Breaking Down the Exotic Super Bowl Prop Bets
The Las Vegas Hilton Super Bowl Prop Bets are out, and you can wager on just about anything, including how long each players first reception or rush attempt will be, whether the quarterbacks will throw interceptions, and of course, who will win the coin toss.
Steve Cofield of the ESPN Radio 1100 in Las Vegas lists some of the more interesting of the myriad of exotic bets, and I thought I would walk through and break down five of them (full prop betting sheets available through link).
1. Who will have more? Blake Griffin rebounds OR Steelers + Packers 2nd quarter points
Everybody loves Blake Griffin. He will be featured in his 1,000th post on the Big Lead next Monday. He’s averaging 12.8 rebounds for the year, and even more in recent weeks. The Over/Under for the Super Bowl is hovering around 44, so 1/4 of that is 11. Seems like Griffin is a no-brainer.
Not so fast. More points are scored in the second quarter than in the first (because drives are already underway when the quarter begins, teams use timeouts more, and teams use strategies to score before the end of the half). In the last 20 Super Bowls, the teams have combined for 13.1 points (median=14) in the second quarter compared to 8.7 combined points in the first.
My pick: Steelers and Packers points in the 2nd quarter, and then hope that Griffin doesn’t grab 20 boards
2. Who will have more? InterMilan + Roma goals (-0.5) OR Steelers + Packers total interceptions (+0.5)
Tie goes to the interceptions in this case. Inter Milan and Roma are averaging 2.9 and 2.6 combined goals in their games, respectively. If we limit it to games against others at the top half of the Serie A table (those teams with at least as many wins as losses), then these two are combining to average 2.4 total goals. Roma beat Inter 1-0 in the first match.
In the last 20 Super Bowls, the teams have combined to average 2.7 interceptions, with a median of 3. Even if you think that Rodgers and Roethlisberger are a little less likely to throw interceptions than your average quarterback in the Super Bowl, the fact that tie goes to the interception is attractive. I’ll root for Inter and Roma to play it close in a game where both are on the edge of European qualification.
My pick: Total Interceptions (please channel your inner Rivers-Manning-Cassel)
3. Who will have more? LeBron James points + assists + rebounds (+1.5) OR Steelers + Packers points (-1.5)
As mentioned earlier, the over/under is right around 44 total points. I think that is a fair estimate to work from.
LeBron is averaging 40.6 combined points+rebounds+assists for the whole season, so it looks like some value going against him. However, his numbers have been steadily increasing, he is averaging 46.4 in January, and has only one game under 40 in 2011. In a Sunday game in the spotlight against Blake Griffin’s team, I look for LeBron to showcase his talents.
My pick: LeBron points, assists, and rebounds, and avoid a shootout
4. Who will have more? Big Ten basketball teams’ total points (-40.5) OR Packers net yards (+40.5)
We probably can’t use the season averages for the Big Ten teams playing on Sunday, because those include games against easier competition. The six teams (Ohio State-Minnesota, Michigan St-Wisconsin, Michigan-Penn State) playing on Sunday have averaged
just under 132 combined points in conference games in 2011. Multiply that by 3 and you get 395.
Green Bay, meanwhile, averaged about 358 yards a game in the regular season, and that has gone up slightly in the postseason. However, the Steelers defense averaged 277 yards per game surrendered, and didn’t give up 300 yards in either playoff game. In order for the Packers to exceed this number, they need to get very close to their season average, against one of the best defenses in the league.
My pick: Big Ten basketball total points (please score, Big Ten teams!)
5. Who will have more? Jared Sullinger points (-3.5) OR Brandon Jackson receiving yards (+3.5)
Sullinger is averaging 18 points this year, and I expect him to put up a solid effort against Minnesota.
This one, though, comes down to how much you believe Jackson will be involved in the game plan in the passing game, as he likely needs to approach 20 to get you the check mark. Jackson averaged 21.4 receiving yards a game in the regular season, and even in the post-season when James Starks took a larger chunk of snaps, he had 50 receiving yards in 3 games. The Steelers, meanwhile, gave up 34.3 yards per game to backs. The Patriots had a combined 58 receiving yards from Woodhead and Green-Ellis. I expect the Packers to utilize Jackson as a receiver when he is in the game on third down passing situations.
My pick: Brandon Jackson receiving yards
[photo via Getty]

- Chris Bosh Blocked Two Shots in the Final Moments to Help Miami Force Game 7 [Video]
- Ray Allen Forced Overtime By Hitting the 3-Pointer the Miami Heat Signed Him to Hit [Video]
- Mike Miller Hit a Huge 3-Pointer While Wearing Just One Shoe [Video]
- Jozy Altidore Scored Fourth Goal in Four Matches, Gave U.S. 1-0 Lead Against Honduras [Video]
- Tim Duncan Scores 25 in the First Half Against the Heat, Miami in Trouble

- Liquor on Chris Bosh Blocked Two Shots in the Final Moments to Help Miami Force Game 7 [Video]
- orly57 on Chris Bosh Blocked Two Shots in the Final Moments to Help Miami Force Game 7 [Video]
- Some Random Old Dude on Kawhi Leondard Slapped Mike Miller in the Face as He Dunked on Him in Game 6 [Video]
- vajayjay redick on Kawhi Leondard Slapped Mike Miller in the Face as He Dunked on Him in Game 6 [Video]
- resolutedefense on Kawhi Leondard Slapped Mike Miller in the Face as He Dunked on Him in Game 6 [Video]
62 Responses to “Breaking Down the Exotic Super Bowl Prop Bets”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






February 1st, 2011 at 2:17 PM
Weak.
/Team Love
February 1st, 2011 at 2:21 PM
Blake and LeBron are both dropping 50.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:24 PM
Brandon Jackson hasn’t been catching much of anything lately, had that one reception against the Bears in which he made Urlacher look the fool but otherwise he’s only good for about one a game…would like to see them try and get him more involved in the receiving game though, perhaps they will hoping to take some pressure off the blitz
February 1st, 2011 at 2:24 PM
nice of them to work Blake Griffin into a prop bet. well done.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:32 PM
You forgot “Who will catch their kid on Brazzers.com during Super Bowl week first, Jon Kitna or Matt Hasselbeck?”
February 1st, 2011 at 2:33 PM
Here’s the best one I’ve seen so far. Who will have a better passer rating, Ben Roethlisberger or the snow storm?
February 1st, 2011 at 2:34 PM
If you read this article, just add “fucking Alabama” after every paragraph and I can bet you sounded just like the author did when he wrote it.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:35 PM
is there somewhere to easily post pictures to share on the interwebs? I’ve got a cool dog/snow picture a friend from Tulsa just sent me.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:37 PM
plixi.com
February 1st, 2011 at 2:39 PM
never been a fan of the prop bets, but #4 seems like a lock.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:40 PM
Who will take a bigger dump by half Ines Sainz or Aaron Rodgers?
/for sc
February 1st, 2011 at 2:43 PM
just add “fucking Alabama”
fuck you. everyone does it.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:45 PM
Who will suck more dick by halftime? Aikman or Sainz?
February 1st, 2011 at 2:51 PM
Don’t get mad at me. I just read the column and thought, “I bet he was thinking, ‘fuck Alabama’ after every paragraph.”
February 1st, 2011 at 2:52 PM
Never underestimate the chance for a 48-47 Wisconsin-MSU game
February 1st, 2011 at 2:52 PM
BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!
February 1st, 2011 at 2:55 PM
Awesome, Spence.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:55 PM
So since I’ve been on Twitter over the past 2 weeks, I’ve had some people start following me that leave me scratching my head. Online retailers from the opposite side of the country and the like. But the most random of all is that I just got a notice that Amanda Beard is now following me. Maybe there’s something about Twitter I’m missing, but it’s just odd to me.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:57 PM
pssh…nick faldo’s following me.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:58 PM
Some really weird people follow me. Asheville, NC retailers and shit like that. Totally random.
February 1st, 2011 at 2:59 PM
I mentioned Wendy’s fries once, and a double cheeseburger started following me an hour later. I don’t get it.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:00 PM
I’m being followed by the Packers now, I now feel like if they’re not running the ball enough during a game I can send them a Tweet and hopefully the message gets passed along to McCarthy at some point
February 1st, 2011 at 3:00 PM
/team anti twitter
February 1st, 2011 at 3:00 PM
At least you write for a golf blog, and have a lot of golf related people that you follow. This would be like if Cael Sanderson starting following you.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:04 PM
MJ Day from SI is following me for some reason. Not complaining about it
February 1st, 2011 at 3:05 PM
I still can’t get TBL to follow me. That makes me sad.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:06 PM
I was anti Twitter before I got on it. Now I’m fully addicted. It’s excellent for a news junkie such as myself.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:07 PM
He reads every one of my tweets with bated breath.
/no he doesn’t
February 1st, 2011 at 3:08 PM
Hernia follows JHS but not me, that was a real kick to the batteries…I even commented on his stupid site the other day too
/Runs away sobbing
February 1st, 2011 at 3:08 PM
I joined around 2 months ago just for shits and giggles. I probably drunk or something.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:10 PM
It’s excellent for a news junkie such as myself.
is it really a news source when there’s no tool in place for accountability?
February 1st, 2011 at 3:10 PM
Ok, I seriously need to start proof reading before I hit submit.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:12 PM
is it really a news source when there’s no tool in place for accountability?
is this your first trip to this website?
February 1st, 2011 at 3:12 PM
I have literally no twitter followers. Not a single person. And I tweet constantly.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:13 PM
I still can’t get TBL to follow me. That makes me sad.
What’s your handle?
February 1st, 2011 at 3:13 PM
is this your first trip to this website?
/ole miss’d
February 1st, 2011 at 3:15 PM
Oh, there is definitely plenty of shit on Twitter, but if you follow actual journalists and such, it’s fantastic.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:16 PM
What’s your handle?
rudy’sjockstrap
February 1st, 2011 at 3:16 PM
What’s your handle?
I don’t want you. I want good people.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:17 PM
I’ll tweet at at you.
Yes.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:17 PM
I have literally no twitter followers. Not a single person. And I tweet constantly.
Your schtick would play perfectly on Twitter. I’m surprised you are not on because it seems like fish to water
February 1st, 2011 at 3:17 PM
I’ve found Twitter to be like blog commenting on steriods.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:19 PM
I’ve got the 2 day puke story to end all 2 day puke stories, too. I could knock that out 140 characters at a time, I reckon.
There’s a lot of puking in it.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:21 PM
If you tweet, and there are no followers, does it make a sound?
February 1st, 2011 at 3:22 PM
Why aren’t you all following me? Bunch of assholes in here.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:22 PM
I’ve found Twitter to be like blog commenting on steriods.
i’d agree. it’s all i can do to keep from yelling at people on facebook for over exposing their lives, i think twitter would push me into Falling Down mode.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:22 PM
Even if it didn’t already, Twitter officially had me when I found “@philsimmsquotes”.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:23 PM
There is a lot of that, but the difference is the awesome links you can find via Twitter. I really like it. It lets you express yourself a little bit at a time, but you can always ignore a tweet if you want to. I tweeted about a nice dinner I made over the weekend, and I’m sure no one cared, but I felt like sharing. If you follow enough people there is almost always something that pops up that is of interest to me.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:23 PM
If you tweet, and there are no followers, does it make a sound?
like despair ate 9 white castle hamburgers 4 hours ago and can’t find a toilet
February 1st, 2011 at 3:25 PM
Husker: Exactly. Not a lot of commitment in twitter. You don’t even have to follow any commenters. It’s nice to get real time thoughts from some of the people that you read, read about, or watch.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:25 PM
That surprises me. He doesn’t follow me either, but that does not surprise me
February 1st, 2011 at 3:26 PM
And Souvenir City meltdowns are always fun
February 1st, 2011 at 3:27 PM
Ehhhhh
February 1st, 2011 at 3:29 PM
I just started about a month ago, and I had similar expectations. It’s really not so bad though — I just don’t follow people that I actually know (other than rare exceptions where they won’t be talking about dumb shit like on facebook). I follow a lot of commenters here, some comedians/actors, and some sportswriters, as well as some deals sites. It’s good stuff.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:29 PM
And Souvenir City meltdowns are always fun
It’s fun to poke the bear when he’s riled up.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:29 PM
Exactly right.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:30 PM
everything is best in moderation. i feel like using twitter, for most of you, should push your current internet usage into overload.
the last thing i want to do when i go home from work is look at a computer.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:33 PM
I could see this, but I never look at Twitter on the computer. I use my phone. It does get addictive, though. There are times where I need to just put the phone down. I get glued to it at times.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:34 PM
smartphone, computer, ipad…. whatever. you see my point? it’s certainly a personal stance, but there’s only so much technology i can take in a 24hr period.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:34 PM
Yep.
February 1st, 2011 at 3:36 PM
the last thing i want to do when i go home from work is look at a computer.
i’m a shut-in, so I very seldom actually leave. Who will care for my cats?
February 1st, 2011 at 3:39 PM
Only if it leads to him deleting something.