A Thought About the Chicago Bears: Jay Cutler’s Sacks
Jay Cutler was lambasted in the NFC Championship game after leaving with a knee injury, but the guy took a beating last year that most quarterbacks don’t endure at any point in their careers. Playing behind a porous offensive line, in Mike Martz system that puts it on the quarterback to get the ball out, Cutler was sacked 52 times, 12 more than any other quarterback (Joe Flacco, 40).
Not all of those sacks are on the line, the quarterback certainly has to recognize where the pressure is coming from and get rid of the ball. In the Giants game where Cutler was knocked out at half time after taking 9 sacks, a fair amount of those were on him. Still, let’s not sugar coat it. The Bears line puts pressure on the quarterback to have to make those decisions quickly. Whether they’ve done enough to upgrade the unit will factor in how likely Cutler is to get through 2011.
The main upgrade is the drafting of Gabe Carimi to play right tackle, but he was more touted as a run blocker ideal for the right side. The other change is not retaining veteran Olin Kreutz, who signed with New Orleans. It does not so far in the preseason look like a unit ready to take a big leap forward.
Since I couldn’t think of a way to look at how the Kristin Cavallari breakup would affect him, I settled for the next best thing. To see the effect of the sacks on Cutler, I looked at other QB’s who pretty up a decent yards per attempt greater than 7.0, in a season in which they took 50 or more sacks. Since 1978, 21 Quarterbacks returned as the starter the next season after meeting those benchmarks (Well, 16, but Bledsoe, Brunell, Kitna, O’Brien and Simms did it twice).
The next year, they averaged 12.6 games played, so the propensity to get hit did result in more games missed than the average starting quarterback with a solid yards per attempt. The sack rates improved slightly, from 10.2% to 9.1%, though the group was still below the league average for taking sacks. The yards per attempt for the group declined from 7.54 to 7.15 the following season. The biggest decliners were Hugh Millen in 1992 (7.5 to 5.9), Drew Bledsoe in 2000 (7.4 to 6.2) and 2003 (7.1 to 6.1), Jon Kitna in 2008 (7.3 to 6.3), and Ron Jaworski in 1984 (7.4 to 6.4).
Of course, we want to compare that to something, so a look at the guys with high yards per attempt but the best sack rates (a lot of Marino, Manning and Fouts) shows that the average games played was 15.3 the next year. The average YPA drop was just a little smaller, even though there was farther to decline because of better performances, from 7.77 to 7.44. If we look at just the guys from each group who averaged between 7.0 to 7.99 YPA the previous year, the high sack guys declined by 0.38 yards per attempt, versus 0.20 for the low sack guys.
I’m not a fan of the Bears prospects in 2011. They relied on a pretty good defense in 2010, something which is less stable, and that defense is built on three players now over 30, Julius Peppers, Brian Urlacher, and Lance Briggs. If any of those guys miss significant time, like Urlacher did two years ago, I can see this unit taking several steps back.
On offense, the major issue is the offensive line. They also addressed their lack of playmakers on offense by trading away Greg Olsen (since Martz didn’t utilize him anyway) and adding two Dallas castoffs, Roy Williams and Marion Barber III, hardly inspiring the fanbase that they had upgraded the position. The Bears ranked 30th in offensive yards, but scored points because the defense put them in good positions, and because of Devin Hester’s returns, including 3 for scores.
Lots of reasons to expect regression this year, including that they scored more points than the yardage profile suggests, they were among the leaders in turnovers forced and special teams touchdowns, plus that point differential shows them to be closer to a 9.5 win team who won close games (7-3 in single score games). It’s not every year that a team can reach the conference championship by never having to beat an average team in the playoffs. I’m not sure Jay Cutler makes it through this year without missing 5 or more games, and unless they show significant improvement on the offensive line from what we expect, 6-7 wins seems more likely than a return showing to a NFC Championship game witnessed by Maurice Jones-Drew and millions of others.
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Indianapolis Colts
2011 NFL PREVIEW: New Orleans Saints
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Tennessee Titans
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Denver Broncos
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Arizona Cardinals
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Buffalo Bills
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Carolina Panthers
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Cincinnati Bengals
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Cleveland Browns
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Jacksonville Bengals
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Minnesota Vikings
2011 NFL PREVIEW: New York Giants
2011 NFL PREVIEW: Pittsburgh Steelers
2011 NFL PREVIEW: St. Louis Rams
[photo via Getty]

- Riddick Bowe Promoted His Unsuccessful Muay Thai Debut By Allowing Monkeys to Climb All Over Him in Thailand
- New Zealand High School Rugby Player With the Most Vicious Hit of the Decade [Painful Video and Gif]
- Mario Balotelli Scores Goal, Kicks Own Shoes, Shouts Out Drake; All in a Day’s Work
- The 2013 MLB All-Star Game Batting Practice Jerseys Can be Yours for the Low, Low Price of $99.99
- Manu Ginobili’s Bald Spot Disappears After One Magical Swipe From Tim Duncan [GIF]

- Shining Base Path on MLB At-Bat Music: Ballplayers Love Drake, Pitbull, Metallica and 90s Hip Hop Jams
- scripty on New Zealand High School Rugby Player With the Most Vicious Hit of the Decade [Painful Video and Gif]
- scripty on Riddick Bowe Promoted His Unsuccessful Muay Thai Debut By Allowing Monkeys to Climb All Over Him in Thailand
- TonyToniTone Has Done It Again on MLB At-Bat Music: Ballplayers Love Drake, Pitbull, Metallica and 90s Hip Hop Jams
- TheRealAC on New Zealand High School Rugby Player With the Most Vicious Hit of the Decade [Painful Video and Gif]
38 Responses to “A Thought About the Chicago Bears: Jay Cutler’s Sacks”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






September 1st, 2011 at 5:04 PM
Thought About the Chicago Bears: Jay Cutler’s Sacks
i couldnt complete very many passes with 2 scrotums, either.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:05 PM
I didn’t think Cutler had a sack? Ohhhh, those sacks…
September 1st, 2011 at 5:07 PM
I can safely say I predicted the direction the first 2 comments were gonna go. Thanks for the confirmation fellas.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:08 PM
6-7? Too high, try like 3-5.
/Cutler is a loser and lacks a sack
September 1st, 2011 at 5:12 PM
Glad I come through
September 1st, 2011 at 5:14 PM
Man, the more I look at this team, they could be a dark horse in the Andrew Luck sweepstakes. Say Cutler gets injured thanks to all the hits. Urlacher too. Their great ST play is nullified on KO by the new rules and they get a bit unlucky in turnovers and close games.
/Bets 10 of Jays mortgage payment on the under
September 1st, 2011 at 5:14 PM
SC is crying somewhere.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:16 PM
Not all of those sacks are on the line Retarder receivers also.
So how do they help him, they get a POS no hands Roy Williams.
Good get em, Jay.
Bears will be lucky to make 8-8 with that craptacular team.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:16 PM
Perhaps not a BIG leap forward, but they will take a step forward. Losing Olin Kreutz hurts the locker room but I still think it helps on the field. Kruetz is a shell of the player he once was. This whole Roberto Garza at center won’t last. Chris Spencer is going to be the center.
I also can’t agree that they haven’t improved in preseason play. Jay is getting rid of the ball and the offensive line has looked pretty good when it’s the first unit. Lance Louis has proven to be a very good blocker when pulling on running plays. The tackles are stable with Carimi being a very solid rookie and J’Marcus Webb having been in the system for a year already. Webb isn’t Jonathan Ogden, but he isn’t what Frank OMG was last year or the corpse of Orlando Pace.
I’ll take the under. He will miss game(s) but not five. Cutler’s toughness was questioned because he went down in a big spot last year. He still managed to play 15 games while getting sacked 51 times. I think he plays 13 at minimum.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:16 PM
Curious how much you’ve seen the Bears this preseason. Other than the Buffalo game, where no one played much, I think their O-line has showed tremendous improvement from last year
September 1st, 2011 at 5:17 PM
We never really had great kickoff return success anyways. Daniel Manning fumbled as many times as he brought it back past the 40.
Punt returns are where the Bears excel.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:19 PM
/scrotal joke
September 1st, 2011 at 5:19 PM
Over/under on Cutler/Rodgers/Stafford combined starts this year at 35.5, I think I lean under.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:20 PM
The Bears are a 7-9 win team this year. They are unlikely to make the playoffs. Then again, we said the same thing last year and they surprised everyone.
Also, look at the schedule. They very well could start 0-3 with those games at the start. Past that? It sets up pretty favorably. This team had to play the NFC East last year. They get the AFC West this year with the two toughest teams coming to Soldier Field and the two most difficult NFC South teams coming in the first two games.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:21 PM
they could be a dark horse in the Andrew Luck sweepstakes
If you follow the Bears you would know they do not like QB’s.
They have a servicable one now, first in over 50 years, and they don’t surround him with any tools, let alone talent, and a mad scientist offensive coordinator who doesn’t grasp he has the tools to run his offesnse.
If Luck gets picked by Bears, he would run to the architecture department at Walmart.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:23 PM
The key for the Bears will be going 3-1 against the Lions and the Vikings. If they can somehow split against Green Bay, they’ve got a shot at the playoffs.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:23 PM
Hugh Millen. Magnificent. That guy needs to be brought up more often
September 1st, 2011 at 5:26 PM
3-1 against the Lions and the Vikings
Won’t get lucky against Lions again, unless Stafford is out.
Only good thing they have going is AFC West except for Chargers.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:27 PM
So, 3-0 at home vs Detroit and the two games vs Minny because I just can’t see Detroit losing that MNF game.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:27 PM
Now, if you want to question the health of Brian Urlacher and Lance Briggs, then you have my attention. Lance has missed all of camp, has not played in the preseason and is being a bitch about a new contract (fuck off, Lance. you’ve got 3 years remaining at plenty of pay). Brian is aging. The secondary is also a concern because if Peanut misses games, we have a major problem. Tim Jennings is a very questionable 2nd corner. The Bears started NINE (!!) different combos at safety last year. Lovie Smith has never been able to develop a safety that he’s drafted. Major Wright is a great open field tackler but he gets hurt a lot and isn’t that great in coverage.
The Lions get talked about a lot on the defensive front in this division. Have we forgotten that Julius Peppers and Israel Idonije are back for the Bears? 17 sacks, 8.5 each between the two of them. They actually have a solid rotation of 4 defensive tackles now too.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:27 PM
So, they need to go 4-2 in the division for a shot at the playoffs? I would say 5-1, because I can’t see the wildcard coming out of this division over the Falcons/Saints/Bucs or Eagles/Cowboys/Giants. Chicago is a solid 9-7 type team, but I think it’ll take more than that to get in the NFC draw.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:29 PM
Probably have to work out that way, yes. I’m under no illusion of beating Green Bay. The only thing that gives me any hope is that Lovie Smith has a pretty good record against the Pack in his tenure. Winning that week 3 game, like we did last year, would be enormous.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:30 PM
I would too. I’m not sure there’s a better division in football than the NFC North at getting pressure on the quarterback.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:31 PM
Never a gimme at Soldier.
The Pack host the Bears on Xmas day which won’t help your cause.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:31 PM
(fuck off, Lance. you’ve got 3 years remaining at plenty of pay)
Lambos don’t grow on trees.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:32 PM
Winning that week 3 game, like we did last year, would be enormous
Hopefully refs call 500 penalties against Pack again
September 1st, 2011 at 5:33 PM
I’d take the over. Stafford is due to, ya know, actually play games and although Cutler and Rodgers have their respective reputation (NFC Champ game) and issue (concussions), they are very tough QBs.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:35 PM
You mean if Stafford and Hill are both out. Chicago only becomes a better team when Stanton has to play.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:37 PM
The Lions secondary is fucking terrible. Past those 4 hooligans on their DL, the defense doesn’t scare me in the least.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:38 PM
Those four hooligans are going to give Cutler 1.7 seconds to release the football.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:39 PM
Legend.
+1 Sooner Schooner 15 yard penalty
September 1st, 2011 at 5:41 PM
I hope Martz runs a lot of his gadget screens and play action during those 2 games. Run the football too. Carimi is a great run blocker and make Suh chase on the outside when Lance Louis is pulling. Suh will be sucking wind by the 3rd quarter.
There isn’t a non-Packer I hate more than him. I got all firey just typing his name.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:44 PM
There’s about to be a tropical storm in the Gulf. I hear it’s a serious situation. In fact, it’s so serious that The Weather Channel has already sent Jim Cantore to New York City.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:45 PM
Jay Cutler doesn’t exactly strike fear in the hearts of NFC North fans either. He’ll still find a way to throw a minimum of 5 picks between the 2 Lions games. And with Lovie still manning the ship and now with the new kickoff rules? The Bears would be lucky to not go 0-4 against the Pack & Lions.
September 1st, 2011 at 5:57 PM
Goes against the narrative that Jay Cutler is sackless.
/confused
September 1st, 2011 at 5:58 PM
Wow, I got beat by comments 1, 2, 4. Thanks for playing all. I’ll take my lantern and go home.
September 1st, 2011 at 6:04 PM
I thought the headline said “Jay Culter Sucks.” Also true.
September 1st, 2011 at 6:27 PM
Hugh Millen. Magnificent. That guy needs to be brought up more often
i see Hugh, i think Downs