NCAA Tournament 2012: The Stats Say You Should Pick (and Avoid) These Teams in Your Brackets
Nate Silver, the statistical genius who you may know from his fantastic work with election maps, wrote probably 2,500 words on the NCAA tournament and stats, and here are the three nuggets (and one chart) that matter the most when it comes to making picks:
* “The worst decision that the tournament committee made? Probably seeding Memphis, whom power ratings have as about the 10th best team in the country, as a No. 8 seed instead. This is one reason that the program likes Missouri rather than Michigan State to emerge out of the West region”
* “the teams seeded from about No. 3 through No. 6 this year are somewhat weaker than normal.”
* “Another under-seeded team is Belmont, who should have been about a No. 9 seed based on their power rating but got a No. 14 seed instead. They could give Georgetown, whom the system thinks was slightly over-seeded as a No. 3, a good run when they play”
* I also highly suggest taking a peek at this chart. Check out what the numbers have to say about double-digits seeds with the best chance of getting to the Sweet 16: Belmont, North Carolina State, Texas and Purdue. One sleeper for the Elite 8 you may want to keep an eye on: New Mexico.
Luke Winn over at SI has some pretty neat statistical tidbits you may also want to take a gander at:
* “Historically, high-seeded teams with great offense/mediocre defense efficiency profiles — the last two Adam Morrison Gonzaga squads, Chris Paul’s last Wake Forest team, and more recently, 2008 Drake, 2010 New Mexico and 2011 Notre Dame — have failed to make deep tourney runs. This is relevant to the 2012 bracket because we have four top-five seeds who fit that profile:” Missouri, Indiana, Duke, Temple.
* Of the 1-4 seeds from the past nine NCAA tournaments (2003-present) … only one team that ranked highest in percentage of possessions on which turnovers were forced made the Final Four and “many of them woefully underperformed their seeding … The top 1-4 seeds in that category this year are East No. 1 Syracuse (6) and West No. 3 Marquette (23).”

- Andre Ethier Acted Like a Tough Guy, Gave Death Stare to an Umpire After Getting Ejected [GIF]
- Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
- Jalen Rose Leaving Numbers Never Lie, Jemele Hill in as New Co-Host
- Peyton Manning Loves Football So Much He’ll Even Play Pass Rusher
- The Greatest Worst Tattoo of All Time, Until the Next One

- JaiAlai on Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
- GloriousMullet on Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
- Jason McIntyre on Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
- Jason McIntyre on Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
- ohheelyeah on Roundup: Ryan Mattheus Broke His Hand Punching a Locker, Spiderman Plays Basketball with Kids & Man Nearly Killed by Bull in Costa Rica
50 Responses to “NCAA Tournament 2012: The Stats Say You Should Pick (and Avoid) These Teams in Your Brackets”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






March 13th, 2012 at 11:18 AM
i feel good about my mizzou pick in my one!!! bracket
March 13th, 2012 at 11:18 AM
Stats are fun and interesting to analyze, but I fill out my bracket the old fashioned way. By consulting Evan Williams.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:19 AM
So I noticed you’re not saying to avoid Long Island….
Message received JMac.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:27 AM
Obama likes Kentucky to play North Carolina in the final.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:27 AM
The east bracket is hard for me. I don’t like any of those teams to make it to the Final 4, but one has to. I guess I’ll ride with OSU…
March 13th, 2012 at 11:27 AM
I’m running the brackets for work. Simple. $5 a bracket. Mostly females. One of those females just gave me four one dollar bills, two quarters, and five dimes. That loose change is going to piss me off for the next three weeks.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:28 AM
One of those females just gave me four one dollar bills, two quarters, and five dimes.
old asian lady?
March 13th, 2012 at 11:31 AM
That’s easy. Bracket not accepted.
Also, fill out one bracket and ride with it.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:33 AM
SHOCKED he went frontrunning.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:33 AM
No, he just manages a shitty strip club.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:34 AM
I agree on both Memphis vs Sparty and Belmont vs Gtown. Both should be great games. And, happily, both are in Columbus.
My seats don’t suck for the Cbus games. 6th row behind the bench. I will tweet the views on Friday. Should be fantastic.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:34 AM
old asian lady?
No. In fact, she had my boss fill out her bracket because she doesn’t know anything.
Also, fill out one bracket and ride with it.
See, you guys keep bashing JMac for filling out 10 brackets and he is going to ban Clay or something.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:35 AM
My seats don’t suck for the Cbus games. 6th row behind the bench. I will tweet the views on Friday. Should be fantastic.
Damn. Have fun. That is awesome.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:38 AM
Filling out ten brackets is a good idea if you want to win some money. But if you fill out ten and then brag about how smart you are when you win, you can get fucked with a pine cone.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:41 AM
Georgetown is going to win the whole thing. Book it. Easy money
March 13th, 2012 at 11:41 AM
When it happens, Santorum will say he conspired to fix the tournament
March 13th, 2012 at 11:42 AM
Georgetown is going to win the whole thing. Book it. Easy money
Homer.
When it happens, Santorum will say he conspired to fix the tournament
Can’t wait for the two days of outrage from FoxNews about how this is a waste of Presidential time and he has more important things to be doing during those 5 minutes.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:43 AM
Georgetown is going to win the whole thing. Book it. Easy money
I have them beating KU in both my brackets. It’ll suck if it is Belmont that shits on us this year.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Never quite understood this logic. Nothing to do with Obama, but when someone (say, Bilas) picks chalk they all get shit for it. What if they actually think that’s how it will play out? Should they have some 3 seed in their so they can be edgy?
March 13th, 2012 at 11:44 AM
I have Belmont beating G’Town.
/knows less than dick about either team
//but I watched 5 min of Belmont against Duke this season
March 13th, 2012 at 11:45 AM
goddamit ruby red grapefruit is delicious
March 13th, 2012 at 11:45 AM
Oh christ.
THERE!!
March 13th, 2012 at 11:46 AM
Wait, where’s the TBL bracket challenge?
March 13th, 2012 at 11:46 AM
Never quite understood this logic. Nothing to do with Obama, but when someone (say, Bilas) picks chalk they all get shit for it. What if they actually think that’s how it will play out? Should they have some 3 seed in their so they can be edgy?
if you’re in a pool for money or pride, picking a bunch of high seeds seems incredibly dumb.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:46 AM
* Of the 1-4 seeds from the past nine NCAA tournaments (2003-present) … only one team that ranked highest in percentage of possessions on which turnovers were forced made the Final Four and “many of them woefully underperformed their seeding … The top 1-4 seeds in that category this year are East No. 1 Syracuse (6) and West No. 3 Marquette (23).”Wow. This is horeshit “analysis.”
March 13th, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Until all four No. 1s make the final four, right? Didn’t that happen a couple of years ago?
March 13th, 2012 at 11:48 AM
did you leave out an s or a w? makes a big difference.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:49 AM
Belmont is seeded too low, Georgetown is seeded too high. Thats the reason people are picking Belmont. But the secret underlying factor that Georgetown is still a statistically far superior team goes mostly unremarked. Hoyas by 10+ and suck it
March 13th, 2012 at 11:49 AM
I guess…but you can’t look really stupid by picking the favorites.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:49 AM
Take your pick.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:50 AM
* Of the 1-4 seeds from the past nine NCAA tournaments (2003-present) … only one team that ranked highest in percentage of possessions on which turnovers were forced made the Final Four and “many of them woefully underperformed their seeding … The top 1-4 seeds in that category this year are East No. 1 Syracuse (6) and West No. 3 Marquette (23).”
Wow. This is horeshit “analysis.” Irvin
I thought that was interesting, but I will in no way shape or form go through percentage of possessions on which turnovers were forced of each team to fill out my bracket. Although, I do think Marquette is fraudy fraud and I have mixed feelings on Syracuse. However, those feeling don’t come from percentage of possessions on which turnovers were forced.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:50 AM
Until all four No. 1s make the final four, right? Didn’t that happen a couple of years ago?
Huh? High seeds = 5, 6, 8, 10, etc.
I guess…but you can’t look really stupid by picking the favorites.
I think we need to clear up my definition of high seeds… low seeds = 1, 2, etc.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:51 AM
Until all four No. 1s make the final four, right? Didn’t that happen a couple of years ago?
2008.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:51 AM
husker, i think in the past two tourneys, only one 1 seed made it to the ff
ever use grapefruit juice in a marinade?
March 13th, 2012 at 11:52 AM
if you’re in a pool for money or pride, picking a bunch of high seeds seems incredibly dumb.
I’m glad you cleared that up. I was beginning to think less of you.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:52 AM
Why don’t you get on the same page as everyone else in this world and refer to high seeds as 12-16 and low seeds as 1-4?
March 13th, 2012 at 11:52 AM
damn…I can’t decide. maybe I’ll just trade the e for an a.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:52 AM
Does a margarita count as a marinade? Nope? Then no.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:53 AM
ever use grapefruit juice in a marinade?
I’ve heard of that, never tried it. I do use apple cider vinegar for pork products.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:53 AM
Vez, why is your name Go See John Carter?
March 13th, 2012 at 11:53 AM
Why don’t you get on the same page as everyone else in this world and refer to high seeds as 12-16 and low seeds as 1-4?
ummm… I am on that page? Are you?
March 13th, 2012 at 11:55 AM
I guess…but you can’t look really stupid by picking the favorites.
you also can’t look hipsterish, edgy or ballsy. i like balance
March 13th, 2012 at 11:55 AM
1,000 apologies. My reading comprehension failed me here.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:57 AM
I have them going to the title game in my bracket, but I think I’m gonna have to change that.
March 13th, 2012 at 11:58 AM
stark, i’m passionate about you seeing that movie. it got bashed here before it came out and i saw it last night and it was really entertaining
March 13th, 2012 at 12:00 PM
They should have 3 seeds if they see it happening that way. If they want to say after doing their job and analyzing for months that the tourney will go all chalk that is fine, but it never does. Some top seeds are going to fall and not make it out of the first weekend. Also, these analysts pick chalk every single year, maybe look closer at the match-ups and see why it rarely happens.
March 13th, 2012 at 12:05 PM
2008 would like a word.
March 13th, 2012 at 12:11 PM
I said never and then said rarely. /nitpicked
One year out of decades, almost 30 since it went 64+.
March 13th, 2012 at 12:14 PM
This tournament looks ripe for a 3-14 upset. St. Bonnie’s-Florida State is my pick.
The problem with a lot of these stats (didnt read the article) but KenPom in particular is it doesnt take into account when the game was played. I’d like to see a ranking based on the last month (or even 2). Doesnt seem like games played in Nov/Dec are relevant anymore.
March 13th, 2012 at 12:37 PM
Missouri has never even made a Final Four. a little something to keep in mind for the chokiest of chokers from the show me state.