With Selig’s Support, MLB Could Add Second Wild Card By 2012
Bud Selig has pledged support for a second wild card team meaning, with minimal opposition, the October format could be changed by 2012. Jon Paul Morosi argues adding the extra wild card would generate interest by allowing more teams to get involved. Sort of, but the real benefit is it will make September far more material and entertaining.
The current system is unfair. The Red Sox and Yankees are the two biggest teams in baseball, in the same division. The Blue Jays, Orioles and Rays get screwed twice. Each plays those teams 38 times, good for the box office but bad for competition. They also must compete with those teams in the standings. One of those teams can play very well, be by all accounts the third best team in the AL and miss the playoffs.
If fairness was the primary concern, alleviating the two inequities would be simple. Move back to single-table leagues, balance the schedule and take the top four. Opportunities are open. The Red Sox and Yankees become everyone’s burden.
Adding the second wild card improves the lost clubs’ lots slightly. A third team from the AL East can make the playoffs, but the real value is it enhances the importance of division races.
Theoretically, the wild card enhances excitement for more teams, but in practice the wild card kills at least one potentially exciting division race. There’s little competitive advantage to winning the division, only home-field, which is less critical in baseball than in others sports.
Three games back in September with the wild card secure, the Red Sox are setting their rotation for the playoffs and trying to stay healthy. That decisive four-game set Fox and ESPN start hyping to death is pointless. The fans know it and the players play like it.
With a second wild card, the wild card now must play an extra, one-off game to make the playoffs. Even if they make it, they must burn their best starter and their bullpen to get there. The division winner’s route is assured. The wild card winner’s is perilous. Teams will gun for the division to the end.
September races at the top become more intense. By adding the extra two slots, more teams are involved. It also gives the two play-in games, which, like the Minnesota-Detroit one a few years ago, would be enthralling. The second wild card would make MLB more competitive and more compelling while getting more teams involved. Hard to see how that could be a bad thing.
[Photo via Getty]

- Oxbow Upsets Orb To Win Preakness, No Triple Crown For 2013
- Charmin “Stop Skidmarks” Billboard Won At Charlotte Motor Speedway
- Mets Resort To Groupon To Sell Tickets, Including Yankees Games
- Oklahoma State Blocks Wes Lunt Transfer Options, Lest Mike Gundy Look Bad Indirectly
- Tony Allen: Here’s Video of Him Dancing in Front of a Green Screen Taping an ESPN NBA Promo

- A.P. on Oklahoma State Blocks Wes Lunt Transfer Options, Lest Mike Gundy Look Bad Indirectly
- A.P. on Jaguars Cheerleader Swimsuit Video is Something to Root For [Video]
- beardown on Oxbow Upsets Orb To Win Preakness, No Triple Crown For 2013
- Caribou on Jaguars Cheerleader Swimsuit Video is Something to Root For [Video]
- Black on Baby Goat Playing and Jumping on a Sleepy Pig Should Highlight Your Weekend [Video]
106 Responses to “With Selig’s Support, MLB Could Add Second Wild Card By 2012”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






March 24th, 2011 at 3:47 PM
Woooooo hooooo let’s play 162 games but let five teams in the playoffs now. Awesome to further defeat the purpose of playing so many games.
/excited to see baseball always played in November.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:48 PM
/Grabs popcorn. Opens beer.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:48 PM
how do the BJ’s/rays/orioles get screwed? they know what they have to do to compete and willingly choose not to.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:50 PM
Do not like or want this idea. Move back to two divisions and take top two from each division.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:53 PM
You just lost $27B in revenue.
/figure approximate
March 24th, 2011 at 3:54 PM
The Blue Jays, Orioles and Rays get screwed twice.
Those teams can’t spend the same dollars, so they have to be creative in terms of prospects. Tampa has done it and the Jays are attempting too.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:55 PM
Give or take a few billion. Thinking through it a little more, go to two divisions and then take top 3 seeds. Combine the AL East with Cleveland, Detroit, NL East gets Houston, Cincy and Pittsburgh. Boom winning idea.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:57 PM
SEC Guy
me
March 24th, 2011 at 3:57 PM
The Rays get screwed b/c they made the playoffs twice in the last three years.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:57 PM
Mom, gave we have the Thanksgiving turkey before the first pitch?
Think of all the head injuries with the extra games.
/dickface’d
March 24th, 2011 at 3:58 PM
If they’re going to do this, reduce the regular season back to the pre-1960/1961 154 games. Oh wait, that will never happen.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:58 PM
how do the BJ’s/rays/orioles get screwed?
they make a great case for euro soccer ways….relegation. better yet, divide the teams by payroll. that way at least one makes the postseason
/ducks for inevitable attack
March 24th, 2011 at 3:58 PM
I want to be outraged but I can’t muster it. I don’t have a problem with any kind of realignment or tinkering with the playoffs. Whatever. I’ll watch it and complain when it happens
March 24th, 2011 at 3:58 PM
Spend more than the other 2 teams? They can’t get in that horserace. Now if you mean do what the Rays did and scout and draft the shit out all the young talent. Well, that’s what the Orioles did… we’ll see how that works out. The Jays and Red Sox were REALLY good last year. Just in the wrong division.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:58 PM
gave=can
/wtf?
March 24th, 2011 at 3:58 PM
Did the Red Sox make the playoffs last year and I didnt notice?
March 24th, 2011 at 3:58 PM
Baseball needs to go back to two divisions per league, then take the winners and two wild-cards. 8 playoff teams (same as now). Perfect. 2 divisions with a balanced schedule.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:59 PM
Bird Selig.
March 24th, 2011 at 3:59 PM
I would fucking love this. But I’m a Yankees fan, so it’s like saying I enjoy Gladiator games.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:01 PM
How would last year’s NL West race between the Giants and the Padres be so much better if they both got in? Wouldn’t that make it less suspenseful?
/Am I remembering the NL West race right?
March 24th, 2011 at 4:01 PM
It’s been an anomaly lately with how good the Rays have and been.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:01 PM
4 from each league is PLENTY of teams to make the playoffs. If any sport’s regular season is an indicator of how good a team is, it’s baseball’s. There’s not more than 4 teams per league that need to be in championship contention.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:03 PM
The Yankees have had a $$$ advantage for the past 90 years or so. They haven’t actually won every year. Remember in the 80s and early 90s when the Yankees sucked and the Blue Jays won back to back WS titles? Remember all the Yankees fans… Wait I don’t remember Yankees fans from the late 80s and early 90s because the fucking stadium was empty. The only constant in life is change and the Cubs won’t win the World Series. Everything else is fluid
March 24th, 2011 at 4:03 PM
Perfect. 2 divisions with a balanced schedule.
One of my biggest gripes with baseball is the unbalanced schedule.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:03 PM
you know who hates fewer playoff teams?
beat writers of teams who are eliminated in may
March 24th, 2011 at 4:04 PM
I’ve been saying this for years. It’s win-win. The small market teams play with teams they can compete with, and the big market teams don’t have to play the teams so often that they thumb their noses at anyway.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:04 PM
Yup, I agree with this. The problem is the unbalanced schedule, due to the divisions and interleague. Switch back to the 2 division format and this is mostly alleviated.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:05 PM
This has nothing to do with competition but only to make more money.
/everyone knows I’m sure
March 24th, 2011 at 4:06 PM
My grandfather would fucking fight you and then fuck your significant other while you watched (probably not, because he doesn’t fuck dudes).
March 24th, 2011 at 4:06 PM
Like saying the Steelers aren’t one of the best teams in the AFC because they missed the playoffs 2 years ago.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:06 PM
I’ve been saying this for years. It’s win-win. The small market teams play with teams they can compete with, and the big market teams don’t have to play the teams so often that they thumb their noses at anyway.
it’s like the lower seeds in the ncaa tourney….the orioles could be vcu, pirates could be, uh, belmont
you get what i’m saying…once yer in, who the hell knows?
March 24th, 2011 at 4:06 PM
Four is the perfect balance. Three teams that win their division and one team to account for a team in a really good division. Wish they wouldn’t mess with this.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:07 PM
I hate the unbalanced schedules so much. I enjoyed back in the day seeing the Dodgers, Cards, Giants, Cubs more than 2 times in a year. But no, we get 9 home games against the Marlins and Nats. Fuck that shit
March 24th, 2011 at 4:08 PM
But I thought playoffs made everything better? Or is that just in college football?
March 24th, 2011 at 4:08 PM
No, it wouldn’t be like that considering how many times a team not named the Red Sox or Yankees hasn’t made the playoffs from that decision since, oh I dunno, Clinton was just finishing his first term.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:08 PM
I hate the unbalanced schedules so much
Would moving the Rockies into the AL west and the Astros into the NL west help?
March 24th, 2011 at 4:09 PM
At least get rid of the abortion that is inter-league play. Please.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:10 PM
Yeah, after this year.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:11 PM
contract the Pirates. That will fix everything.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:11 PM
No, because you can’t have two 15-team leagues, unless interleague play happened every single day which I don’t think is possible, and is the reason that there are 14 teams in the AL and 16 in the NL.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:11 PM
No, unless MLB expands to 32 teams, the divisions have to be uneven.
I don’t mind interleague, but at least limit it to 12 games a year.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:12 PM
Don Gorske > Bud Selig
March 24th, 2011 at 4:12 PM
They didn’t move the Brewers to the NL for kicks when they added the Rays and D-backs.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:12 PM
That’s not why you’re losing those games. You’re losing them because they’re replacing them with interleague games. It’s making teams like the Royals and A’s lose their cash-cow home series with the Yankees so that the Yankees can play more Subway Series while they play the Pirates.
/YAY INTERLEAGUE!
March 24th, 2011 at 4:12 PM
My grandfather would fucking fight you and then fuck your significant other while you watched (probably not, because he doesn’t fuck dudes).
Dammit. This is unfair. What did you give up for lent, Jersey?
March 24th, 2011 at 4:12 PM
Way too much of it, series like White Sox-Cubs are still cool but we don’t need 18 games of it…and then you run into unbalanced schedules where for example the Sox get the Cubs six times while the Twins have to play a much better Brewer team, there are enough games in the season that everyone should be able to play the same schedule
March 24th, 2011 at 4:12 PM
It’s fucking ridiculous that a team in the NL Central has to be better than 5 teams to win the division, while a team in the AL West has to be better than 3. How does this make sense?
March 24th, 2011 at 4:13 PM
RIP Lights Out. Never got around to watching any eps, and I guess I won’t be doing so in the future.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:14 PM
I honestly think interleague would be cool if you played three 4 game series against the other division. So say next year the Yankees would play the Nationals, Cubs and Rockies. The year after they play Phillies, Reds and D’Backs. Just constantly rotate.
/kinda sick of Phils-Red Sox every year where they push the Phils shit in.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:15 PM
Red meat, and I was supposed to be doing this with you (/pause) but I got all caught up in responding.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:16 PM
No. Nononononononononono. Stop it. I DON’T BELIEVE YOU.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:17 PM
Not entirely, but it’s damn near impossible to make everything perfect. I guess MLB could expand to two more markets, throw them in the AL, go to one “division” per league, eliminate interleague, and this would give them a a completely balanced schedule. Might be asking for too much though.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:17 PM
FFFUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCKKKKKKKKK
March 24th, 2011 at 4:17 PM
does this involve the astros? no? dammit.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:17 PM
Can’t have 15 teams in each league or else there with either have to be an interleague series at all times or teams would get a bye of sorts
March 24th, 2011 at 4:18 PM
Just go back to the days of no divisions. Have a single league, take the top four for the playoffs and try to have a balanced schedule. This is far preferable to going to two Wild Card teams.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:18 PM
Which two markets could take on teams? Portland? Vegas (over Selig’s dead body)? Charlotte? Austin?
March 24th, 2011 at 4:19 PM
Red meat, and I was supposed to be doing this with you (/pause) but I got all caught up in responding.
It’s cool. I mean, your grandfather would have had time to track me down in the late 80s and early 90s while he was busy with the rest of New York not going to Yankees Stadium
March 24th, 2011 at 4:19 PM
No divisions. Top 4 teams make it.
Winning.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:19 PM
Given how Detroit is going, we could contract the Tigers….
Alright, that was mean. Sorry.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:20 PM
Brooklyn and New Jersey
March 24th, 2011 at 4:20 PM
Lights Out is good. But it’s no Terriers. That show was fucking awesome. Fuck you American Public.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:21 PM
Wouldn’t have taken that long. You and your biffy were probably at a Boy George or Madonna concert. Wouldn’t have taken taken long.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:21 PM
Which two markets could take on teams?
Montreal and Puerto Rico
March 24th, 2011 at 4:21 PM
ideally i say move that extra team into the AL West and be done with it.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:22 PM
Take Houston out of the NL Central. Put them in AL West, take out Oakland and shove them in NL West, put Colorado in AL Central, put Cleveland in NL Central.
Winning.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:22 PM
Oh sweet Jews for Jesus….
/opens bottle of scotch.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:22 PM
New Jersey Situation?
/do not want
March 24th, 2011 at 4:23 PM
Dammit Jersey I have a perfect response to that but I’m being mentally strong. What the hell? I’m not even a practicing Catholic but I am acing my Lenten abstention
March 24th, 2011 at 4:23 PM
YOU CAN’T! Unless you want an interleague matchup happening at all times.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:23 PM
Bring another team to New York/New York area. Population-wise, this would be a better move than Portland or something like that. Portland, Sacramento, and San Antonio might be other decent options based on population.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:24 PM
i’ve learned over the years it’s better to not get yourself invested in boarderline shows and wait to see if they at least make it to the second season before watching.
would saved a lot of time with great shows, now cancelled, had i had that mantra earlier.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:24 PM
If they could just bring major league baseball back to Camden Yards I’d be happy with that
March 24th, 2011 at 4:24 PM
I felt that way about The Good Guys. They debuted it after American Idol, only got okay ratings, and so they moved it to Friday Night Hell and canceled it.
Way to go, Fox. Send a show to Hell because 13 year old girls who like Carrie Underwood didn’t want to watch a Cop comedy with a 50-year-old lead.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:25 PM
Or just watch HBO shows because they tend to stick with good ones, no matter what the viewership. See: The Wire.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:25 PM
Take Houston out of the NL Central. Put them in AL West
Fuck and No. Having to watch your team play half of its away games in a different, later, time zone is bullshit. And the Astros are a geographic fit with the other teams in the NL Central. I actually don’t mind the division being as large as it is.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:25 PM
Sorry Stark. It’s just weird not being able to remember a time when one of your favorite teams never languished in terribleness. Never really had that problem.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:25 PM
listening to scalabrine interviewing omer ashik. could probably find it at 670 the score podcast later
March 24th, 2011 at 4:26 PM
The Rangers should be in the NL East
/Jerry FUCKING Jones
//WINNING
March 24th, 2011 at 4:27 PM
how do you figure that?
(may have missed it while skimming the comments)
i’d like to see houston moved to NL West, and the rockies in the AL West
March 24th, 2011 at 4:28 PM
Portland just lost their AAA team since the park had to be renovated into a soccer stadium. The city chose MLS over baseball.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:28 PM
I only vaguely remember when the Packers were absolutely rotten, otherwise it’s been streets ahead going on 20 years now
March 24th, 2011 at 4:28 PM
No the D’Backs should be the NL East!
/bi-winning!
March 24th, 2011 at 4:28 PM
Which two markets could take on teams? Portland? Vegas (over Selig’s dead body)? Charlotte? Austin?
Vancouver.
/gives ms the finger
March 24th, 2011 at 4:29 PM
no, it was more that no one wanted to watch that.
however, the show would have been awesome in the 80′s. perfect compliment to the a-team.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:29 PM
how do you figure that?
(may have missed it while skimming the comments)
i’d like to see houston moved to NL West, and the rockies in the AL West
Unless you give a team a rotating “bye” series during the season, as opposed to random off days… you cant have 15 teams playing each other at the same time… math don’t add up, son. You’ll have one team without anyone to play.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:29 PM
Having a central time zone team play a shitload of games out west in any sport keeps me from watching
/not staying up until 1 a.m. to watch the Hornets play the Blazers
March 24th, 2011 at 4:30 PM
Anyone remember when the Braves were in the NL West? The current geographic divisions are an improvement over their predecessors, but they do have some problems (like requiring unbalanced scheduling).
March 24th, 2011 at 4:30 PM
Fifteen teams in each league cannot work unless you want to have interleague-play every single day of the year, which may not be possible or desirable.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:30 PM
Sorry Stark. It’s just weird not being able to remember a time when one of your favorite teams never languished in terribleness. Never really had that problem.
It’s ok, I’m a little older than you so I do remember the Orioles being good. More than once. 3 separate eras of being good. I can also clearly remember a time when your favorite languished in 10 year cycle of being the butt of every baseball joke around. It’s fine. I can wait it out til the birds are gooder’n the Yanks again.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:31 PM
Vancouver.
/gives ms the finger
//checks Geeezeus into the turnbuckle.
///gets arrested by police for assault.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:31 PM
As much as I’d like to, can’t see it working here. No stadium for one, no money left to build a proper stadium, and I think most people are happy being Jays or Mariners fans (or at least going to Safeco for an afternoon/evening). The base is just no here in my opinion.
It would be pretty hard to top Safeco as a venue as well.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:31 PM
Anyone remember when the Braves were in the NL West?
Vaguely. That must have sucked living in the Eastern Time Zone and having your team play on the West Coast most of the year. Would have been some late nights.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:31 PM
i’d like to see houston moved to NL West, and the rockies in the AL West
Hey you bastards stop trying to move my team.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:32 PM
That’s not actually true. I take the “My Name Is Earl” criticism, all the people I knew who actually realized that this show was still on the air loved it. The biggest problem in my opinion was that it was a Fox show with a CBS demographic.
/girls under 29 don’t need to have every damn show on television, you know
March 24th, 2011 at 4:33 PM
If we could just figure out a way to move the Astros to the WAC to make up for BYU going indie I think we’d have this whole loggerjam knocked out
March 24th, 2011 at 4:33 PM
Sorry Stark. It’s just weird not being able to remember a time when one of your favorite teams never languished in terribleness. Never really had that problem.
I remember the Orioles being respectable/in the Playoffs in the mid-late 90′s. Davey Johnson Era. They just ran into the Yankees every year, right? That’s not THAT long ago. The Brewers were god-awful for almost 25 years. And those poor, poor Royals fans.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:33 PM
FX has had a lot of shows go well before their deserved time…Terriers is certainly one, but the most egregious example is The Riches. Man, I loved that show.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:34 PM
that settles it then, contract the pirates and drown all their players, except for Alvarez and McCutchen.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:35 PM
That’s not actually true. I take the “My Name Is Earl” criticism, all the people I knew who actually realized that this show was still on the air loved it. The biggest problem in my opinion was that it was a Fox show with a CBS demographic.
/girls under 29 don’t need to have every damn show on television, you know
That’s a bannin’
March 24th, 2011 at 4:35 PM
If we could just figure out a way to move the Astros to the WAC to make up for BYU going indie I think we’d have this whole loggerjam knocked out
/shakes fist at starkweather.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:39 PM
Cubs still aren’t making it.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:44 PM
even if they were in a league with just the Pirates, Chicago will still find a way to lose.
March 24th, 2011 at 4:47 PM
The Pirates are in the NL Central. They don’t count as a “team”
March 24th, 2011 at 4:53 PM
take for yourself a healthy does of fake internet points to keep in your safe place.
March 24th, 2011 at 6:00 PM
People complain about the Yankees and Red Sox having too high of payrolls. It’s a fair argument, so how about going after their revenue streams? Move teams or expand into their markets. New York used to have three teams, and it can again. Boston used to be a two team town so give them one as well. Tampa can move to NY and the D-Backs can move to Boston. If the A’s really can’t draw in the Bay Area or build a new stadium, move them back to Philly. If you add two teams, you can have 4 divisions of 8 and take the 2 division winners and the top 2 finishers in the league.