ESPN Talent on the Longhorn Network Better Be Nice – or the University of Texas Might Have You Replaced
ESPN’s Longhorn Network will make its much-ballyhooed debut in August, and the No. 1 thing to monitor will be whether or not any broadcasters are critical of the school or program. Because if they are, the University of Texas is likely to have them “replaced,” according to the contract the school signed with the network.
The Statesman got the contract through an FOI, and here’s some language that might make a broadcaster skittish:
“in the event that UT reasonably determines that any on-air talent does not reflect the quality and reputation desired by UT for the Network based on inappropriate statements made or actions taken by such talent and so notifies ESPN, ESPN will cause such talent to be promptly replaced (and will in any event no longer allow them on air following such notice).”
So if a Texas football player is arrested, will we hear the gory details on air, or will we just hear that he’s been suspended for a game? If the offense is struggling, will announcers have the ability to be critical of a QB or coordinator? Can’t wait.
UT TV network: ESPN handles hiring, but UT, in some cases, can fire [Statesman]

- Oxbow Upsets Orb To Win Preakness, No Triple Crown For 2013
- Charmin “Stop Skidmarks” Billboard Won At Charlotte Motor Speedway
- Mets Resort To Groupon To Sell Tickets, Including Yankees Games
- Oklahoma State Blocks Wes Lunt Transfer Options, Lest Mike Gundy Look Bad Indirectly
- Tony Allen: Here’s Video of Him Dancing in Front of a Green Screen Taping an ESPN NBA Promo

- A.P. on Oxbow Upsets Orb To Win Preakness, No Triple Crown For 2013
- A.P. on Mets Resort To Groupon To Sell Tickets, Including Yankees Games
- Sturmy on Mets Resort To Groupon To Sell Tickets, Including Yankees Games
- KC Resident on Oklahoma State Blocks Wes Lunt Transfer Options, Lest Mike Gundy Look Bad Indirectly
- PAR5N2 on Oklahoma State Blocks Wes Lunt Transfer Options, Lest Mike Gundy Look Bad Indirectly
125 Responses to “ESPN Talent on the Longhorn Network Better Be Nice – or the University of Texas Might Have You Replaced”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






May 4th, 2011 at 12:19 PM
ESPN selling out? No way.
/Sky is blue.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:19 PM
If he was still Ombudsman, Ohlmeyer would have a mildly-worded opinion on this coming in late 2013.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:20 PM
And the title is misleading. When talking UT and talent, I thought you meant how Hot the chicks reporting would be.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:22 PM
ESPN complained when UFC wouldn’t credential their writer because he was critical of the UFC. Guess the shoe is on the other foot now. ESPN = Hypocritical
May 4th, 2011 at 12:22 PM
Clown would make the ideal on air personality for Longhorn Network
/Garrett Gilbert Top 5.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:24 PM
That typo in the first sentence is really distracting me. Can somebody give me the gist of the rest of it?
May 4th, 2011 at 12:24 PM
Maybe ESPN should hire Tressel for the job. kind of a good fit.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:25 PM
And he will have the free time!
May 4th, 2011 at 12:26 PM
I see this as no different than a baseball team’s regular broadcasters, who are employed by the team usually, glossing over the team’s shittiness or the arrest of a player recently: the way the Astros broadcasters casually looked past Julio Lugo’s arrest for beating his wife after the game the previous night a few years ago comes to mind.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:27 PM
This just seems like a standard clause in an on-air talent contract, am I wrong? Like, I know everybody on here flipped out about (I don’t remember whose contract) that clause that said the standard b.s. about owning work produced in all the universe or whatever – I’ve done work for hire and had to sign that type of shit for pretty much any entertainment industry job I’ve ever had. It’s hilarious language but it’s kind of, you know, standard
May 4th, 2011 at 12:27 PM
I don’t see a typo.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:27 PM
When does the Oregon Cheerleader Network go on air?
May 4th, 2011 at 12:28 PM
The Longhorn Network is to be run like the Ministry of Truth with a Two Minutes Hate every day at noon set to Sooner highlights
May 4th, 2011 at 12:28 PM
Winner.
Move along, there is nothing else to see here.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:33 PM
Mendenhall speaks
May 4th, 2011 at 12:34 PM
right after phil knight lets em know the money’s on the dresser.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:35 PM
I don’t see a typo.
/!
May 4th, 2011 at 12:35 PM
…Oh, except for the post that I deleted
May 4th, 2011 at 12:35 PM
why didn’t he address the one that pissed everyone off?
May 4th, 2011 at 12:36 PM
“The World Trade Centers”
May 4th, 2011 at 12:36 PM
I didn’t think anything could make me root for Oklahoma and Douche Stoops but I now shall be rooting for OU against Texas.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:37 PM
what’s this? “debut?”
oh, that’s the butt. i also wrote tennis!
/ladies man’d
May 4th, 2011 at 12:37 PM
Tim 7, Hernia 5, Stark 0. Or something.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:38 PM
“It was only meant to encourage anyone reading it to think.”
Take your own advice hoss, trying to play the intellectually superior card here just makes you come off worse…notice he didn’t touch the Truther bullshit
May 4th, 2011 at 12:38 PM
His blog post was eloquent enough, and he did apologize but the above statement in it’s ignorance trumps everything. We did her OBL/UBL speak and we did hear his side. Furthermore, there are thousands of quotes in the bible that can be taken a number of ways, quoting the bible is a dicey proposition if you are trying to go with a literal message.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:38 PM
So if a Texas football player is arrested, will we hear the gory details on air, or will we just hear that he’s been suspended for a game?
As long as the other ESPN networks cover said stories, I don’t really see how this could really be an issue
May 4th, 2011 at 12:39 PM
It just says you have to be good at your job. The horror!
/Hook ‘em
May 4th, 2011 at 12:39 PM
“It was only meant to encourage anyone reading it to think.”
It certainly caused the University of Illinois to think about its admissions policy for student-athletes.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:39 PM
Helps when your agent finds someone to write it
May 4th, 2011 at 12:40 PM
Thats because he thinks if you delete a Twitter post that it never existed..
May 4th, 2011 at 12:40 PM
Tim 7, Hernia 5, Stark 0. Or something.
No way, I totally reverse !’d you on twitter the other day. And there was that one time I got Jersey and somebody else to notice your type before you deleted it. So I’m going to mark that a “2″ in the Starkweather column
May 4th, 2011 at 12:41 PM
So Rick Barnes isn’t allowed to appear on the Network?
/ZING!
May 4th, 2011 at 12:41 PM
Maybe he should of released a VLOG if he wanted to encourage thinking and discussion. Just like that idiot Zach Follet who ranted about Satan and Jesus!
May 4th, 2011 at 12:41 PM
Wait just a minute… Are you suggesting that the Bible shouldn’t be taken literally? That’s not what I’ve been led to believe.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:41 PM
Two “Texas sucks” posts in a row? Interesting…
May 4th, 2011 at 12:42 PM
Hey come one now, his number 1 priority is to get his players to the NBA, and he has been doing that.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:42 PM
i really don’t see the problem in THAT particular tweet (the 9/11 one was just retarded tho).
you can say all you want that you understand osama’s side of the thing, but until youre a muslim and watch the US pull their CIA shit for decades in your homeland and walk away like it’s nothing, you really don’t understand it.
we only udnerstand the whole situation from an american point of view, and that’s what i think mendenhall was saying.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:42 PM
-2
May 4th, 2011 at 12:43 PM
You go to Catholic school growing up too? Yeah, the nuns were not fans of me.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:43 PM
my religion teacher told me that angry, old testament god was a dick to job because job gave god a gorilla mask.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:44 PM
Understanding is one thing, but he said we only heard one side. Which is false. He freaking said we never heard him speak.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:44 PM
I stand by my comments. You have a type. A fixed gear bicycle riding, $400 haircut type. Mark it 2, dude
May 4th, 2011 at 12:45 PM
“I appreciate those of you who have decided to read this letter and attain a greater understanding of my recent twitter posts. I see how they have gotten misconstrued, and wanted to use this outlet as a way to clear up all things that do not truthfully represent myself, what I stand for personally, and any organization that I am a part of.”
OK who wrote this for him? I’ve seen his tweets and I know where he went to school. No fucking way he knows what the word “misconstrued” means.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:45 PM
Thats because he thinks if you delete a Twitter post that it never existed..
But more importantly, what are his views on dinosaurs??
May 4th, 2011 at 12:47 PM
Like Butters said, it was probably put together by the Agency his agent is a part of. Definitely wasn’t him.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:48 PM
Yeah, this clause seems more directed at people saying/doing stupid stuff (like saying Hitler was a great leader–who would do that?). They COULD try to pull a guy for talking about player arrests and stuff, but that would probably open them up to a lawsuit.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:48 PM
If Mendenhall wanted to go the “intelectually superior” route he should have hired Ty Duffy, not used this half-ass transcript…
May 4th, 2011 at 12:48 PM
And there was that one time I got Jersey and somebody else to notice your typ
eo before you deleted it.Just saying.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:49 PM
Mendenhall for Commish.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:50 PM
we heard what our govt de-classified and let us hear.
but im gonna stop…im treading too close to defending the fucker.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:50 PM
OK who wrote this for him?
Katie Baker.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:51 PM
But he’s a intellectual conversationalist! How dare you doubt his lexicon!
May 4th, 2011 at 12:54 PM
Two “Texas sucks” posts in a row? Interesting…
In Texas, football is more than a sport…
“I appreciate those of you who have decided to read this letter and attain a greater understanding of my recent twitter posts. I see how they have gotten misconstrued
Uh, no. I don’t think they’ve gotten misconstrued at all. He didn’t like people celebrating Bin Laden’s death. He tweeted about it. People disagreed. He tried to get intellectual by stating that we didn’t hear both sides of the argument. People got offended at that.
Note to Mendenhall and all athletes, remember these words and say them whenever asked about anything: “Both teams played hard.”
May 4th, 2011 at 12:56 PM
Mendenhall must have been pissed when everyone celebrated David killing Goliath and defeating the Phillistines. We never heard Goliath’s story.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:57 PM
god damnit, i have a quote from osama that gives his side of it and yet, i don’t want to post it because it’ll look like im defending the fuck.
whatever. next post.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:58 PM
Next post may very well be about Mendenall’s statement Spence so you can put it in there.
May 4th, 2011 at 12:58 PM
Spencer’s Wahabist!
May 4th, 2011 at 12:59 PM
Spence, I dont think thats the way anyone took his tweets, because of the order he wrote them. He wrote: “We’ve only heard one side…” and immediately followed it with ”
“We’ll never know what really happened. I just have a hard time believing a plane could take a skyscraper down demolition style.” As if he thinks hearing the other ‘side’ might clear up what ‘really happened’ that day. Nothing to do with what you are talking about, only about what happened on 9/11.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:00 PM
osama’s quote.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:01 PM
god damnit, i have a quote from osama that gives his side of it and yet, i don’t want to post it because it’ll look like im defending the fuck.
Don’t worry spence. We know you’re not defending the fuck.
To me, it’s immaterial what his point is. Once you start bombing trains and night clubs and using planes as missiles against innocent people, your point goes out the window.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:01 PM
I wasn’t that fired up about Mendenhall’s comments initially, but then when Chris Harris spoke up defending Mendenhall with more ignorant BS logic I got pissed.
You guys have touched on it, but these aren’t opinions people are mad about. They’re facts. In 2004, OBL took responsibility for the attacks on international TV. Where’s the apology for that? Stop hiding behind a warped sense of freedom of speech (when no one is debating it) that can only be justifiable when you’ve lived a coddled adult life disconnected from reality.
RM invoking the Bible is the adult equivalent of a child punching someone then running and hiding behind their mom’s leg so they can’t be hit back. You weren’t misinterpreted, you were wrong.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:02 PM
cj…maybe im giving him too much credit.
and maybe im just being too cynical towards our govt’s seedy underbelly.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:04 PM
our own CIA funded, trained and outfitted numerous dicator-led armies which used those skills and equipment against their own people. this happened across the world…in SE asia, africa, south america, the midle east.
our hands are pretty fucking dirty too.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:04 PM
UBL doesn’t have a “side of it.” There is no explanation or justification for killing innocent people simply because you disagree with there religious beliefs or, worse yet, there lifestyle (I’m obviously not suggesting that you believe that there is). I appreciate the artful way Mendenhall’s “apology” was crafted, but there’s no getting around that he’s obviously an idiot.
Now, please share your quote so that we may discuss…
May 4th, 2011 at 1:05 PM
According to Darren Rovell, Mendenhall’s post was 100% word-for-word his own.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:05 PM
Nah, I’m told Tom Brady was out on the town and there are photographs- that obviously gets first priority.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:07 PM
Shoot me.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:07 PM
Spence, I know you might get lamabsted here but I completely see your point. I still think there is a distinct difference to funding regimes and making head-on attacks targeted specifically at civilians. No doubt our government has done fucked up shit though. Humans are fucked up though, so you have to look at things in a running tally, because every entity of power is inherently corrupt and has done horrible things.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:09 PM
/pats SG on the back
There there, there there
May 4th, 2011 at 1:09 PM
Oh for crissakes – typing too fast and not proofreading. My bad. Please replace the middle two with “THEIR.”
May 4th, 2011 at 1:09 PM
and maybe im just being too cynical towards our govt’s seedy underbelly.
If OBL was so aghast and so against what our government did in Lebanon in 1982 or if he was opposed to our continued support of Israel over the Palestinian people, he didn’t seem to speak up about it in the years after when we were supplying the mujahideen in Afghanistan with weapons and rockets and other support to fight the Soviet Union. On the contrary, he and the muj seemed all to eager to take whatever help Uncle Sam gave them to fight the big bad Red army.
If he was so enraged by our actions in the Middle East, he could have said “Up yours. After we’re done with these assholes, you’re next.” He didn’t. Tells me this was bs excuse-making of the highest order to try and wrap his little campaign in the flag of the oppressed.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:11 PM
Al Qaeda and OBL crying about the injustice of the USA/Israel alliance makes me sick. Last time I checked those scumbags attach bombs to women and children. Those sack of shit Imam’s praise Hitler and call for the extermination of the Jewish people worldwide.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:13 PM
the americans only funded and equipped afghan nationals. both the CIA and bin laden/zawahiri have said that they didn’t get shit and had their own muslim-backed funding.
bin laden offered his services to protect the saudis from sadam using his mujahideen, but saudi arabia went with the US instead. to someone who’s fully committed to sharia law, that’s a slap in the face.
he actually did. and he declared war on saudi arabia before the US.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:14 PM
and this is where my internal conflict comes in and i stop defending him.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:16 PM
Comment no. 5 is awesome. Clown would have a raging boner reading Texas highlights. His highlight package of the OU 30 point win would be every Gilbert completion (all 7 of them) set to the theme from Dallas. After every completion you’d hear a muted “hook ‘em” while he high fived his co-host.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:16 PM
our own CIA funded, trained and outfitted numerous dicator-led armies which used those skills and equipment against their own people. this happened across the world…in SE asia, africa, south america, the midle east.
our hands are pretty fucking dirty too.
No doubt. I grew up in one of those countries where US financial support helped keep a civil war going for a decade (hint: Iran-Contra).
Did we get involved in things we shouldn’t have for reasons that shouldn’t have factored? Absolutely. Are we not paying the price for having supported dictators, assholes and despots in the Cold War chess game against the Soviets? Bet your ass.
But if OBL was so intent on actually helping alleviate the plight of the Palestinians and the Lebanese and the other oppressed people of the Middle East, striking like he did at America is the least helpful way imaginable. How did that solve anything?
May 4th, 2011 at 1:17 PM
Some good salient points being made in here and I’m glad no one is overreacting.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:17 PM
I’m going out on a limb and assuming that if RM didn’t realize OBL took credit for the attacks he doesn’t know the back story. Maybe an unfair leap in logic, but one I’m willing to make. I bet he also feels terrible Pat Tillman and other Americans got duped into joining the military. But hey he participated in a football camp for the sons of those dopes so it’s all good.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:18 PM
Sorry, I broke that up.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:19 PM
well, without the US’ guns and ships, israel would be a pretty inviting target, no?
and i never said they were smart about the whole thing either. if they really wanted to make a change, they should’ve tried to appeal to the upper-class, rich white woman crowd…get them on your side and the politicians would’ve done whatever they asked.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:19 PM
His goal was to change America, and he sort of succeeded
May 4th, 2011 at 1:20 PM
You really didn’t. I was talking about it getting to a Roundup level shouting and namecalling match, which it hasn’t.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:21 PM
He was a tremendous champion for women’s rights, that’s got to count for something.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:22 PM
Sorry for my simplistic take on the whole thing, but I’m just looking at OBL’s effect on America, not his overall change in the Middle East. It seems to me that the Middle East is changing in a way that he may have liked (Overthrowing dictators) but then again wouldn’t like (chants for democracy instead of Islamic rule)
May 4th, 2011 at 1:22 PM
Mr. Burns (AKA Mrejrl (sp?)) will be here soon enough to render this comment moot.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:23 PM
well, without the US’ guns and ships, israel would be a pretty inviting target, no?
Everytime they gang up on Israel, Israel whups their asses. They do such a fine job of protecting themselves that I don’t get why we’re there at all.
and i never said they were smart about the whole thing either. if they really wanted to make a change, they should’ve tried to appeal to the upper-class, rich white woman crowd…get them on your side and the politicians would’ve done whatever they asked.
Fair enough. And you’re right: get enough kids in front of a TV camera and ask some rich, white people to start hosting fundraisers and telethons for you and people’s perceptions change.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:23 PM
What he should have done if we are talking non-horrific violence root is gain more control of the oil in his native SA and then use his vast wealth to buy his way into our political system. That’s how others have done it and succeeded.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:25 PM
Using weapons that the US has sold/provided them.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:25 PM
His goal was to change America, and he sort of succeeded
Without a doubt. We live under far more federal scrutiny. Civil liberties eroded. More power in the executive branch’s hands than ever before. A Congress that seems incapable of finding a nutsack. Polarized population that screams and fights itself. We can’t even enjoy True Lies for the popcorn fluff that it is anymore!
May 4th, 2011 at 1:26 PM
Well that and the Arabic nations can’t seem to agree on anything when they’re attacking and can’t run decent campaigns.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:27 PM
More onto the Israel point. I’m a pretty staunch Libertarian on most issues and really don’t endorse foreign financial aid. But, I’m fully for aid and support for Israel. Even though Israel has an amazing military and can easily fuck up any of these other “enemy” countries. Without the support and backing of the US there’s a good chance they would be blown away. Here is a small little article that echos some of my feelings that also has some video links to show how valuable Israel is.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:27 PM
For Cleet: @ChrisHarrisNFL Why is it that a guy like @R_Mendenhall gets ridiculed n bashed 4 his thoughts n opinions but Rush Limbaugh can say whatever the hell He feels at no one say a thing or its not all over the news?
That this was from an African-American NFL player is a little too ironic to be fabricated.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:27 PM
Using weapons that the US has sold/provided them.
Hey, we gotta make a buck in there somewhere. Chinese sell their stuff to North Korea. Russia sells their stuff to Libya and other places. In the end, it’s all about money.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:29 PM
There’s a whole system of beliefs (Wahabism) that informed everything Osama did that precludes the sort of syncretic infiltration you’re suggesting. It’s a very “burn-them-all”/fascistic little sect. Has anybody read Ghost Wars? That’s a fantastic book
May 4th, 2011 at 1:29 PM
Israel has the backing of big brother and big brother’s toys. If we pulled all of our support, Israel would not last long (though neither would their attackers as Israel would blow the entire region back to biblical times).
May 4th, 2011 at 1:29 PM
from the wiki…
shit.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:29 PM
@ Mr. A.
/forehead slap
May 4th, 2011 at 1:31 PM
beach house.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:31 PM
Cause I’m sure Chris Harris listens to Rush. Right? I’ve actually seen that exact statement about 10 times on comment sections in the past 2 days.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:33 PM
So Rush doesn’t say extremely offensive things on the hour? The point the man was making holds a lot of water.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:33 PM
israel might have a nice military, i find it hard to believe that the combined force of the arab nations against them wouldn’t be anything but a rout without the US sitting on the sidelines looking all ominous and shit.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:34 PM
I know this isn’t directed at me, but Limbaugh catches a lot of shit for what he says. However it’s not the 1990s anymore, so everyone is used to it.
Limbaugh used to be pretty good. Now it’s all attacks on Obama for no reason and then two hours of him complaining that people are attacking him & he’s too smart for the world.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:34 PM
Ron Paul has been repeating that for the past decade or more. He may have an isolationist POV which I can’t fully support. But at least he speaks his mind and doesn’t flip flop.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:34 PM
Oh FFS they let Duffy do the post on Mendenhall’s statement.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:34 PM
So Rush doesn’t say extremely offensive things on the hour? The point the man was making holds a lot of water.
Ummm, I would like to find one day in the last, oh, 19 years where there wasn’t a story somewhere ridiculing something ridiculous that Rush Limbaugh had to say.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:35 PM
Gary Johnson for President.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:35 PM
Can’t remember the guy’s name, but the founder/theological light behind Wahhabism lived in Greeley, CO back in the…wanna say ’30s, and credited that experience with his later radicalization. Thanks a lot, Greeley.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:35 PM
i dunno bout that considering that rush limbaugh is almost universally viewed as a total fucking asshat.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:37 PM
I’m not here to defend Rush. He’s OK in my book. A little too neo-con for my blood. What do you deem extremely offensive? And if that’s offensive to you, how is what he says anymore offensive than what is said on the left past and present but pundits and talk show hosts.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:39 PM
I was driving into CHicago one day and these guys devoted an entire hour to what Glenn Beck had said on radio earlier in the day. Why the fuck are you breaking down what the opposition is saying? 1). You’re giving him free pub, 2). It ruins your show and 3). I doubt your audience gives a rats ass what a certified lunatic/money grubber Glenn Beck has to say about anything.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:39 PM
Keeping this in the sports spectrum… Chris Harris is upset ppl are getting on RM for his ‘opinions’. He therefore compares him to a guy that was fired for offering his opinion and says RM is the victim? I’m not suggesting what Rush said is valid, just that pointing to a guy that got fired as never getting in trouble is moronic.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:42 PM
OK.
Uh.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:43 PM
BTW, I love the constant “the left says the same thing!!1!” canard. There is no left wing equivalent of Rush Limbaugh, wish though you might.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:44 PM
jon stewart and colbert?
May 4th, 2011 at 1:47 PM
jon stewart and colbert?
Really? Maybe in terms of audience size but… Really?
May 4th, 2011 at 1:48 PM
Israel has hidden nukes that everyone in the region is aware of. Piss off Israel, you’ll have a 5 megaton nuke coming in no time. I remember reading that Isreal was ready to send one to Baghdad back in the Gulf War.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:50 PM
Their rhetoric is nothing alike. Rush, especially these days, is willing to blatantly racebait and lie, and there isn’t that winking sarcasm. Stewart, it should also be said, is a lot more centrist than progressive.
He’s also a lot more popular. He may be a Big Fat Idiot, but he’s the #1 talk show broadcaster of the last 20 years. The other two have shows on Comedy Central.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:50 PM
and the surrounding countries have pretty much shown how much of a shit they give about their citizens.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:54 PM
it’s entertainment and, lets face it, neither are going to be confused with tim russert or fareed zakaria anytime soon.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:56 PM
Entertainment, yes, but my point remains: there isn’t a liberal equivalent to Limbaugh. Those two aren’t it.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:57 PM
Also, they won’t be confused with Russert because they are still alive.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:58 PM
waka waka!
/i get your point and agree…i was being facetious with stewart and colbert
May 4th, 2011 at 1:59 PM
ABC/NBC/CBS/MSNBC > Some Big Fat Idiot
But whatever, you’re right. Rush has never said one factual thing! Just straight lies homey. The country is going along swell.
May 4th, 2011 at 1:59 PM
Ah, got it.
May 4th, 2011 at 2:00 PM
That’s not what I said, but eh.