<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Michael Vick&#8217;s New Deal: Overpaying For A Running Quarterback</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/</link> <description>Sports, Media, Entertainment</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 05:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: Sports Fanatic</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414737</link> <dc:creator>Sports Fanatic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 03:33:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414737</guid> <description><![CDATA[Does he still owe money to creditors and taxes?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does he still owe money to creditors and taxes?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gaseous Clay</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414691</link> <dc:creator>Gaseous Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 23:42:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414691</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Dirt, just so we’re clear, there are several big contracts out there (one example, Eli) where bonus money is prorated equallly over the entire deal.&lt;/em&gt;yeah, but that&#039;s bonus money already paid.  It&#039;s not future guaranteed money. You&#039;re talking cap hit.  Lisk was talking actual payments due that NFL teams couldn&#039;t miss, because they were guaranteed.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Dirt, just so we’re clear, there are several big contracts out there (one example, Eli) where bonus money is prorated equallly over the entire deal.</em></p><p>yeah, but that&#8217;s bonus money already paid.  It&#8217;s not future guaranteed money. You&#8217;re talking cap hit.  Lisk was talking actual payments due that NFL teams couldn&#8217;t miss, because they were guaranteed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah!</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414346</link> <dc:creator>Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah!</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:26:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414346</guid> <description><![CDATA[Randall&#039;s big knee injury came while he was in the pocket.  McNabb busted up his ankle while passing in the pocket.  Roger Staubach caught the concussion that put him out while he was in the pocket.  If you&#039;re a QB, you can get hurt just like any other player anytime, anywhere on the field.  If Vick gets put out, he&#039;ll be put out on a blitzer let free by the doo doo brown of a offensive line.  Payton&#039;s neck isn&#039;t crap now because of all of those hits he took while making 20 yard runs.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall&#8217;s big knee injury came while he was in the pocket.  McNabb busted up his ankle while passing in the pocket.  Roger Staubach caught the concussion that put him out while he was in the pocket.  If you&#8217;re a QB, you can get hurt just like any other player anytime, anywhere on the field.  If Vick gets put out, he&#8217;ll be put out on a blitzer let free by the doo doo brown of a offensive line.  Payton&#8217;s neck isn&#8217;t crap now because of all of those hits he took while making 20 yard runs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sportsdork</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414135</link> <dc:creator>sportsdork</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:04:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414135</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;somebody point me to an NFL contract that had guaranteed money or bonus money that came in seasons after non-guaranteed money. Just name me a guy. Not a roster bonus guaranteed next season, but a roster bonus guaranteed in season 4 of that contract.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Dirt, just so we&#039;re clear, there are several big contracts out there (one example, Eli) where bonus money is prorated equallly over the entire deal. So there&#039;s never a point where you get out without a major cap hit.Obviously the wisdom of such deals depends on the player, the length of the deal, and the way the rest of the roster is constructed.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>somebody point me to an NFL contract that had guaranteed money or bonus money that came in seasons after non-guaranteed money. Just name me a guy. Not a roster bonus guaranteed next season, but a roster bonus guaranteed in season 4 of that contract.</p></blockquote><p>Dirt, just so we&#8217;re clear, there are several big contracts out there (one example, Eli) where bonus money is prorated equallly over the entire deal. So there&#8217;s never a point where you get out without a major cap hit.</p><p>Obviously the wisdom of such deals depends on the player, the length of the deal, and the way the rest of the roster is constructed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gaseous Clay</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414079</link> <dc:creator>Gaseous Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414079</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;but has LTBE money in 2013 that kicks in if I play X amount of snaps in 2011,&lt;/em&gt;I assume there&#039;s not a lot of that going on.  I think LBTE money is about getting a check for doing a thing.  Not about getting a promissory note for doing a thing. Just based on how cutthroat the business is.  Bringing in a guy  you owe 5 million and telling him to take the league minimum or get cut and take nothing, and he has the day to decide, but you just flew to Minnesota for a game, and his agent lives in Texas and is in texas.  But till the end of the day, or you&#039;re cut.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>but has LTBE money in 2013 that kicks in if I play X amount of snaps in 2011,</em></p><p>I assume there&#8217;s not a lot of that going on.  I think LBTE money is about getting a check for doing a thing.  Not about getting a promissory note for doing a thing.<br /> Just based on how cutthroat the business is.  Bringing in a guy  you owe 5 million and telling him to take the league minimum or get cut and take nothing, and he has the day to decide, but you just flew to Minnesota for a game, and his agent lives in Texas and is in texas.  But till the end of the day, or you&#8217;re cut.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sportsdork</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414066</link> <dc:creator>sportsdork</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:44:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414066</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;ome of those are performance bonuses. Half the snaps on defense, on the opening day roster, boom, bonus + that year’s salary becomes guaranteed. More than 10 tackles, or more than 1 sack.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, that&#039;s exactly my point, about why sometimes predicting a team&#039;s future cap hit for cutting a player is unclear.If I signed a deal in 2008 that prorates my signing bonus (whatever the  guaranteed portion of the deal is) over 3 years, but has LTBE money in 2013 that kicks in if I play X amount of snaps in 2011, then there is a new cap hit in 2013 if I achieved that but get cut before the 2013 season, yeah?  I really don&#039;t know.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ome of those are performance bonuses. Half the snaps on defense, on the opening day roster, boom, bonus + that year’s salary becomes guaranteed. More than 10 tackles, or more than 1 sack.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah, that&#8217;s exactly my point, about why sometimes predicting a team&#8217;s future cap hit for cutting a player is unclear.</p><p>If I signed a deal in 2008 that prorates my signing bonus (whatever the  guaranteed portion of the deal is) over 3 years, but has LTBE money in 2013 that kicks in if I play X amount of snaps in 2011, then there is a new cap hit in 2013 if I achieved that but get cut before the 2013 season, yeah?  I really don&#8217;t know.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gaseous Clay</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414051</link> <dc:creator>Gaseous Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:40:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414051</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;What I never had clarified for me is when those go from “Likely” to “Guaranteed”. &lt;/em&gt;some of those are performance bonuses.  Half the snaps on defense, on the opening day roster, boom, bonus + that year&#039;s salary becomes guaranteed.  More than 10 tackles, or more than 1 sack.Remember that Vernon Gholston Jets one, where if he got a sack or recovered a fumble at any point with the Jets, he got 9 million?  That was a likely to be earned incentive. Just like the reason Nmandi Asomough got to opt out with the Raiders, because he didn&#039;t meet some &quot;likely to be met&quot; individual performance standards, like tackles + interceptions + passes defended, which did damage to his perceived value in the long run.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What I never had clarified for me is when those go from “Likely” to “Guaranteed”. </em></p><p>some of those are performance bonuses.  Half the snaps on defense, on the opening day roster, boom, bonus + that year&#8217;s salary becomes guaranteed.  More than 10 tackles, or more than 1 sack.</p><p>Remember that Vernon Gholston Jets one, where if he got a sack or recovered a fumble at any point with the Jets, he got 9 million?  That was a likely to be earned incentive.<br /> Just like the reason Nmandi Asomough got to opt out with the Raiders, because he didn&#8217;t meet some &#8220;likely to be met&#8221; individual performance standards, like tackles + interceptions + passes defended, which did damage to his perceived value in the long run.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gaseous Clay</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414038</link> <dc:creator>Gaseous Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:38:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414038</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;What I never had clarified for me is when those go from “Likely” to “Guaranteed”. For example, when the contract is signed there is a 2012 “LTBE” bonus, but is that earned in 2011? If so, if the player is cut, then is their dead money in 2012 because he earned it in 2011?&lt;/em&gt;a likely to be earned incentive is just that.  It&#039;s not a number so high that you become too expensive to continue to employ, or it&#039;s an offseason workout bonus that you can have if you show the dedication to show up. Or it&#039;s a roster bonus next year when you got fatly bonused this year.You hear all the time about roster bonuses, workout bonuses, etc.  But those aren&#039;t guaranteed unless they are called guaranteed bonuses.  If they&#039;re called &quot;likely to be earned,&quot; then they are obviously not guaranteed.  If this guy breaks his neck, they aren&#039;t paying him a workout bonus in the summer of 2013.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>What I never had clarified for me is when those go from “Likely” to “Guaranteed”. For example, when the contract is signed there is a 2012 “LTBE” bonus, but is that earned in 2011? If so, if the player is cut, then is their dead money in 2012 because he earned it in 2011?</em></p><p>a likely to be earned incentive is just that.  It&#8217;s not a number so high that you become too expensive to continue to employ, or it&#8217;s an offseason workout bonus that you can have if you show the dedication to show up.<br /> Or it&#8217;s a roster bonus next year when you got fatly bonused this year.</p><p>You hear all the time about roster bonuses, workout bonuses, etc.  But those aren&#8217;t guaranteed unless they are called guaranteed bonuses.  If they&#8217;re called &#8220;likely to be earned,&#8221; then they are obviously not guaranteed.  If this guy breaks his neck, they aren&#8217;t paying him a workout bonus in the summer of 2013.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sportsdork</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414032</link> <dc:creator>sportsdork</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:34:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414032</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;what am i supposed to be seeing? roster bonuses?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Likely To Be Earned incentives.&lt;blockquote&gt;There are LTBE incentives of 1,040,000 in 2011, 1,102,000 in 2012, 1,064,000 in 2013, 1,076,000 in 2014, and 588,000 in 2015. There are escalators of up to 1M in 2009, 2013, and 2014; 1.25M in 2015, and 1.5M in 2016.&lt;/blockquote&gt;What I never had clarified for me is when those go from &quot;Likely&quot; to &quot;Guaranteed&quot;.  For example, when the contract is signed there is a 2012 &quot;LTBE&quot; bonus, but is that earned in 2011?  If so, if the player is cut, then is their dead money in 2012 because he earned it in 2011?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>what am i supposed to be seeing? roster bonuses?</p></blockquote><p>Likely To Be Earned incentives.</p><blockquote><p>There are LTBE incentives of 1,040,000 in 2011, 1,102,000 in 2012, 1,064,000 in 2013, 1,076,000 in 2014, and 588,000 in 2015. There are escalators of up to 1M in 2009, 2013, and 2014; 1.25M in 2015, and 1.5M in 2016.</p></blockquote><p>What I never had clarified for me is when those go from &#8220;Likely&#8221; to &#8220;Guaranteed&#8221;.  For example, when the contract is signed there is a 2012 &#8220;LTBE&#8221; bonus, but is that earned in 2011?  If so, if the player is cut, then is their dead money in 2012 because he earned it in 2011?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: starkweather</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414027</link> <dc:creator>starkweather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:33:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414027</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;I heard they’re looking into a home and home with Boise State once that QB graduates.&lt;/em&gt;FedEx field is considered a neutral site, though, so they&#039;re just playing both games in Raljon, MD]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I heard they’re looking into a home and home with Boise State once that QB graduates.</em></p><p>FedEx field is considered a neutral site, though, so they&#8217;re just playing both games in Raljon, MD</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gaseous Clay</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414026</link> <dc:creator>Gaseous Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:32:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414026</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;not every year, damn it!&lt;/em&gt;I heard they&#039;re looking into a home and home with Boise State once that QB graduates.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>not every year, damn it!</em></p><p>I heard they&#8217;re looking into a home and home with Boise State once that QB graduates.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: geoffreyvs is doing the Tomahawk Chop</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414025</link> <dc:creator>geoffreyvs is doing the Tomahawk Chop</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:31:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414025</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Boomer Esiason. Legend&lt;/blockquote&gt;&quot;I&#039;m going to Disney World!&quot; Pause. &quot;Ah, shit.&quot;]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Boomer Esiason. Legend</p></blockquote><p>&#8220;I&#8217;m going to Disney World!&#8221; Pause. &#8220;Ah, shit.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gaseous Clay</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414024</link> <dc:creator>Gaseous Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:31:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414024</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Check out the Mike Patterson deal&lt;/em&gt;what am i supposed to be seeing?  roster bonuses?  Those aren&#039;t guaranteed.  Only the dead money is guaranteed if you cut him prior to the original bonus being amortized away.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Check out the Mike Patterson deal</em></p><p>what am i supposed to be seeing?  roster bonuses?  Those aren&#8217;t guaranteed.  Only the dead money is guaranteed if you cut him prior to the original bonus being amortized away.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sportsdork</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414023</link> <dc:creator>sportsdork</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414023</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I know that it wasn’t to be taken literally…I was mainly lamenting the fact that the Skins generally suffer for their sins when the player is actually presently sucking for them, not thereafter.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Ha, fair enough. I&#039;m certainly guilty of picking on Snyder even at times it&#039;s not warranted.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I know that it wasn’t to be taken literally…I was mainly lamenting the fact that the Skins generally suffer for their sins when the player is actually presently sucking for them, not thereafter.</p></blockquote><p>Ha, fair enough. I&#8217;m certainly guilty of picking on Snyder even at times it&#8217;s not warranted.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: spencer096</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414021</link> <dc:creator>spencer096</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414021</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;I know that it wasn’t to be taken literally…I was mainly lamenting the fact that the Skins generally suffer for their sins when the player is actually presently sucking for them, not thereafter.&lt;/blockquote&gt;i like how the bengals suffer for their sins when the player is presently retired./high fives carson palmer]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I know that it wasn’t to be taken literally…I was mainly lamenting the fact that the Skins generally suffer for their sins when the player is actually presently sucking for them, not thereafter.</p></blockquote><p>i like how the bengals suffer for their sins when the player is presently retired.</p><p>/high fives carson palmer</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay V Of Considerable Influence</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414018</link> <dc:creator>Jay V Of Considerable Influence</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414018</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;and along the way, they rack up enough wins to become bowl eligible every year.&lt;/blockquote&gt;not every year, damn it!]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and along the way, they rack up enough wins to become bowl eligible every year.</p></blockquote><p>not every year, damn it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jay V Of Considerable Influence</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414016</link> <dc:creator>Jay V Of Considerable Influence</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:28:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414016</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course they haven’t taken a $15 million hit on one player in one season. I didn’t expect anyone to take that literally.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I know that it wasn&#039;t to be taken literally...I was mainly lamenting the fact that the Skins generally suffer for their sins when the player is actually presently sucking for them, not thereafter.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course they haven’t taken a $15 million hit on one player in one season. I didn’t expect anyone to take that literally.</p></blockquote><p>I know that it wasn&#8217;t to be taken literally&#8230;I was mainly lamenting the fact that the Skins generally suffer for their sins when the player is actually presently sucking for them, not thereafter.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gaseous Clay</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414015</link> <dc:creator>Gaseous Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:28:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414015</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Meaning, the team took their roster bonus and changed it to a signing bonus so they could pro-rate it over the life of the contract.&lt;/em&gt;when you do that, you hand the guy a check for the money, or you are just futzing with the bookkeeping on money you&#039;ve already paid him.  You aren&#039;t actually promising to pay him Tuesday for a hamburger today.  All you spread out is the cap hit.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Meaning, the team took their roster bonus and changed it to a signing bonus so they could pro-rate it over the life of the contract.</em></p><p>when you do that, you hand the guy a check for the money, or you are just futzing with the bookkeeping on money you&#8217;ve already paid him.  You aren&#8217;t actually promising to pay him Tuesday for a hamburger today.  All you spread out is the cap hit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sportsdork</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414014</link> <dc:creator>sportsdork</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:27:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414014</guid> <description><![CDATA[@Gaseous - Often it&#039;s not even as simple as the Roster/Signing bonus, though. Check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eaglescap.com/Players/MikePatterson.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mike Patterson&lt;/a&gt; deal.  The Eagles did a bunch of contracts like that with young guys (like Reggie Brown, woops).The team doesn&#039;t get hurt real bad, but you do have some wacky stuff on the back end sometimes.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gaseous &#8211; Often it&#8217;s not even as simple as the Roster/Signing bonus, though. Check out the <a href="http://www.eaglescap.com/Players/MikePatterson.html" rel="nofollow">Mike Patterson</a> deal.  The Eagles did a bunch of contracts like that with young guys (like Reggie Brown, woops).</p><p>The team doesn&#8217;t get hurt real bad, but you do have some wacky stuff on the back end sometimes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: YYSA</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/08/30/michael-vicks-new-deal-overpaying-for-a-running-quarterback/comment-page-3/#comment-1414013</link> <dc:creator>YYSA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:27:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=118176#comment-1414013</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;that he’s physically unable to perform?&lt;/blockquote&gt;work ethic.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>that he’s physically unable to perform?</p></blockquote><p>work ethic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/28 queries in 0.040 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 431/487 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com

 Served from: www.thebiglead.com @ 2013-05-26 04:48:15 by W3 Total Cache -->