<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: No, the Jets Don&#8217;t Need Peyton Manning</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/</link> <description>Sports, Media, Entertainment</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:53:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: mingusmonk</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1602045</link> <dc:creator>mingusmonk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:48:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1602045</guid> <description><![CDATA[The reason this should not even be discussed has nothing to do with the Jets decision making.Really, why on earth would Peyton Manning waste 60 seconds of thought on being a potential Jet?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason this should not even be discussed has nothing to do with the Jets decision making.</p><p>Really, why on earth would Peyton Manning waste 60 seconds of thought on being a potential Jet?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason McIntyre</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1602017</link> <dc:creator>Jason McIntyre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:05:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1602017</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hacker - There isn&#039;t enough time in the day, unfortunately. Going on five hours sleep, today will be a rough one ...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hacker &#8211; There isn&#8217;t enough time in the day, unfortunately. Going on five hours sleep, today will be a rough one &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HtownHacker</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1602016</link> <dc:creator>HtownHacker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:01:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1602016</guid> <description><![CDATA[It&#039;s more fun around here when JMac comments to defend his position.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s more fun around here when JMac comments to defend his position.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick Jett</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1602001</link> <dc:creator>Nick Jett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 04:01:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1602001</guid> <description><![CDATA[The Jets need to focus on building the team from within, and trying to plug up the multitude of holes they have that a 36 year old Manning coming off of four neck surgeries likely won&#039;t cover up by himself.Stop with the carousel, and the flirtation with every major free agent &quot;name&quot; every offseason and build the fuckin team according to a blueprint the powers-that-be believe in.  They started to do that and built an identity in 2009 and 2010, only to do who knows what last season.  If that doesn&#039;t work out, and Sanchez sucks worse, so be it.  The Jets do not need another circus, which is exactly what will result by bringing Manning in.  Ground and pound?  Not with Manning...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jets need to focus on building the team from within, and trying to plug up the multitude of holes they have that a 36 year old Manning coming off of four neck surgeries likely won&#8217;t cover up by himself.</p><p>Stop with the carousel, and the flirtation with every major free agent &#8220;name&#8221; every offseason and build the fuckin team according to a blueprint the powers-that-be believe in.  They started to do that and built an identity in 2009 and 2010, only to do who knows what last season.  If that doesn&#8217;t work out, and Sanchez sucks worse, so be it.  The Jets do not need another circus, which is exactly what will result by bringing Manning in.  Ground and pound?  Not with Manning&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wally's World</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601998</link> <dc:creator>Wally's World</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 03:43:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601998</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;sure, could lose with Sanchez. could win with him, too. done it before.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Everyone else thinks that the Jets won IN SPITE of Sanchez.  They won because they had a lethal defense and a great running game.  Now that the defense is not as lethal and the run game is a little less great, the QB can&#039;t carry the team.So, to be clear.  You would rather lose with Sanchez than take a chance on Manning (who absolutely will not go to New York and play for Ryan), correct?Wow.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>sure, could lose with Sanchez. could win with him, too. done it before.</p></blockquote><p>Everyone else thinks that the Jets won IN SPITE of Sanchez.  They won because they had a lethal defense and a great running game.  Now that the defense is not as lethal and the run game is a little less great, the QB can&#8217;t carry the team.</p><p>So, to be clear.  You would rather lose with Sanchez than take a chance on Manning (who absolutely will not go to New York and play for Ryan), correct?</p><p>Wow.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick Jett</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601995</link> <dc:creator>Nick Jett</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 03:38:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601995</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Shouldn’t even be discussed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Thank you.  Couldn&#039;t agree more.  Wasn&#039;t sure what the sentiment would be here, but it makes little sense on so many levels.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Shouldn’t even be discussed.</p></blockquote><p>Thank you.  Couldn&#8217;t agree more.  Wasn&#8217;t sure what the sentiment would be here, but it makes little sense on so many levels.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nada</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601994</link> <dc:creator>Nada</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 03:36:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601994</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s no point in going down the Brett Favre road again. &lt;/blockquote&gt;The difference being that Favre was the Gunslinger, while Peyton is Sergeant York.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There’s no point in going down the Brett Favre road again.</p></blockquote><p>The difference being that Favre was the Gunslinger, while Peyton is Sergeant York.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rondoman</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601985</link> <dc:creator>rondoman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:36:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601985</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;You’re right, PM jumping to a new team that got whipped by the Patriots twice last year – when the defense was garbage – would have no problem all of a sudden.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, those teams that got whipped had Mark Sanchez playing for them so...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You’re right, PM jumping to a new team that got whipped by the Patriots twice last year – when the defense was garbage – would have no problem all of a sudden.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, those teams that got whipped had Mark Sanchez playing for them so&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric T0upal aka BrawnyTom</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601974</link> <dc:creator>Eric T0upal aka BrawnyTom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:22:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601974</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Brawny – the cherry picking of defensive stats is hilarious. the defense has gotten worse each of the last 3 years.&lt;/blockquote&gt;What did I cherry pick? I just looked at their rank. I&#039;ll admit its not the most accurate ranking, but 5th != &lt;em&gt;increasingly bad defense&lt;/em&gt;But if you have anything to add other than the J-Mac eyeball test to back up your claims, I am all ears.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Brawny – the cherry picking of defensive stats is hilarious. the defense has gotten worse each of the last 3 years.</p></blockquote><p>What did I cherry pick? I just looked at their rank. I&#8217;ll admit its not the most accurate ranking, but 5th != <em>increasingly bad defense</em></p><p>But if you have anything to add other than the J-Mac eyeball test to back up your claims, I am all ears.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason McIntyre</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601973</link> <dc:creator>Jason McIntyre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:20:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601973</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;TBL- Weren’t you the one on here OR on twitter talking about how you are ready to bury Sanchez? I remember it vividly to be honest.&lt;/blockquote&gt;heat-of-the-moment tweets during a game happen. I&#039;m sure i said that, but when the smoke clears, level-headedness rules.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>TBL- Weren’t you the one on here OR on twitter talking about how you are ready to bury Sanchez? I remember it vividly to be honest.</p></blockquote><p>heat-of-the-moment tweets during a game happen. I&#8217;m sure i said that, but when the smoke clears, level-headedness rules.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric T0upal aka BrawnyTom</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601972</link> <dc:creator>Eric T0upal aka BrawnyTom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601972</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;sure, could lose with Sanchez. could win with him, too. done it before.&lt;/blockquote&gt;They give out awards for road playoff wins? Otherwise the trophy case is pretty bare.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>sure, could lose with Sanchez. could win with him, too. done it before.</p></blockquote><p>They give out awards for road playoff wins? Otherwise the trophy case is pretty bare.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason McIntyre</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601971</link> <dc:creator>Jason McIntyre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:19:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601971</guid> <description><![CDATA[Brawny - the cherry picking of defensive stats is hilarious. the defense has gotten worse each of the last 3 years.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brawny &#8211; the cherry picking of defensive stats is hilarious. the defense has gotten worse each of the last 3 years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah!</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601969</link> <dc:creator>Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:18:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601969</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Pounty receiver.What does that mean?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Its code for Sanchez was so bad last year, Holmes and Plax put a Pounty on him.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Pounty receiver.</p><p>What does that mean?</p></blockquote><p>Its code for Sanchez was so bad last year, Holmes and Plax put a Pounty on him.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason McIntyre</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601967</link> <dc:creator>Jason McIntyre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:17:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601967</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I almost think you’d rather lose with Sanchez than win with Manning.&lt;/blockquote&gt;As the post says ... i&#039;d rather give MS one more shot instead of taking a chance on Peyton. sure, could lose with Sanchez. could win with him, too. done it before.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I almost think you’d rather lose with Sanchez than win with Manning.</p></blockquote><p>As the post says &#8230; i&#8217;d rather give MS one more shot instead of taking a chance on Peyton. sure, could lose with Sanchez. could win with him, too. done it before.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason McIntyre</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-2/#comment-1601965</link> <dc:creator>Jason McIntyre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:16:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601965</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, because Peyton Manning has played so poorly against Belichick, in road games and with a dominating offensive line in recent years. Oh…wait, none of that’s true. Eh, so what.&lt;/blockquote&gt;You&#039;re right, PM jumping to a new team that got whipped by the Patriots twice last year - when the defense was garbage - would have no problem all of a sudden.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes, because Peyton Manning has played so poorly against Belichick, in road games and with a dominating offensive line in recent years. Oh…wait, none of that’s true. Eh, so what.</p></blockquote><p>You&#8217;re right, PM jumping to a new team that got whipped by the Patriots twice last year &#8211; when the defense was garbage &#8211; would have no problem all of a sudden.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: starkweather</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-1/#comment-1601961</link> <dc:creator>starkweather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:12:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601961</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Why give up on Mark Sanchez so soon? &lt;/em&gt;Blaine Gabbert heartily agrees with the conclusions you&#039;re drawing.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Why give up on Mark Sanchez so soon? </em></p><p>Blaine Gabbert heartily agrees with the conclusions you&#8217;re drawing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: starkweather</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-1/#comment-1601959</link> <dc:creator>starkweather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:09:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601959</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Pounty receiver.&lt;/em&gt;What does that mean?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Pounty receiver.</em></p><p>What does that mean?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rondoman</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-1/#comment-1601954</link> <dc:creator>rondoman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:04:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601954</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;If he’s at the point where you say give the guy one more year before you cut him, then there isn’t anything wrong with cutting strings a year early to get a Peyton Manning.&lt;/blockquote&gt;You can see TBL now after another shitty season by Sanchez &quot;it was his first year in a new system!!!!&quot;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If he’s at the point where you say give the guy one more year before you cut him, then there isn’t anything wrong with cutting strings a year early to get a Peyton Manning.</p></blockquote><p>You can see TBL now after another shitty season by Sanchez &#8220;it was his first year in a new system!!!!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah!</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-1/#comment-1601950</link> <dc:creator>Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:02:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601950</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I haven’t wavered in my thoughts on Sanchez: Give the guy one more year under a new offensive coordinator. If he doesn’t show improvement in 2012, then it’s time to make a move.&lt;/blockquote&gt;If he&#039;s at the point where you say give the guy one more year before you cut him, then there isn&#039;t anything wrong with cutting strings a year early to get a Peyton Manning.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I haven’t wavered in my thoughts on Sanchez: Give the guy one more year under a new offensive coordinator. If he doesn’t show improvement in 2012, then it’s time to make a move.</p></blockquote><p>If he&#8217;s at the point where you say give the guy one more year before you cut him, then there isn&#8217;t anything wrong with cutting strings a year early to get a Peyton Manning.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rondoman</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/03/07/no-the-jets-dont-need-peyton-manning/comment-page-1/#comment-1601948</link> <dc:creator>rondoman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 01:01:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=165332#comment-1601948</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Cross the Jets off Peyton Manning’s potential destination. Shouldn’t happen. Shouldn’t even be discussed.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Isnt discussing it EXACTLY what you are doing here?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Cross the Jets off Peyton Manning’s potential destination. Shouldn’t happen. Shouldn’t even be discussed.</p></blockquote><p>Isnt discussing it EXACTLY what you are doing here?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/24 queries in 0.023 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 478/480 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com

 Served from: www.thebiglead.com @ 2013-05-19 11:56:32 by W3 Total Cache -->