/matt millen’d

I don’t know the origin story on the pejorative McTibble, but it’s really funny.

I think it’s moot, because that #2 pick is definitely being traded, but yeah, I think they take Griffin if they end up jammed up with the pick. Because that’s not even a bad price for a 2nd QB.
They’re stuck with Bradford for now, though. His contract is onerous.

in that scenario, the “nothing” they are likely getting is Griffin, so I think your equation is invalid.

You think the Rams would draft Griffin if no one gives them what they want? I don’t think that’s a bad idea necessarily, but they’d have a tough time unloading Bradford’s contract, right?

I always lean productivity > Combine

If RGIII had a poor combine, you’d be all over him dropping, Tibble.

in that scenario, the “nothing” they are likely getting is Griffin, so I think your equation is invalid. And your P-value is really tiny, if you catch my meaning.

and the only issue is whether a team gives up enough picks to move up in front of that.

How could they not. Even if the Rams don’t get the haul they want, they can still get something >>> nothing.

if I were an industrious blogger, I might write a post about RGIII’s decision to throw only at Baylor Pro Day might give this guy a chance at a full redemption. Because it’s going to. Scourts are going to be slobbering all over themselves at Griffin throwing, and they’ll later remember that this kid was catching passes, and they were slobbering while he was doing it.

I actually think it’s a given, it’s just a matter of whether that broken draft choice trade sheet gets shown up to be broken. If the best offer is Cleveland’s 2 #1′s, for instance. Because the Rams have to take that, I would think. But we won’t know that for a long, miserable time.

I liked the unnamed Conference USA coach that PFT trotted out to say that this big dude took plays off. They could have named the coach, and nobody would have been able to figure out the school.

All it takes is one team to take a chance, but his stock is definitely going to be way down from where he appeared to be a year ago.

Reminds me of Mike Shanahan taking Clarett 2 rounds before anyone else would have.

He didn’t say he didn’t use both; just weighs one more than the other

Well he said he leans one versus the other implying a choice had to be made between the two. But given the choice of looking a ones production college versus their measurables, I’d take measurables. Fortunately, GMs don’t have to chose. Though I imagine they’d rank game film above all.

He didn’t say he didn’t use both; just weighs one more than the other

You know you’re allowed to use both when evaluating right?

Not when you are crafting a narrative.

/Hot for Teacher

I always lean productivity > Combine

You know you’re allowed to use both when evaluating right?

I always lean productivity > Combine