Fox Outbids ESPN For 2018 and 2022 World Cup Rights
Cleatus is going to Russia and Qatar. Sports Business Journal and SI.com are reporting that FOX has outbid ESPN and NBC for the U.S. based English language rights for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. FOX reportedly offered four to five times ESPN’s $100 million bid for the last cycle. The fallout for soccer in this country could be massive.
Soccer has become vastly more visible in the United States the past few years. This is indisputably the result of ESPN’s active promotion of the sport. The network forced staff to treat highlights professionally, brought in talented announcers such as Ian Darke, invested in the USMNT and club leagues and inserted the sport into the national sports discussion it dictates. The World Cup became a major television event as a consequence. The Gold Cup drew ratings on par with the Stanley Cup Final.
Without the World Cup, soccer, at least men’s soccer, on ESPN likely dies. This was John Skipper’s pet project and legacy. He just lost it. There’s no longer an incentive for ESPN to invest in the U.S. Men’s National Team. The only incentive for ESPN to invest in MLS was to promote said national team. Highlights should be drastically reduced on Sportscenter. For a significant segment of the casual sports audience, it likely ceases to exist. Soccer will be promoted through 2014, but without the impetus to build a future audience.
The 2010 World Cup on ESPN was one of the most professional production efforts in the history of sports on American television. Viewers were treated as intelligent consumers of information. The perfect balance was struck between being educational and being informative. Despite internet knives being sharpened, there were few if any complaints. Soccer fans forgot that Dave O’Brien happened. ESPN fine-tuned, waxed and detailed the car. FIFA just tossed the keys to FOX.
What will the World Cup look like on FOX? Picture every ham-fisted FOX sports production, but worse. Visions of Joe Buck flat-lining a World Cup winning goal may be overstated, but a World Cup is 64 matches over a month. We received a preview of a FOX World Cup in one match, during last season’s Champions League Final, and it was a disaster.
FOX imported the match content from its Sky affiliate in the UK, so the only thing the network really had to do was put out decent studio content. Curt Menefee, the NFL host, was called up for duty, as was former U.S. goalkeeper Brad Friedel who mumbled in a strange accent and never looked directly at the camera. The crew ignored the match itself, focusing on cross-promotion with a lame Michael Strahan “football vs. soccer” segment and investigating Barcelona defender Gerard Pique’s relationship with Shakira. The target audience, for a soccer match, seemed to be lowest-rung TV viewers with no interest in soccer. FOX does run two full-time soccer channels on American TV. Said channels are known largely for cheap looking sets, for dumbed-down commentary and for hawking cheap, up-converted SD feeds as “high-definition.”
There are no shackles on FOX. It has seven years to raise its performance, though its record engenders little hope. Soccer has a beachhead. Passionate fans will watch it wherever it is shown, but, at this juncture, it’s hard to see ESPN losing the World Cup rights as anything but a significant step backward for exporting soccer to the mainstream sports culture.
[Photo via Getty]

- The Kansas City Royals Are Becoming the Royals Again, and Fans Have Been Far Too Patient
- Champions League: Bayern Munich a Legacy of Losing at Stake
- Teddy Bridgewater Declined Heisman Promotion, But Louisville May Need That Attention
- Champions League: Borussia Dortmund’s Chance to Turn from Hipster Darlings to European Champions
- Jeff Goodman Has Left CBS Sports for ESPN

- Senator Jersey on Champions League: Bayern Munich a Legacy of Losing at Stake
- Billy Buckner on The Kansas City Royals Are Becoming the Royals Again, and Fans Have Been Far Too Patient
- pRohphet8 on Champions League: Bayern Munich a Legacy of Losing at Stake
- pRohphet8 on Champions League: Bayern Munich a Legacy of Losing at Stake
- KC Resident on The Kansas City Royals Are Becoming the Royals Again, and Fans Have Been Far Too Patient
73 Responses to “Fox Outbids ESPN For 2018 and 2022 World Cup Rights”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






October 21st, 2011 at 11:09 AM
One word: Fuck.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:11 AM
Hopefully Telemundo will improve their feed, because I suspect more and more people will want to watch the Spanish broadcast anyway. Especially since they have Andres Cantor.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:12 AM
As much as I despise ESPN when it acts the bully against smaller sports (hockey), I appreciate it when it champions a sport like soccer. There’s a reason club soccer grew in the US: cause ESPN had the Champions League and treated it like it mattered. (I still remember PTI talking about the Milan-Liverpool Final of 04).
Fox should be at the forefront but their efforts have been second-rate to say the least. And that’s with most of the heavy lifting being done for them by their News Corp partners across the pond. Instead it’s a lame set-up highlighted by babbling monkeys like Warren Barton and Christian Miles. Ugh.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:12 AM
Not good news at all, but hopefully they make a ton of improvements over the next few years as at times the games on FSC are horrible. I do like a few of the current commentators but definitely wanted ESPN to win these rights as they did a great job in 2010
October 21st, 2011 at 11:13 AM
Fox winning the bid is the REAL Vick’s Sleeper pick of the week.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:14 AM
All of this. Well said, Duffy.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:15 AM
Goosebumps.Every.Fucking.Time.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:15 AM
I wonder if anyone from ESPN will defect to Fox in the next couple of years. HOpefully Fox learned from their Champs League broadcast because that was just cringeworthy
October 21st, 2011 at 11:16 AM
dancing robots kicking a soccer ball and generally acting a fool might actually make the sport more popular among casual viewers.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:17 AM
Maybe ESPN could trade its baseball coverage rights to Fox for the rights to the WC in 2018 and 2022? If not, then we may be stuck watching Messi try and kick the ball between Strahan’s “gaptoothed goal” as another stupid football v. soccer gimmick.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:18 AM
As much as we (I) give ESPN shit, they handle big events like this pretty well. I like ESPN’s World Cup coverage and I think they could handle it better than Fox, who will try to create some loveable character to “enhance” coverage.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:18 AM
Looks like I have 7 years to learn Spanish.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:18 AM
Does this mean Ian Darke won’t be doing games? Or is he sort of a freelancer and can work with whomever he likes? It would be a shame if Gus Fucking Johnson is calling soccer.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:18 AM
Fox hasn’t learned anything as they continue to employ Warren Barton as an analyst. That guy states the most obvious things possible, like Rooney is a good player type analysis.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:19 AM
Robots. Lots and lots of robots jumping around and pointing.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:19 AM
Out of all the commentators on Fox, I must say Martino is probably the best one. Sullivan at times seems like he is sleeping when talking so hopefully he doesn’t call to many games. I wonder if Fox will hire some foreigners to call the games like ESPN did
October 21st, 2011 at 11:20 AM
As a hockey fan, I relate this back to when ESPN dropped/lost hockey.
Everyone loves to make fun of NBC/Versus, but the fact is, hockey fans watch it.
Soccer fans will get over this and who knows? Fox may surprise you.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:20 AM
Damn wilhelm, I should’ve refreshed.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:20 AM
2014 should be one hell of a swansong for ESPN for many reasons: I doubt they’ll scale back on their scope of coverage and ratings will improve on 2010 due to the lack of a time difference (1-2 hours), meaning more games in the afternoon and evenings.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:20 AM
Great post, Duffy, really well said.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:20 AM
Duffy absolutely murdered this article – well done. Only problem is that it made me physically sick. I remember the Menefee/Friedel/Strahan promo debacle extremely well. Of course FIFA was going to ignore quality of programming and the growth of its biggest untapped market for dollars – we saw that with the Qatar bid. Not the lease bit surprising – no less depressing.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:21 AM
Tim McCarver will be retired by 2018, right?
October 21st, 2011 at 11:23 AM
Darke’s contract, I believe, runs through 2014. Worked for Sky (FOX) for 18 years before that. Not sure how acrimonious the departure was.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:23 AM
Looks like I have 7 years to learn Spanish.
“GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLL!!!!” = “Goal”
“Penal!” = “Penalty kick!”
“Tarjeta Amarilla” = “Yellow Card”
“Tarjeta Roja” = “Red Card”
“Aqui estan las chicas brasilenas” = “Look at the cans on those Brazilian girls”
“Cabron deja de joderme” = “Hey asshole! Stop [BLEEP]ing with me!”
“Dos cervezas por favor” = …..
October 21st, 2011 at 11:23 AM
Fox
FX
FSC
Fox Sports Regional
They’ll have the networks to cover it.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:24 AM
I’m guessing all the play-by-play will be handled by the children of famous soccer announcers.
/Joe Buck’d
//Thom Brennaman’d
///Kenny Albert’d
////Chip Caray’d (for a short time)
October 21st, 2011 at 11:24 AM
Over which network televises a tournament? Based on the fanaticism demonstrated on this blog and on Twitter, I can’t see that happening. You’ll all watch.
I wanted ESPN to get rights to hockey but NBC outbid them. Hasn’t changed my viewing habits.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:24 AM
Good piece, I find FOX Soccer pretty much unwatchable and equivalent to local cable access, except for live EPL games. I’ve really come to appreciate ESPN’s EPL game each Saturday, I think it’s a good production with a great announcing crew. There’s just something fundamentally different between British and American commentators that I can’t exactly pinpoint, maybe it’s that Americans feel a need to always talk where British guys are more willing to have moments where nothing is said. Essentially, Americans are way too over the top, and I think FOX would be the epitome, everything they do is like that
October 21st, 2011 at 11:24 AM
Was FOX using a different model than ESPN? How do you outbid your competitor by 4-5 times and NOT lose money?
October 21st, 2011 at 11:24 AM
get ready for Freddy Adu and Landon Donovan in the booth when 2018 rolls around
October 21st, 2011 at 11:24 AM
I’m surprised every year Fox execs watch a playoff run with Joe Buck and Tim McCarver and renew the pairing.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:25 AM
You really only need two, though. This also means those bastards will put their shit on the crappy FSC feeds. Duffy was spot on when he called their HD claim bogus as hell.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:25 AM
What’s going to suck is when a lot less people are going to watch games since Fox Soccer is in a lot less homes than ESPN.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:25 AM
Actually I’ll go against the grain here again. Biggest event in the world. 1-0 games. This is the kind of event where Gus’s over the top bullshit is actually appropriate. Have you ever heard foreign announcers?
October 21st, 2011 at 11:28 AM
Furthermore, FOX writes/perpetuates narratives… just like other network television stations do for sports. You guys may not like them, but it won’t prevent you from watching the games*. If anything, it’ll drive John Q. Viewer to the teevee so he can follow a story instead of the sport. I don’t see how that’s bad for the popularity of this game.
*- you’ll just complain about the narratives
October 21st, 2011 at 11:28 AM
Didn’t you know that soccer will be the most popular sport in America (see everyone who has ever invested in soccer since the late 1960′s). I’m a fan of the sport but the money that is spent for these rights never seems to make any sense.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:28 AM
My number one concern is the personnel that FOX currently employs. The best part about FSC’s Premier League coverage is that they pipe in the feed from the UK-affiliate, so the in-game announcing is excellent. The FSC studio guys, on the other hand, are quite poor, and the guys that do the daily Fox Soccer Report are show still mispronouncing names on a daily basis.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:29 AM
Couldn’t agree more. Even their live games look like shit compared to ESPN’s. Add in Darke and Macca and you have a much better commenting team, too (at least for me).
October 21st, 2011 at 11:29 AM
Not that’s a legit concern right there for yas.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:31 AM
At least it’s not on NBC
/PRIMETIME GAMES!
October 21st, 2011 at 11:31 AM
Gus Johnson would be the real life embodiment of the Arriaga announcer from The Simpsons, make this happen FOX
October 21st, 2011 at 11:32 AM
*Not = Now
October 21st, 2011 at 11:32 AM
Fox has the worst of the four major networks for HD.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:32 AM
I would find him terrible for soccer I think. Gus needs a constant action sport, a la basketball. He’s terrible doing football games and I can only imagine him trying to hype up soccer. It’d be a train wreck.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:32 AM
I don’t know anything about Gus’s experience with soccer, but I’d assume that it’s minimal. So unless he spends the next 7 years studying the game and its history and following the major leagues/teams/players around the world, it would be an embarrassment for him to even step in the booth.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:32 AM
I meant it will suck for the casual viewer who might watch a match or two on ESPN, but won’t shell out the extra cash to get Fox Soccer.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:33 AM
Have you ever heard foreign announcers?
Yes, they actually sound better than the majority of over the top and stupid shit heard here.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:34 AM
That PK was fisted.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:34 AM
Pretty sure ESPN made some bank on the last WC. Not positive though.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:35 AM
I’m indifferent on both. Don’t hate them, don’t love them.
I would love to see an internet/facebook campaign getting Vin Scully to do one more World Series. Even if it’s just Game 1 or something.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:35 AM
Over which network televises a tournament? Based on the fanaticism demonstrated on this blog and on Twitter, I can’t see that happening. You’ll all watch.
I wanted ESPN to get rights to hockey but NBC outbid them. Hasn’t changed my viewing habits.
Diehard soccer fans will follow. But in order to get the kind of quality coverage we got in 2010, you need the other folks — the casual viewers, the big-event-only viewers, the passersby.
Did ESPN retain the Women’s WC?
October 21st, 2011 at 11:36 AM
It would be interesting to see since there are virtually no commercial breaks in the games themselves.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:37 AM
Foreign broadcasters are much better with soccer than their American counterparts.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:39 AM
That’s because they genuinely care about the sport. Do you think Joe Buck gives two shits about baseball?
October 21st, 2011 at 11:40 AM
You’ll get them. You’re on network TV instead of cable. The people that watch the programming on FOX are going to get bombarded with advertisements during House, The Simpsons, Office re-runs etc.
FOX will promote the hell out of this.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:40 AM
There were major sponsors lining up for it, and I think they spent little compared to other networks. The Spanish rights went for 3x as much as did the English rights.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:42 AM
Do you think Joe Buck gives two shits about baseball?
I laughed at this.
The Spanish rights went for 3x as much as did the English rights.
That’s because Univision has equal reach to ESPN and as much of a support base.
I know I’ll often watch WC games in Spanish — except when it’s a Mexico game since the Univision guys cannot help themselves from slurping up the FMF.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:43 AM
ABC had most of the really big games I believe, and I would bet a lot of money that FX and FSC will do the heavy lifting for Fox.
Apparently they spent the farm to get it, so this is undoubtedly true.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:44 AM
ESPN covered the Mexico-Brazil game the other day and had a Mexican do the color. He was unabashed in his homerism for the Mexican side. It was glorious watching the tri colore blow a 1-0 lead up a man and with a PK. Fuck Mexico (sorry Clown).
October 21st, 2011 at 11:48 AM
Fox won rights to every FIFA tournament through ’22. Men’s WC. Women’s WC in ’15 and ’19. Under-17 and Under 20 World Cups.
October 21st, 2011 at 11:49 AM
My Spanish is mediocre but I also watched more games on Univision than I did on ESPN
October 21st, 2011 at 12:10 PM
I know I’ll often watch WC games in Spanish
My Spanish is mediocre
the less words you actually know, the better.
October 21st, 2011 at 12:26 PM
Shitty news to wake up to. Real nice write up Duffy. Reminded me of your World Cup previews. Hopefully Darke moves back to fox and they get their production act together.
October 21st, 2011 at 1:26 PM
This is bad news. FOX sux ass in soccer. And, if ESPN stops covering soccer, it will once again prove they aren’t a journalistic network. They just promote the shit they buy. Fuck ESPN. They are cheap bastards that never should have let FOX steal soccer from them. This is all ESPN’s fault.
October 21st, 2011 at 1:32 PM
I’d like to see more of that girl in the photo
October 21st, 2011 at 1:46 PM
doesnt matter who televises it. soccer wont be good in the usa til team usa is good
October 21st, 2011 at 1:48 PM
if by good you mean popular, then yes
October 21st, 2011 at 2:09 PM
Some asshole at Fox must really fucking hate soccer to outbid ESPN 4X’s to ensure no household has the ability to watch a match.
October 21st, 2011 at 2:16 PM
ESPN sucks as much as soccer… can’t wait to watch it die.
October 21st, 2011 at 2:20 PM
what a thoughful, well constructed argument. Care to elaborate, truffleshuffle02?
October 21st, 2011 at 2:25 PM
what will fox cut to since there are no marching bands?
October 21st, 2011 at 5:31 PM
Not an argument just an opinion, ESPN shoved soccer down our throat until most gave in to their marketing shame. Since Americans can’t think for themselves anymore they bought in to it. But now like with hockey ESPN will wipe their hands of it and go back to focusing on the big markets and football… don’t really hate soccer just hate ESPN.
October 21st, 2011 at 8:19 PM
wow, it must’ve been really hard for you to have ESPN literally shove down soccer down your throat. I hope you were able to fully recover from that experience. My deep condolences to you and your family. Words can’t express how mad I am that ESPN shoved soccer down your throat. I am heartbroken.