Comments on: Kentucky’s Just Too Good: Wildcats 102, Hooisers 90

By: Cheesus

Cheesus — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 16:08:19 +0000

’05 UNC was better than ’09 UNC. ’01 Duke is probably the right answer.

By: Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah!

Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah! — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:18:17 +0000

In my opinion, if Kentucky wins. They will go down as the best team since the turn of the century.

01 Duke.

By: kazzythekid

kazzythekid — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:51:08 +0000

This game was sloppy

You must have been trying to post in the UNC-Ohio thread, because this may have been the least sloppy game of the tourney so far. If Oladipo doesn’t foul out, then maybe the Hoosiers keep it closer, but I doubt it. I hope the Wiz don’t get screwed in the draft lottery, and can get either Davis or MKG. Barnes looks like a bust IMO.

By: CARCAR

CARCAR — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:25:38 +0000

Not to mention Miller off the bench, and Davis would eat Hansbrough alive.

By: Matty_Cam

Matty_Cam — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:24:40 +0000

The UNC title team with Hansbrough would beatdown this Kentucky team.

I’m not so sure…

Lawson > Teague
Lamb and Danny Green = push
Kidd-Gilchrist > Ellington
Jones and Deon Thompson = push
And you really think Hansbrough is that much better than Davis?

By: A.P. (artist formerly TJ21)

A.P. (artist formerly TJ21) — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:17:10 +0000

The UNC title team with Hansbrough would beatdown this Kentucky team. Thats the best college team since the early 90s UNLV squad.

By: CARCAR

CARCAR — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:12:00 +0000

In my opinion, if Kentucky wins. They will go down as the best team since the turn of the century.

By: CARCAR

CARCAR — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:10:30 +0000

The Wall-Cousins team couldn’t shoot, the Knight-Harrellson team wasn’t very talented in retrospect, but this year’s team has unbelievable talent to go along with 3 dead-eye shooters. Not saying they are a lock by any stretch but if they go on to win this thing, history will look very favorably on Kentucky

By: Matty_Cam

Matty_Cam — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 05:09:03 +0000

This game was sloppy

192 total points and only 14 combined turnovers beg to differ. Indiana could not have played any better. Anthony Davis basically only played one half. And they Kentucky still won by 12. Yes, they can be beat… But it’s going to take a herculean effort to do so.

By: A.P. (artist formerly TJ21)

A.P. (artist formerly TJ21) — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 04:58:36 +0000

Wally, don’t infuse facts into the assumptions!

By: A.P. (artist formerly TJ21)

A.P. (artist formerly TJ21) — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 04:57:06 +0000

Your statement about nobody beating them will only be true if they shoot like this the rest of the way.

By: Wally's World

Wally's World — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 04:55:42 +0000

Indiana plays 0 defense. Hasn’t all year. Kentucky is definitely the odds on favorite. But, they can be beaten. KY probably doesn’t want to see Florida again. It’s tough to beat a team that you’ve played a bunch during the year.

Vandy showed the way. IU just doesn’t have the horses.

By: A.P. (artist formerly TJ21)

A.P. (artist formerly TJ21) — Sat, 24 Mar 2012 04:52:22 +0000

Yeah,people said nobody would beat kentucky until Vanderbilt did. This game was sloppy, overofficiated, and kentucky was just hot from the field. Syracuse can beat Kentucky. UNC and Kansas can beat UK. Hell, baylor may be able to best them if Perry Jones shows up. Kentucky is a very good team but they aren’t an all-time juggernaut. People said nobody was beating the John Wall-Demarcus Cousins UK team but they lost. This team is vulnerable against teams with very good guard play. If Indiana had a bigger, more competent PG, this game would have been much different.

Both teams tonight were very good offensively but the game was not fun to watch. The officials were bullshit and called way too many cheap fouls on both teams.