didn’t link to the Sydney Morning Herald piece. I was just talking about this yesterday with someone and I do think I would feel differently about it if he were a favorite to win (or if somehow he does win). But yeah I agree that for right now I think it’s cool he gets to compete.
July 7th, 2012 at 3:34 PM
You didn’t link to the Sydney Morning Herald piece. I was just talking about this yesterday with someone and I do think I would feel differently about it if he were a favorite to win (or if somehow he does win). But yeah I agree that for right now I think it’s cool he gets to compete.
Added it in.
July 7th, 2012 at 3:40 PM
Kind of a cowardly position. Okay to let the cripple in as long as he doesn’t cause any waves? World Court of Sport has ruled he can play a long time ago. If he wins, (not likely at all), so be it.
July 7th, 2012 at 3:46 PM
Well I just mean it appears that he’s not actually getting an advantage from it. I think it’s pretty easy to imagine a hypothetical runner in the future with prosthetic legs that do provide a serious advantage, which would defeat the purpose of the competition.
July 7th, 2012 at 3:50 PM
Fuck milk. Got legs?
July 7th, 2012 at 8:16 PM
Not feelin’ it.
http://shoeuntied.wordpress.com/2012/07/06/man-with-carbon-fiber-legs-to-compete-in-the-london-olympics-hold-on-a-second/
July 7th, 2012 at 8:20 PM
You’re an idiot. HE HAS NO FUCKING LEGS. It’s been studied, the fact that they MIGHT help him is offset by the fact THEY ARE ARTIFICIAL AND HIS BODY HAS TO ADJUST FOR NOT HAVING ANY FUCKING LEGS.
July 7th, 2012 at 9:46 PM
You’re an idiot. HE HAS NO FUCKING LEGS. It’s been studied, the fact that they MIGHT help him is offset by the fact THEY ARE ARTIFICIAL AND HIS BODY HAS TO ADJUST FOR NOT HAVING ANY FUCKING LEGS.
Exactly. He doesn’t have two legs up on the competition. He’s gonna have to put his best feet forward if he expects to walk away a winner of this race.
July 7th, 2012 at 10:42 PM
He has had more than twenty years to adapt to not having legs. He doesn’t even remember having feet. He barely made the standard, he is not going to place well, and this is a waste of time.
July 8th, 2012 at 12:10 AM
Professor Reggie Edgerton
fantastic for this story
July 8th, 2012 at 12:11 AM
this inspires about the same debate as the NCAA champion wrestler with no legs from 2011. advantage or disadvantage?
July 8th, 2012 at 2:30 AM
Here’s how I look at it… can he get shin splints? does his lower legs fatigue? can he twist an ankle? alright then.
For a sport that goes to extremes to ensure a level playing field its tough to make an objective case that a level playing field exists in this case.
Another way to look at it is this and yes I know its an extreme but its still illustrative. Assuming an athlete obsessed with winning decided to amputate his legs and use the same prosthetic to run would he be allowed to run? the answer i’m guessing is no.
The lesson here is that decision to let him run doesn’t stand on objective grounds but instead colored by the human interest story that comes with it.
July 8th, 2012 at 3:06 PM
Here’s how I look at it… can he get shin splints? does his lower legs fatigue? can he twist an ankle? alright then.
That’s actually a really good fucking point
July 8th, 2012 at 9:32 PM
Here’s how I look at it… can he get shin splints? does his lower legs fatigue? can he twist an ankle? alright then.
There are a variety of things he was to deal with another runner doesn’t. You’re really trying to find reason’s to exclude this guy. Pathetic.
Assuming an athlete obsessed with winning decided to amputate his legs and use the same prosthetic to run would he be allowed to run? the answer i’m guessing is no.
If he could make the time, YES. It has nothing to do with WHO it is.
July 8th, 2012 at 10:12 PM
1) It does not appear that Pistorious’s prosthetics provide any competitive advantage, and as closely as possible approximate real legs.
2) It is easy to imagine prosthetics that do provide a competitive advantage, whether by producing better springs, reducing shin splints, whatever.
In general I am in favor of allowing people with disabilities to participate in the Olympics if: a) they can meet the qualifying standards, and b) they do not get any competitive advantage from whatever prosthetics they have. I think there is basically only a positive effect with respect to inspiring those with disabilities (most of whom will never have the money to afford these sort of prosthetics).
That said it’s easy to imagine prosthetics that do provide a competitive advantage at some point in the future. And I don’t really trust the “World Court of Sport” to determine whether and when people with disabilities should compete. They’ve made their decision in this case and that’s fine. But I find it very hard to imagine a runner with prosthetic legs winning a gold medal and not feeling like the competition is somewhat cheapened.
Then again I don’t have a horse in this race.
July 8th, 2012 at 10:20 PM
I guess you can make a case for each side. Many reasons why to or not to. So fuck it, like gfunk said, I don’t have a horse in this race.
July 9th, 2012 at 1:43 AM
Yes, his lower legs can fatigue and break at anytime. He gets tons of blisters to make up for shin splints. And he can break an ankle..that’s for sure.