Jackie Robinson day and nary a mention of the 9-1 Dodgers. I’m glad to see the anti Dodger bias is alive and well (And no I don’t care how easy the schedule has been).

They were featured on Friday, jackass. SHUT. IT.

Jackie Robinson day and nary a mention of the 9-1 Dodgers. I’m glad to see the anti Dodger bias is alive and well (And no I don’t care how easy the schedule has been).

Oh no. You will now have to tune into ESPN for your slurping. Just enjoy the 9-1. I don’t want to enjoy their fall back to .500 too much.

So I’m thinking of taking the plunge and buying the mlb.tv package. Any words of caution that I should know about or is it more than worth it and I should stop being a pussy and buy it already?

Yes. Man up. The top package is worth every damn penny…

Why the fuck is he even on Yahoo

Go black face or go home

I believe those were Whoopi’s exact words to Ted Danson.

What’s everyone’s thoughts on the 42s for Jackie Day?

I think everyone should wear pinstripes to commemorate Bloated Babe Ruth Day.
Or attack cripples in the stands to commemorate Crazy Ass Ty Cobb Day.

how about fans yell racist remarks at the players before a white guy on each team puts his hand on the shoulder of one designated black player at second base and teaches everyone a lesson in tolerance?

Pee Wee!

Well said, thanks.

So I’m thinking of taking the plunge and buying the mlb.tv package. Any words of caution that I should know about or is it more than worth it and I should stop being a pussy and buy it already?

Sack up!

Maybe just a delegate from each team gets to wear it. Not the whole squad.

I agree. One 42 on each team, and one 14 on each team 3 months later.

So I’m thinking of taking the plunge and buying the mlb.tv package. Any words of caution that I should know about or is it more than worth it and I should stop being a pussy and buy it already?

words of caution: they only show baseball on that channel.

First, that dude doesn’t have the requisite upper back hair bursting out of the t-shirt to get to impersonate me. Second, Royals. Not Saint Louis.

I believe when it first started, players were allowed to wear the number if they so desired. I guess the problem with that is, those who don’t wear the number will be labeled as racists by morons.

like being asked if I’d like to donate a dollar to the March of Dimes when I check out at Publix. or when Firehouse Subs asks me if I’d like to round my bill up to the nearest dollar so the change can be donated to firemen supoprt groups or something.

+1 I believe a team captain designated as the guy who gets to wear it, is sufficient.

let’s change it up a bit. how about fans yell racist remarks at the players before a white guy on each team puts his hand on the shoulder of one designated black player at second base and teaches everyone a lesson in tolerance?

Isn’t that how it started? But like most things, a little is never enough.

I believe when it first started, players were allowed to wear the number if they so desired. I guess the problem with that is, those who don’t wear the number will be labeled as racists by morons.