Criticism of Goodell’s Punishment of the Saints is Shortsighted
When many felt a household hammer would suffice for the Saints, Roger Goodell used a sledge. His bounty sanctions kneecapped New Orleans’ 2012 season and cost head coach Sean Payton $7.5 million in salary. The punishments seem excessive, even vindictive if viewed in a vacuum, but the truth is far more complex.
The severity had little to do with the Saints’ actions in isolation and internal league politics and everything to do with the imminent and potentially catastrophic litigation the league faces over head injuries. Scientific exploration of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy and concussions is in the preliminary stages, and the case studies of Dave Duerson, Chris Henry and others present a grim forecast.
We have not yet had a generation of players, who played through modern 10 to 15-year careers, move into middle age fully cognizant of the damage they might have suffered. Unlike scores of other health problems faced by football players, concussions can be attributed directly to NFL football, league policies and neglect. The moral toll itself may make the sport, as presently constituted, untenable. The fiscal toll from a massive class-action lawsuit could cripple it.
Radical reform is required. NFL officials understand this better than any outsider. This is why intrusive safety measures have been introduced, including massive fines for violent hits and moving the kickoff to the 35-yard line. This is why we should expect the league to be far more proactive funding research the next few years.
Viewing the New Orleans events through this prism, an organized bounty system is one of the worst things the NFL could have happen. This is not just players deliberately injuring other players. This is NFL employees orchestrating and promoting the deliberate injuring of other players. Any leniency on the league’s part, especially after the Saints had been ordered once to stop it, would be viewed later as tacit acceptance. It would undermine any claims the league would make about promoting adequate safety measures. Roger Goodell’s only option, to blunt this being used to the league’s detriment, was to be concrete and merciless.
The shocking, prohibitive penalties emphasize a broader culture point. Rules are being altered to enact a cultural change. The NFL sorely needs this. Most players, fans and media members seem less concerned about the safety implications of a bounty system than about the betrayal of the whistleblower or “snitch” who leaked word of it and set back the Saints franchise. Immediate competitive concerns can no longer trump the welfare of the work force. Goodell hitting the Saints this hard drives that point home.
If the lockout taught anything, it’s that Roger Goodell is no dictator. He’s a steward, employed by an oligarchy to protect billions of dollars worth of investments. It may be five, ten or fifteen years from now, but the NFL will combat litigation that could mushroom into an apocalyptic shit storm. Compared to that grave reality, the fate of Sean Payton’s coaching future and New Orleans’ 2012 season are mere trifles. Goodell had to act.
The NFL has to become safer to survive. League officials, thus far, have shown the conviction to buck fan sentiment and take the appropriate steps. Even if that is out of naked self-interest, it is still commendable.
[Photo via Getty]

- 2013 NBA Mock Draft: Victor Oladipo 2nd, Tim Hardaway Jr. 11th
- Tony Allen Nominated for an Oscar After This Flop of the Century Against the Spurs [Video & GIF]
- Cam Newton Celebrated His Birthday With Some Loud Clothing and a Segway
- Paulina Gretzky Probably Not Impressed These Pictures of Wayne Gretzky That Just Showed Up Online
- Anthony Davis Might Be Dating One of the Gonzalez Twins

- mmonast on 2013 NBA Mock Draft: Victor Oladipo 2nd, Tim Hardaway Jr. 11th
- Trey on 2013 NBA Mock Draft: Victor Oladipo 2nd, Tim Hardaway Jr. 11th
- mmonast on 2013 NBA Mock Draft: Victor Oladipo 2nd, Tim Hardaway Jr. 11th
- Scalia on 2013 NBA Mock Draft: Victor Oladipo 2nd, Tim Hardaway Jr. 11th
- Chelsea Chris on 2013 NBA Mock Draft: Victor Oladipo 2nd, Tim Hardaway Jr. 11th
93 Responses to “Criticism of Goodell’s Punishment of the Saints is Shortsighted”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






March 23rd, 2012 at 3:27 PM
there’s criticism? can’t imagine why. i can criticize goodell’s push for 18 games while saying he wants the sport safer, but not these punishments
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:29 PM
I would buy this argument if Goodell wasn’t pushing for an eighteen game season. I don’t think he has any interest in the health of the players outside of from a business and PR standpoint. I don’t think the punishments were too severe, but I do think it is completely a stunt by the NFL to make themselves look more interested in player health.
Basically I agree with what your saying, but think Goodell’s motives are as driven by legitimate health concerns than anything else in question.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:29 PM
So its not excessive because they need to protect their own asses after decades of horrible treatment toward ex players. Gotcha.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:29 PM
I just cant believe Sapp hasnt been punished yet.. he works for your freaking network, NFL, and his message of ‘snitches’ is not good for your product.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:33 PM
Also didn’t help the Saints that they repeatedly lied during the investigation…I doubt the suspensions would have been as bad if they’d just been up front about it, kinda like the Buckeye business in that regard
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:34 PM
The problem is that Goodell’s punishments have been so arbitrary and capricious that no one can trust his motivation. It appears that he simply does what he wants, when he wants, w/o consulting anyone else involved. He’s also supremely hypocritical – you simply can’t say that you’re concerned about player safety and then attempt to increase the length of the regular season. That’s simply inconsistent.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:36 PM
but I do think it is completely a stunt by the NFL to make themselves look more interested in player health.
i just think he doesn’t want to get sued, because he knows with all the new research coming out he’d probably lose. with all this player safety stuff he can say hey look: we tried to do something. agree with your comment about the hypocrisy of doing this and advocated an 18 game schedule.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:36 PM
Duffy, While I agree with you that the critics of Goodell’s punishment are wrong, I don’t know if it is due to your reasoning.
There was a huge public outcry against the idea of teams having a bounty system. The NFL needed to show the public and the rest of the teams and coaches that this type of system is not tolerated and is not how NFL coaches conduct themselves.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:38 PM
I can’t be alone in refusing to believe the NFL or media didn’t know about this in some capacity though.
Also why aren’t concussion proof helmets mandatory?
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:38 PM
There was a huge public outcry against the idea of teams having a bounty system.
there was? not too long ago there was a segment on ESPN titled “Jacked up”
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:38 PM
For hilarity, go to NOLA.com and read the reactions from Aints fans to the suspensions. “Clueless” is what comes to mind. Or maybe “total lack of self-awareness.”
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:39 PM
Also why aren’t concussion proof helmets mandatory?
i’ve heard (although haven’t looked it up for myself) that these helmets do exist, but aren’t made by the company that has a contract with the nfl
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:40 PM
This is my feeling as well.
He should lose his job.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:40 PM
THIS is the point that everyone keeps missing. The Aints are not being punished for HAVING a bounty program, but for LYING about it.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:40 PM
Ya, he gotta go. Why don’t they just take away helmets? That would be awesome.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:40 PM
I can’t be alone in refusing to believe the NFL or media didn’t know about this in some capacity though.
must not have watched “the U” documentary
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:41 PM
Pennypacker, are you really just another nom de plume for Gregg Easterbrook?
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:42 PM
Pennypacker, are you really just another nom de plume for Gregg Easterbrook?
huh? don’t read him. and I didn’t say what you quoted.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:43 PM
Let’s also not forget that the NFL is desperate to grow the sport amongst women (the largest non-NFL viewing population left in the U.S.) given that their attempts to make the sport global are dying at the vine. You can’t really sell tackle football to the soccer moms of America and make them feel comfortable with it while ex-players and coaches are going before Congress to speak on how it turned their brains to granola and brie and current players are throwing money at each other for “widowmakers”.
So end result is the Saints gotta pay through the nose because they made Roger look ridiculous. And a man and his position can’t be made to look ridiculous!!
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:44 PM
Wait, What?
Isn’t he judge, jury and executioner. Don’t all punishment appeals go to him after he decides the punishment?
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:44 PM
I’m not Gregg Easterbrook, though I am Batman. Also Gregg Easterbrook.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:44 PM
just cant believe Sapp hasnt been punished yet.. he works for your freaking network, NFL, and his message of ‘snitches’ is not good for your product.
having a crack riddled, neck stabbing, lying narcissist on air isnt good for your product either, but he still is working.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:44 PM
While I agree with you that “Jacked up” promoted this kind of thing, the public perception is what rule the current talking points. The general public is not smart enough to realize that there isn’t much of a difference between glorifying big hits and having a bounty system.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:44 PM
God the office bathroom is at the furthest possible point. I musta had me about 10 Dr. Peppers.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:45 PM
For hilarity, go to NOLA.com and read the reactions from Aints fans to the suspensions. “Clueless” is what comes to mind. Or maybe “total lack of self-awareness.”
“Tribal” is the word you’re looking for.
And make no mistake, had it been the Niners, their fans would be up in arms. If it’d been the Eagles, Philly fans would have taken to the street. If it was Dolphins fans, South Beach might have bothered to look up before flipping over to work on their tan some more.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:45 PM
the only reason i sneer at the level of the suspensions is because the owners breed this type of atmosphere throughout the franchise with the macho posturing, the overt military tones, the demands placed on maximum production while being able to get rid of them for nothing later on. it’s hypocritical on an institutional level.
you can’t tell guys to give everything they have, to push themselves to limits we couldn’t even fathom because you might not have a job tomorrow and then condemn them for acting like mercenaries with a straight face. just no leg to stand on.
between stuff like this and the suspensions from violent hits, i feel like the NFL brass is treating the symptom rather than the disease.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:45 PM
Why hello Mr. Gump.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:46 PM
i’ve heard (although haven’t looked it up for myself) that these helmets do exist, but aren’t made by the company that has a contract with the nfl
and players don’t like the look
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:46 PM
THIS is the point that everyone keeps missing. The Aints are not being punished for HAVING a bounty program, but for LYING about it.
Yes, because allowing a team to lie and continue to carry on an activity that has some bearing on future litigation, and then not punish it, would be a problem. More of a problem than finding it initially, them stopping right away, etc. So, yes, the lying magnified it.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:46 PM
it’s kind of silly when you realize the league puts more effort to make sure players are properly wearing their uniforms before and during games than they do when it comes to making sure concussion reducing helmets are being worn.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:46 PM
I’m about to do a mock fantasy baseball draft. Mailing in my Friday at the office.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:47 PM
snitch = only two of us gon’ get caught for makin the sale, i’m one, and if you the other bro, i can’t tell
/cool breeze’d
//not drew brees nfl jersey commerciald either’d
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:47 PM
i think helmets like these are one of the biggest causes of the problems. you’re telling freak athletes with violent tendancies that “hey, launch yourself at your opponent…you won’t get a concussion, these helmets are bulletproof.”
HORRIBLE.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:47 PM
Nothing is radical about huge fines for players who break ambiguous impossible to physically obey rules. Helmet to helmet hits are actually mostly legal in football except for a few difficult to ascertain situations.
I call this the “just the tip” judiciary system in which the tip is okay but full penetration isn’t. On paper that sounds logical but practically everyone knows most will end up talking the plunge.
If you want to do something radical then outlaw fumbles but yeah I wouldn’t watch that football either.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:49 PM
i always used to get excited about doing those at work, then my hopes are dashed by the guy who bids up Pujols to $240 then leaves. happens every time.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:49 PM
you can’t tell guys to give everything they have, to push themselves to limits we couldn’t even fathom because you might not have a job tomorrow and then condemn them for acting like mercenaries with a straight face. just no leg to stand on.
thats why i dont have a problem with the bounty itself. i am sure this has happened before. and the way America has a boner for violent hits, this just does not surprise me.
but the lying does.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:49 PM
Is the deal with “current” helmets that they’re designed to protect against skkull fractures and the like, not traumatic brain injury?
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:50 PM
sure sapp should go, but we better not see payton on TV shows related to NFL product
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:50 PM
i dont think it’s smart to get rid of facemasks all together, but definitely reduce the maximum size and we might see some changes. go back to the old school jim brown-era helmets with the small, two bar facemasks and lets see of you really want to use your head as a weapon. smaller shoulder pads too…
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:51 PM
Like fans of every team reaction wouldn’t have a similar reaction to a ridiculous punishment like this. Well, maybe not Jacksonville. Because no one cares/knows how to use the Internet.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:53 PM
Overall, Duffy, I liked the post. I do wonder if the “radical reform” leaves us with the same game we grew up loving? After such changes, will a game remain that satisfies our lust for violence?
I love watching a hard, clean hit as much as the next ‘Merican. But hey, wasn’t it Teddy Roosevelt who wanted to ban football a century ago (primarily due to on-field maiming and death)?
We’ve come a long way, or have we…?
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:53 PM
You know Breesus has a comment loaded up and is just sitting there trying his absolute damnedest to not send hit “submit.”
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:55 PM
teddy roosevelt could impregnate a woman with a nod and friendly tip of his pipe.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:55 PM
Do you mean capricious and arbitrary?
In all seriousness, I agree with your overall point. The NFL does not seem to have any real guidelines for punishment. It’s ol’ Roger walking around with his banhammer any time someone does something wrong. The Union is a big loose wad of over-used vaginas for not collectively bargaining an actual punishment process for on and off the field offenses.
He just makes up the fucking rules as he goes.
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:55 PM
What if Goodell was wearing a hoodie while issuing these penalties?
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:58 PM
It seems like all we’re trying to do here is reduce our guilt about our enjoyment of a absurdly barbaric activity. The league is looking for slight changes that can be made to create a safer cigarette so to speak.
You don’t climb trees to get to the moon. If football is to be made safer the league must be willing to piss off its blood thirsty fans and jeopardize some of its revenue.
And by the way concussion proof helmets don’t exist if it did it would violate every law of moving bodies
March 23rd, 2012 at 3:59 PM
The beauty of football isn’t the violence. It’s the chess match.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:00 PM
The beauty of football isn’t the violence. It’s the chess match.
That may be true — but the money is in the violence
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:00 PM
SAS made this point on 1st and 10 yesterday. I didn’t watch for long I swear.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:01 PM
It’s still a chess match if they don’t tackle and wear flags. Somehow I don’t think i’d be as popular.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:02 PM
i am sure this has happened before.
so? is this the same as ‘everyone does it’ as a defense and reason to not punish?
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:03 PM
The beauty of football isn’t the violence. It’s the chess match.
Which is the reason that Major League Chess is so popular in America today.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:04 PM
Yeah, but the defense starts without a rook, bishop and knight.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:05 PM
Is this real?
Because if it is, yikes.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:06 PM
He just makes up the fucking rules as he goes.
that’s the job man
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:06 PM
id say the defense is more like the pawns. football without the threat of violence would lead to the power pieces getting free reign of the entire board without having to worry about getting picked off by a little pawn that’s in the way.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:06 PM
Faulkner, I respectfully disagree. For every fan who looks at the strategy, two or three others whoop and holler when somebody gets blown up. We’ve been conditioned to respect the tenacity and willingness of a player to sacrifice his body and well-being for the good of the team.
We’ve got decades of NFL Films that touch on the chess match, but focus on the toughness.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:07 PM
haven’t you ever gotten just the least bit aggressive when taking out the queen with the rook though?
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:07 PM
More Teddy Roosevelt, and less Franklin Roosevelt.
I swear I heard a caller into FAN propose that the NFL go back to leather helmets. His reasoning was that players would be hesitant to hit each other too hard.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:08 PM
tiger and sergio both in contention? w00t!
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:09 PM
Feels like a PM Roundup kind of afternoon. Let’s have one!
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:09 PM
Is this for real? Because if it is, yikes:
“It sounds like a monster; it literally sounds dangerous. It sounds like that left of center, that place of discomfort that created rock ‘n’ roll, created the metal, where it all spawned from … [Limp Bizkit's upcoming album The Unquestionable Truth Part 2 will be] the heaviest, most crazy metal record of all time.” —Fred Durst
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:09 PM
FDR was a badass in his own right.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:09 PM
Challenge Accepted.
/Going to be a good night
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:09 PM
did he call himself “spencer oh ninety sicks”?
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:10 PM
Is this real?
Because if it is, yikes.
i see the outrage, but i first thought it was funny because i took it as not all women like to give head, not the forcible oral sex vibe the commenters got
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:10 PM
Don’t know, but I like how half of the reblogged notes are from “newwavefeminism”
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:11 PM
Pretty sure there was a recent study that found no major difference in protection offered by modern helmets versus their leather ancestors. So there’s that.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:12 PM
“newwavefeminism”
wonder what cause old wave feminism was concerned with.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:13 PM
I agree with all of this. I also think most NFL fans are lowest common denominator types. Their bloodlust blinds them to the best parts of the game. The league knows this, and packages itself accordingly. Highlight reels of hits, closeups of the QB in the pocket, tight shots of receivers catching the ball, all while ignoring why that stuff happened. It makes for a more digestible product. But violence alone or “Jacked Up” segments or explosive hits aren’t why football is a great game.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:15 PM
Free Suh
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:18 PM
Some morons went anti-pornography and sided inexplicably with the right.
Fuck em.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:23 PM
Feels like a PM Roundup kind of afternoon. Let’s have one!
I’m in. Putting jambalaya on the stove, and I’ve no where else to go.
Faulkner, I agree with your baseline point. If the league could sell it that way – the chess game aspect – and make the same billions of $ AND choose not to do it, that would be reprehensible.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:23 PM
Pennypacker and Mole, I apologize for the misattributed quote.
/ Lights Bat signal for the tastefully-named Gregg Easterbrook
Here’s a quote from the NFL report (I added the bolding), according to Nola.com:
“A combination of elements made this matter particularly unusual and egregious. When there is targeting of players for injury and cash rewards over a three-year period, the involvement of the coaching staff, and three years of denials and willful disrespect of the rules, a strong and lasting message must be sent that such conduct is totally unacceptable and has no place in the game.”
And from Goodell:
“Clearly we were lied to. … We were misled … there were denials.”
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:23 PM
The beauty of football isn’t the violence. It’s the chess match.
you and i are in the minority here, judging from most of what I read.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:28 PM
jambalaya
quite possibly my favorite food
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:29 PM
*Doorbell rings*
Some Random Old Dude answers door to find Nada standing outside
Nada: Hi, I’m Nada. I’m a former sportswriter, current new media blog commenter/shit-stirrer, reformed Aints fan and bayou-born Cajun, and I heard you had jambalaya on the stove –
SROD: Who told you I had jamabalaya on the stove?!
Nada: Uh, you did.
SROD: Damn you, TBL comments section!
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:31 PM
The beauty of football isn’t the violence. It’s the chess match.
you and i are in the minority here, judging from most of what I read.
The chess match is just as present in baseball and in hockey and in basketball. It’s the tactics and the push-pull of two teams trying to win.
So yes, I love the chess match. But let’s not mistake our bloodlust for intellectual concern.
And from Goodell:
“Clearly we were lied to. … We were misled … there were denials.”
“You are messing with forces you can’t understand…We have major corporations sponsoring this event!”
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:32 PM
Nada, now that’s funny.
Too bad a “how did you get my cell number?” reference wouldn’t fit.
IOU one bowl of grub. I am putting shrimp in it, though.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:32 PM
I don’t get how anyone can say its the chess match not the violence without immediately explaining how the elimination of all the violent elements fails jeopardize the beauty i.e. your statement MUST be necessarily followed by an argument for the beauty of two-hand touch.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:34 PM
New wave, 3rd wave, whatever–let’s just say that younger feminists are not in general the “anti-pornography” bunch.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:38 PM
I’ve thought that this had the stench of cover for an 18 game season from the get go. They said player safety too much.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:42 PM
crawdad’s >>> shrimp
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:45 PM
crawdad’s >>> shrimp
COLO don’t have many crawdaddies.
March 23rd, 2012 at 4:53 PM
The beauty of football is the tight pants on the non-fat players, amirite?
March 23rd, 2012 at 5:01 PM
You’re damn right you are.
Although chicken would suffice.
March 23rd, 2012 at 5:01 PM
Please close the door behind you as you exit this room. Thank you.
March 23rd, 2012 at 5:05 PM
andooooweeee sausage, don’t skimp now
March 23rd, 2012 at 5:06 PM
Although chicken would suffice.
2lbs shrimp and one smoked sausage, sliced. Just about done, and it smells gooooooooood.
March 23rd, 2012 at 5:07 PM
Troy Smith must have had the greatest backsides to ever grace tights in NFL history.
/off to rail the gf
March 23rd, 2012 at 5:08 PM
andooooweeee sausage, don’t skimp now
Next time, seven. I got you.
got_em, thanks for playing the Friday episode of “TMI”. Dang.
March 23rd, 2012 at 5:13 PM
when we eat, srord, we listen to this
March 23rd, 2012 at 7:50 PM
when we eat, srord, we listen to this
Nice an’ funky. You got good taste.
Like the old folk say back home, “Whatchu know about Fred Wesley and the JBs?” That’s an answer.