<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/" > <channel><title>Comments on: NFL Draft 2011: Draft Philosophy, Best Player Available, and How the Rich May Get Richer in 2011</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/</link> <description>Sports, Media, Entertainment</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:44:55 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <item><title>By: YoungmanU2</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272553</link> <dc:creator>YoungmanU2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:15:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272553</guid> <description><![CDATA[I also think it&#039;s useful for a team to trade down and accumulate more picks if their guy they had pegged - via bpa analysis - is not there and they see several players so closely ranked they don&#039;t see a big differential. And, they can also still take a shot and draft for need in that area. This really starts to happen from the middle of round 1 on. How many players will bust from round 1? Generally you can figure about 15-20.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think it&#8217;s useful for a team to trade down and accumulate more picks if their guy they had pegged &#8211; via bpa analysis &#8211; is not there and they see several players so closely ranked they don&#8217;t see a big differential. And, they can also still take a shot and draft for need in that area. This really starts to happen from the middle of round 1 on. How many players will bust from round 1? Generally you can figure about 15-20.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wide Word of Sport (?)</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272492</link> <dc:creator>Wide Word of Sport (?)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:11:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272492</guid> <description><![CDATA[Sometimes it doesn&#039;t even take one... you can just invent your own market!/ Scott Boras&#039;d]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes it doesn&#8217;t even take one&#8230; you can just invent your own market!</p><p>/ Scott Boras&#8217;d</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: starkweather</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272491</link> <dc:creator>starkweather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:10:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272491</guid> <description><![CDATA[I want to read more about Maurice Clarett. His time as a star will come this fall when the UFL gets that new week-to-week deal with NBC]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to read more about Maurice Clarett. His time as a star will come this fall when the UFL gets that new week-to-week deal with NBC</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gerard Portmanteau</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272487</link> <dc:creator>Gerard Portmanteau</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:07:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272487</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;If half the teams thought Russell wasn’t worth a pick at all, and half think he is a top 10 pick, then even though opinion is very much mixed, he is going to go high.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Exactly. The old &quot;it only takes one&quot; cliche has a lot of truthyness, here. Especially if the &quot;one&quot; is Mike Shanahan and the object is Marcus Nash/Willie Middlebrooks/Paul Toviessi/Jarvis Moss.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If half the teams thought Russell wasn’t worth a pick at all, and half think he is a top 10 pick, then even though opinion is very much mixed, he is going to go high.</p></blockquote><p>Exactly. The old &#8220;it only takes one&#8221; cliche has a lot of truthyness, here. Especially if the &#8220;one&#8221; is Mike Shanahan and the object is Marcus Nash/Willie Middlebrooks/Paul Toviessi/Jarvis Moss.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wide Word of Sport (?)</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272485</link> <dc:creator>Wide Word of Sport (?)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:05:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272485</guid> <description><![CDATA[Would be a lot better for 2nd/3rd rounders though.... shit I don&#039;t know what the best way to study this, you may have had the right idea all along, Lisk.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be a lot better for 2nd/3rd rounders though&#8230;. shit I don&#8217;t know what the best way to study this, you may have had the right idea all along, Lisk.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geeezeus</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272482</link> <dc:creator>Geeezeus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:04:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272482</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Man, I am getting excited for the draft. Its nerdy, but I loved almost as much as the games.&lt;/em&gt;The NHL draft lottery last week was must see TV for me. The draft(s) is one of my favorite events of year.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Man, I am getting excited for the draft. Its nerdy, but I loved almost as much as the games.</em></p><p>The NHL draft lottery last week was must see TV for me. The draft(s) is one of my favorite events of year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wide Word of Sport (?)</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272479</link> <dc:creator>Wide Word of Sport (?)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:03:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272479</guid> <description><![CDATA[I wonder if you could use games started as a rookie as a stand-in for drafting for need and use that to look and see if teams do &#039;reach&#039; for need]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if you could use games started as a rookie as a stand-in for drafting for need and use that to look and see if teams do &#8216;reach&#8217; for need</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BrawnyTom</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272478</link> <dc:creator>BrawnyTom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:02:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272478</guid> <description><![CDATA[Man, I am getting excited for the draft. Its nerdy, but I loved almost as much as the games.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I am getting excited for the draft. Its nerdy, but I loved almost as much as the games.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: starkweather</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272477</link> <dc:creator>starkweather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:01:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272477</guid> <description><![CDATA[Well, there was a lot of speculation about the Redskins trading up for Harrington, IIRC, so he had some PR around him at the very least]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there was a lot of speculation about the Redskins trading up for Harrington, IIRC, so he had some PR around him at the very least</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wide Word of Sport (?)</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272476</link> <dc:creator>Wide Word of Sport (?)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:01:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272476</guid> <description><![CDATA[http://sports.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/04/2007-nfl-draft-grades/Here&#039;s a nice post where a bunch of people pick the Raiders as &#039;winners&#039; for picking Russell and no mention of risk.  I don&#039;t think there is any good way to study this prospectively.  ESPN&#039;s guys are just too dumb.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sports.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/04/2007-nfl-draft-grades/" rel="nofollow">http://sports.outsidethebeltway.com/2007/04/2007-nfl-draft-grades/</a></p><p>Here&#8217;s a nice post where a bunch of people pick the Raiders as &#8216;winners&#8217; for picking Russell and no mention of risk.  I don&#8217;t think there is any good way to study this prospectively.  ESPN&#8217;s guys are just too dumb.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BrawnyTom</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272473</link> <dc:creator>BrawnyTom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:58:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272473</guid> <description><![CDATA[Then again, maybe its revisionist history on my part.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then again, maybe its revisionist history on my part.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Lisk</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272470</link> <dc:creator>Jason Lisk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:57:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272470</guid> <description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the thing about draft picks. At an auction, value is set by the 20% that value someone the most, and not by the 20% that value him least. If half the teams thought Russell wasn&#039;t worth a pick at all, and half think he is a top 10 pick, then even though opinion is very much mixed, he is going to go high.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the thing about draft picks. At an auction, value is set by the 20% that value someone the most, and not by the 20% that value him least. If half the teams thought Russell wasn&#8217;t worth a pick at all, and half think he is a top 10 pick, then even though opinion is very much mixed, he is going to go high.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wide Word of Sport (?)</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272469</link> <dc:creator>Wide Word of Sport (?)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:57:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272469</guid> <description><![CDATA[You&#039;re gonna want an intern/grad student if you want to google search each year and figure it out by going to links like this:  http://espn.go.com/melkiper/s/2001/0422/1177521.html]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re gonna want an intern/grad student if you want to google search each year and figure it out by going to links like this: <a href="http://espn.go.com/melkiper/s/2001/0422/1177521.html" rel="nofollow">http://espn.go.com/melkiper/s/2001/0422/1177521.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BrawnyTom</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272465</link> <dc:creator>BrawnyTom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:56:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272465</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;FWIW, Harrington and Jamarcus were not considered reach picks at the time&lt;/blockquote&gt;I seem to remember many people had Joe Thomas and Calvin Johnson rated higher, but yeah the Raiders were not the only team willing to take him at the top.As far as Harrington, I just remember being shocked at how for Bryant Mckinnie fell. I thought he, Carr, Peppers and Jammer were the best prospects.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>FWIW, Harrington and Jamarcus were not considered reach picks at the time</p></blockquote><p>I seem to remember many people had Joe Thomas and Calvin Johnson rated higher, but yeah the Raiders were not the only team willing to take him at the top.</p><p>As far as Harrington, I just remember being shocked at how for Bryant Mckinnie fell. I thought he, Carr, Peppers and Jammer were the best prospects.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wide Word of Sport (?)</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272464</link> <dc:creator>Wide Word of Sport (?)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:56:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272464</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;WWoS. Do you know where to get last 10 years of predraft opinion by ____ (Kiper, somebody else). My fear is I cant get enough info. I would gladly look at it. I just want to have some methodology before I embark, rather than doing what guys like Clayton do and just cherry pick examples.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I dont, and I wish I did.  I really like what you do, asking the question ahead of time before you look, and you know I&#039;m a sucker for hypothesis testing, I just don&#039;t know the best way to study it.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>WWoS. Do you know where to get last 10 years of predraft opinion by ____ (Kiper, somebody else). My fear is I cant get enough info. I would gladly look at it. I just want to have some methodology before I embark, rather than doing what guys like Clayton do and just cherry pick examples.</p></blockquote><p>I dont, and I wish I did.  I really like what you do, asking the question ahead of time before you look, and you know I&#8217;m a sucker for hypothesis testing, I just don&#8217;t know the best way to study it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wide Word of Sport (?)</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272463</link> <dc:creator>Wide Word of Sport (?)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:55:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272463</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Give me Sam Bradford and Jason Smith over Antrel Rolle and Levi Brown.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah... I feel like we answer that just by picking four random guys and comparing.  The best way really is a prospective cohort study, which given the lack of numbers/power, and the little problem of only 10 top ten picks a year, not sure how that would work.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Give me Sam Bradford and Jason Smith over Antrel Rolle and Levi Brown.</p></blockquote><p>Yeah&#8230; I feel like we answer that just by picking four random guys and comparing.  The best way really is a prospective cohort study, which given the lack of numbers/power, and the little problem of only 10 top ten picks a year, not sure how that would work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Lisk</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272462</link> <dc:creator>Jason Lisk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:54:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272462</guid> <description><![CDATA[WWoS. Do you know where to get last 10 years of predraft opinion by ____ (Kiper, somebody else). My fear is I cant get enough info. I would gladly look at it. I just want to have some methodology before I embark, rather than doing what guys like Clayton do and just cherry pick examples.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WWoS. Do you know where to get last 10 years of predraft opinion by ____ (Kiper, somebody else). My fear is I cant get enough info. I would gladly look at it. I just want to have some methodology before I embark, rather than doing what guys like Clayton do and just cherry pick examples.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wide Word of Sport (?)</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272460</link> <dc:creator>Wide Word of Sport (?)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272460</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;FWIW, Harrington and Jamarcus were not considered reach picks at the time&lt;/blockquote&gt;Is that true?  I don&#039;t remember that well, but I remember thinking all along that this is a guy who couldn&#039;t consistently start for LSU and got drafted basically because he beat ND and Brady Quinn in a bowl game...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>FWIW, Harrington and Jamarcus were not considered reach picks at the time</p></blockquote><p>Is that true?  I don&#8217;t remember that well, but I remember thinking all along that this is a guy who couldn&#8217;t consistently start for LSU and got drafted basically because he beat ND and Brady Quinn in a bowl game&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason Lisk</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272458</link> <dc:creator>Jason Lisk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:52:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272458</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;FWIW, Harrington and Jamarcus were not considered reach picks at the time&lt;/em&gt;Harrington, slightly. He would have gone by #15 to someone, but I don&#039;t remember him being the slam dunk top 5 pick going in. JaMarcus definitely. There was mixed opinion on him, but enough people raved about him that he was going early to someone.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>FWIW, Harrington and Jamarcus were not considered reach picks at the time</em></p><p>Harrington, slightly. He would have gone by #15 to someone, but I don&#8217;t remember him being the slam dunk top 5 pick going in. JaMarcus definitely. There was mixed opinion on him, but enough people raved about him that he was going early to someone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BrawnyTom</title><link>http://www.thebiglead.com/index.php/2011/04/15/nfl-draft-2011-draft-philosophy-best-player-available-and-how-the-rich-may-get-richer-in-2011/comment-page-2/#comment-1272457</link> <dc:creator>BrawnyTom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebiglead.com/?p=90160#comment-1272457</guid> <description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Is it better to nail a great pick along with a bad one, or get two average ones when you draft early.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Give me Sam Bradford and Jason Smith over Antrel Rolle and Levi Brown.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is it better to nail a great pick along with a bad one, or get two average ones when you draft early.</p></blockquote><p>Give me Sam Bradford and Jason Smith over Antrel Rolle and Levi Brown.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/24 queries in 0.023 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 478/480 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via thebiglead.fantasysportsven.netdna-cdn.com

 Served from: www.thebiglead.com @ 2013-05-20 01:48:16 by W3 Total Cache -->