For Tiger Woods, Good Days and Bad Days That Come With Mortality
Good days and bad days, but the bad days get a little more frequent. Tiger Woods was poised after Friday to regain his Majors momentum, and one prominent writer felt it was in the bag after Woods charged to the lead on the back nine on Friday afternoon. From a 27-hole stretch late Friday until late Sunday afternoon when he fell out of contention, Woods had 9 bogeys, 1 double bogey, and a single birdie.
While the attention was on Woods entering the weekend, it was Webb Simpson who accomplished what many were expecting of Woods, posting a good number and then putting pressure on the leaders. Even after Saturday, Woods could still have been in contention with the type of round he is capable of, a great round of 67 on a tough course. If he had just shot a 141 over the weekend, he would have been in a playoff. 141 was tough on the weekend, but 14 of the 72 golfers playing over the weekend managed it. If Tiger had been top 20% after having the lead, he’s sitting at 15 majors. Instead, he was closer to bottom 20% — his iron shots were just a little inexact, he couldn’t get close enough on the fast greens to get on any kind of roll over the weekend.
So what he’s shown is that he is golf mortal recently, and that the standards are different for him. Mickelson was way worse, last year’s winner, Rory McIlroy — younger and with none of the off the course narrative — was way worse. I kind of feel like Tiger is never going to be back to the dominance, but that’s to be expected, but that he is back to being JATG (Just a Top Golfer). I suspect he wins a major in the next calendar year now more than two weeks ago, and will still be ahead of Nicklaus’ pace at the same age. Good days, and bad days, but he’ll have a tournament where the good rounds outnumber the bad, unlike this one where it was a draw.
You might be surprised to know, by the way, that Tiger is contending in the same percentage of majors since 2007 as he was before — the difference is finishing and truly dominant performances like at Pebble Beach or the Masters in 1997. From 1997 to 2001, he was Top 10 in 60% of the majors he played, and won half of those he was Top 10. Same thing from 2002 to 2006. Since 2007, it’s 11 of 18 in the Top 10 (61%) but only 2 wins of those 11.
So JATG, but if he contends in about 60% of them over the next few years, he’s going to break through and win. He’s just not going to keep running away from the field like he once did. By the way, from age 36 to 39, after winning his 14th, Jack finished Top 10 in 13 Majors but won only once.
[photo via US Presswire]

- Premier League: What Each Club Should Prioritize in the Summer
- Footage of Kelly Tripucka Unveiling the Original Teal Charlotte Hornets’ Uniforms in 1988 is Breathtaking [Video]
- NFL Coaches Using Microsoft Tablets on the Sidelines in the Future Should Lead to Advances in Clock Management and Strategy
- European Tour Chief George O’Grady: “Most of Sergio’s friends are colored athletes”
- Cute Dog Goes on Canadian Morning Show to Pick Senators – Peguins Winner, Instead Chooses Bacon

- MP III on Footage of Kelly Tripucka Unveiling the Original Teal Charlotte Hornets' Uniforms in 1988 is Breathtaking [Video]
- spencer096 on NFL Coaches Using Microsoft Tablets on the Sidelines in the Future Should Lead to Advances in Clock Management and Strategy
- Trey on NFL Coaches Using Microsoft Tablets on the Sidelines in the Future Should Lead to Advances in Clock Management and Strategy
- cleet on Footage of Kelly Tripucka Unveiling the Original Teal Charlotte Hornets' Uniforms in 1988 is Breathtaking [Video]
- A.P. on NFL Coaches Using Microsoft Tablets on the Sidelines in the Future Should Lead to Advances in Clock Management and Strategy
34 Responses to “For Tiger Woods, Good Days and Bad Days That Come With Mortality”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






June 18th, 2012 at 3:59 PM
Fair, reasonable assessment of Tiger Woods? I shall now collapse.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:04 PM
holy shit, today’s a soggy golf dream come true.
tiger’s on his way up and there isn’t another player in the world who’s long term prospects i like more other than rory. we might be back to business as usual as early as next year.
but then he won two majors in 1980 at 40…why’d you cut it off at 39?
June 18th, 2012 at 4:10 PM
but then he won two majors in 1980 at 40…why’d you cut it off at 39?
sure, to show that Jack had a stretch where he lost a bunch when he was in contention.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:11 PM
also, Spencer, get your butt to KC and give my son a golf lesson.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:11 PM
Well reasoned, Lisk. For the golf folks… which of the 4 Majors do we see Eldrick having the best shot at for the rest of his career? Augusta simply because it’s the same course each year or one of the others?
Now about those QB projection posts that were so awesome…
June 18th, 2012 at 4:11 PM
ah…fsho. i just thought i missed something.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:12 PM
once im done with him (/no sandusky) he’s gonna make you a lotta money.
/again, i must emphasize the lack of sandusky in the above
June 18th, 2012 at 4:14 PM
Roger Clemens verdict going to be announced in 5 minutes.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:14 PM
both opens…augusta is a sprint and i don’t think he’s got the raw firepower to stick with the bubba’s and rory’s at the current augusta. jack still had a length advantage when he won in 1986, tiger doesn’t have that anymore.
the pga’s no different than a regular tourney…he could win some of those, sure.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:14 PM
Torrey Pines. Not sure when the Open returns there, though.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:17 PM
nice post, Lisk.
Tiger used to get all the breaks he needed and dominated, now he’s not.
happens in every sport, your luck runs out.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:23 PM
If the PGA Championship comes to Medinah again, you can pencil him in the top 10 at least.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:29 PM
I think Tiger will shine in a British Open or two. Which course was it where he only hit iron off the tee? No reason he can’t do that when he’s 40.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:36 PM
I think Tiger will shine in a British Open or two. Which course was it where he only hit iron off the tee? No reason he can’t do that when he’s 40.
While I am not a fan of Tiger, those stinger 2-irons he hits are one of my favorite shots in golf to watch
June 18th, 2012 at 4:40 PM
Tiger used to get all the breaks he needed and dominated, now he’s not.
happens in every sport, your luck runs out.
when it happens as frequently as it did with Tiger, i’d argue you make your own luck.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:46 PM
to an extent, i mean, you don’t win every time.
it’s not a scientific study but it seems like you have players in any sport that are truly dominant and winning championships in 1, maybe two short spans of their career, beginning, middle or end, there’s very few, if none, that were dominant and crushing championships from day 1 of the career to the last day
June 18th, 2012 at 4:46 PM
it’s a good post, but i’m not really sure it says anything. that’s not a bad thing. lord knows there’s plenty of know-it-alls taking their hard stance on tiger’s current and future condition today.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:47 PM
both opens…augusta is a sprint and i don’t think he’s got the raw firepower to stick with the bubba’s and rory’s at the current augusta
I agree 100% with this.
Lisk a stat with Tiger you might like is win-rate. It examines a winning percentage out of top 5 or top 10′s. He won a disproportionate (sic) amount of majors early, and is now having some regression to mean. Nicklaus had 19 2nd place finishes for example. For a while, Tiger had only 1-2.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:47 PM
Shocking. Clemens found Not Guilty on all counts.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:49 PM
Tiger’s greatest accomplishment will always be how he was able to be underground for so long after Hydrantgate. With all the papparazzi today, purely amazing.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:50 PM
While I am not a fan of Tiger, those stinger 2-irons he hits are one of my favorite shots in golf to watch
He chunked that one Friday on the back nine. It went like 150-180 yards.
June 18th, 2012 at 4:55 PM
Nicklaus had 19 2nd place finishes for example. For a while, Tiger had only 1-2.
different talent in the field.
June 18th, 2012 at 5:02 PM
different talent in the field.
agree with everything except this…
June 18th, 2012 at 5:59 PM
different eras, can’t compare. nowadays anyone can come out and contend…john peterson doesn’t have any status on a tour, yet what’d he finish last weekend? back in jack’s era it was the same baker’s dozen of contenders each week.
gary player, seve and shark blew the game up internationally…for every one of them in jack’s era there are three players with enormous potential in their place today. all it takes is one hot putter to contend, and because of the better equipment, the great ballstrikers can’t separate themselves like they used to.
id argue it’s harder to dominate in eras pf parity.
June 18th, 2012 at 6:29 PM
i’d rather be paired with Jim Furyk or YE Yang than this guy
June 18th, 2012 at 6:30 PM
what about this guy?
June 18th, 2012 at 6:31 PM
trevino’s the best.
June 18th, 2012 at 6:34 PM
never seen that photo…awesome. I could and listen to him tell stories until his voice gave out.
June 18th, 2012 at 6:36 PM
palmer, watson, trevino, miller, seve, player, a young norman, weiskopf
i’ll take playing in the era of parity
June 18th, 2012 at 6:43 PM
i get what you’re saying and will give you that i like the swings, characters, style, grace and competition of that era over the current one for sure, the players today have better equipment, education and have the precedents already set. they’re not fighting for paychecks anymore so they can afford to go for broke and miss a cut if they contend just as often when they’re hot.
sports evolve, and golf’s no different (pre-emptive shut it). jack’s era was borne out of an era where snead, hogan and nelson dominated with classical styles where the three dominated at an even greater level than during jack’s era.
doesn’t make their contributions any less impressive, but eras have to be compared on their own merit and there are just more guys can flat out shoot low scores today.
June 18th, 2012 at 6:44 PM
to put it another way…is there ANY way we could ever see a trevino again? someone who picks the game up at 21 and qualifies for the us open as a money player with a reputation, finish 5th in the us open and win the next week? no fucking way…there are guys on minitours struggling to earn a paycheck, missing cuts shooting 66-65.
June 18th, 2012 at 6:51 PM
I agree with all your point, but I still don’t think that the fields that Jack dominated were less talented than these fields. Agreed that there is no way to compare but think of Hogan with todays equipment…they would have to make the hole smaller.
June 18th, 2012 at 7:08 PM
if we’re thinking of hogan with today’s driver and ball, i think we’re looking at something around 85% fairways and GIR.
now think of jack and greg norman in their primes with a 460cc and a prov1x…THAT’S scary. if jack were 22 with today’s equipment, i’m not sure he’d carry anything longer than a 3i. and a few hours with stan utley while roger cleveland grinds a 60* lob wedge would’ve done wonders for his short game…on the four greens he missed a tournament.
ive always thought tiger reminded me more of seve than jack, but could you imagine “tiger-proofint” working if jack were in his prime? it’d play right into his wheelhouse…he’d be so far past the competition and still be in the fairway, he’d be at even more of an advantage.
June 18th, 2012 at 7:12 PM
on the flipside, the equipment really hurt guys like trevino and faldo who sacrificed distance off the tee in favor of carving in 7 woods and 2 irons. it’s a shame we’ve lost that style.