The Big Ten is Now “Open and Curious” About a College Football Playoff
Traditionally, the Big Ten has been a college football playoff’s strongest opponent. The conference’s goal has been to keep access to the Rose Bowl, and to make sure that access remains relevant. Now, however, the conference appears not only open to a four-team playoff, but according to the Chicago Tribune, may present its own radical four-team plan for one. The following comments came out of a Big Ten AD’s mouth: “We have to listen to the fans. We cannot be tone deaf” and “The Big Ten is open and curious.”
The reported Big Ten plan would be a four-team playoff outside the bowl system. The two semifinal games would be home games for the No. 1 and No. 2 seeds. The title game would be bid out to a neutral site like the Super Bowl. It’s unclear whether the losers would be eligible for a bowl game, or when the semifinal games would be played. Though, the conference wants the title game moved closer to New Years.
“There is a very strong sense that we have missed the boat and are playing games too late,” Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany told the Tribune. “Students are back in class, people are back at work.”
First off, if college football’s greatest tradition fetishists are now “open and curious,” some form of playoff will be in place by 2014. Lock that down.
Looking at this specific plan, it upgrades the current system. Alabama and Oklahoma State would have settled No. 2 vs. No. 3 on the field. The home games (a) provide the on campus spectacle that makes college football special, (b) provide a meaningful incentive to finish No. 1 instead of No. 4 and (c) make the games a true intra-conference test. The Big Ten, undoubtedly, would love to test Pac 12 and SEC speed in the snow. The BCS formula issue would need to be settled. The only downside is that it would lead directly to the question the Big Ten doesn’t want asked, why not eight?
This seems like a bizarre shift for the Big Ten, but really it’s consistent. Jim Delany’s priority always has been doing what is best for the Big Ten. This bowl season emphasized how the landscape has changed. The conference’s foundation is no longer on terra firma. It is time to recast the system in their favor.
Bowl games no longer confer prestige. A conference must compete for national titles. The Big Ten has been shut out of the game since 2007. Adding a title game, adding Nebraska, moving to nine conference games (probably not) and having a scheduling contract with the Pac 12 will only decrease the likelihood of a Big Ten team getting there with the present constraints.
A four-team playoff would see a Big Ten team competing for the national title almost every year. Dismantling the BCS would allow the Big Ten to exert an even greater stranglehold on the top bowl games. Expect both to happen. Expect the Big Ten to benefit from it.
Previously: Virginia Tech’s Long-Snapper, Collin Carroll: Time to Eliminate the Extravagance of Bowl Week
Previously: Chris Petersen Rips the Silly BCS System. Somebody Tell Him a Playoff is Coming in 2015!
Previously: Leadership Changes Atop the Big 12 and Pac 12, Plus Oklahoma State Getting Screwed Likely Will Lead to a Plus-1 College Football Playoff in 2015
[Photo via Getty]

- Cain Velasquez Knocked Out Bigfoot Silva, Retains UFC Heavyweight Title at UFC 160 [gif]
- Junior dos Santos Knocked Out Mark Hunt With a Spinning Heel Kick at UFC 160 [gif]
- Everett Golson, Notre Dame QB, Reportedly Has Left the School [UPDATE]
- Gregg Popovich and His Two Word “Turnover” Interview [Video]
- Angel Pagan Hit a Walk-Off Inside-the-Park Home Run Today vs. the Rockies [Video]

- resolutedefense on Everett Golson, Notre Dame QB, Reportedly Has Left the School [UPDATE]
- jim on Everett Golson, Notre Dame QB, Reportedly Has Left the School [UPDATE]
- beardown on Rich Rodriguez's 50th Birthday Featured a Mariachi Band [Video]
- resolutedefense on Everett Golson, Notre Dame QB, Reportedly Has Left the School [UPDATE]
- Chief on Gregg Popovich and His Two Word "Turnover" Interview [Video]
89 Responses to “The Big Ten is Now “Open and Curious” About a College Football Playoff”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






February 7th, 2012 at 1:23 PM
The Big 10 getting home playoff games is the only thing that will help it v. southern speed. But even that won’t be enough.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:25 PM
LOL @ the B1G getting a high enough seed to host a playoff game.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:26 PM
Only once in the last five years has a Big Ten team been in the top four in the BCS rankings going in to bowls, right?
February 7th, 2012 at 1:27 PM
Not really.
/2011 and 2010…stopped going back further to make my point
February 7th, 2012 at 1:29 PM
just go back to the old bowl system.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:30 PM
Finally, an entity with some brains proposes a playoff that makes some sense.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:31 PM
Jennifer Lopez is a total smoke show in Out of Sight. So is Catherine Keener for that matter.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:31 PM
A good Big Ten team gets the strongest media push. It could happen.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:31 PM
“open and curious…”
Sounds weirdly sexual, eh?
I love this. “I got an idea. Of course, I have to have primo seating. After all, it’s MY idea.”
Bowl games no longer confer prestige.
They gave away such prestige. Can’t feed the bulldog with prestige.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:32 PM
So the SEC was quicker to something than was the Big 10? Shocking.
/SEC Speed
February 7th, 2012 at 1:32 PM
tradition fetishists
Is this some sort of Penn State reference?
February 7th, 2012 at 1:33 PM
I am closed and dismissive about this website’s thoughts on the college football postseason.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:33 PM
/bracket creep’d
February 7th, 2012 at 1:34 PM
So we are throwing out “deciding it on the field” before the playoff system even starts?
February 7th, 2012 at 1:35 PM
Not anymore. Now that ESPN has a stake in the SEC I think that line of thinking can be considered outdated.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:35 PM
Always said I’d support a small playoff with homefield advantage. That was until the NFL showed it to be too fluky these last 5 years (with a massive marginalization of the regular season). Now I might be inclined to flip-flop.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:36 PM
Jennifer Lopez
Caught a glimpse of her on Idol the other night while the wife was watching … I let a “Wow” slip and she looked at me funny. “Wow. That’s a really cool dress she’s wearing, isn’t it?” Nice save.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:36 PM
Why not just have every single D-1 school in a bracket and screw the regular season? Seems that’s the only way to make people happy
February 7th, 2012 at 1:37 PM
Good piece about how OSU would have had some homefield advantage
February 7th, 2012 at 1:38 PM
/sees Michigan leapfrog 5 teams to get into the BCS
//yeah, he’s right
February 7th, 2012 at 1:39 PM
6 out of last 10 years B10 would have gotten a team into final four. Would have had two teams twice.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:39 PM
They’ve been shutout since 2007.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:39 PM
That’s in a down period for the Big Ten.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:40 PM
Not really, outside of the two Giant outliers over the last ten years the champion has finished top-10 in point differential…even if they had to go the Wild Card route due to having the misfortune of sharing a division with another good team the Super Bowl champ is still really good
February 7th, 2012 at 1:41 PM
Ohio State fans are awesome. “Waaaaaahhhhhh…..waaaaaahhhhh. We need home field advantage. I mean, the Fiesta bowl really is in downtown Gainesville, right?”
/idiots
February 7th, 2012 at 1:42 PM
/pours one out for The Bulldog.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:42 PM
Does that article address how home field would have given OSU a whole bunch of better players they would have needed to compete competently in those games? If not, I don’t see the point.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:42 PM
in the snow
What is snow? Ohio doesn’t get snow until march these days.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:43 PM
really? so before it was “the big ten’s schedule is too easy and they get an automatic BCS berth” and now “there’s no way they’ll get a high seed.”
dumbasses.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:44 PM
The regular season is filled with mismatches and blowouts surrounding a handful of important games for the top teams…the romanticizing of it I think is overblown
February 7th, 2012 at 1:44 PM
Well based on the most recent history they wouldn’t be getting the high seeds.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:46 PM
Hilarious.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:46 PM
College football talk brings out the best in TBL commenters. Highly entertaining.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:48 PM
Minutes later, Greg Oden started receiving suggestive phone calls from anonymous guys.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:49 PM
/SEC fans.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:49 PM
coaching was the problem, not the talent. cmon lawya.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:50 PM
Florida beats Ohio State wherever they play them. LSU beats Ohio State wherever they play them. They were up against teams with far better talent at the key spots. Is what it is.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:50 PM
so based on your selective, arbitrary “history?” got it.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:51 PM
There wasn’t shit those slow ass OL could do against Florida, though. Not sure what coaching schemes would have done.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:51 PM
agreed that Michigan has beaten Florida in Florida.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:51 PM
Urban warfare is coming.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:52 PM
This is like using the stat that the Team A is 2-9 lifetime when playing Team B. It doesn’t make any difference. Especially since college teams turn over their rosters every couple of years.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:53 PM
No, it’s not arbitrary.
The period you’re referring to when you are talking about people bitching about the Big Ten schedules letting sub-par teams slide into the title game is when they were getting in to the top of the BCS polls.
The period you’re referring to when you are talking about people saying there’s no way they would get the high seeds is because in the years since those embarrassing OSU eggs that were so publicly laid, they have only had one team that would have been in the playoffs under this format.
Lawya.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:53 PM
read this and tell me you don’t agree…
February 7th, 2012 at 1:54 PM
The revisionist history with this is awesome. The Buckeyes were like 9.5 point favorites against Florida. I’m not sure what the LSU line was, but I’ll guess we were no more than 5 point dogs. I hope all the southerners that “knew” Florida was going to win took a second mortgage out on their double wides.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:54 PM
I was talking about the specific OSU games in question. The Fiesta Bowl and the Sugar Bowl (BCS title games).
February 7th, 2012 at 1:56 PM
I thought OSU would win the first year.
The second year, I remember Herbie in the game buildup saying that OSU would win because all the players had been there last year and would have grown and learned from that. My household laid heavily against OSU based on that fact. You don’t suddenly learn to not get worked after a year.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:57 PM
so, ignore the, what, four years out of five that IMMEDIATELY PRECEDED this HORRIBLE one out of five year streak?
February 7th, 2012 at 1:57 PM
And? They feasted on a shitty Big 10 slate and got exposed. It happens.
Even Spencer knows OSU had no business on that field. They were the sacrificial lamb after everyone kept losing.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:59 PM
seriously…there were like six teams that lost in the last two weeks of the season that year.
February 7th, 2012 at 1:59 PM
No I’m pretty sure I covered that with the part when people were bitching about the Big Ten teams having creampuff schedules.
Not sure what your point is here.
Big Ten had a stretch of years where they were in the title mix each year, people knocked their schedules granted a lot of it was in hindsight after the SEC trouncings.
Since then they have had a down period and have largely been irrelevant in the NCG discussion.
This isn’t a matter of opinion.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:00 PM
Spencer: I know Bollman is the guy everyone blames at OSU, but Florida had the DL to feast on OSU. No coaching could change that.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:01 PM
Exactly. The game done changed.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:02 PM
And I’m not saying that will mean that they won’t be good again.
However, claiming they will be in contention every year based on the fact that they WERE dominant and have improving recruiting classes (which are just such a great predictor of success what’s up Clemson) is no less rational than saying that they won’t be in contention because they haven’t mattered in the last four years.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:04 PM
no…but perhaps a chaperone that could’ve told them all “you don’t need thirds, fatty” would’ve helped.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Again, I don’t think that would have changed anything. I know we all look for reasons why our teams get beat, but most of the time it’s because the other team is better.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:08 PM
I will say it takes some balls to try and pull off what Delany is about to engage in: opine for a playoff as if it was their idea from the get-go, instead of the main obstacle to getting one. Having said that, I’ve wanted a plus-one/Final Four for a while and I think it would be the best thing for all involved. The regular season is enhanced, the final game is more righteous and the bowls get to keep on keepin’ on.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:09 PM
the fact that OSU’s sucked in those years isn’t a matter of opinion either…that’s fact. what’s also fact is that no big ten team has stepped up in that void…so if you’re a dominant team in the conference, no matter if you’re OSU or mich or wisky, you have an easier path than an SEC team to a high seed.
dumbass.
you know what is rational? that the conference was dominated by a team with a coach who didn’t use them to their full strength for a near decade. that it took the program being metaphorically decapitated in order for the rest of the conference to “catch up” and, after that, the program upgraded in both coaching and recruiting allure.
simply put, in words your feeble little brain can understand, ohio state WILL be in contention every year because they spend the most on coaches and players in the conference. and since the rest of the conference are apparently led by little bitches with handshake agreements, that’s as much a certainty as anything else in the sport.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:11 PM
Only Michigan can, really. Maybe one of the NEB/MSU/NEB troika can on occasion, but not consistently, or at least not in my opinion.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:11 PM
i think it’d have been closer if ginn wasn’t hurt and florida couldn’t pin their ears back and send 6 guys against a line full of chubbies…but agree, still think florida wins by two scores. OSU’s defensive strategy was just plain stupid that game…”hurr we’ll run cover 2 against spread derp.”
February 7th, 2012 at 2:12 PM
Agreed, although let’s reign it back a tad about the greatness of that Florida team like they were invincible. They struggled mightily with a Tennessee team that looked horrendous against PSU. They had a rough game with Auburn (who struggled against Nebraska in their bowl game, and also got hammered by a mediocre Ark team).
It wasn’t like Florida was one of the best college teams ever and OSU had no business being on the field with them. Do you guys remember Chris Leak? The goal for teams all season was to make him beat them, instead, OSU got dinked and dunked on the field the entire game…not to mention the game was over by half so Leak didn’t have to do shit and had no pressure to make big throws.
As for the Florida DE’s..yeah, OSU had no answers. But they should have stayed much more competitive on the other end of the field.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
Not in this case. If ginn doesn’t get hurt that’s a different game (not completely serious)
February 7th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
they attacked that weakness multiple times…send pressure up the middle, force the tackles to have to block one-on-one…get money.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:13 PM
So basically Spence the only difference between the Big Ten and ACC is that the media will push a Big Ten team in?
Fuck the playoffs. Keep it as an all SEC affair.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:14 PM
Not in this case. If ginn doesn’t get hurt that’s a different game (not completely serious)
Jim Harbaugh, is that you?
February 7th, 2012 at 2:14 PM
Did you read eleven warriors yesterday spencer? Had an article talking about what you just said
February 7th, 2012 at 2:14 PM
It’s not about that. It’s about match-ups. Florida and OSU weren’t even at key spots. It doesn’t mean that UF couldn’t have lost to another team, but against THAT Ohio State team, they owned the match-ups.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:16 PM
was this the same decade that OSU fans were collectively stroking Tressel every minute of every day saying he was the greatest coach ever?
February 7th, 2012 at 2:16 PM
the biggest difference between the b10 and ACC is that ACC-team-du-jour always loses one too many games to get the chance to choke on the big stage like OSU.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:16 PM
It’s just like Nebraska waxing Michigan State this year, yet getting blown out of the gym by Michigan whereas MSU owns Michigan.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:16 PM
Fair enough Husker, no game earned the instant DVR delete as quick as that one.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:17 PM
You clearly have never been to Hineygate
February 7th, 2012 at 2:18 PM
Man…I’ve had plenty of those lately. I really hope 2012 is a good one for UGA, as no way in hell it will be a good one for Nebraska.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:19 PM
I have faith in Florida State.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:20 PM
Well he did beat one sec team in a BCS game…
February 7th, 2012 at 2:20 PM
never heard of it.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:21 PM
They should have a top-5 defense next year, but holy hell are they average on offense.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:21 PM
not according to anyone outside of Ohio.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:23 PM
Never snows in Utah, Colorado, Corvallis, Eugene or Pullman?
February 7th, 2012 at 2:24 PM
i think we’re “arguegreeing.”
February 7th, 2012 at 2:27 PM
do you want me to send you the DVR copy i have?
February 7th, 2012 at 2:28 PM
So following this plan, it’d have been
#1 LSU v #4 Oregon at Death Valley
#2 Alabama v #3 Oklahoma State at Tuscaloosa
Hmmm…not seeing B1G in there.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:31 PM
Funny thing is, Oregon was actually behind Stanford in the BCS, even though they beat them and won the Pac 12.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:32 PM
you know I honestly have never watched that game, save for me being at it. I actually wouldn’t mind seeing it again. once you figure out how to send that DVR let me know. dieck.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
The game-ending, back-breaking Mallett pick was one I called on Twitter. You could feel it was coming after the ARK kid inexplicably fell down after picking up the blocked punt.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:34 PM
i’ll just burn it to DVD and send you a few copies. it was a great game…youll love it.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:38 PM
I’m surprised I didn’t have a stage 15 heart attach after that emotional rollercoaster during the 4th quarter of that game.
February 7th, 2012 at 2:50 PM
Funny thing is, Oregon was actually behind Stanford in the BCS, even though they beat them and won the Pac 12.
I went with final standings pre-BCS.
BTW, when do these games take place? Christmas week?
February 7th, 2012 at 3:14 PM
First half was the best I’ve ever seen the OSU offense. Tressel was calling plays I didn’t know had been invented yet.