The Twisted Tale of Paddy Ice

This is the fictional tale of Tom Brady’s career in reverse – very Lost-like, right? – until the point his team gives up on him after six playoff failures, thus missing out on his Super Bowl years because fans and his team think he’s a loser.
This is a story about a quarterback, amateur media psychology, overly crediting quarterbacks with wins and losses, and forgetting that this is the ultimate team game. Any references or similarities to real life quarterbacks is purely intentional.
Once upon a time, a young quarterback entered the league with great fanfare. His name was Patrick, a good Irish name, and he was immediately promoted as the savior of the franchise. In his first season as the starter, he led the team to many quality wins and victories over other teams that would be in the playoffs. He showed an efficiency rarely seen in young quarterbacks, seldom turning the ball over. He became so known for his cool play under pressure that the media bestowed upon him a cheesy nickname, as they are wont to do. Patrick became “Paddy Ice.”
Paddy Ice was a heart throb who dated supermodels and promoted designer clothing. He had devilish good looks and the All-American boy demeanor. Paddy Ice’s team captured the No. 1 overall seed that first season as a starter. As he entered his first post season, the pundits were sure he had what it took to win in the post season. He was after all, Paddy Ice. Except his team lost at home, something they simply did not do in the regular season, in embarrassing fashion to a rival. few, just a select few, mind you, began to use the term “Paddy Ice” derisively. After all, he was still the anointed one.
The next year, Paddy’s team again returned to the playoffs after another great regular season and division title, and hosted a playoff game. This time, they lost in an even worse performance, and Paddy himself looked unable to handle the pressure, throwing three interceptions and barely passing for 150 yards. The tide of public opinion was definitely swinging on young Paddy Ice – he was now viewed as a stat guy who could put up big numbers in the regular season when it didn’t matter, but apparently couldn’t get it done in a big game (where “big game” is solely defined by the final game that he lost each year). People questioned his dating choices. Women were a distraction to him, and his rock star persona was blamed for his poor playoff performances. When you are anointed Paddy Ice and then you don’t deliver on the media’s promises, the backlash can be hell.
The following season, young Paddy Ice was hurt for the year, a right shoulder injury that would linger with him for the rest of his career, and the team went on without him. His little-known backup played reasonably well. Those that studied such things insisted that Paddy Ice was much better than his backup, pointed out that the offense did decline slightly and the team performed as should be expected with a backup considering the talent on the rest of the roster. Others, who had already written off Paddy Ice as a choker, called for the new guy. Management eventually stuck with the highly drafted Paddy Ice, but not without much controversy.
By the start of his fourth season in the NFL, Paddy Ice was no longer. Now, it was simply Patrick Edward Thomas O’Grady, the guy who couldn’t win the big one. The local media was relentless that offseason, because the favorite backup, Mike Chateau, had been traded. It was do or die time for young Patrick O’Grady in the minds of the talking heads, though management firmly insisted he was their guy.
For seventeen weeks, Patrick shut his doubters up as no one ever had. He simply had the best regular season performance by a quarterback ever, and broke the league touchdown record. His team went undefeated in the regular season, the first team to do so in thirty years. Still, as the playoffs began, the whispers came. O’Grady won his first playoff game in the opener. In the championship game, his team won to advance to the Super Bowl, but he didn’t play real well, throwing three interceptions and looking vulnerable for about the first time all year. Talk shows berated him for throwing three interceptions again, for the second time in four playoff games. He couldn’t win in the court of public opinion; the die had been cast. As the Super Bowl approached, the pressure on O’Grady was intense and focused. If they lost, he would be the reason.
The opponent played great defense that day, and as had been the case in many of O’Grady’s playoff appearances to that point, it was the other side that had the better of it on the defensive side of the ball. Patrick didn’t have his best game, but with the pressure on late and his team trailing, he led the go-ahead drive to potentially win the Super Bowl and achieve immortality. The problem was, the opponent made an improbable play with time running out, and the defense gave up the winning touchdown with less than a minute left.
The response was immediate and decisive. O’Grady was a choker, a charlatan, a stat whore. The perfect season was not a badge of honor; it was a scarlet letter to be worn with shame. At that point, O’Grady had thrown over 100 touchdowns and averaged over 8.0 yards per pass attempt, a record for a player in his first three seasons. Still, those who pointed out how great he was, that it was a team game and he was neither the sole reason nor excuse for playoff failures, were derided as needing to actually watch the game rather than look at spreadsheets.
In year five, his team was again in the playoff chase. They won the opener, having to play in the wildcard round, then went on the road to the top seed. O’Grady threw three interceptions, but the final one was fumbled back by the defender, giving his team a chance to win it with a late field goal, and they did. The fickle hand of fortune had finally shined on O’Grady and his team, something long overdue, but that’s not how it was perceived.
“Lucky win.”
“They won despite him, not because of him.”
Even in victory, O’Grady couldn’t win.
The following week, with redemption for the previous Super Bowl loss on the line, in a game against his biggest rival, O’Grady’s team jumped out to a 21-3 lead, and the Super Bowl seemed certain. It was not to be, though. The defense, as it was capable of doing, allowed big plays, and the game was tied late. O’Grady led a field goal drive (but he shouldn’t have missed that third down pass), and the opponent responded with a late touchdown. With very little time left, O’Grady drove his team down, but was intercepted to seal the defeat.
O’Grady had averaged over 7.7 yards per attempt with a stellar td to int ratio of nearly 4 to 1, but in the playoffs, was barely over 6.0 yards per attempt and had 11 interceptions in 8 games. His teams, by all rights, could have won two Super Bowls. The book was closed on Patrick Edward Thomas O’Grady by most–he was that most heinous of American crimes, a fraud. The following year, when the defense was as bad as they had been during his tenure, merely confirmed those beliefs. He won again at home, but threw two interceptions in a divisional round loss, one of which was almost returned 100 yards. Like the crowd crying for Barrabas, the media throng cried out for his opponent, Brian the Lion, espousing his virtues, though O’Grady had played pretty well other than the one mistake, and the differences were more about the teams around them. Brian the Lion was a winner. O’Grady was a loser.
The cacophony of sound finally broke through, and the organization felt it had to go a different direction. How could they go on with someone that couldn’t win The Big One, and who had that balky shoulder that caused him to constantly appear on the injury report to boot? He wasn’t getting younger, and he surely wasn’t getting better at winning The Big One. He was traded away, and the team went with a game manager. It was a shame, as the defense started to come together the next season, would have been the best defense he was able to play with, and a good quarterback could have made the difference.
O’Grady, for his part, bounced around for a few seasons on some bad teams that he helped propel to modest records. He signed on as a backup late in his career, and got a chance when the starter got hurt. O’Grady led the team on an improbable run to the playoffs, though his numbers were not as good as they had been earlier in his career. No one believed his team had a chance, least of all because of who was taking the snaps. They won a memorable playoff game on a controversial call involving an O’Grady fumble. He was still a loser though, and one that just got lucky. They improbably won a championship game when special teams and defense made some key plays, and the media was quick to point that out. Crediting O’Grady for anything was simply against the narrative.
His team would be a sacrificial lamb for the Biggest Deal on Grass. O’Grady’s presence as a choke artist surely drove the line even higher, and by game time his team was a larger underdog than Namath’s Jets. When they improbably pulled the greatest upset of all-time, when Paddy Ice came out of hibernation and led the coolest game winning drive this side of Joe Montana, well, it was because of the other team choking, and the kicker, but it wasn’t because of Patrick Edward Thomas O’Grady. That was against the narrative.
And once the narrative is written, any evidence to the contrary must be ignored.
[photo via Getty]

- Roy Hibbert Blocked Carmelo Anthony And It Was Epic [GIF]
- Oxbow Upsets Orb To Win Preakness, No Triple Crown For 2013
- Charmin “Stop Skidmarks” Billboard Won At Charlotte Motor Speedway
- Mets Resort To Groupon To Sell Tickets, Including Yankees Games
- Oklahoma State Blocks Wes Lunt Transfer Options, Lest Mike Gundy Look Bad Indirectly

- resolutedefense on Roy Hibbert Blocked Carmelo Anthony And It Was Epic [GIF]
- Benjamin Franklin Rodriguez has the highest WAR evah! on Roy Hibbert Blocked Carmelo Anthony And It Was Epic [GIF]
- orly57 on Charmin "Stop Skidmarks" Billboard Won At Charlotte Motor Speedway
- resolutedefense on Charmin "Stop Skidmarks" Billboard Won At Charlotte Motor Speedway
- orly57 on Oklahoma State Blocks Wes Lunt Transfer Options, Lest Mike Gundy Look Bad Indirectly
78 Responses to “The Twisted Tale of Paddy Ice”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.






January 17th, 2011 at 11:52 AM
Not gonna lie, I made it about halfway and gave up.
January 17th, 2011 at 11:53 AM
Too. Many. Words.
January 17th, 2011 at 11:54 AM
Hate to say it, but I would have preferred a Jets post.
January 17th, 2011 at 11:54 AM
This sounds more like John Elway’s career, pre-Terrell Davis.
Jersey said this was going to “tear Matt Ryan the fuck down”…??
January 17th, 2011 at 11:54 AM
I’m confused, can I just go ahead and start calling Matt Ryan “Dink ‘N Dump” now?
January 17th, 2011 at 11:55 AM
Drifted off in the 2nd paragraph. Seems like it might be interesting though.
January 17th, 2011 at 11:56 AM
That pick six was a killllllller.
January 17th, 2011 at 11:56 AM
I think I got it…
Joe Montana > Tom Brady
January 17th, 2011 at 11:58 AM
Tramon Williams was brilliant on the play, he knew what they were doing but held back just long enough to bait Ryan into the throw…why they felt the need to play for five more yards in the first place was a questionable decision, the throw even worse
January 17th, 2011 at 11:58 AM
I got about half way
January 17th, 2011 at 11:58 AM
Totally not I what i was expecting.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:00 PM
why they felt the need to play for five more yards in the first place was a questionable decision, the throw even worse
My thinking exactly.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:00 PM
To sum up for the people who didn’t read the whole thing. Once people have made their minds up about a guy, that’s it. Any anecdote becomes confirmation bias, accurate or not. Kinda like say, Peyton Manning. “He won his only Super Bowl against Rex Grossman!”
January 17th, 2011 at 12:01 PM
I mean, I think i see the point, but I’m just confused as to what would make you write something like this?
January 17th, 2011 at 12:02 PM
I get that. I guess, Lisk is saying that Matt Ryan is in trouble because he’s going to start being perceived as a guy who can’t win a playoff game?
January 17th, 2011 at 12:04 PM
I mean, I think i see the point, but I’m just confused as to what would make you write something like this?
my brain, synapses, and electronic impulses sent to my fingers.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:04 PM
I really enjoyed this.
Is there any role in sports where media narrative is generally more ridiculous and more difficult to overcome than NFL Quarterback?
January 17th, 2011 at 12:05 PM
I have a headache now, so thanks for that. Twas fascinating though.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:05 PM
Also, really enjoyed this semi-related bit from the FO Audibles piece today.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:05 PM
Might be Duckworthing, but Irsay’s twitter is great.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:05 PM
That pick 6 before the half was just horrible.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:05 PM
Or if Derek Jeter commits an error, it’s somehow part of a larger strategy when the next batter hits into a double play.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:06 PM
“Tawmmy just doesn’t lose at home in the playoffs like Peyton!”
January 17th, 2011 at 12:06 PM
But that would never happen though. The minute you win 2 superbowls the narrative would change, and you’d be hall of fame bound.
/unless you’re mexican
January 17th, 2011 at 12:08 PM
OK, I really really enjoy this…
Followed up by this:
January 17th, 2011 at 12:08 PM
I really enjoyed this.
I knew that once the late reporting Sportsdork precinct results started coming in, I wouldn’t have to concede just yet.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:08 PM
Lisk hates Irish…people
January 17th, 2011 at 12:09 PM
Is there any role in sports where media narrative is generally more ridiculous and more difficult to overcome than NFL Quarterback?
Goalie, but not quite to the same degree.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:09 PM
Matt Ryan is the 3rd best quarterback.
/in the NFC South
January 17th, 2011 at 12:10 PM
The only thing that comes close is a starting pitcher I think. Jack Morris “won every big start.” Johan Santana was beginning to be perceived as “not clutch” because he didn’t win his starts in the playoffs.”
But how are people supposed to communicate without speaking in strong declarative statements? Enough of this pussy bullshit! RINGS = GREATNESS, because REAL MEN win RINGS. They don’t need qualifiers! Right, Ballz?
January 17th, 2011 at 12:10 PM
I thought Matt Ryan was already the beneficiary of the public narrative that he’s an elite quarterback who never fails in the clutch despite being a rich man’s Brad Johnson
Now this is how you have fun with the comments…nicely done
January 17th, 2011 at 12:10 PM
Lisk hates Irish…people
this was my theme, everything else was a cleverly disguised ruse to hide it.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:10 PM
Or closer
January 17th, 2011 at 12:11 PM
Hmm….. No, I don’t believe so.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:12 PM
A team effort can change your narrative. Look at Kobe he couldn’t win a
ringplayoff series without Shaq and then once the Lakers pulled off the dark knight of the century in getting Gasol, Kobe was winning again.January 17th, 2011 at 12:12 PM
Note to all Clevelanders, the Really Big Show is moving to afternoon drive
/off topic
/first comment ever
January 17th, 2011 at 12:13 PM
Ha. I really do make a point of being complimentary of your posts because there are always plenty of “too longs”, “too many numbers”, and “gave me a headaches”.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:14 PM
And that would have been 4th if Luck came out!
January 17th, 2011 at 12:16 PM
I knew that once the late reporting Sportsdork precinct results started coming in, I wouldn’t have to concede just yet.
Hey Sally: we like you, we really like you
January 17th, 2011 at 12:17 PM
And let’s not overlook the other rotten decision where they were driving for a late first half lead but Williams got him again with a pick reminiscent of the one that sealed the Philly game…what a player that guy’s turned into
January 17th, 2011 at 12:17 PM
Phil Mickelson could drop 50 pounds and win 3 more Masters, and people would still say “Yeah, but Mickeltits still choked in the U.S. Open.”
/ask Greg Norman
January 17th, 2011 at 12:17 PM
The narrative isn’t limited to the media. No position in sports is more defined by perception or misperception more than the QB position.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:18 PM
Lisk hates Irish…people
this was my theme, everything else was a cleverly disguised ruse to hide it.
just remember, Jason…
January 17th, 2011 at 12:19 PM
Yeah I think you’re right, though obviously the NFL trumps all because of its giant popularity lead.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:19 PM
And once the narrative is written, any evidence to the contrary must be ignored
Awesome post Lisk, this last line couldn’t be more true, look at how people deride Manning for beating the Grossman Bears, or completely excuse Favre’s crushing turnovers in some of his postseason games. Had the Ravens somehow pulled that game out on Saturday, suddenly Joe Flacco would have “finally won the big game and established himself as elite” even though the offense was awful and he made some crucial mistakes.
Again, well done, even if I had trouble following it.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:21 PM
Considering no other sport (that Americans care about) has as large a media presence as football, I doubt it. I agree that a starting pitcher is the closest thing. Or a New York Yankee of any position
January 17th, 2011 at 12:22 PM
Adderall? Meth? Coke?
This is like a Lester Bangs post.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:23 PM
Excellent work Lisk, and I’m not just saying it because of my Colts bias.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:23 PM
You mean Scott Brosius is a “True Yankee” but A-Rod isn’t?
January 17th, 2011 at 12:24 PM
I was reading part of an article this morning before I lost it that said what I’ve said about Ryan the whole time. A big part of the love he received was the fact that he wasn’t Michael Vick or the Michael Vick he ultimately replaced. The difference between him and a Sanchez is that Ryan may not make many mistakes, but he also isn’t making as many throws. When everything is a dink and dunk and those dink and dunks are being defined as being intelligent as opposed to the reality of it being the result of covering up a lack of arm strength or the ability to read the field, that stuff eventually comes to light. He has been a beneficiary of a flaw in how the QB position is evaluated, as if not throwing many interceptions in of itself defines how good of a QB you are.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:24 PM
That’s a good comparison. Probably as close as it gets.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:25 PM
Yeah. Don’t know why I didn’t think of it. Just look at Arod/Jeter.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:29 PM
But like Peyton Manning, the narrative was written before he played a snap in the NFL. “Matty Ice” was Heisman hype, which was reaffirmed after his dramatic comeback against Virginia Tech (?), and subsequently ignored when he and his team shit the bed the 2nd half of the season.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:30 PM
No one is saying the guy is Peyton Manning.
But when you throw 28 touchdowns to just 9 INTs, and you have nearly 600 attempts, I’d say it’s hard to argue you don’t have the ability to “read the field”.
Offense in football is about moving the chains first and not turning the ball over second. Ryan is really good at those things.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:30 PM
When everything is a dink and dunk and those dink and dunks are being defined as being intelligent
Good point, I feel the same way about Tom Brady sometimes. You watch the Pats offense and he rarely makes tough throws and has a lot of time to stand in the pocket, and yet is praised like he is unstoppable.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:31 PM
PK provided another example today:
What does that even mean? Ray Rice had 12 for 37, no comment on him because “you can’t run against the Steelers” of course.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:35 PM
Couple weeks back King said that Eli Manning’s 24 interceptions “was unacceptable” a page after yet again praising Drew Brees who had 22 this season and at least one in the last 12 games of the regular season…wipe your chin off already Pete
January 17th, 2011 at 12:35 PM
I’m not a fan of PK’s work but I continue to read it.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:36 PM
Disagree. I think offense is about imposing a certain style first, making the defense react instead of act. Matt Ryan does the two things you mentioned well, but in no way does he make defenses think, “What can we do to stop Matt Ryan?”
January 17th, 2011 at 12:38 PM
Imposing a style? I’m not sure what you mean. I don’t care whether the defense thinks I’m imposing something as long as I don’t have to punt.
Defenses try to stop the offense, not just the quarterback.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:39 PM
The fuck???
January 17th, 2011 at 12:39 PM
Brees had a bad season, but the narrative is already written for him too.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:41 PM
Good not great.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:43 PM
The Falcons were all about pounding the defense into submission by keeping the offense on the field for 40 minutes.
I’m not saying that he’s destined to be this way, but being an old-school Saints fan, I see Matt Ryan as a glorified Bobby Hebert with All-Pro skill players surrounding him.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:43 PM
I’d venture to say that at least half of Eli’s interceptions were not his fault. Nicks, Manningham and company tipped a ton of catchable balls into the defense. A majority of the time you can attribute interceptions to the quarterback (be it poor decision or poor throw) but this was one hell of an outlier where the Jints receivers really didn’t help Eli out.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:43 PM
I enjoyed this, Lisk.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:47 PM
As Dilfer stated, when paired with a defense that gets off the field, that strategy is damn near unbeatable. Stat of the game imo was 28 first downs for GB and no conversion more critical than the one to start the 2nd half.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:49 PM
I’m saying your offense needs a strength to make the defense say, “If we shut this down, we have a chance.” For example in the Jets case, I’d imagine defenses aim to shut down the run first and say, “We’re going to make Mark Sanchez have to beat us.”
If you don’t do at least one thing really well (which I don’t think the Falcons offense did this year), the D can play to its own strengths and dictate the entire gameplan.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:52 PM
Sort of my point. You can talk about the benefits of a “big play” offense — I’m quite familiar with the Eagles version — but that Matt Ryan doesn’t have DeSean Jackson doesn’t mean he’s not a good quarterback. The Falcons offense is effective because Ryan is efficient and moves the chains.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:55 PM
there were alot of high passes that were tipped. A few of them were bad passes, but more than a few were passes that NFL receivers catch. I think Eli had a really good season.
January 17th, 2011 at 12:58 PM
The Falcons move the chains off of the running game, and Ryan plays off of that. Ryan had a bit of a sophomore slump which also coincided with Turner being out for the year. You shut down the Falcons running game, and you build a big lead, Ryan is out of his comfort zone, and isn’t nearly as efficient or effective. Teams go against the Falcons looking to shut down their running game.
January 17th, 2011 at 1:01 PM
Is there a quarterback in the NFL who is at his best when playing from way behind? Of course if you make a team one-dimensional the defense has an advantage and the offense has a disadvantage.
January 17th, 2011 at 1:02 PM
Is there a quarterback in the NFL who is at his best when playing from way behind? Of course if you make a team one-dimensional the defense has an advantage and the offense has a disadvantage.
Matt Schaub is fucking awesome at it.
January 17th, 2011 at 1:03 PM
Atlanta was a highly inefficient running team this year, by the way. And a very efficient passing team.
January 17th, 2011 at 1:11 PM
Phillip Rivers (not meant as a knock, this time).
January 17th, 2011 at 1:20 PM
He’s had a lot of practice.
January 21st, 2013 at 4:50 PM
Deez nuts.
January 21st, 2013 at 5:47 PM
Hi