Barry Bonds Finally Brought to Justice, Was It Worth The Millions Spent?
After eight years of investigation and legal wrangling, the government finally got “that f–ker.” A Federal Court convicted Barry Bonds of obstructing justice, though he somehow did this without perjuring himself. A hearing is set about whether to overturn the conviction. He likely will serve no jail time.
Most reasonable people would assume Barry Bonds was at least disingenuous to a grand jury about his steroid use. The salient issue, however, is not whether Bonds committed crime. It’s whether that crime was so serious it warranted tying up federal investigators for the better part of a decade and allocating tens of millions in public funding.
Nearly every charge against Bonds was thrown out. Only a Herculean effort from the government’s legal team earned even one conviction based on the evidence. Had he not been “Barry Bonds” this case likely would never have been investigated initially and never have gone to trial.
Barry Bonds is no mob boss. He’s neither a villian nor a violent criminal. He’s a baseball player. The expensive trial and inconsequential conviction served no public purpose. The only rational explanations for the government’s are actions retribution for a personal vendetta and wanting a high-profile head on a pike.
Jeff Novitzky’s inquisition was unnecessary. It may have resulted in more serious crimes than it was intended to prosecute. Novitzky illegally seized a database containing MLB’s confidential steroid test results from 2003. He created and presumably disseminated a spreadsheet containing the private medical records of 104 individuals. Despite that information being sealed, names were leaked to the media, to the same reporters who received circumstantial evidence about Lance Armstrong, another Novitzky target.
The government spent millions getting Barry Bonds before a federal jury for no compelling reason. Intending to make Bonds a pariah, the process engendered sympathy. The investigation didn’t vindicate the public, didn’t make the public safer and did nothing to inform the public, except about the state of Barry’s testicles, undoubtedly a matter of grave concern.
[Photo via Getty]

- Bob Stoops: Home Was Burglarized, Had Car Stolen
- Muhammed “King Mo” Lawal’s KO of the Year Candidate Against Seth Petruzelli at Bellator 96
- Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
- Fight Master: Bellator MMA: Freshening Up a Tired Format
- John Wall Tattoos Are of the Raleigh Skyline and ‘The Great Wall’

- PL StabbinKabin on Muhammed "King Mo" Lawal's KO of the Year Candidate Against Seth Petruzelli at Bellator 96
- PL StabbinKabin on Neymar's Silky Dribbling Schools the Mexican Defense, Sets Up Another Brazilian Goal [Video]
- VladimirCrouton on Bob Stoops: Home Was Burglarized, Had Car Stolen
- KC Resident on Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
- A.P. on Break-Up Song About Players Leaving Via Free Agency Should Make Fans Cry
94 Responses to “Barry Bonds Finally Brought to Justice, Was It Worth The Millions Spent?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






April 14th, 2011 at 12:42 PM
No.
Fin
April 14th, 2011 at 12:43 PM
They got a conviction. Works for them.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:43 PM
not sure it was a waste of money, although he didnt really get a strict conviction. thats a tough point.
but, he admitted to using roids, so its official that he was a cheating shitfart.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:43 PM
good stuff.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:44 PM
but the government didn’t even have a daughter.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:46 PM
It’s whether that crime was so serious it warranted tying up federal investigators for the better part of a decade and allocating tens of millions in public funding.
Yes we should ignore some crimes because prosecuting them might get too expensive. I’ll grant the investigation could have been handled in a more efficient manner saving time and money, but that shouldn’t be a reason against pursuing it in the first place. Bonds lied to federal investigators. That’s a felony.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:46 PM
Is it over? I thought since the jury was hung on the other accounts they would recharge him.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:47 PM
really, when he admitted to using roids was all i needed. everything since has been boring, and i dont really care.
p.s.- fuck this guy, hank is the home run leader.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:48 PM
Is it over? I thought since the jury was hung on the other accounts they would recharge him.
I think that would be up to the prosecution. They had a conviction on the second count, but then a juror changed his mind and the vote when from 12-0 to 11-1, which led to a mistrial. So the prosecution might be willing to take its chances again based on that.
And Bonds’ attorneys have indicated they will ask a judge to set aside the guilty verdict on the last count. So no, this isn’t over.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:48 PM
econonmic stimulus package
April 14th, 2011 at 12:49 PM
past the 5 comment threshold so Jerry Kill thread jack (via mgoblog):
/end TJ
April 14th, 2011 at 12:50 PM
past the 5 comment threshold so Jerry Kill thread jack (via mgoblog):
Some players have been forced to wear brown jerseys in spring practice with the words “Minnesota Lophers” on the front and “I let my teammates down” on the back.
/end TJ
That should go over well….
April 14th, 2011 at 12:51 PM
Let’s string up Barry Bonds, Clemens, etc. St. Bud Selig had no idea of all these horrible acts of cheating. Quick, let’s build another statue in his honor.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:53 PM
That dude is a trip. He’s like 5-6 with teeth that wouldn’t even make the shortlist for The Big Book of British Smiles. He’s a good coach, though. Runs some intense friggin practices.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:54 PM
lol. that reminds me of Hernia’s hilarious comment along the lines of the statute not appropriately honoring Selig because there was no nest or worms.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:54 PM
He used roids when he was with the Astro’s. Also used amphetamines throughout his career.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:55 PM
so, lying under oath is not a compelling reason to put someone on trial?
so, what other crimes would you like to classify as not worthy of trial?
April 14th, 2011 at 12:56 PM
Here’s the problem with not going after Barry (or Clemens): you’re basically saying that perjury is tolerable as long as it isn’t tied to a serious situation, like Mafia-related crime. And perjury is the one crime that undoes the whole of the judicial system.
So while the result may not be what they wanted, the prosecutors didn’t have much of a choice. They had to go after Barry.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:56 PM
Ask former Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick what happens when you commit perjury.
No question that Bonds himself is no danger to “the public.” This view, however, is an oversimplification and doesn’t take into account why we have laws as a society. He broke the law. Looking the other way just because he is who he is or becuase you don’t think that he personally presents a danger undermines the whole system. People who are inclined to lie to impede investigations or to cover up crimes need to understand that there are consequences for doing so.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:58 PM
He used roids when he was with the Astro’s. Also used amphetamines throughout his career.
Who? Neither Bonds nor Aaron were ever on the Astros. Are you talking about Luis Gonzalez or Ken Caminiti? Caminiti probably yes on both counts, Gonzalez didn’t bulk up and starting hitting ridiculous amounts of home runs until he was on the Diamondbacks. Same with Steve Finley…he didn’t “get good” until he was on the Dodgers (or was it the Padres?)
April 14th, 2011 at 12:58 PM
The money was well spent if it deters others from lying to federal investigators. The message is pretty simple, don’t jerk us around or we’ll take you down.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:58 PM
Do most perjury trials take 8 years and cost tens of millions?
April 14th, 2011 at 12:59 PM
so, what other crimes would you like to classify as not worthy of trial?
Murder.
/everybody murders.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:59 PM
Speaking of Justice…
April 14th, 2011 at 12:59 PM
No question that Bonds himself is no danger to “the public.” This view, however, is an oversimplification and doesn’t take into account why we have laws as a society. He broke the law. Looking the other way just because he is who he is or becuase you don’t think that he personally presents a danger undermines the whole system. People who are inclined to lie to impede investigations or to cover up crimes need to understand that there are consequences for doing so
All of this.
April 14th, 2011 at 12:59 PM
Barry’s going to get house arrest at the most. I find it comical that the justice system always thinks putting these mega-millionaires in house arrest is punishment. We need to define house before moving on. If it’s a 4 story palace with waterfalls and half-naked baristas, NO that is not a friggin house
April 14th, 2011 at 1:01 PM
Do most perjury trials take 8 years and cost tens of millions?
Most perjurers don’t have the money, resources, and defense team that Bonds has.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:01 PM
Or what Fredo an TK said.
But they sure as shit better spend money investigating bowl games.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:03 PM
that’s true. Don’t forget, Bonds’ lawyers didn’t do this pro bono. they are getting their fair share of money in this deal and that will eventually trickle down to the little people and back to the gov’t in taxes.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:03 PM
Lawl, where did you get that from?
April 14th, 2011 at 1:09 PM
Most perjurers don’t have the money, resources, and defense team that Bonds has.
And that’s the key difference. Most perjurers would have taken a deal a few years back. Even someone with Bonds’ resources would have taken a deal, as long as it guaranteed no jail time. Bonds, however, is stubborn, has millions in the bank and believes that he does no wrong.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:10 PM
It’s their job. If they weren’t going after Bonds, they’d be spending that money going after somebody else. Plus your reasoning stumbles easily down the slippery slope – why allocate money to prosecuting traffic offenders, or drug users… the list goes on.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:11 PM
Hmmm… seems like an interesting take. Willing to sacrifice someone’s liberty so the government can “send a message”?
April 14th, 2011 at 1:11 PM
And that’s the key difference. Most perjurers would have taken a deal a few years back. Even someone with Bonds’ resources would have taken a deal, as long as it guaranteed no jail time. Bonds, however, is stubborn, has millions in the bank and believes that he does no wrong.
Another reason this case dragged on was that I don’t believe the prosecution considered that Greg Anderson would much rather keep going to jail rather than testify. That hamstrung them badly. Who knows what his testimony would have produced.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:11 PM
By far the biggest crime with long-lasting implications was the leaking of sealed grand jury testimony. Of which Bonds was a victim. Let’s say you’re a witness and your life is potentially on the line… do you trust the grand jury to keep your testimony sealed as promised?
April 14th, 2011 at 1:11 PM
Love it. Too many of the players had a sense of entitlement under Rev. Brew, and it showed on the field. Kill’s making the kids work, and work hard.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:11 PM
ha, just realized this was a duffy post, no wonder there aren’t many comments…yet.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:12 PM
Concur.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:12 PM
holy crap that is awesome.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:13 PM
By far the biggest crime with long-lasting implications was the leaking of sealed grand jury testimony. Of which Bonds was a victim. Let’s say you’re a witness and your life is potentially on the line… do you trust the grand jury to keep your testimony sealed as promised?
Agreed, but does not the fact that the defendant was Barry Bonds and not Joe Schmo drug dealer mean that there was greater incentive for someone on the grand jury to leak the testimony? There was nothing about this investigation or case that was normal.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:14 PM
When the government spends as much resources as it did in a case like this and the public comes away with as little to show for it as it did here I don’t understand how any of you can argue this was worthwhile.
And it was clear from the get-go this was nonsense. It’s not like people are surprised by the verdict. If anything, it’s amazing (and confusing) he was convicted of anything.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:14 PM
Hey speaking of posts without many comments, Lisk had a really nice write up about the Rooney Rule that got a shitty time slot yesterday. I would encourage you to check it out.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:16 PM
When the government spends as much resources as it did in a case like this and the public comes away with as little to show for it as it did here I don’t understand how any of you can argue this was worthwhile.
I disagree with your characterization of this–and Duffy’s too for that matter. The ends are not supposed to justify the mean. The pursuit of those who have potentially committed a crime is the justification. It’s as simple as that. As Fredo said a moment ago, if this was any other perjurer this would have been settled years ago. But then not all perjurers have Bonds’ resources or a key witness who simply refuses to testify no matter how much time he spends in jail.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:17 PM
When the government spends as much resources as it did in a case like this and the public comes away with as little to show for it as it did here I don’t understand how any of you can argue this was worthwhile.
No different than the OJ Simpson murder trial. The results can’t justify the effort.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:18 PM
yeah, interesting article, but not as click generating as the gossip shit so it unfortunately gets relegated to the late shift.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:19 PM
He “sacrificed his liberty” all on his own.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:19 PM
It might be as simple as that if we lived in a world where how the government spent resources didn’t matter. But each case involves a cost/benefit analysis. And like I said, it was clear from the get-go this case was highly unlikely to be worth the costs. Sorry, real world.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:21 PM
i am sure the gov’t will have an eye on Anderson’s income once he is released. I’m betting bags full of cash under the table will be going his way…
April 14th, 2011 at 1:21 PM
And then no athlete would ever feel the need to tell the truth to the feds. That’s shitty.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:23 PM
What?
April 14th, 2011 at 1:25 PM
And then no person of means would ever feel the need to tell the truth to the feds. That’s shitty.
/Fixed for reality
//Agree with Sportsdork
April 14th, 2011 at 1:25 PM
You’re creating a world where people with the means to do so will be able to do whatever they want. Here Barry was only able to delay the inevitable (the trial).
April 14th, 2011 at 1:28 PM
If the government decided, ‘hey, this is gonna be too hard and too expensive, let’s give Bonds a pass on this.’ that could have horrible consequences. Like someone said, letting perjury go is not an option – telling the truth under oath is WAYY too important for this country’s justice system.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:28 PM
You’re creating a world where people with the means to do so will be able to do whatever they want. Here Barry was only able to delay the inevitable (the trial).
Isn’t this what happens on a regular basis? Except it involves issues a tad more important than what a baseball player ingested, injected or smeared on himself.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:28 PM
The government could not convince a jury that Barry Bonds lied. You’re right, now that world where privileged people have a better chance of getting away with crimes now no longer exists. Problem solved!
April 14th, 2011 at 1:29 PM
smells like idealism up in here…
April 14th, 2011 at 1:31 PM
Been asking for this for months.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:31 PM
You know what’s ACTUALLY important? Having the threat of prosecution be credible. And not wasting valuable resources on no-win cases when it could be spent on organized crime, or identity theft cases, or child porn.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:32 PM
The government could not convince a jury that Barry Bonds lied. You’re right, now that world where privileged people have a better chance of getting away with crimes now no longer exists. Problem solved!
Do people get away with it in our system? All the time. How many times did John Gotti walk out of a courtroom, smiling and free while the feds scrambled to figure out how the hell that happened?
That Barry Bonds is a baseball player is irrelevant. That he lied about injecting himself with steroids or HGH is irrelevant. That he fought and fought to get a near sweep with the jurors is irrelevant.
Perjury has to be pursued. Otherwise it’s a meaningless crime that torpedoes our entire witness system. Standing before a judge or Congress and swearing to tell the truth (whole and nothing but) would be rendered as meaningless as Barry’s wedding vows.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:33 PM
Ok, lovely. Personally I think there are a ton more ‘crimes’ I’d rather see let go before perjury.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:33 PM
Except that’s not what this is about, at all.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:34 PM
It might be as simple as that if we lived in a world where how the government spent resources didn’t matter. But each case involves a cost/benefit analysis. And like I said, it was clear from the get-go this case was highly unlikely to be worth the costs. Sorry, real world.
The day that decisions retarding justice are made based on a financial cost-benefit analysis is the day that Lincoln’s declaration that ‘right makes might’ is longer valid. And that will be a sad day.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:35 PM
/fixed for sports
April 14th, 2011 at 1:35 PM
Meh…I like to believe in the illusion of justice for all.
/public defenders ftw
April 14th, 2011 at 1:35 PM
Shit. Retarding was supposed to be regarding.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:36 PM
This world already exists, it’s called real fucking life. How many times do the rich and famous and well-off ALREADY get away with shit??
The feds already knew Anderson wasn’t going to testify but they brought the case trial anyway. It was a weak case and they got nothing. The judge is going to throw out the obstruction charge because how can you obstruct justice without lying to the grand jury (which is what the mistrial on perjury charges means)?
April 14th, 2011 at 1:37 PM
Shit. Retarding was supposed to be regarding.
Retatrded justice seems about right in this case
April 14th, 2011 at 1:37 PM
And the last sentence should have been ‘no longer valid’.
Phone commenting sucks.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:39 PM
Shit. Retarding was supposed to be regarding.
Retatrded justice seems about right in this case
One of my better Freudian slips.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:39 PM
Except that’s not what this is about, at all.
Except it is about whether he lied about taking a substance that may have made him a better baseball player.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:40 PM
So you believe in a cost/benefit analysis for justice? Do poor people feel the same way when they are getting screwed over?
Good for the government. Due the crime do the time. It’s the best way to deter this ahead. If you lie to cops or feds, yes it is worth it IMO.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:42 PM
Not every case the government loses is a waste of time or resources. But this case definitely was. Not because Barry Bonds is a celebrity or because he’s rich. But because the case was weak and the costs to pursue it were enormous.
And the end result of losing a perjury case (in embarrassing fashion) is that you end up doing the opposite of what you hoped to do. Instead of deterring people from lying to a jury, you make the threat of prosecution for doing so seem a joke. Well done.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:42 PM
That’s reality.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:44 PM
Where do you live? We’re already there and have been for a while.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:46 PM
We’re talking about FEDERAL crimes here. You guys are acting like perjury is an everyday occurrence. In this case, I still believe everybody is treated the same by the law.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:46 PM
You’re creating a world where people with the means to do so will be able to do whatever they want.
Where do you live? We’re already there and have been for a while.
That’s exactly what I was getting at.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:46 PM
Sportsdork, I’ll concur that the investigation could have been handled better, but I think your viewpoint is based on hIndsight rather than severity of the crime.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:49 PM
No, it doesn’t. Perjury is most often not investigated unless its egregious because it’s too hard to prove in court and too cumbersome to investigate.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:49 PM
My statement still is correct, the rich and famous and well-off still already get away with federal crimes all the fucking time. It’s called embezzlement and falsifying SEC records and perjury and things of that nature. You’re acting like this is the first and only perjury case or something. Yes these things do happen all the time, they just aren’t glorified like they were with Barry. This case was glorified ONLY because it was Barry.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:50 PM
I’m hardly the only person who has held this viewpoint over the incredibly long period of time it took to pursue and try this case. Hindsight it is not. The end result only affirms it.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:51 PM
Ding ding ding. And in this case, the feds knew the guy they wanted to testify wouldn’t (and got denied every single time trying to bring up evidence related to him) but they pursued it anyway.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:52 PM
Even the average criminal does not have federal agents hounding him for the better part of a decade, organizing sting operations etc. etc. etc.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:55 PM
I’m hardly the only person who has held this viewpoint over the incredibly long period of time it took to pursue and try this case. Hindsight it is not. The end result only affirms it.
I know you’re not the only one saying this.
We’ll agree to disagree. And shockingly no one’s mind changed yet again in an Internet debate. The streak continues.
April 14th, 2011 at 1:58 PM
We’ll agree to disagree. And shockingly no one’s mind changed yet again in an Internet debate. The streak continues.
Damn it! I really thought we had a chance this time…
April 14th, 2011 at 2:02 PM
Scooter Libby and Bernie Madoff agree, they usually let that shit slide.
April 14th, 2011 at 2:03 PM
Awesome: http://www.hangingsliders.com/archives/496
April 14th, 2011 at 2:05 PM
Yes, leaking the ID of a covert CIA operative and fraud that cost investors $18 billion. Totally analogous situations.
April 14th, 2011 at 2:07 PM
You said perjury isn’t prosecuted. Off the top of my head I could think of examples when it was. The law exists and is enforced.
April 14th, 2011 at 2:09 PM
No one said that.
April 14th, 2011 at 2:15 PM
No, I said perjury is MOST OFTEN not prosecuted. Because it’s too hard to prove in court and not serious enough to be worth the cost of investigating it. Every time it’s a cost/benefit analysis. Obviously, in matters of great national importance such as Libby/Madoff cases the benefit is worth the cost.
Bonds wasn’t a criminal. His perjury wasn’t evident initially or easy to prove. The government decided he perjured himself, spent the better part of a decade investigating it and brought a substandard case to court because it was Barry Bonds.
April 14th, 2011 at 2:20 PM
Bonds wasn’t a criminal. His perjury wasn’t evident initially or easy to prove.
The second sentence may well be true, but it doesn’t prove the first one.
The government decided he perjured himself, spent the better part of a decade investigating it and brought a substandard case to court because it was Barry Bonds.
I think the problem with this Duffy is that it’s as easy to prove that this is the case as it was to prove Bonds committed perjury.
April 14th, 2011 at 2:25 PM
My examples were off the top of my head and poor in comparison, I’m sure if I were inclined I could fine many cases of perjury that were for minor offenses.
I think most peoples contention is with the idea that if its not easy to prove or might cost a lot of money that it isn’t “worth” doing. The prosecutes probably thought he’d plea out. When he didn’t their only real option was to go forward.
April 14th, 2011 at 3:49 PM
I said it yesterday, and I’ll go hoarse saying it until the end of time: it was definitely worth it. Don’t lie to the feds. Don’t cheat. Fuck Barry Bonds.
/Fin
April 15th, 2011 at 12:09 PM
Whether you like him or not, I think he is trash, our government could have wasted those millions on something else….. His name should never even show up on a ballot on a Hall of Fame ballot, same goes for Sosa, McGuire, Clemons and any others that have used roids….. What should be done is go back and make them pay back all those millions they were paid for playing under the influence…