NFL Draft 2011: Get Ready For Smokescreens. Like – Dallas is “Not In Love” in Prince Amukamura
We’re exactly one month away from the NFL Draft. I will promise you that I will never claim to be anything close to a scout or to have any special knowledge about whether a player is going to be a bust. I may offer opinions over the next month, but they are just my opinions.
What I do think I can keep an eye out for, though, is the annual “silly draft” stuff that floats around all April. I may not be a scout, but I’d like to think I can detect B.S., and my background has taught me to look at evidence and determine who has bias and motivation and incentive to say certain things.
Last year at about this time, I became convinced that the Kansas City Chiefs were going to draft Eric Berry if he was still there when they picked 5th. I based that on this piece by Peter King, where he discusses Eric Berry, and how Thomas Dimitroff relayed a conversation with Scott Pioli, which cast doubt that Pioli would have any interest. It was a little too convenient (and was a well-placed smoke screen using Peter King, by the way). The Chiefs needed a safety. They had none on the roster. Pioli said, “you know how I feel about safeties that high,” when I looked through the draft record … it became obvious.
The ruse worked, as the Chiefs got their man at #5, and the blogosphere spent much time discussing whether a safety was really worth a top five pick and buying into the myth that safeties are more of a risk at the top of the draft.
This item, then, from Tony Pauline, a well-respected draft insider for Sports Illustrated, writing on his blog at TFY Draft Insider last night, piqued my attention:
Where will the Dallas Cowboys go in round one? Evidently the team is not in love with Prince Amukamara and won’t use the 9th selection on him. This on the heels of sources telling us the team will cut veteran Terence Newman. All signs continue to point to an offensive tackle, specifically one that can play the right side . . . Sources have told us there is already a plan in place with a team that holds a mid-first round pick if either Blaine Gabbert or Cam Newton are still on the board when Dallas is called to the clock.
And what I hear is “the Cowboys are in love with Prince Amukamara, and really would love it if another team traded in front of them to get one of the quarterbacks because they believe this trade leak, so Amukamara slips to Dallas.”
It’s possible that the Cowboys organization has written off Amukamara on their board, and then allowed this information to be leaked. I have no doubt that Pauline is accurately passing along some rumors that he is hearing. Without knowing the source, though, I would be more inclined to believe it if it came from the janitor than someone associated with the Cowboys’ front office.
Let’s review. Would it make strategic sense for a leak of this type to come out if Dallas truly wasn’t interested in Amukamara? I don’t think so. Why tell people that you are not interested in a player who is projected on most boards to go before or right near your pick.
Now, the reverse. The #1 reason that Dallas fell so far last year, more than an injury to Tony Romo, and just ahead of interior offensive line play (which you don’t spend a early first or even a mid-first on), was the collapse of the defensive secondary. They must upgrade there. Now, it is separately rumored that the team will part ways with Terence Newman (a separate leak I do believe because any number of parties may have a motivation for leaking that). Newman was far from the worst player in that secondary, though his contract may be prohibitive. Removing him would make it just that much more likely that Dallas needs to go cornerback.
Then, you have one guy who may be on the board, if he gets to you, at that exact position of need. (Patrick Peterson is not making it anywhere close to Dallas). In some ways, it’s obvious, much like the Chiefs’ need of Berry was obvious last year, so the only reason to leak such a thing is to make it less obvious. One guy fits that bill. And you leak that you “are not in love” with him. Riggggghhhht. On Pauline’s site, he lists Amukamara as #7 on his board. That’s about where I see him going. So leak a story, try to plant seeds in other organizations that he may have flaws, without actually saying that, and then hope he drops to #9. I doubt he’s getting past that slot.
[photo via Getty]

- LeBron James and Paul George Slapped Hands After Exchanging Spectacular Baskets to End the 3rd Quarter [Video]
- Paul George’s Vicious Dunk on Birdman Was Not Rated PG [Video]
- Matt Harvey, the New York Mets’ Star Pitcher, is Dating SI Swimsuit Model Anne V
- The Kansas City Royals Are Becoming the Royals Again, and Fans Have Been Far Too Patient
- Champions League: Bayern Munich a Legacy of Losing at Stake

- Chief on LeBron James and Paul George Slapped Hands After Exchanging Spectacular Baskets to End the 3rd Quarter [Video]
- A.P. on Matt Harvey, the New York Mets' Star Pitcher, is Dating SI Swimsuit Model Anne V
- jdeeser5 on Matt Harvey, the New York Mets' Star Pitcher, is Dating SI Swimsuit Model Anne V
- jdeeser5 on Matt Harvey, the New York Mets' Star Pitcher, is Dating SI Swimsuit Model Anne V
- Monster is Meth on The Kansas City Royals Are Becoming the Royals Again, and Fans Have Been Far Too Patient
54 Responses to “NFL Draft 2011: Get Ready For Smokescreens. Like – Dallas is “Not In Love” in Prince Amukamura”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






March 28th, 2011 at 6:49 PM
If Quincy Carter can happen, anything is possible
March 28th, 2011 at 6:53 PM
Please please please this not be a smokescreen.
March 28th, 2011 at 6:54 PM
I like the misuse of there/they’re in the caption…
March 28th, 2011 at 6:56 PM
I’ve heard alot about Jimmy Smith being considered a better prospect than Prince but “character” issues have hurt his stock.
March 28th, 2011 at 7:11 PM
Wouldn’t mind Terrence Newman on the lions if he’ll sign for a significant paycut.
Dallas is either taking a CB or an OT, can’t see it going any other way.
March 28th, 2011 at 8:18 PM
I like the misuse of there/they’re in the caption…
suck it’s
March 28th, 2011 at 8:18 PM
I so very much hope he drops to the Ravens.
March 28th, 2011 at 8:33 PM
Mike Milbury needs to be thrown off television permanently.
March 28th, 2011 at 8:34 PM
Open Water 2. A bunch of retards jump out of a boat and can’t get back in. Fucking compelling stuff right there.
March 28th, 2011 at 8:37 PM
haha awesome. im sure that has happened many times
March 28th, 2011 at 8:45 PM
Followed by Open Water 3 where a bunch of Cajun in jean shorts jump out of a boat to piss in the water and get eaten by gators.
March 28th, 2011 at 8:55 PM
open water 1 was good (breasts)
March 28th, 2011 at 8:58 PM
Well there’s something I’ve never seen before. 2 on 1 for ND and they throw the high lob for the basket.
/nobody beats ND 22 times in a row. Well maybe UCONN.
March 28th, 2011 at 8:59 PM
For anyone that was in the soccer post, here a top 10 list of German prospects/young players
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/raphael_honigstein/03/23/10.germanstars/index.html
March 28th, 2011 at 9:08 PM
Mario Gotze is God. And not going to stay on Dortmund forever. I don’t know what Gods was talking about earlier. Germany is going to be the feared team of the tourney in Euro and in Brazil.
March 28th, 2011 at 9:16 PM
Hey Jersey, I didn’t see you in here Saturday night and I wanted your take: what say you on the USMNT red jersey?
March 28th, 2011 at 9:31 PM
Excellent. I really hope to see more of it. Just bad ass.
March 28th, 2011 at 9:32 PM
You didn’t ask me, but they were kind of awesome.
March 28th, 2011 at 9:42 PM
Dallas is not in love with Prince Amukamara? Are they talking themselves into loving Mike Jenkins and Orlando Scandrick?
March 28th, 2011 at 9:47 PM
If it gets any livelier in here a funeral might break out.
March 28th, 2011 at 10:01 PM
I think everyone is just experiencing post-tourney weekend burnout. Or maybe everyone’s just realized that by next weekend, we will all be at the mercy of Bud Selig and David Stern and are taking appropriate medication.
March 28th, 2011 at 10:12 PM
Fuck Brad Watson. Looks like he got a call from Gary that the Hawks need to make the playoffs.
March 28th, 2011 at 10:13 PM
Hossa!
March 28th, 2011 at 10:18 PM
These people on twitter following Whitlock aren’t very bright
March 28th, 2011 at 10:22 PM
These people on twitter following Whitlock aren’t very bright
I’m pretty sure one of them is an NFL lineman. No joke…. check it out…
“RT@ericwinston Please do not tell me Knight just got $10m a year at Purdue. I don’t mind the guy but that is just ridic.”
March 28th, 2011 at 10:48 PM
I said Germany would be the best European squad. It just so happens that both Argentina and Brazil will be loaded too, and they have home continent soil, plus they have the home climate.
March 28th, 2011 at 11:23 PM
I said Germany would be the best European squad. It just so happens that both Argentina and Brazil will be loaded too, and they have home continent soil, plus they have the home climate.
This is a fairly large factor. I took a look at it and home continent advantage is real. South Africa was sort of its own beast, because the other African countries were all from Central and North Africa (at least as far as Seattle to Miami), Europe had similar time zone advantage, South America had similar climate/seasonal advantage. Europe struggled early, the big teams that made it through then came on late.
March 28th, 2011 at 11:27 PM
Here’s what I wrote before the last World Cup on home region advantage:
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=6852
“European teams have won 68.1% (with draws counting as half wins) of their matches in World Cups played in Europe, but only 50.9% of matches in World Cups played on other continents. A World Cup was last played in the Southern Hemisphere in 1978, and European teams have a losing record in World Cups in South America (46.1%). In contrast, South American teams have won only 51.7% of their games played in Europe, compared to 66.3% in the three South American World Cups and 64.2% in other World Cups, primarily also played in the Western Hemisphere.”
March 29th, 2011 at 12:00 AM
Pink Floyd, Rolling Stones and Led Zeppelin back to back to back on the Biography channel
March 29th, 2011 at 12:03 AM
bueller if you could have every song of only one of those groups who would you have to take?
/doing TBLAD since 2009
March 29th, 2011 at 12:09 AM
For me Led Zeppelin no question
March 29th, 2011 at 12:18 AM
SHIT! Thanks.
March 29th, 2011 at 12:20 AM
Zeppelin, then Floyd, then the Stones.
March 29th, 2011 at 12:43 AM
stones, zepp, floyd
March 29th, 2011 at 12:44 AM
Wrong.
March 29th, 2011 at 12:46 AM
That’s a joke. I love all those bands. But IMO Zeppelin and Floyd have WAY more good songs than the Stones do. I should also point out I’m listening to ‘Animals’ by Pink Floyd right now. Pigs (Three Different Ones) to be precise.
March 29th, 2011 at 12:54 AM
oink
March 29th, 2011 at 12:58 AM
BTW I’d put The Beatles at #1 (by a mile) obviously and U2 just behind Zeppelin with a bit of hesitation if we were doing all time and not just bands covered by the Biography Channel.
March 29th, 2011 at 1:10 AM
all those bands suck. fuck the 70s.
March 29th, 2011 at 1:11 AM
and 60s i guess. except not really.
March 29th, 2011 at 1:19 AM
Wow. Really? I’m almost afraid to ask, but who doesn’t suck? And are you 17 years old or something?
March 29th, 2011 at 1:20 AM
I only ask because I thought it was impossible to have stupider opinions on music than spencer.
March 29th, 2011 at 1:41 AM
I just have never really listened to any of those bands. I think I’d probably like Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin.
I do like the Beatles a lot. Also the Kinks. As far as the 70s go I like the punk bands from the later years (Ramones specifically, Clash, not so much the Sex Pistols. Also T. Rex from the early 70s).
Mostly just being a (drunken) dick for no real reason.
March 29th, 2011 at 1:44 AM
Yeah, I knew you were a punk fan(like me) so I figured you hadn’t listened to a lot of those bands songs. But you should. I’ve liked the Beatles all my life because of my dad. But I didn’t become a big Zeppelin, U2, Pink Floyd, or Stones fan until my early to mid 20′s. Ramones and the Clash are cool. Fuck the Pistols.
March 29th, 2011 at 1:52 AM
Probably. I do like some Pink Floyd songs (Another Brick in the Wall (we don’t need no education…not sure what the name of that song is, Money). I like Dancing Days but mostly because of the STP cover)). I should give their well-known/respected albums a fair chance, but you know. Only so much time in the day.
U2 can suck it though. Unlike those other bands U2 has a lot of songs that I still hear from time to time and New Years Day is the only one I like. Plus Bono seems like a total dick.
March 29th, 2011 at 2:05 AM
Wow. Ok, #1, yes listen to as much Led Zeppelin as possible. Pink Floyd, listen to all of Dark Side of the Moon, Wish You Were Here, Animals, and The Wall. Listen to most of Meddle. As for U2, All their early stuff, with the exception of some of October, is awesome. I a have no idea why you think Bono is a dick. A cooler, more down to earth rockstar has never existed. Achtung Baby, Pop, and Zooropa have a shitload of cool, interesting songs on them. But you’re right about New Years Day. That’s my favorite song ever.
March 29th, 2011 at 2:06 AM
If you heed my advice, you’re about to embark on an epic musical journey. And I envy you.
March 29th, 2011 at 8:41 AM
I picture TBL passed out on the floor next to the crib right now
March 29th, 2011 at 8:43 AM
lol
March 29th, 2011 at 8:43 AM
CJ I was just about to ask where everyone is… Do none of the other east coasters get into work before 9am?
March 29th, 2011 at 8:43 AM
ha. close, CJ
March 29th, 2011 at 8:43 AM
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!! that’s fucking hysterical.
March 29th, 2011 at 8:45 AM
This place actually used to start before 8 AM most days.. the past few weeks have been depressing
March 29th, 2011 at 8:46 AM
I start at 630. I’m not enjoying this trend of late morning roundups.