My vote, if they are going the country route, would be Brad Paisley.

My vote is they kill the country route all together.

David Allen Coe

“A little less talk and a lot more action”, then immediately cut to ESPN’s 30 talking heads…

My only issue is with the asinine headline on this post

Whoops. Not the headline, but the statement in the post itself.

It was a stupid analogy to make, and even a dumber one to defend. The job of the Executive and Legislative Branches is to work together. That’s how the Constitution set it up. So, for him to be incredulous at the fact that they were at the very least attempting to give the appearance of working together proves he isn’t only stupid, but ignorant as well, and who would want that to represent them?

I agree. Any mention of Hitler has long been a no-no. To be clear, I don’t think what he said was right or that he shouldn’t have been fired. My only issue is with the asinine headline on this post. It’s inaccurate and bush league.

/St. Bernards running and crapping on the turf.

1. Toby Keith
2. Kenny Chesney
3. Keith Urban
4. Hank III

My vote, if they are going the country route, would be Brad Paisley.

that’s actually him backpedalling off of what he said, not him clarifying what he meant.

how so? in listening to the interview (which is painful), i think it’s pretty clear this is exactly what he meant.

By pulling my opening Oct 3rd, You (ESPN) stepped on the Toes of The First Amendment Freedom of Speech,

Really? Idiot. Were you thrown in jail by the government for your comments Hank? You could have a more intelligent conversation with a door.

/not that hard

Dude, it was a fucking round of GOLF, how does any of the shit coming out of his mouth make the least bit of sense. It wasn’t like they were going to a speaking engagement about the economy together…

“My analogy was extreme — but it was to make a point. I was simply trying to explain how stupid it seemed to me — how ludicrous that pairing was. They’re polar opposites and it made no sense. They don’t see eye-to-eye and never will.”

/not that hard

It was a stupid analogy to make, and even a dumber one to defend. The job of the Executive and Legislative Branches is to work together. That’s how the Constitution set it up. So, for him to be incredulous at the fact that they were at the very least attempting to give the appearance of working together proves he isn’t only stupid, but ignorant as well, and who would want that to represent them?

that’s actually him backpedalling off of what he said, not him clarifying what he meant. Either way, he only said that to try and save his monday night football money, because that’s part of apology #2, not the original apology deemed insincere.

to be fair, he has looked as smart as a tree forever.

So what we’ve learned:

HWJ is an idiot.

Fox and Friends is a horrible show.

The First Amendment does not prevent you from being fired for saying stupid things that embarrass your employer.

So actually, we learned nothing because we already knew all this.

This.

HWJ is an idiot.

Fox and Friends is a horrible show.

The First Amendment does not prevent you from being fired for saying stupid things that embarrass your employer.

So actually, we learned nothing because we already knew all this.

“My analogy was extreme — but it was to make a point. I was simply trying to explain how stupid it seemed to me — how ludicrous that pairing was. They’re polar opposites and it made no sense. They don’t see eye-to-eye and never will.”

/not that hard

like using Hitler on one side of an analogy and using Obama on another, and then trying to hide behind the first amendment to keep your job as the public face of something, after neither of your two insincere apologies makes the issue go away?

How is there any argument that he meant Obama=Hitler

Because the Right will always defend their own just as the left will. It’s insane to say he wasn’t comparing them, but this is what happens with politics.